Doppler effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

Change of wavelength caused by motion of the source.

An animation illustrating how the Doppler effect causes a car engine or siren to
sound higher in pitch when it is approaching than when it is receding. The pink
circles represent sound waves.

Passing car horn

MENU0:00
Problems playing this file? See media help.
The Doppler effect (or the Doppler shift) is the change in frequency or wavelength
of a wave in relation to an observer who is moving relative to the wave source.[1]
It is named after the Austrian physicist Christian Doppler, who described the
phenomenon in 1842.

A common example of Doppler shift is the change of pitch heard when a vehicle
sounding a horn approaches and recedes from an observer. Compared to the emitted
frequency, the received frequency is higher during the approach, identical at the
instant of passing by, and lower during the recession.[2]

The reason for the Doppler effect is that when the source of the waves is moving
towards the observer, each successive wave crest is emitted from a position closer
to the observer than the crest of the previous wave.[2][3] Therefore, each wave
takes slightly less time to reach the observer than the previous wave. Hence, the
time between the arrivals of successive wave crests at the observer is reduced,
causing an increase in the frequency. While they are traveling, the distance
between successive wave fronts is reduced, so the waves "bunch together".
Conversely, if the source of waves is moving away from the observer, each wave is
emitted from a position farther from the observer than the previous wave, so the
arrival time between successive waves is increased, reducing the frequency. The
distance between successive wave fronts is then increased, so the waves "spread
out".

For waves that propagate in a medium, such as sound waves, the velocity of the
observer and of the source are relative to the medium in which the waves are
transmitted.[1] The total Doppler effect may therefore result from motion of the
source, motion of the observer, or motion of the medium. Each of these effects is
analyzed separately. For waves which do not require a medium, such as light or
gravity in general relativity, only the relative difference in velocity between the
observer and the source needs to be considered.

Contents
1 History
2 General
3 Analysis
4 Application
4.1 Sirens
4.2 Astronomy
4.3 Radar
4.4 Medical
4.5 Flow measurement
4.6 Velocity profile measurement
4.7 Satellite communication
4.8 Audio
4.9 Vibration measurement
4.10 Developmental biology
5 Inverse Doppler effect
6 See also
7 Primary sources
8 References
9 Further reading
10 External links
History
Doppler first proposed this effect in 1842 in his treatise "�ber das farbige Licht
der Doppelsterne und einiger anderer Gestirne des Himmels" (On the coloured light
of the binary stars and some other stars of the heavens).[4] The hypothesis was
tested for sound waves by Buys Ballot in 1845.[p 1] He confirmed that the sound's
pitch was higher than the emitted frequency when the sound source approached him,
and lower than the emitted frequency when the sound source receded from him.
Hippolyte Fizeau discovered independently the same phenomenon on electromagnetic
waves in 1848 (in France, the effect is sometimes called "effet Doppler-Fizeau" but
that name was not adopted by the rest of the world as Fizeau's discovery was six
years after Doppler's proposal).[p 2][5] In Britain, John Scott Russell made an
experimental study of the Doppler effect (1848).[p 3]

General
In classical physics, where the speeds of source and the receiver relative to the
medium are lower than the velocity of waves in the medium, the relationship between
observed frequency {\displaystyle f} f and emitted frequency {\displaystyle
f_{\text{0}}} f_{{\text{0}}} is given by:[6]

{\displaystyle f=\left({\frac {c\pm v_{\text{r}}}{c\pm

v_{\text{s}}}}\right)f_{0}\,} {\displaystyle f=\left({\frac {c\pm v_{\text{r}}}
{c\pm v_{\text{s}}}}\right)f_{0}\,}
where
{\displaystyle c\;} c\; is the velocity of waves in the medium;
{\displaystyle v_{\text{r}}\,} v_{{\text{r}}}\, is the velocity of the receiver
relative to the medium; positive if the receiver is moving towards the source (and
negative in the other direction);
{\displaystyle v_{\text{s}}\,} v_{{\text{s}}}\, is the velocity of the source
relative to the medium; positive if the source is moving away from the receiver
(and negative in the other direction).
The frequency is decreased if either is moving away from the other.

Equivalent formula, easier to remember:

{\displaystyle {\frac {f}{v_{wr}}}={\frac {f_{0}}{v_{ws}}}={\frac {1}{\lambda }}}

{\displaystyle {\frac {f}{v_{wr}}}={\frac {f_{0}}{v_{ws}}}={\frac {1}{\lambda }}}
where
{\displaystyle {v_{wr}}} {\displaystyle {v_{wr}}} is the wave's velocity relative
to the receiver;
{\displaystyle {v_{ws}}} {\displaystyle {v_{ws}}} is the wave's velocity relative
to the source;
{\displaystyle {\lambda }} {\lambda } is the wavelength.
The above formula assumes that the source is either directly approaching or
receding from the observer. If the source approaches the observer at an angle (but
still with a constant velocity), the observed frequency that is first heard is
higher than the object's emitted frequency. Thereafter, there is a monotonic
decrease in the observed frequency as it gets closer to the observer, through
equality when it is coming from a direction perpendicular to the relative motion
(and was emitted at the point of closest approach; but when the wave is received,
the source and observer will no longer be at their closest), and a continued
monotonic decrease as it recedes from the observer. When the observer is very close
to the path of the object, the transition from high to low frequency is very
abrupt. When the observer is far from the path of the object, the transition from
high to low frequency is gradual.

If the speeds {\displaystyle v_{\text{s}}\,} v_{{\text{s}}}\, and {\displaystyle

v_{\text{r}}\,} v_{{\text{r}}}\, are small compared to the speed of the wave, the
relationship between observed frequency {\displaystyle f} f and emitted frequency
{\displaystyle f_{\text{0}}} f_{{\text{0}}} is approximately[6]

Observed frequency Change in frequency

{\displaystyle f=\left(1+{\frac {\Delta v}{c}}\right)f_{0}} f=\left(1+{\frac
{\Delta v}{c}}\right)f_{0}
{\displaystyle \Delta f={\frac {\Delta v}{c}}f_{0}} \Delta f={\frac {\Delta v}
{c}}f_{0}
where
{\displaystyle \Delta f=f-f_{0}\,} \Delta f=f-f_{0}\,
{\displaystyle \Delta v=v_{\text{r}}-v_{\text{s}}\,} \Delta v=v_{{\text{r}}}-
v_{{\text{s}}}\, is the velocity of the receiver relative to the source: it is
positive when the source and the receiver are moving towards each other.
Proof

Stationary sound source produces sound waves at a constant frequency f, and the
wave-fronts propagate symmetrically away from the source at a constant speed c. The
distance between wave-fronts is the wavelength. All observers will hear the same
frequency, which will be equal to the actual frequency of the source where f = f0 .

The same sound source is radiating sound waves at a constant frequency in the same
medium. However, now the sound source is moving with a speed ?s = 0.7 c. Since the
source is moving, the centre of each new wavefront is now slightly displaced to the
right. As a result, the wave-fronts begin to bunch up on the right side (in front
of) and spread further apart on the left side (behind) of the source. An observer
in front of the source will hear a higher frequency f =
c + 0
/
c � 0.7c
f0 = 3.33 f0 and an observer behind the source will hear a lower frequency f =
c � 0
/
c + 0.7c
f0 = 0.59 f0 .

Now the source is moving at the speed of sound in the medium (?s = c). The wave
fronts in front of the source are now all bunched up at the same point. As a
result, an observer in front of the source will detect nothing until the source
arrives where f =
c + 0
/
c � c
f0 = 8 and an observer behind the source will hear a lower frequency f =
c � 0
/
c + c
f0 = 0.5 f0 .
The sound source has now surpassed the speed of sound in the medium, and is
traveling at 1.4 c. Since the source is moving faster than the sound waves it
creates, it actually leads the advancing wavefront. The sound source will pass by a
stationary observer before the observer hears the sound. As a result, an observer
in front of the source will detect f =
c + 0
/
c � 1.4c
f0 = -2.5 f0 and an observer behind the source will hear a lower frequency f =
c � 0
/
c + 1.4c
f0 = 0.42 f0 .

Analysis
To understand what happens, consider the following analogy. Someone throws one ball
every second at a man. Assume that balls travel with constant velocity. If the
thrower is stationary, the man will receive one ball every second. However, if the
thrower is moving towards the man, he will receive balls more frequently because
the balls will be less spaced out. The inverse is true if the thrower is moving
away from the man. So it is actually the wavelength which is affected; as a
consequence, the received frequency is also affected. It may also be said that the
velocity of the wave remains constant whereas wavelength changes; hence frequency
also changes.

With an observer stationary relative to the medium, if a moving source is emitting

waves with an actual frequency {\displaystyle f_{\text{0}}} f_{{\text{0}}} (in this
case, the wavelength is changed, the transmission velocity of the wave keeps
constant {\displaystyle {\text{--}}} {\text{--}} note that the transmission
velocity of the wave does not depend on the velocity of the source), then the
observer detects waves with a frequency {\displaystyle f} f given by

{\displaystyle f=\left({\frac {c}{c\pm v_{\text{s}}}}\right)f_{0}} {\displaystyle

f=\left({\frac {c}{c\pm v_{\text{s}}}}\right)f_{0}}
A similar analysis for a moving observer and a stationary source (in this case, the
wavelength keeps constant, but due to the motion, the rate at which the observer
receives waves {\displaystyle {\text{--}}} {\text{--}} and hence the transmission
velocity of the wave [with respect to the observer] {\displaystyle {\text{--}}}
{\text{--}} is changed) yields the observed frequency:

{\displaystyle f=\left({\frac {c\pm v_{\text{r}}}{c}}\right)f_{0}} {\displaystyle

f=\left({\frac {c\pm v_{\text{r}}}{c}}\right)f_{0}}
These can be generalized into the equation that was presented in the previous
section.

{\displaystyle f=\left({\frac {c\pm v_{\text{r}}}{c\pm v_{\text{s}}}}\right)f_{0}}

{\displaystyle f=\left({\frac {c\pm v_{\text{r}}}{c\pm v_{\text{s}}}}\right)f_{0}}
An interesting effect was predicted by Lord Rayleigh in his classic book on sound:
if the source is moving toward the observer at twice the speed of sound, a musical
piece emitted by that source would be heard in correct time and tune, but
backwards.[7] The Doppler effect with sound is only clearly heard with objects
moving at high speed, as change in frequency of musical tone involves a speed of
around 40 meters per second, and smaller changes in frequency can easily be
confused by changes in the amplitude of the sounds from moving emitters. Neil A
Downie has demonstrated [8] how the Doppler effect can be made much more easily
audible by using an ultrasonic (e.g. 40 kHz) emitter on the moving object. The
observer then uses a heterodyne frequency converter, as used in many bat detectors,
to listen to a band around 40 kHz. In this case, with the bat detector tuned to
give frequency for the stationary emitter of 2000 Hz, the observer will perceive a
frequency shift of a whole tone, 240 Hz, if the emitter travels at 2 meters per
second.

Application
Sirens
File:Juli 2016 - Spoedtransport, Huisarts, Brandweer, Politie en Ambulances met
spoed in Rotterdam -451.webm
Sirens on passing emergency vehicles.
A siren on a passing emergency vehicle will start out higher than its stationary
pitch, slide down as it passes, and continue lower than its stationary pitch as it
recedes from the observer. Astronomer John Dobson explained the effect thus:

The reason the siren slides is because it doesn't hit you.

In other words, if the siren approached the observer directly, the pitch would
remain constant, at a higher than stationary pitch, until the vehicle hit him, and
then immediately jump to a new lower pitch. Because the vehicle passes by the
observer, the radial velocity does not remain constant, but instead varies as a
function of the angle between his line of sight and the siren's velocity:

{\displaystyle v_{\text{radial}}=v_{\text{s}}\cdot \cos {\theta }}

v_{{\text{radial}}}=v_{{\text{s}}}\cdot \cos {\theta }
where {\displaystyle \theta } \theta is the angle between the object's forward
velocity and the line of sight from the object to the observer.

Astronomy

Redshift of spectral lines in the optical spectrum of a supercluster of distant

galaxies (right), as compared to that of the Sun (left)
The Doppler effect for electromagnetic waves such as light is of great use in
astronomy and results in either a so-called redshift or blueshift. It has been used
to measure the speed at which stars and galaxies are approaching or receding from
us; that is, their radial velocities. This may be used to detect if an apparently
single star is, in reality, a close binary, to measure the rotational speed of
stars and galaxies, or to detect exoplanets. This redshift and blueshift happens on
a very small scale. If an object be moving toward earth, there would not be a
noticeable difference in visible light, to the unaided eye.[9]

Note that redshift is also used to measure the expansion of space, but that this is
not truly a Doppler effect.[10] Rather, redshifting due to the expansion of space
is known as cosmological redshift, which can be derived purely from the Robertson-
Walker metric under the formalism of General Relativity. Having said this, it also
happens that there are detectable Doppler effects on cosmological scales, which, if
incorrectly interpreted as cosmological in origin, lead to the observation of
redshift-space distortions.[11]

The use of the Doppler effect for light in astronomy depends on our knowledge that
the spectra of stars are not homogeneous. They exhibit absorption lines at well
defined frequencies that are correlated with the energies required to excite
electrons in various elements from one level to another. The Doppler effect is
recognizable in the fact that the absorption lines are not always at the
frequencies that are obtained from the spectrum of a stationary light source. Since
blue light has a higher frequency than red light, the spectral lines of an
approaching astronomical light source exhibit a blueshift and those of a receding
astronomical light source exhibit a redshift.

Among the nearby stars, the largest radial velocities with respect to the Sun are
+308 km/s (BD-15�4041, also known as LHS 52, 81.7 light-years away) and -260 km/s
(Woolley 9722, also known as Wolf 1106 and LHS 64, 78.2 light-years away). Positive
radial velocity means the star is receding from the Sun, negative that it is
approaching.

Radar
Main article: Doppler radar
The Doppler effect is used in some types of radar, to measure the velocity of
detected objects. A radar beam is fired at a moving target � e.g. a motor car, as
police use radar to detect speeding motorists � as it approaches or recedes from
the radar source. Each successive radar wave has to travel farther to reach the
car, before being reflected and re-detected near the source. As each wave has to
move farther, the gap between each wave increases, increasing the wavelength. In
some situations, the radar beam is fired at the moving car as it approaches, in
which case each successive wave travels a lesser distance, decreasing the
wavelength. In either situation, calculations from the Doppler effect accurately
determine the car's velocity. Moreover, the proximity fuze, developed during World
War II, relies upon Doppler radar to detonate explosives at the correct time,
height, distance, etc.[citation needed]

Because the doppler shift affects the wave incident upon the target as well as the
wave reflected back to the radar, the change in frequency observed by a radar due
to a target moving at relative velocity {\displaystyle \Delta v} \Delta v is twice
that from the same target emitting a wave:

{\displaystyle \Delta f={\frac {2\Delta v}{c}}f_{0}} \Delta f={\frac {2\Delta v}

{c}}f_{0}.[12]
Medical
Main article: Doppler ultrasonography

Colour flow ultrasonography (Doppler) of a carotid artery � scanner and screen

An echocardiogram can, within certain limits, produce an accurate assessment of the
direction of blood flow and the velocity of blood and cardiac tissue at any
arbitrary point using the Doppler effect. One of the limitations is that the
ultrasound beam should be as parallel to the blood flow as possible. Velocity
measurements allow assessment of cardiac valve areas and function, abnormal
communications between the left and right side of the heart, leaking of blood
through the valves (valvular regurgitation), and calculation of the cardiac output.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using gas-filled microbubble contrast media can be
used to improve velocity or other flow-related medical measurements.[13][14]

Although "Doppler" has become synonymous with "velocity measurement" in medical

imaging, in many cases it is not the frequency shift (Doppler shift) of the
received signal that is measured, but the phase shift (when the received signal
arrives).[p 4]

Velocity measurements of blood flow are also used in other fields of medical
ultrasonography, such as obstetric ultrasonography and neurology. Velocity
measurement of blood flow in arteries and veins based on Doppler effect is an
effective tool for diagnosis of vascular problems like stenosis.[15]

Flow measurement
Instruments such as the laser Doppler velocimeter (LDV), and acoustic Doppler
velocimeter (ADV) have been developed to measure velocities in a fluid flow. The
LDV emits a light beam and the ADV emits an ultrasonic acoustic burst, and measure
the Doppler shift in wavelengths of reflections from particles moving with the
flow. The actual flow is computed as a function of the water velocity and phase.
This technique allows non-intrusive flow measurements, at high precision and high
frequency.

Velocity profile measurement

Developed originally for velocity measurements in medical applications (blood
flow), Ultrasonic Doppler Velocimetry (UDV) can measure in real time complete
velocity profile in almost any liquids containing particles in suspension such as
dust, gas bubbles, emulsions. Flows can be pulsating, oscillating, laminar or
turbulent, stationary or transient. This technique is fully non-invasive.

Satellite communication

Possible Doppler shifts in dependence of the elevation angle (LEO: orbit altitude
{\displaystyle h} h = 750 km). Fixed ground station.[16]

Geometry for Doppler effects. Variables: {\displaystyle v_{mob}} {\displaystyle

v_{mob}} is the velocity of the mobile station, {\displaystyle v_{Sat}}
{\displaystyle v_{Sat}} is the velocity of the satellite, {\displaystyle
v_{rel,sat}} {\displaystyle v_{rel,sat}} is the relative speed of the satellite,
{\displaystyle \phi } \phi is the elevation angle of the satellite and
{\displaystyle \theta } \theta is the driving direction with respect to the
satellite.

Doppler effect on the mobile channel. Variables: {\displaystyle f_{c}={\frac {c}

{\lambda _{\rm {c}}}}} {\displaystyle f_{c}={\frac {c}{\lambda _{\rm {c}}}}} is the
carrier frequency, {\displaystyle f_{\rm {D,max}}={\frac {v_{\rm {mob}}}{\lambda
_{\rm {c}}}}} {\displaystyle f_{\rm {D,max}}={\frac {v_{\rm {mob}}}{\lambda _{\rm
{c}}}}} is the maximum Doppler shift due to the mobile station moving and
{\displaystyle f_{\rm {D,Sat}}} {\displaystyle f_{\rm {D,Sat}}} is the additional
Doppler shift due to the satellite moving.
Fast moving satellites can have a Doppler shift of dozens of kilohertz relative to
a ground station. The speed, thus magnitude of Doppler effect, changes due to earth
curvature. Dynamic Doppler compensation, where the frequency of a signal is changed
progressively during transmission, is used so the satellite receives a constant
frequency signal.[17]

Doppler shift of the direct path can be estimated by the following formula:[18]

{\displaystyle f_{\rm {D,dir}}={\frac {v_{\rm {mob}}}{\lambda _{\rm {c}}}}\cos \phi

\cos \theta } {\displaystyle f_{\rm {D,dir}}={\frac {v_{\rm {mob}}}{\lambda _{\rm
{c}}}}\cos \phi \cos \theta }

where {\displaystyle v_{mob}} {\displaystyle v_{mob}} is the velocity of the mobile

station, {\displaystyle \lambda _{\rm {c}}} {\displaystyle \lambda _{\rm {c}}} is
the wavelength of the carrier, {\displaystyle \phi } \phi is the elevation angle
of the satellite and {\displaystyle \theta } \theta is the driving direction with
respect to the satellite.

The additional Doppler shift due to the satellite moving can be described as:

{\displaystyle f_{\rm {D,sat}}={\frac {v_{\rm {rel,sat}}}{\lambda _{\rm {c}}}}}

{\displaystyle f_{\rm {D,sat}}={\frac {v_{\rm {rel,sat}}}{\lambda _{\rm {c}}}}}

where {\displaystyle v_{\rm {rel,sat}}} {\displaystyle v_{\rm {rel,sat}}} is the

relative speed of the satellite.

Audio
The Leslie speaker, most commonly associated with and predominantly used with the
famous Hammond organ, takes advantage of the Doppler effect by using an electric
motor to rotate an acoustic horn around a loudspeaker, sending its sound in a
circle. This results at the listener's ear in rapidly fluctuating frequencies of a
keyboard note.
Vibration measurement
A laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) is a non-contact instrument for measuring
vibration. The laser beam from the LDV is directed at the surface of interest, and
the vibration amplitude and frequency are extracted from the Doppler shift of the
laser beam frequency due to the motion of the surface.

Developmental biology
During the segmentation of vertebrate embryos, waves of gene expression sweep
across the presomitic mesoderm, the tissue from which the precursors of the
vertebrae (somites) are formed. A new somite is formed upon arrival of a wave at
the anterior end of the presomitic mesoderm. In zebrafish, it has been shown that
the shortening of the presomitic mesoderm during segmentation leads to a Doppler
effect as the anterior end of the tissue moves into the waves. This Doppler effect
contributes to the period of segmentation.[p 5]

Inverse Doppler effect

Since 1968 scientists such as Victor Veselago have speculated about the possibility
of an inverse Doppler effect. The size of the Doppler shift depends on the
refractive index of the medium a wave is traveling through. But some materials are
capable of negative refraction, which should lead to a Doppler shift that works in
a direction opposite that of a conventional Doppler shift.[19] First experiment
that detected this effect was conducted by Nigel Seddon and Trevor Bearpark in
Bristol, United Kingdom in 2003.[p 6] Later inverse Doppler effect was observed in
some inhomogeneous materials and predicted inside Vavilov�Cherenkov cone.[20]

See also
Differential Doppler effect
Doppler cooling
Dopplergraph
Fading
Fizeau experiment
Photoacoustic Doppler effect
Rayleigh fading
Redshift
Relativistic Doppler effect
Primary sources
Buys Ballot (1845). "Akustische Versuche auf der Niederl�ndischen Eisenbahn, nebst
gelegentlichen Bemerkungen zur Theorie des Hrn. Prof. Doppler (in German)". Annalen
der Physik und Chemie. 11 (11): 321�351. Bibcode:1845AnP...142..321B.
doi:10.1002/andp.18451421102.
Fizeau: "Acoustique et optique". Lecture, Soci�t� Philomathique de Paris, 29
December 1848. According to Becker(pg. 109), this was never published, but
recounted by M. Moigno(1850): "R�pertoire d'optique moderne" (in French), vol 3. pp
1165�1203 and later in full by Fizeau, "Des effets du mouvement sur le ton des
vibrations sonores et sur la longeur d'onde des rayons de lumi�re"; [Paris, 1870].
Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 19, 211�221.
Scott Russell, John (1848). "On certain effects produced on sound by the rapid
motion of the observer". Report of the Eighteenth Meeting of the British
Association for the Advancement of Science. 18 (7): 37�38. Retrieved 2008-07-08.
Petrescu, Florian Ion T (2015). "Improving Medical Imaging and Blood Flow
Measurement by using a New Doppler Effect Relationship". American Journal of
Engineering and Applied Sciences. 8 (4): 582�588. doi:10.3844/ajeassp.2015.582.588
� via Proquest.
Soroldoni, D.; J�rg, D. J.; Morelli, L. G.; Richmond, D. L.; Schindelin, J.;
J�licher, F.; Oates, A. C. (2014). "A Doppler Effect in Embryonic Pattern
Formation". Science. 345 (6193): 222�225. Bibcode:2014Sci...345..222S.
doi:10.1126/science.1253089. PMID 25013078.
Kozyrev, Alexander B.; van der Weide, Daniel W. (2005). "Explanation of the
Inverse Doppler Effect Observed in Nonlinear Transmission Lines". Physical Review
Letters. 94 (20): 203902. Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94t3902K.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.203902. PMID 16090248.
References
Giordano, Nicholas (2009). College Physics: Reasoning and Relationships. Cengage
Learning. pp. 421�424. ISBN 978-0534424718.
Possel, Markus (2017). "Waves, motion and frequency: the Doppler effect". Einstein
Online, Vol. 5. Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, Potsdam, Germany.
Retrieved September 4, 2017.
Henderson, Tom (2017). "The Doppler Effect � Lesson 3, Waves". Physics tutorial.
The Physics Classroom. Retrieved September 4, 2017.
Alec Eden The search for Christian Doppler, Springer-Verlag, Wien 1992. Contains a
facsimile edition with an English translation.
Becker (2011). Barbara J. Becker, Unravelling Starlight: William and Margaret
Huggins and the Rise of the New Astronomy, illustrated Edition, Cambridge
University Press, 2011; ISBN 110700229X, 9781107002296.
Rosen, Joe; Gothard, Lisa Quinn (2009). Encyclopedia of Physical Science. Infobase
Publishing. p. 155. ISBN 978-0-8160-7011-4.
Strutt (Lord Rayleigh), John William (1896). MacMillan & Co (ed.). The Theory of
Sound. 2 (2 ed.). Macmillan. p. 154.
Downie, Neil A, 'Vacuum Bazookas, Electric Rainbow Jelly and 27 other projects for
Saturday Science', Princeton (2001) ISBN 0-691-00986-4
"Doppler Shift". www.astro.ucla.edu.
The distinction is made clear in Harrison, Edward Robert (2000). Cosmology: The
Science of the Universe (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 306ff. ISBN 978-
0-521-66148-5.
An excellent review of the topic in technical detail is given here: Percival,
Will; Samushia, Lado; Ross, Ashley; Shapiro, Charles; Raccanelli, Alvise (2011).
"Review article: Redshift-space distortions" (PDF). Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society. 369 (1957): 5058�67. Bibcode:2011RSPTA.369.5058P.
doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0370. PMID 22084293.
Wolff, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Christian. "Radar Basics". www.radartutorial.eu. Retrieved
14 April 2018.
Davies, MJ; Newton, JD (2 July 2017). "Non-invasive imaging in cardiology for the
generalist". British Journal of Hospital Medicine (London, England : 2005). 78 (7):
392�398. doi:10.12968/hmed.2017.78.7.392. PMID 28692375.
Appis, AW; Tracy, MJ; Feinstein, SB (1 June 2015). "Update on the safety and
efficacy of commercial ultrasound contrast agents in cardiac applications". Echo
Research and Practice. 2 (2): R55�62. doi:10.1530/ERP-15-0018. PMC 4676450. PMID
26693339.
Evans, D. H.; McDicken, W. N. (2000). Doppler Ultrasound (2nd ed.). New York: John
Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-97001-9.[page needed]
Otilia Popescuy, Jason S. Harrisz and Dimitrie C. Popescuz, Designing the
Communica- tion Sub-System for Nanosatellite CubeSat Missions: Operational and
Implementation Perspectives, 2016, IEEE
Qingchong, Liu (1999), "Doppler measurement and compensation in mobile satellite
communications systems", Military Communications Conference Proceedings / MILCOM,
1: 316�320, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.674.3987, doi:10.1109/milcom.1999.822695, ISBN 978-0-
7803-5538-5
Arndt, D. (2015). On Channel Modelling for Land Mobile Satellite Reception
(Doctoral dissertation).
"Doppler shift is seen in reverse". Physics World. 10 March 2011.
Shi, Xihang; Lin, Xiao; Kaminer, Ido; Gao, Fei; Yang, Zhaoju; Joannopoulos, John
D.; Soljacic, Marin; Zhang, Baile (October 2018). "Superlight inverse Doppler
effect". Nature Physics. 14 (10): 1001�1005. doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0209-6. ISSN
1745-2473.
Further reading
Doppler, C. (1842). �ber das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne und einiger anderer
Gestirne des Himmels (About the coloured light of the binary stars and some other
stars of the heavens). Publisher: Abhandlungen der K�nigl. B�hm. Gesellschaft der
Wissenschaften (V. Folge, Bd. 2, S. 465�482) [Proceedings of the Royal Bohemian
Society of Sciences (Part V, Vol 2)]; Prague: 1842 (Reissued 1903). Some sources
mention 1843 as year of publication because in that year the article was published
in the Proceedings of the Bohemian Society of Sciences. Doppler himself referred to
the publication as "Prag 1842 bei Borrosch und Andr�", because in 1842 he had a
preliminary edition printed that he distributed independently.
"Doppler and the Doppler effect", E. N. da C. Andrade, Endeavour Vol. XVIII No. 69,
January 1959 (published by ICI London). Historical account of Doppler's original
paper and subsequent developments.
Adrian, Eleni (24 June 1995). "Doppler Effect". NCSA. Retrieved 2008-07-13.