Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture Outline
‣ Overview of Nonexperimental Research
‣ Correlational Research
‣ Quasi-Experimental Research
‣ Qualitative Research
Chapter 7
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
some problems, but the lack of random assignment and experimental control fails to ad
for example, that a researcher finds two similar schools, starts an antibullying program
fewer bullying incidents in that “treatment school” than in the “control school.” There is no
Types of Nonexperimental Research Let’s Revisit Internal Validity
because clearly
‣ Nonexperimental research falls into three broad categories the number of bullying
‣ Internal incidents did not determine which school got the p
validity is the extent to which the independent variable
‣ Single-variable research lack of random assignment of children to observed
caused the schoolschangecould still
in the meanvariable.
dependent that students in the tre
‣ Milgram’s original research was just on obedience ‣ Internal validity tends to be highest with experimental research,
‣
from students in the control schoolfollowed
in some other way thatresearch,
by quasi-experimental couldandexplain thenon-
then finally difference in b
Correlational research
‣ Looking at the relationship between two variables without any attempt to experimental research, although there is some overlap
control extraneous variables
‣ Quasi-experimental research
‣ The experimenter manipulates the IV, but there is no random assignment to
conditions or orders of conditions.
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Figure 7.1 Internal Validity of Correlation, Quasi-Experimental, and Experimental Studies. Experiments are gener
validity, quasi-experiments lower, and correlation studies lower still.
Advantages of the Non-Experimental Method Problems
‣ Real life situations ‣ Direction of cause and effect
‣ Prediction ‣ Does X cause Y?
‣ Study aspects of people such as personality characteristics ‣ Or does Y cause X?
‣ Can study variables that would be unethical to manipulate in ‣ Uncontrolled third variables
a true experiment ‣ Perhaps Z causes both X and Y
‣ If so X and Y will appear to be related
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
CORRELATIONAL RESEARC
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
idea that hassles cause symptoms, it is also consistent with the idea that symptoms cause hassles or that so
variable (e.g., neuroticism) causes both.
A common misconception among beginning researchers is that correlational research must involve tw
titative variables, such as scores on two extraversion tests or the number of hassles and number of sy
people have experienced. However, the defining feature of correlational research is that the two variables
sured—neither one is manipulated—and this is true regardless of whether the variables are quantitativ
egorical. Imagine, for example, that a researcher administers the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale to 50 A
university students and 50 Japanese university students. Although this “feels” like a between-subjects exp
it is a correlational study because the researcher did not manipulate the students’ nationalities. The same i
the study by Cacioppo and Petty comparing professors and factory workers in terms of their need for cog
is a correlational study because the researchers did not manipulate the participants’ occupations.
Figure 7.2 shows data from a hypothetical study on the relationship between whether people make a dai
things to do (a “to-do list”) and stress. Notice that it is unclear whether this design is an experiment or a
tional study because it is unclear whether the independent variable was manipulated. If the researcher ra
assigned some participants to make daily to-do lists and others not to, then it is an experiment. If the re
What is Correlational Research? Types of Correlations
simply asked participants whether they made daily to-do lists, then it is a correlational study. The distin
important because if the study was an experiment, then it could be concluded that making the daily to
‣ Correlational research is when two variables are measured, and the ‣ A common misconception is that correlational research can
reduced participants’ stress. But if it was a correlational study, it could only be concluded that these varia
related. Perhaps being stressed has a negative effect on people’s ability to plan ahead (the directionality p
statistical relationship between them is assessed. only be done with variables that are quantitative in nature
Or perhaps people who are more conscientious are more likely to make to-do lists and less likely to be
‣ There is little or no effort to control extraneous variables (e.g., ordinal or interval/ratio).
(the third-variable problem). The crucial point is that what defines a study as experimental or correlation
the variables being studied, nor whether the variables are quantitative or categorical, nor the type of grap
‣ Correlational research is often conducted when there is no reason to ‣ This is not the case, as we can look at the correlation between
tistics used to analyze the data. It is how the study is conducted.
believe there is a causal relationship between two variables any two variables.
‣ Look at the relationship between a brief version of an extraversion test and a
long version of the test to see if the results are correlated with one another… ‣ Correlational research is defined
the short version does not cause the long version! by the method, not by the
‣ The terms “independent variable” and “dependent variable” do not variables.
really apply to correlational research.
Figure 7.2 Results of a Hypothetical Study on Whether People Who Make Daily To-Do Lists Experience Less Stress Than People W
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 —
Not Make Research
Such Lists Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
No Relationship Data Collection in Correlational Research
‣ When the two variables are ‣ The defining feature of correlational research is that neither
not related to one another, variable is manipulated, they are only measured.
then there is no relationship. ‣ Correlational research can be carried out in a variety of
‣ That is, the variables vary settings
independently from one ‣ Studies can be carried out in labs, correlating two different measures, or
another. can be carried out in more natural situations.
‣ The produces a graph with a ‣ Three alternative ways (i.e., other than a lab setting) of
flat line collecting data for correlational research are
‣ Naturalistic Observation; Archival Data; and Surveys
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Defining the Scope of the Observation Limits of Naturalistic Observation
‣ In naturalistic observation, there is an incredible wealth of ‣ Cannot be used to study all issues.
information. ‣ Less useful when studying well-defined hypotheses under
‣ It is tempting to want to study it all, in case you miss precisely specific conditions.
something important. ‣ Field research is difficult to do.
‣ In practical terms, we must limit the scope of the observations ‣ A negative case analysis may be necessary.
to focus on one or two behaviours that are relevant to the ‣ Examine the reasons why an observation is inconsistent with the
central issues of the study. general observations.
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Lecture Outline Quasi-Experimental Research
‣ Overview of Nonexperimental Research ‣ Quasi-experimental research resembles true experimental
‣ Correlational Research research (the independent variable is manipulated), but
participants are not randomly assigned to conditions or orders
‣ Quasi-Experimental Research
of conditions.
‣ Qualitative Research ‣ When people form their own groups, it is sometimes referred to as an
ex post facto design
‣ Quasi-experimental removes the directionality issue, but
confounding variables are not removed, so cause and effect
cannot be established.
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Figure 7.3 shows data from a hypothetical interrupted time-series study. The dependent variable is the numb
of student absences per week in a research methods course. The treatment is that the instructor begins public
taking attendance each day so that students know that the instructor is aware of who is present and who is absen
The top panel of Figure 7.3 shows how the data might look if this treatment worked. There is a consistently hig
number of absences before the treatment, and there is an immediate and sustained drop in absences after the trea
ment. The bottom panel of Figure 7.3 shows how the data might look if this treatment did not work. On averag
the number of absences after the treatment is about the same as the number before. This figure also illustrates a
advantage of the interrupted time-series design over a simpler pretest-posttest design. If there had been only on
measurement of absences before the treatment at Week 7 and one afterward at Week 8, then it would have looke
‣ There are several problems when trying to interpret pretest-posttest designs ‣ An extension of the pretest-
1. History posttest design is called the
‣ Things may have happened between the pretest and posttest that the experimenter has interrupted time series
no control over
design.
2. Maturation
‣ People grow, mature, and learn between the pretest and posttest ‣ In this study, participants are
3. Regression to the Mean measured multiple times
‣ Extreme measures tend to move towards the mean with repeated measurements prior to the treatment, and
4. Spontaneous Remission
then multiple times after the
‣ Many things improve over time without any intervention treatment.
Figure 7.3 A Hypothetical Interrupted Time-Series Design. The top panel shows data that suggest that the treatment caused a reduction in
absences. The bottom panel shows data that suggest that it did not.
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
5. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues in field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Combination Designs Lecture Outline
‣ A combination design uses both the pretest-posttest design ‣ Overview of Nonexperimental Research
and the non-equivalent groups design. ‣ Correlational Research
‣ One group (the treatment group) is given the pretest, the ‣ Quasi-Experimental Research
treatment, and then the posttest
‣ Qualitative Research
‣ Another group (the control group) is given the pretest, no
treatment or a placebo, and then the posttest.
‣ The important measure is whether or not the treatment group
shows more improvement than the control group.
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019
Data Analysis in Qualitative Research Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
‣ The difference between quantitative and qualitative research is not ‣ Often use both approaches in the same study.
so much in the methods used to collect the data, but in the methods ‣ This is called mixed-methods research
used to analyze the data.
‣ One approach is to use qualitative research to generate
‣ If we collect data using unstructured interviews, but then code the responses
and provided descriptive and inferential statistics, then it is quantitative
hypotheses, and then use quantitative research to test the
research. hypotheses.
‣ Analysis of qualitative research often uses techniques such as ‣ A second approach is to use triangulation, which uses both
grounded theory. techniques simultaneously to try to come to the same conclusion.
‣ The data is collected, and then a theory is developed based on the data. ‣ Both approaches are valuable and provide us with different ways
‣ Repeated ideas are identified and theoretical narrative is developed of understand or interpreting the same situation.
Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019 Psyc 201 — Research Methods in Psychology — Spring 2019