Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 13 Element Calculations, The Master Element and Transformation Equations PDF
Lecture 13 Element Calculations, The Master Element and Transformation Equations PDF
Email: zabaras@cornell.edu
URL: http://mpdc.mae.cornell.edu/
y x
Determinant of the Jacobian
d 1 dx
matrix
d | J | y x dy | J | det J det J
T x y x y
1 y 1 x
, ,
x | J | y | J |
1 y 1 x
,
x | J | y | J |
dA | J | d A
leads to:
M N j ( , ) M N j ( , ) M N j ( , ) M N j ( , )
| J | det J x j y
x y
j j j
j 1 j 1 j 1 j 1
1 M N j ( , ) 1 M N j ( , ) 1 M N j ( , ) 1 M N j (,,)
yj , xj , yj , xj
x | J | j 1 y | J | j 1 x | J | j 1 y | J | j 1
T11 ?
M 3
x x j N j ( , ) 3 N 1 ( , ) 3 N 2 ( , ) (1 )
j 1 2
T1 :
M 1
y y j N j ( , ) N 2 ( , ) N 3 ( , ) (1 )
j 1 2
3
0
2 3 0
• Note that | J | det the map T1 is invertable.
1 0 4
2
T21 ?
M 3
x x j N j ( , ) 3 N 3 ( , ) 3 N 4 ( , ) (1 )
j 1 2
T2 :
M 1
y y j N j ( , ) N 2 ( , ) N 3 ( , ) (1 )
j 1 2
3
0 2 3 0
• Note that | J | det the map T2 is not invertable.
1 0
4
2
T31 ?
M 1
x x j N j ( , ) N 2 ( , ) 2 N 3 ( , ) (3 3 )
j 1 4
T3 :
M 1
y y j N j ( , ) 2 N 3 ( , ) N 4 ( , ) (3 3 )
j 1 4
1 1
(3 ) (1 ) 1 1 1
| J | det 4 4
|J| cannot be zero inside the element so
1 (1 ) 1 (3 ) 2 8 8
the map T3 is invertable.
4 4
T41 ?
M 1
x x j N j ( , ) 3 N 2 ( , ) N 3 ( , ) (4 4 2 2 )
j 1 4
T4 :
M 1
y y j N j ( , ) N 3 ( , ) 2 N 4 ( , ) (3 3 )
j 1 4
|J| is not >0 everywhere inside the element
1 1 so the map T3 is not invertable. The
(4 2 ) (2 2 ) 1
| J | det 4 4
(5 3 4 ) marked region near node 3 -- above the
1
(1 ) 1 8
(3 ) line 5 3 4 3 -- is mapped outside the
4 4
element.
• All angles of quadrilateral elements need to be < p.
MAE 4700 – FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
CORNELL
U N I V E R S I T Y
N. Zabaras (03/06/2014) 16
Finite element equations
• To solve our boundary value problem of interest
examined earlier, we need to compute the following
matrices and vectors ( 1 e E,1 i, j Ne ):
N e
N e
N e
N e
kij k
e i
x x
j
i
j
bNi N j dxdy
e e
fi e fNie dxdy
e
y y e
P e
ij i
e
pN N dse
j
g ie g Nie ds
e2 h
e2 h
j 1
N
y y j N j ( , ),
e
j 1
• This mapping Te : e , is completed defined by the
nodal coordinates ( x j , y j ) of element e.
g ( x, y ) g ( x( , ), y ( , )) g ( , )
, xk
e
x x x k 1 k 1
N ej ( x, y ) where: y N N k ( , ) y N N k ( , )
N j N j yk yk
e e
,
k 1 k 1
y y y
1 M N k ( , ) 1 M N k ( , ) 1 M N k ( , ) 1 M N k ( , )
yk , xk , yk , xk
x | J | k 1 y | J | k 1 x | J | k 1 y | J | k 1
we conclude: N ej ( x, y ) 1 N j N N k ( , ) N j N N k ( , )
e e
yk yk ,
x | J | k 1 k 1
N ej ( x, y ) 1 N j N N k ( , ) N j N N k ( , )
e e
xk xk
y | J | k 1 jk 1
j 1
g ( x, y )dxdy g ( x( , ), y ( , )) | J | d d g ( , ) | J | d d
G ( , )
e
wi
i 1
Gaus s Gauss
int egration int egration
po int s weights
kj
j 1 j 1
k(x , y )
j j
e1 e e1
e eq
Ke fe fe
N1
e
N 2
e
N nen
e
x ...
x
B e
e x KE K EF d E f E rE
N e N1e N 2e ... N nen
e
N1 N 2e N nen
e
K K F d F f F
y
y
...
y FE
N1e N 2e N3e
x x x 1 y2e y3e y3e y11 y1e y2e
B e
e
e 2
N1 N 2e N3e 2 Ae x3 x2
e
x1e x3e x2e x1e
cons tan t
y y y
matrix
1
2 Ae x2e y3e x3e y2e x1e y3e x3e y1e x1e y2e x2e y1e
e B [ D ] B d B k B A
T T
K e e e e e e e
1 0.5 1 0.5
• For e=1: B1
2 2 0 2
1 2 3
5.3125 0.625 4.6875 1
K 1 B1 B1kA1 0.625 0.625 2
T
1.25
4.6875 0.625 5.3125 3
N1e N 2e N3e
x x x 1 y2e y3e y3e y11 y1e y2e 1
B e
e
e
cons tan t N1 N 2e N3e 2 Ae x3 x2
e
x1e x3e x2e x1e
matrix y y y
2 Ae x2e y3e x3e y2e x1e y3e x3e y1e x1e y2e x2e y1e
Ke B [ D ]B d B BkA
T T
e e e e e
e
0 0.5 0.5
• For e=2: B2
2 2 0
2 4 3
10 10 0 2
K 2 B B 2 kA2 10 10.625 0.625
2 T
4
0 0.625 0.625 3
MAE 4700 – FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
CORNELL
U N I V E R S I T Y
N. Zabaras (03/06/2014) 28
Example problem : Assembled stiffness
• Assembling the 2 stiffness matrices gives:
N1e
1
( x2e y3e x3e y2e ( y2e y3e ) x ( x3e x2e ) y )
1
e
2A 2
1
N 2e e ( x3e y1e x1e y3e ( y3e y1e ) x ( x1e x3e ) y )
2A
1
N3e e ( x1e y2e x2e y1e ( y1e y2e ) x ( x2e x1e ) y ) 1
2A
1 This expression
2 Ae x2e y3e x3e y2e x1e y3e x3e y1e x1e y2e x2e y1e f f N
e e T
d
fAe
1 can be proved for
3
e
1 constant f!
• For e=1: 1 1 2 1
1
f 1 3 1 3 1 2
fA 6 1
2
2 2 1
1 1 2 3 2 1 3
• For e=2: 1 1 1 2 f L f L f
1 T 1 2 T 2
2 1 3
2
3
2
f 2 3 1 3 1 1
fA 6 0.5
4
1 1 4
2A y 1
0 0 2
• Thus: fe 0 0.5x 20dx 20
2
4
0.5 x 1 20
3
0
q 2 qx2 k B 2 d 2 5 2 2 2 1.788 17.88
2
q 0 0.5 0.5 4.47
y
0
N e e
N 4 N 4 T1
e e e e e e e
T e
N1 N 2 N 2 N 3 N 3
1
e
x x x x x x x x T2
x
T e e e e e e e e e e
1 N N 1 N 2 N 2 N 3 N 3 N 4 N 4 T3
y y y y y y y y y T4e
y e x e
This comes from an d 1 dx
e
earlier derivation: d | J | y e e dy
x
MAE 4700 – FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
CORNELL
U N I V E R S I T Y
N. Zabaras (03/06/2014) 36
Example problem using 4-node quadrilateral elements
y e N 1 N 4
e e e e
y e N 2 N3
B
e 1
| Je | e
x e x e N 1e e
N 2 N3
e
N 4
4
Inverse of
the Jacobian J e
x e x ej N j ( , ),
j 1
• The Jacobian matrix can be computed from:y e 4
y j N j ( , ),
e
j 1
e e e e xe y1e
x e
y e
N1 N 2 N3 N 4 1
e
x2 y2
e
J e
x e e e e
y e e e
N 4 x3 y3e
Jacobian N1 N 2 N3
matrix of
element e
x4e
y4e
1
3 1 1 1 1 1 1
B
1
8 4 1 1 1 1
0
3
T 1 1 T
• The element stiffness is: K 1 B1 D1 B1 d B1 D1 B1 | J 1 | d d
1
1 1
k[ I ]
N 2 N 2
K1
int int
1 T 1 1
1
1
),(Wi ,W j ) (1,1)
k B B | J | W W , ( , ) ( ,
i 1 j 1
,
i j i j
3 3
i j
1 1 N 2
e
e
1 1
3 2
e
N 4
Jacobian
|J |
1
20
L /2 (1 )
1
2
r1 17.5
• Assembly of all the nodal f f f r r2 2.5
r3 2
contributions gives: 18
MAE 4700 – FE Analysis for Mechanical & Aerospace Design
CORNELL
U N I V E R S I T Y
N. Zabaras (03/06/2014) 40
Example problem using 4-node quadrilateral elements
• We finally obtain:
1 1 1 0.8979
q ( , )
3 3 3.5916
1 1 1 2.2965
q ( , )
3 3 19.793
1 1 1 4.9482
q ( , )
3 3 19.793
1 1 1 5.8042
q ( , )
3 3 3.5916