Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article.
(http://iopscience.iop.org/1402-4896/1990/T30/017)
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
Download details:
IP Address: 140.164.31.174
The article was downloaded on 19/02/2013 at 16:46
E = 1 Ken,
n
(9)
A = 1 Inh,,
n
(10)
where
2
+ j ( m + p + 1) tg (91.
g(t) = [wpi + wp - 22, wp (1 - +e ( 5 ) The quantity w(z) is given by
-
IC,'
eq:(r, z) E - -
m,
4
c2 e -2r2:1,; (1 +$) (6)
which is the radius of curvature of the wavefront that inter-
sects the axis at z, H,(x)is the Hermite polynomial of order
x Wi + k , ) sin [(k, + k2)ZI m
- ( k , - k2) sin [(k, - k,)zI), ZR = nN'i/A (14)
where w, is the waist radius and zR is the Rayleigh length is the Raylei& distance, p = is the free space pro-
given by zR z w,2(kl + k2)/4(see Section 3). pagation constant and 5, is the free space electromagnetic
The longitudinal field amplitude (normalized to the impedance.
Dawson's field limit ED = 4nen0/kp)on the axis ofthe cavity Using the Maxwell equation [5] we find for the coefficients
E~~~~~ is given by V,, I, in eqs. (9) and (10)
(7) In = --
jwE0
P' - k,Z 21 & )
[j( E x h,*) * ii ds,
while the radial field on the axis of the cavity is zero. The
longitudinal field amplitude takes its maximum at r = y, = ~- kn [{ ( E x h,*) - r i ds,
v/0.5Wo[(nW'o/A)2 - 1]"2. P' - k,Z 21 ti") &
where ef; and hf; are the orthonormal electromagnetic modes we have
of the metallic rectangular waveguide. The coupling of eqs.
(17) and (18) with eqs. (9) and (10) when we impose the
continuity for tangential component of the magnetic field on
the coupling aperture (A). gives
(19)
4. Experimental setup and parameters
where
So far we have described the general behavior of an open
PnF = \jh; h f ds = x , * ~ , resonator excited by two microwaves of nearly equal fre-
(A) quency w , z 0 2 filled
, with a plasma of subcritical density,
b,, is the Kronecher symbol and Z , is the mth mode wave- no = 1011-10’2cm-3.In this section the main characteristics
guide characteristic impedance. With (-),“+and ( -):- we indi- of the experimental apparatus and the main parameter will be
cate the amplitude of the forward and backward waves in the described, assuming only the fundamental mode in the open
waveguide, respectively. We have assumed only the funda- resonator.
mental mode for the forward wave. We consider a plasma with no = 1012cm-3as a ref-
The quality factor Q, of the cavity for the nth mode is erence case. In fact a fully ionized plasma with a density
defined as of the order of 10’2cm-3can be obtained in a large volume
by using helicon waves [7, 81. For no = l O ’ * ~ mwe - ~ obtain
wp = 62.8 x 10l2 (radis), (f, = 10GHz). Then requiring
for the “transparency condition” wI = w2 z loo,, we
where W, is the stored electromagnetic energy in the cavity obtain for the pump frequencies o1z w2 z 5 x 10l2
and P, is the power loss at the resonance frequency u , ~The
. (radis) (f;z f 2 z l00GHz). Then we assume a reference
power loss is mainly due to diffraction and ohmic losses. We case fi = 110 GHz and f 2 = 120 GHz ( h = wf/27c =
analyze here the two contributions to the Qn value. From 115GHz).
expression (1 5) we have We know from the electromagnetic theory that the
waist transverse dimension cannot be less than the radiation
wavelength. Then in our case we assume as a reference
case wo = 2 4 = 5.2”. In this experiment we need a
thin (well collimed) envelope in such a way to achieve
+ T>D/Z
( E x h,*)*ii ds .
I
When we compute eq. (21) near the resonance frequencies by
(21)
high electromagnetic field intensity with reasonable input
electromagnetic power. The Rayleigh length in this case is
65.3 mni.
So we have fixed the plasma density, the plasma frequency,
using the Leontovic approximation for the electromagnetic the pump electromagnetic frequencies, the waist radius and
fields on the mirrors, we obtain the Rayleigh length. The free parameters are: the input elec-
tromagnetic pump power in the cavity, the cavity length and
hnI2ds the cavity quality factor Q. In the following we discuss how
to determine these parameters in order to achieve a high
amplitude plasma wave.
Let us start with an important consideration on some
characteristic time scales of the experiment: the plasma wave
where B is electrical conductibility of the mirrors and S is saturation time z, and the cavity filling time z,. The round trip
penetration depth of the field in the mirrors. We can write the time T,, = 41/c, namely the time occurring for a wave to
integrals in eq. (22) as a function of the quality factor for make a complete trip between the two mirrors, is related to
ohmic losses Qr and for diffraction losses Qd the cavity saturation time z, by the relation zr = T,,/a,where
a represents the loss rate per round trip time in the cavity. The
z parameter and the quality factor Q are related by the
relation: Q = ( q + I)TC/CIwhere q is the longitudinal mode
number which is given by the resonant condition (q + 1) 2
4!fJc.
By using eq. (21), eq. (22) becomes In order that the cavity is “efficient” we must require
z, 9 TI, and ( l / x ) 9 1. Typically we can achieve I / % =
zs -
10-100, then the constraint T~ $ T,, may be equivalent to
7 , . The saturation time 5, is given by the nonlinear
'
In Fig. 2(c) we have drawn xif(x)' versus .Y in the range
0.5 < x < 5. When x + x ,we have x / f ( x ) ' " + 3" while
for x -+ 0, xif(x)I diverges. Then in order to reduce 7 f we
S.
must reduce x or/and we must increase (pi%);this implies to
reduce the length I unless we keep %/pconstant and increase
SI, but SI cannot be greater then 0.1, otherwise the "efficiency"
of the cavity is too low.
If now we introduce the quantity 0, w,/w,,* and POE
i v o / w ~with opO= 62.8 x 10l2 (radis) and wz = 5.2mm,
assuming the transparency condition to be valid as usual
w , 2 low,, we obtain
E,,,, = 25 [kV/cm]
Fig. 2. (a) l/f(sj. (bjg(.xj/[f(.u)]' ' and (c) .x/[f(s)]' 'plotted against x in the
range 0.5 < .Y < 5 . ~~f~
= 22 667
[f(-41'
(Y)i
',
6 2 E2 SI
(33)
where P P/P*. By using eqs. (27) and (28) we obtain for These quantities are measured in volt.
5. Conclusions
bl
In this paper we have reviewed the beat wave experiment
Fig. 3. The amplitude of the first three modes (V) as a function of the radial
scaled at microwaves in an open resonator.
distance r (m) in the center of the cavity ( r = 0, z = 0) is reported for 1 watt
The coupling between the cavity and the microwave
input electromagnetic power. (a) (0, 0, 175) mode and (b) (0, 1, 175) and
(1, 0, 175) modes. sources in an underdense plasma has been treated in a self
consistent way.
New scaling laws with respect to our previous works have
As a result of the previous calculations we consider been identified as leading to a better choice of the main
an open resonator with a distance between the mirrors parameters: the input power, the demi-distance between the
21 = 24cm, a mirror curvature radius R = 12.8cm and a two mirrors and the quality factor Q for fixed plasma density
mirror diameter D = 5.8 cm. The dimensions of the rectan- (or plasma frequency).
gular waveguide are 0.136 x 0.07 cm. The mode (0, 0, 175) in A field of 100 kV/cm may be obtained with 50 kW input
the cavity has a resonant frequency equal to 110.58 GHz power, with pump frequencies of the order of 100 GHz, with
which is also the frequency of the first mode propagating in a demi-distance of 12cm and with a quality factor Q = 17 220.
the waveguide. The value of the quality factor Q for this first In this case the plasma wave amplitude saturates in 84 ns (840
mode is 17 120. The modes (0, 1, 175) and (1, 0, 175) are plasma wave periods). With 0.5 kW we may obtain an electric
degeneres with a resonant frequency equal to 1 1 1.049 GHz field of 10 kV/cm, but the required time is about 1 ps (lo4
and Q = 3397. By taking into account these three modes in times the plasma wave periods). However a more careful
the cavity and in the waveguide and assuming bg' = 1 , the analysis should take into account ion motion as well as
collisional damping, because of the long scale time of the
microwave
plasma wave building up.
plasma chamber
References
1. Rosenbluth, M. N. and Liu, C. S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 701 (1972).
2. Miano, G.: See in this issue.
3. de Angelis, U,, Fedele, R., Miano, G. and Nappi, C., Plasma Physics
and Controlled Fusion 29, 789 (1987).
4. de Angelis, U,: De Menna, L., Fedele, R., Miano, G., Nappi, C. and
Vaccaro, V. G., IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science PS-15, 179 (1987).
5. Vaynshteyn, L. A., Theory of Diffraction and Factorization Method.
Golem Press, Boulder (1969).
6. Di Massa, G., Cuomo, D., Cutolo, A. and Delle Cave, G., IEE Procs.
136-Pt.H, 159 (1989).
El
7. Boswell, R. W., Plasma Phys. and Controlled Fusion 26, 1147 (1984).
Fig. 4 . Schematic view of the experimental apparatus 8. Chen. F. F.. Laser and particle beams (to be published).