1 Built-‐up
compression
members
The
built-‐up
members
can
be
classified
according
to
several
categories,
which
will
be
analyzed
in
the
following
sections.
We
can
classify
the
compound
struts
by
means
of:
• Distance
between
struts
• Connection
between
chords
1.1 Distance
between
struts
Where
ℎ!
is
the
distance
between
the
centroids
of
the
chords
and
𝑖!
is
the
radius
of
gyration
of
the
chord
along
the
axis
where
the
element
is
compounded,
we
can
classify
the
elements
such
that:
• If
ℎ!
>
6𝑖! :
Strut
with
distant
chords,
typically
used
as
columns
to
sustain
vertical
compression
loads
• If
ℎ!
<
3𝑖! :
Strut
with
close
chords,
typically
used
for
the
chords
of
both
trusses
or
for
the
struts
in
case
of
elevated
axial
loads.
1.2 Connection
between
chords
• Laced
members:
Lacing
members
are
interested
by
axial
forces.
Each
chord
is
considered
as
a
simple
strut.
Shear
deformability
depends
on
axial
deformability
of
lattice
members.
• Strut
with
batten
plates:
Chords
rigidly
connected
by
batten
plates.
Chords
are
compressed
and
bent
with
a
linear
distribution
of
bending
moments
null
at
the
middle
of
each
panel.
Vertical
buckling
effects
are
considered
balanced
by
equal
and
opposite
axial
forces.
• Buttoned
struts:
Each
chord
is
compressed
and
bent
with
a
bending
moment
distribution
that
cannot
be
approximated
as
linear.
Shear
deformability
depends
mainly
on
the
flexural
deformability
of
the
chords.
1.3 Connection
Connections
represent
a
critical
element
on
the
built-‐up
section
since
they
must
suffer
from
an
excessive
deformation
to
allow
an
adequate
performance
of
the
chords,
on
the
other
hand,
and
excessive
deformation
decreases
the
load
carrying
capacity.
The
types
of
connection
are
the
following:
• Connection
with
static
function:
Able
to
resist
sliding
force
between
isolated
members.
• Connection
with
kinematic
function:
Able
to
prevent
the
buckling
of
the
isolated
member
in
the
weakest
direction.
1.4 Design
approach
of
chord
members
The
elastic
critical
load,
𝑁!",!" ,
can
be
defined
on
the
basis
of
Eulerian
load,
considering
only
the
flexural
contribution:
𝑁!" 𝜋 ! 𝐸𝐴
𝑁!",!" = 𝜒! = !
1 + 𝐺𝐴 𝑁!" 𝜆!"
We
can
calculate
the
maximum
axial
load
on
the
chord
with
the
second
order
effects.
The
deflection
at
midspan
is
computed
by:
𝑒!
𝑣=
𝑁
1−𝑁
!",!"
1
𝑁!",!" =
1 1
𝑁!" + 𝑆!
𝑒! 𝑁
𝑀=
𝑁
1−𝑁
!",!"
The
maximum
axial
load
is
then
computed
as:
𝑁 𝑀
𝑁! = +
2 ℎ!
1.5 Shear
stiffness
Sv
The
resistant
of
the
built-‐up
member
depends
mainly
also
on
the
shear
deformability
of
the
panel
element.
Therefore,
we
need
to
evaluate
this
value
in
two
different
configurations.
1.5.1 Laced
compound
struts
The
shear
displacements
on
this
configuration
are
due
to
lengthening
of
the
diagonal
lacing
and
to
the
shortening
of
the
batten.
The
elongation
of
the
diagonal
element
can
be
evaluated
as:
𝑁!
𝛥 = 𝑒𝐿! = 𝐿
𝐸𝐴! !
𝑇 1 𝑎
𝛥=
cos 𝛷 𝐸𝐴! sin 𝛷
The
corresponding
lateral
displacement
𝛿!
of
the
panel
is:
𝛥 𝑇 𝑎
𝛿! = =
cos 𝛷 𝐸𝐴! sin 𝛷 cos ! 𝛷
The
shortening
of
the
batten
is
therefore:
𝑇𝑏
𝛿! =
𝐸𝐴!
The
total
angular
displacement
produced
by
the
horizontal
force
T
is:
𝛿! + 𝛿!
𝛾=
𝑎
Finally,
the
shear
stiffness
𝑆! :
𝑇
𝑆! =
𝛾
1 1 𝑏
= !
+
𝑆! 𝐸𝐴! sin 𝛷 cos 𝛷 𝑎𝐸𝐴!
Finally,
1
𝑁!",!! =
1 1 𝑏
+ +
𝑁!" 𝐸𝐴! sin 𝛷 cos ! 𝛷 𝑎𝐸𝐴!
1.5.2 Battened
compound
struts
The
chords
are
subjected
to
bending,
shear
and
axial
load,
while
battens
are
mainly
affected
by
shear
and
bending
moments.
Reference
has
to
be
made
to
an
internal
panel
delimited
by
m-‐n,
m1-‐n1:
The
total
displacement
can
be
obtained
as:
𝛿!"! = 𝛿!,!"# + 𝛿!,!"# + 𝛿!,!"#
Flexure
of
the
chords:
Considering
a
cantilever
beam
𝑇 𝑎 ! 1 𝑇𝑎!
𝛿= =
2 2 3𝐸𝐼!"# 48𝐸𝐼!"#
𝛿!,!"# = 2𝛿
Flexure
of
the
batten:
Due
to
the
rotation
𝜃
at
the
chord-‐to-‐batten
node.
The
moment
!! !"
of
the
chord
is
! !
and
therefore
the
moment
at
the
end
of
each
batten
is
! .
The
rotation
is:
𝑇𝑎 1 𝑏 𝑇𝑎𝑏
𝜃= =
2 3𝐸𝐼!"! 2 12𝐸𝐼!"#
𝑎 𝑇𝑎! 𝑏
𝛿!,!"# = 2𝜃 =
2 12𝐸𝐼!"#
Shear
deformation
of
the
batten:
The
displacement
𝛿!,!"#
is
evaluated
under
a
!"
constant
shear
load
of
!
and
the
shear
strain
is:
𝜒! 𝑇𝑎
𝛾=
𝑏𝐺𝐴!"#
and
the
displacement
is
therefore
𝑎
𝛿!,!"# = 2𝛾
2
Finally,
the
shear
stiffness
is:
1 𝛿!,!"# + 𝛿!,!"# + 𝛿!,!"# 𝑎! 𝑎𝑏 𝜒! 𝑎
= = + +
𝑆! 𝑎𝑇 24𝐸𝐼!"# 12𝐸𝐼!"# 𝑏𝐴!"# 𝐺
And
the
elastic
critical
load
for
battened
struts
is:
𝜋 ! 𝐸𝐼 1
𝑁!",!" =
𝐿! 𝜋 ! 𝐸𝐼
1 + ! 𝑆!
𝐿
1.6 Design
in
accordance
with
the
European
approach
!
Initial
deformation
𝑒! = !""
The
ideal
critical
load,
considering
the
shear
deformability:
1
𝑁!",!" =
1 1
𝑁!" 𝑆! +
Also,
the
shear
angular
deformation:
𝑇
𝛾 =
𝑆!
And
the
ideal
critical
load
can
be
defined
as:
𝜋!𝐸
𝑁!",!" = !
𝑘! 𝐿
Where
𝑘!
depends
on
the
shear
deformability.
By
the
imperfection
there
would
be
an
bending
action
M,
that
can
be
decomposed
in
a
force
F:
𝑀 𝑒! 𝑁 1
𝐹= =
ℎ! 1 − 𝑁 ℎ!
𝑁!",!"
So
one
of
the
chords
will
be
subjected
to
the
compression
of
F/2:
𝑀!" ℎ! 𝐴!!
𝑁!!,!" = 0.5𝑁!" +
2𝐼!""
Where,
𝐼!"" :
Inertia
of
the
built-‐in
section
𝐴!! :
Channel
area
The
acting
bending
moment
is:
!
𝑒! 𝑁!" + 𝑀!"
𝑀!" =
𝑁 𝑁
1 − 𝑁!" − 𝑆!"
!" !
Where,
𝜋 ! 𝐸𝐼!""
𝑁!" =
𝐿!
The
lacings
should
be
verified
to
shear
force:
𝜋 ! 𝑀!"
𝑉!" =
𝐿
For
laced
struts:
𝐼!"" = 0.5ℎ!! 𝐴!!
For
battened
struts:
𝐼!"" = 0.5ℎ!! 𝐴!! + 2𝐼!! 𝜇
For
buttoned
struts,
we
can
neglect
the
influence
of
the
shear
stiffness
𝑆! = ∞