Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Written Assignment v1
Written Assignment v1
Mrs. Balka
IB HL English Year 1
Written Assignment
of Optimism, and further satirizes Pangloss to portray the insufficiency of his beliefs.
named Leibniz, that reasoned that every event that occurs, good or bad, is for a good
reason. Voltaire had a rather pragmatic outlook on life, and believed this reasoning was
Optimistic ideology who has centered his life entirely over the thoughts of Optimism,
Pangloss in a such a way that reveals his negative outlook on his beliefs. A common
trait of Pangloss that associates with Voltaire’s view of Optimism is ignorance. Pangloss
is commonly presented as ignorant throughout the novel, such as when he claims the
death of James the Anabaptist was all for the better, stating that “Lisbon Harbour was
made on purpose for this Anabaptist to drown there.”(33). Pangloss shows absolutely
no remorse over the death of James the Anabaptist, justifying it with absurd Optimistic
ideals, demonstrating his utter ignorance of real life tragedy. This characterization
parallels with Voltaire’s perception of Optimism as being rather ignorant to the real
world, because the idea that every occurence has an underlying good reason, ignores a
realistic outlook life. Pangloss being portrayed in such a way goes to belittle the popular
caricature of Optimism itself throughout the novel. Not only is Pangloss a representation
establishes a character foil between Pangloss, and the notoriously pessimistic, Martin to
that his exaggerated Optimistic ideals are emphasized when contrasted to the
Pessimistic ones of Martin. Martin preaches of how all men are driven by greed, the
world is inherently evil, and “that God has abandoned it to some mischievous
serves to support the notion that Pangloss’ absurdly Optimistic beliefs are unrealistic.
discredit the ideals of Optimism. In the instance of Candide and Pangloss reuniting after
Pangloss was assumed to be dead, Pangloss explains to Candide that he has been
infected with a fatal sexually transmitted disease, justifying it with his “universal rule of
Reason”(34). Pangloss elaborates, explaining that the infection was for his better
health, and that without the disease coming into circulation amongst peoples, they
“should have neither chocolate nor cochineal.”(30). Pangloss tells how the introduction
of his deadly STD to society was the introduction of chocolate and cochineal as well, to
justify his infection. This litote very much under exaggerates the fatality of Pangloss’
STD by stating that it is less important compared to the simple uses of chocolate and
cochineal. Pangloss’ ridiculous rationale that justifies his STD demonstrates how droll
he and his Optimistic ideals are in real life circumstances, especially inevitable
unfortunate situations. Voltaire includes this element into the novel so that the reader
Candide. Voltaire’s inclusion of fake, hyperbolic adjectives to describe Pangloss and his
study. Voltaire continues to explain Optimism, under this humorous term. This name is
excessively long, as well as a made-up term, and serves to represent the absurdity of
Optimism. This ridicules Optimism, characterizing it as fake and hyperbolic, just like the
established nickname. Along with this, Voltaire forms a dramatically serious tone for
Pangloss when he discusses Optimism through the entirety of the story, making him
look foolish. The tone is contrasted with the exaggerated information given, to further
emphasize how dramatic and ridiculous Optimism is. An example of this is when
“our noses were made to carry spectacles, so we have spectacles. Legs were clearly
intended for breeches, and we wear them.”(20). This example lacks logical reason,
because Pangloss’ logic is backwards, as breeches were made to compliment legs, and
spectacles were to benefit eyes. Pangloss’ idiotic example of Optimism, contrasted with
his serious, informational tone, make Optimism look absolutely ridiculous. Voltaire’s
tsunami and a raging fire, that completely demolished the popular sea port and city.
Lacking a reason to justify the natural disaster, Pangloss insists that “There is certainly
a vein of sulphur running under the earth from Lima to Lisbon.”(34). Pangloss explains
how the earthquake was an attempt to expose said sulphur to the citizens of Lisbon, to
benefit the citizens with a newly introduced source of wealth. This is an obvious
hyperbole that shows the ridiculousness of Optimism, providing an event that ultimately
had no underlying justification, and then showing Pangloss flustered, trying to fabricate
an explanation for this tragedy. This goes to further invalidate Optimism as a reasonable
philosophy.
the novel. Pangloss is hanged early on in the novel, and makes a reappearance at the
outlook on life shifts. Instead of preaching of a perfect world where every event is
justified, Pangloss begins to advocate for a simple, content life. For example, at the end
of the story, Pangloss supports Candide when he states that for a happy life, they “must
go work in the garden”(143). Pangloss is disregarding his old philosophical ideals, and
advocating for a simple life on the garden. This demonstrates how, even in the eyes of
it’s most faithful philosopher, Optimism will not pass the test of time. As the conclusion
of the story, this detail gives the reader the knowledge that Optimism is an inadequate
philosophy, and it’s key points will be disregarded in time. Voltaire includes this crucial
element to the conclusion of the story making the bold assertion that Optimism is
ultimately inadequate.
teachings. Voltaire utilizes caricature, hyperbole, litote, and the resurrection of Pangloss