Pub How To Play The Scotch Gambit

How to play
the Scotch
Gambit
Erick Schiller
w, .", • group ofcbe", f.", woo He JIOdocilig new cbe" mo.t,"'1 W, hove members from .JllIIOum the
worll, belJlI';in;; to diff, rent Gulture, am ,!='~ diff,re rt hll';m;;". all OfllS joined byour GortrrOOn I"", for
cbe",1 W, oop' JDu will ,njoyourworkl
Sool"" l<1 ~ o de lYWim s ~ ojO<U I , que ,,;tom o, t",tondo de 1=<000 cir roel'O m.te<i ol COOlO ,,;t,,
de, ,,,rOoooo ct ler.,.." I=<0)'e cto, , de". Te<leffi O' m iembros de ctfe<e<te , l""Ie, ~ mco:fo , I=<o,,,,,,,te,
de ctler""es CU I L.<M , Ml>ondo ctler""e. ief1~s , lrIidos pc< ", e" ", po';';n pc< ~ ojoo:>' e ~ E,p.H.mos que
ct, h t ", de .". m """ r ~ de "",,,ro tr'""'iol
IfJDu"" inlere,\ed in jo ining us, or "rrl.nycomm,nl< drop us IIll ,mail.f: thocoi.. u...erl@pWL<orn
S< oio;luief1 ."uvie,.
n te.-.sodo '" lOr,. 01 ~_ "OS puode<1 . ,crlb ' 0: thocoissolou<n@gmoil.<om
"C.i... L... , .."

Dour To Play The
Seoteh
Gambit
Erie Schiller
How to Play the
Scotch Gambit
by Eric Schiller
Chess Enterprises
Coraopolis PA
1992
Chess Enterprises, Coraopolis PA 15108
Copyright © 1992 by Eric Schiller

All rights reserved.
Published 1992
Printed in the United States of America
95 94 93 92 5 4 3 2 1
ISBN: 0-945470-24-X
Editor: B.G. Dudley

Proofreader: Thomas Magar
Typesetting: M.L. Rantala for Chessworks Unlimited
Set in Palatino and Avant Garde by Adobe; and Reykjavik Laserfont

designed by Eric Schiller for Chess Laboratories, P.O. Box 3541, South
Pasadena CA 91030. .
The manuscript was prepared using NisuS™ 3.0 and Microsoft Word™
running on a Macintosh SEe ChessBasc 3.0 was employed in the
preparation of the data.
Manuscript completed October 31, 1991.

Revisions completed March 3 1992.
Contents
(")reface.............................................................................................1
Part One: Black does not play 4 ... Nf6!

Chapter 1: 4 ... Miscellaneous Replies by Black ...................3
Chapter 2: 4...d6 ...................................................................... 14
Chapter 3: 4 ... Bb4+ ................................................................. 22
Chapter 4: 4 ... 'Bc5 .................................................................... 33
Chapter 5: 4 ... BcS S.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7. Bd2 ...................37
Part Two: Black plays 4 ... Nf6!

Chapter 6: S.eS N g4 ................................................................ 52
Chapter 7: S.eS N e4 ................................................................ 67
Chapter 8: S.eS N e4 6.0-0 d5 .................................................71
Chapter 9: S.eS d5 ................................................................... 73
Chapter 10: S.eS d5 6.BbS Ne4 7.Nxd4 Bd7 .......................... 76
Chapter 11: S.eS d5 6. BbS Ne4 7.Nxd4 Bc5 ......................... 102
Preface
The Scotch Gambit (1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4!?)
is a grand old opening which has faded from popularity
with the rise of the Spanish Game (3.BbS). Nevertheless, it
remains an attractive opening at the club and amateur
level, since it provides good attacking chances and
practically guarantees a small positional edge as well.
In the 19th Century, it was a successful weapon for
Anderssen, Bird, Charousek, Morphy and Steinitz, among
others, and as the century turned Breyer, Marshall,
Schlechter, and Spielmann were among its practitioners.
It was so thoroughly analyzed that it fell from favor for
many years, until Yakov Estrin resurrected it in
correspondence play, and his Soviet colleague Evgeny
Sveshnikov reintroduced it to regular grandmaster praxis.
Tim Harding, in his 1991 revision of a book on the
Evans Gambit-which includes a Scotch Gambit system
against the Two Knights Defense-has helped to
revitalize the opening by discovering many improve-
ments for White, many original, and some buried in the
literature. I have tried to expand upon his analysis, and
have subjected it to critical review. As a result, I believe
that I have found additional resources for White. In
addition, this book surveys lines where Black does not
transpose to the Two Knights.
But the most important aspect of the Scotch Gambit is
its clarity of ideas, which makes it an opening which is
especially useful to intermediate level players who need a
sound opening with good winning prospects which does
not involve a great deal of memorizing theoretical
variations. This book helps to keep the opening simple by
1
2 How to Play the Scotch Gambit
choosing only the lines for White which fit into the same
conceptual scheme, where recurring positional themes
make it easy to absorb the fundamentals of the opening. I
also happen to think that these lines are the best that
White has in the Scotch Gambit.
This book is designed for players rated 1400 to 1800. I
have tried to include a great deal of explanation and have
extended previously analyzed lines to the point where the
evaluation should be clear to the reader. Many diagrams
are provided to aid the reader in following lines, and I
have tried to avoid extensive embedding wherever
possible.
The material in this book is available on disk in
ChessBase and Access format from ChessBase USA, 2153
Highway 35, Sea Girt NJ 08750.
Chapter 1
Miscellaneous Replies by Black
Maroczy-Porges
Nurnberg 1896
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Qf6?!
These early queen deployments never succeed in the

Scotch Gambit, because White is too well-developed.
4... Qe7 5.0-0 QcS 6.Qd3 g6 is another attempt to hang on
to the pawn, but it doesn't work. 7.c3! Bg7 8.cxd4 Nxd4
9.Nxd4 Qxd4 lO.Qb3! Nh6 11.Bxh6 Bxh6 12.Bxf7+ was
effective in Bonch Osmolovsky-Alatortsev, USSR 1962.
5~c3!?
Maroczy's notes indicate that simple castling would
have been better, so that the e-pawn could have advanced,
using the potential pin on the e-file.
5... BcS
6.0-0
Maroczy gives 6.eS!, but that seems a bit speculative.
6... d6
7.Nxd4 Nxd4
8.cxd4 Bxd4
3
9.Qb3 Bb6
lO.a4
White has compensation for his pawn, but only if he
keeps the initiative. An alternative plan would be to
continue development, and make use of dS. 10.Nc3! Ne7
11.Be3 0-0 (11 ... Bxe3? 12.fxe3 drops the pawn at £7.) 12.Bxb6
axb6 13.Nb5! with win of material. 13 ... c6 14.Nc7 Ra5
15.Qxb6 RcS 16.Bd3 and although the knight is trapped,
there is no way to get at it, and the Black attack is nothing
to worry about. 16 ... Ng6 (to stop f2-f4) 17.Rfcl Rxcl+
18.Rxcl Nf4 19.Bf1 Ne6 20.Nxe6 fxe6 21.a4 with a slight
edge for White.
10... Ne7
11.Khl Nc6
12.Bd2 0-0
12... aS!? might have been a useful interpolation.
13.a5 Bd4
14.Nc3 Bxc3
Practically forced, because of the weakness at dS.
15.Bxc3 Qe7
16.Bd5 Nd8
Or 16... Bd717.a6 bxa618.Rxa6 I{ab8 19.Qa3!
17.eS c6
17 ... dxeS?! 18.Rfel Nc6 19.a6!
Chapter 1: Miscellaneous Replies by Black 5
18.exd6 Qxd6
19.Be4 Be6
20.Qa4
Although White is still a pawn down his bishop pair
and active pieces give him sufficient compensation.
20... f5
21.Bf3 Qc7
22. Rfel ReB
23.BhS! Re7
24.Qh4 Kf8
Black can't bring his defensive forces closer to the king,
so he tries to bring the king closer to his pieces!
25.BeS Qd7
26.Qg3 g6
At least there is no pin on the g-pawn, part of the point
of Kf8.
27.Radl! Qe8
28.Be2 Nf7
29.Bd4?!
The bishop should have retreated to c3.
29... KgB
30.BhS f4
To avoid the destructive sacrifice at g6.
31.Qh4
Not 31.Qxf4? Bb3!
31... Rd8
32.Qf6 Rxd4!
That's why the bishop should have been posted at c3
instead of d4.
33.Rxd4 gxhS
34.IQ:f4 N d8
3S.Rf3 Rf7
36.Rg3+ Kf8
37.Qh8+ Ke7
38.Rg8 Rf8
Or 38 ... Qd7 39.Rxd8! Qxd8 40.Rxe6+ Kd7 41.Rd6+
winning the queen.
39.Qxh7+ Kd6
40.Rg7 Rf7
41.Qxh5 Qe7
42.Rg6 Kd7
43.f3
Black's king is surrounded by pieces and White cannot
win by direct attack.
43... Qf8
44.RgS Qd6
45. RgeS
Threatening Rxe6!
45... BdS
46.Re8 Qf6
47.R8e5 Kc7
48.Qg4 a6
49.Qg3 Ke8
50.Qg4+ Kc7
51.Qg3 Kc8
52.Qg5
The repetition was probably due to time pressure, as
White has every reason to play for a win.
52... QxgS
53.Rxg5 Kd7
54.Rg4 Ne6
55.Kg1 Nf4
The endgame favors White because he already has

passed pawns.
56.Re3 Kd6
57.b4 cS
S8.bxc5+ Kxc5
59.g3 Ne6
60.Rg6 NfB
61.RgS Kd4
62. Ree5 Rd7
Black did not fall for 62 ... Bxf3? 63.Ref5!
63.Rel Ne6
64.Rg4+ Kc3
65.Re3+ Kd2
66.Kf2 Rc7
67.Rb4 ReS
68.h4 Rxa5
69.f4 ReS
How to Play the Scotch Gambit
70.f5 as
71.Ra4 b5
72.Raa3!
The threat of Re2+ is worth more than the pawn at as.
72... Nf4
What else?
73.gxf4 Bc4
74. ReS Rc7
7S.RxaS b4
76.Rac5 RxcS
77.Rxc5 Kc3
78.f6 b3
79.f7 b2
80.f8Q blQ
81.Qf6+ Kd2
82.Qd4+ 1-0
Owens & Staunton-Horwitz & Loewenthal

London 1856
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Be7?!
This move is too slow, but it does not deserve the lack
of recognition it has been subject to in the literature.
S.O-O
5.c3 is an excellent alternative, since Black cannot
capture at c3: S... dxc3 6.Qd5! forced Black's resignation in
DeVisser-Jennings, New York 1922.
5... d6
6.Nxd4 Nxd4
7. Qxd4 Bf6
This is Black's idea-to develop the bishop with tempo
and keep control of eS while planning to develop the
knight via e7.
8.QdS
8.Qd3 was seen in a game between Cunningham and
Staunton as White and a team including Loewenthal as
Black, but the queen is not well placed there. Notes by
Staunton indicate that 8.Qe3 is best, but there is nothing
wrong with QdS.
8... Qd7
9.f4!
White gains further space, while there is no need to
worry about the a7-g1 diagonal. because neither the queen
nor bishop is in a position to exploit it.
9... c6
9 ... Nh6 IO.eS! dxeS 11.Qxd7+ Bxd7 12.fxe5 Bxe5 13.Bxh6
gxh6 14.Bxf7+ Kd8 15.c3 will be uncomfortable for Black,
though the bishop pair provides some relief.
10.Qdl Nh6
11.c3
Black has finally developed, but there is now a major

weakness at d6. White must not allow Black to release the
pressure with d6-d5 (12.£5?! d5!).
12.Na3 Qe7
13.Bd3!
The c4 square will be more useful for a knight which
will pressure d6 and keep an eye on e5.
13... g6
14.f5 Bg5
A major strategic concession which will lead to the loss
of the pawn at d6, but there were no attractive
alternatives.
15.£6 Qe5
16.Nc4 QcS+
17.Khl Bxcl
18.Qxcl!
The attack at h6 deflects the queen and the d-pawn

falls.
18... Qh5
18 ... Ng4 19.Be2 N£2+ 20.Rxf2 (20.Kg1 Nh3+ 20.Khl
Qgl+ 21.Rxg1 Nf2#) 20 ... Qxf2 21.Qg5 h6! 22.Qxh6 Qxf6 and
Black is better. White could play 19.Qd2 keeping all threats
open-Magar.
19.Nxd6 Rd8
20.Qf4 Bg4
21.Bc4 b5
22.Bb3 Rd7
23.Rf2 Rad8
24.Rd2 c5
25.Rd5! Qh4
Black's pinned and overworked pieces are no match

for the invaders.
26.Nxf7! Nxf7
27.Rxd7 c4
27... Rxd7 28.Qb8+ Rd8 29.Qxd8+
28.I{xd8+ N xd8
29.Rfl Ne6
29... cxb3 30.f7+ Kf8 31.Qd6+ Qe7 32.Qxe7+ Kxe7 33.f8Q+
30.Qb8+ Kf7
31.Qxa7+ KgB
32.Qb8+ Kf7
33.Qb7+ KgB
34.Qc8+ 1-0
Sfeinifz-Lang
Vienna 1860
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Qe7
This is less risky than 4 ...Qf6?!, but is also inadequate,

not because of the entombed Bf8, but rather because Black
has conceded control of the center.
5.0-0 Ne5
5 ... QcS 6.Qd3 g6 is another attempt to hang on to the
pawn, but it doesn't work. 7.c3! Bg7 8.cxd4 Nxd4 9.Nxd4
Qxd4 lO.Qb3! Nh6 11.Bxh6 Bxh6 12.13xf7+ was effective in
Bonch Osmolovsky-Alatortsev, USSR 1962.
6.NxeS Qxe5
7.c3!
Black is behind in development, and now White takes
control of the entire center. Black never gets time to bring
his pieces into the game. .
7... c5
7... dxc3 8.Nxc3 Bb4 9.Bxf7+! Kxf7 lO.Qb3+ Ke8 11.Qxb4
intending f4.
8.f4 Qf6
9.eS Qb6
10.Khl
A good prophylactic move, taking away any possible
counterplay on the diagonal.
10... Be7
11.f5 d5
Black must do something to free his game. If 11 ... d6,
then 12.e6! is very strong.
12.BxdS Nh6
13.f6 Bf8
14.Bxh6 gxh6
lS.Bxf7+!
White's advanced pawns are all the queen needs to
carry out the attack.
15... Kxf7
16.Qh5+ Ke6
17.Qe8+ KdS
18.cxd4 Be6
18 ... cxd4 19.Nc3+ dxc3 20.Radl+ Kc5 21.b4+ Qxb4
(21 ... Kxb4 22.Rhl+ KaS 23.Rxb6 axb6 24.Rf4 b5 25.a4) 22.Qd8
also looks very good for White.
19.Nc3+ Kc4
White's queen isn't really a major part of the attack

now-in fact, it is completely superfluous!
19 ... Kxd4 20.Qxa8 Bg7 21.Radl+ Kxe5 22.Rdel+ Kd6
23.Qxa7 Qxa7 24.Nb5+
20.d5!! Rxe8
21.Rf4+ Kd3
22.Rdl+ Kc2
22...Ke3 23.Rf3+
23.Rf2# 1-0
Chapter 2
4 ... d6
Charousek-Exner
Budapest IMatch 1896
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 d6?!
This move is so obscure that it isn't even in the books,

although it might be seen in amateur games. Black gets a
bad version of the Philidor or Hungarian J?efense.
5.Nxd4
White should capture immediately: 5.0-0 Bg4! 6.Bb5
Qf6 7.Bxc6+ bxc6 8.Qxd4 Bxf3 9.Qxf6 Nxf6 10.gxf3 h6=+
Rousseau-Stanley, New Orleans (m/2) 1845.
5... Nf6
The alternatives are not a whole lot better:5 ... Nxd4
6.Qxd4 Be6 is relatively best, though after castling White
retains his developmental and spatial advantage.5 ... Ne5?!
6.Bb3 c5 7.Nf3 Nxf3+ 8.Qxf3 Nf6 9.Bg5 Be7 lO.Nc3 0-0 11.0-0
Be6 12.NdS!+= BxdS 13.Bxf6 Bxe4 14.Bxe7 Qxe7 15.Qe3 Qe8!
16.Rfel Bc6 17.QgS with a slight initiative for White in
Rousseau-Stanley, New Orleans (m/8) 1845.
6.Nc3 Be7
14
Chapter 2: 4 .. .d4 15
7.0-0 0-0
8.£3
Since Black cannot get his bishop to the a7-g1 diagonal,
there is no weakness associated with this move.
8... ReB
9.Be3 BfB?!
Black is attempting to play pure defense, but after
White pins the Nf6 the bishop will have to return to e7,
so the immediate 9 ... NeS would have been better, though
after lO.Bb3 White would still have a clear advantage.
10.Qd2 Ne7
11.Radl Bd7
12.Bg5!
By threatening to cripple tIle Bl·.1ck pawns, White
forces his opponent to waste two moves to break the pin.
12... Ng6
13.NdS Be7
Now White can eliminate the important defender and

maintain the pin.
14.Nxe7+ Qxe7
IS.Rfel!
Both sides are fully developed but Black's pieces are
ineffective while White has placed every piece on an
optimal square.
15... Qd8
16.Bb5!
Charousek understands the value of a knight outpost
at f5. To obtain this, he will have to eliminate the enemy
bishop. The text cannot be met by 16 ... c6, because that
would critically weaken the pawn at d6.
16... Bxb5
17.Nxb5
Now Black must finally accept doubled pawns on the

kingside, because after 18.Bxf6 the queen must remain at
d8 to guard c7.
17... ReS
18.Bxf6 gxf6
19.Nd4!
Headed for the key square f5.
19... Qf8
20.Nf5 Rae8
21.Qc3!
The point of this move is not only to attack c7, but
more importantly, to create a pin on the ReS. Perhaps
Black should have accepted the inevitable here and played
21 ... RcS.
21... d5
22.Rxd5 RxdS
23.exd5 Rxe1+
24.Qxel
Chapter 2: 4.. .d4 17
The endgame is winning for White, not so much
because of the extra pawn at d5 but rather because the
kingside is so weak.
24... QcS+
25.Qe3 Qxe3+
25... Qxd5?? 26.Qe8+ Nf8 27.Ne7+; 25 ...Qxc2 26.Qe8+ NfB
27.Nh6+ Kg7 28.Qxf7+ Kxh6 29.Qxf8+ Kg6 30.Qe8+ Kg7
31.Qe7+ KgB (31 ... Kg6 32.Qe4+.) 32.Qxf6 Qdl+ 33.Kf2 Qxd5
34.a3 and White can win by advancing the h-pawn.
26.Nxe3
r-~IT---'''''''''
* -."1I: .... r~- ••
I W~i, ~f~J~ !~~n '~fI

~i 1i~: ~~l~~ff~i ;ICj.~
~J"r"
This endgame is a technical win-and Charousek

demonstrates that he has the necessary skills.
26... Kf8
27.Kf2 Ke7
28.Nf5+ Kd7
29.Ke3
Black's king is rendered harmless by the combination
of knight and PdS.
29... NeS
30.b3 c6
31.Ke4 cxdS+
32.KxdS Ng6
33.g3
The king has taken over for the pawn at d5, and the
Black knight is limited in scope.
33... Ne5
34.Ke4 Nc6
35.Nd4
Now the monarch heads for the kingside. Obviously
Black cannot exchange knights.
35 ... Ne7
36.c4 b6
37.b4 a6
38.a3 NcB
A clever move, inviting 39.Kf5? when 39 ... Nd6+ eats
up the queenside pawns.
39.Nf5 Ke6
40.h4 Na7
41.Nd4+ Kd6
42.Kf5
Now it is safe.
42 ... Ke7
43.a4 NcB
44.c5 bxcS
45.bxc5 Na7
46.h5 as
47.h6 1-0
Breyer-Fahrni
Baden 1914
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 d6 5.Nxd4 g6
19
This plan makes a little more sense than Exner's

5 ... Nf6, but it is not enough for equality.
6.0-0
A logical move, but to reach the modern lines of the
Philidor, White might have delayed this move and played
6.Nc3, keeping open the option of castling queenside.
6.Nc3 Bg7 7.Be3 Nf6 8.Qd2 0-0 9.Nxc6! bxc6 10.Bh6 Bxh6
11.Qxh6 Nxe4 12.Nxe4 ReB (12 ... d5 13.NgS and White
wins.) 13.Bxf7+ Kxf7 14.Qxh7+ Kf8 15.Qxg6 Qe7 16.f3 d5
17.0-0 dxe4 18.fxe4+
6 ... Bg7
7.Be3 Nf6
B.Nc3 0-0
9.Qd2 ReB
10.Rael NeS
11.Bb3
White has organized his pieces well, and Black is

behind in development and must be concerned about the
advance of the f-pawn.
11... c5?!
A sign of desperation early in the game. 11 ... Neg4!?
might have been wiser.
12.Ndb5 c4
13.f4! Neg4
14.Bxc4 Nxe3
15.Rxe3 Ng4
16.Rd3
Not only has White won one pawn, but he has
another one coming.
16... Qb6+
17.Khl Bxc3
18.Nxc3 Be6
19.Bxe6 fxc6
20.h3 Nf6
This has been pretty much forced, and now the two
extra pawns are easily converted int() an endgame victory.
21... Rad8
21 ...Qxb2 22.eS Nh5 23.g4 Ng7 24.Ne4 Re7 25.Nf6+ Kh8
26.Rd8+ Rxd8 27.QxdB+ ReB 28.Nxe8
22.Rxb6 Rxd2
23.Rxb7 Nh5
24.Rdl RedB
25.Rxd2 Rxd2
Chapter 2: 4 .. .d4 21
26.Rxa7 Nxf4
27.Rb7
And the a-pawn flies.
27 ... Nxg2
28.a4 Nh4
29.Rb3 Rxc2
30.NbS Rcl+
31.Kh2 Rc2+
32.Kgl Rcl+
33.Kf2 Re2+
34.Ke3 e5
3S.Kd3 ReB
36.aS I{a8
37.Ra3 Ng2
38.a6 Nf4+
39.Ke3 Ne6
40.a7 Kf7
41.h4 Ke7
42.Ra6 Kd7
43.Rd6+ Ke7
44.Rxe6+! Kxe6
45.Nc7+ Kd7
46.Nxa8 1-0
Chapter 3
4 ... Bb4+
Charousek-Porges
Nuremberg 1896
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Bb4+
White can respond to this with a strong, if typical,

pawn sacrifice.
5.c3 dxc3
6.0-0 c2
Black returns the pawn in the hopes of blunting
White's attack, but he remains too far behind in
developmen t.
7.Qxc2 Nge7
7 ... d6 8.a3 BaS 9.b4 Bb6 lO.Bb2 Nf6 of Staunton-Popert,
London (m/ 3) 1842 saw White gain the upper hand after
a decisive advance in the center: 11.eS! dxe5 12.Nxe5 Nxe5
13.BxeS 0-0 14.Nc3 Ng4 15.Bg3 QgS 16.Rael BfS 17.Qb3 Nf6
18.Re7 with compensation.
8.a3 BaS
9.b4 Bb6
10.Bb2+/- f6
10... 0-0 11.Qc3
22
Chapter 3: 4 .. .Bh4+ 23
11.Nc3 d6
12.NdS NxdS
13.Bxd5 Ne7
13 ... Bd7 intending Qe7, 0-0-0 was suggested by Tarrasch,
but as in the game, the queenside is hardly a safe haven.
14.Rfel c6
15.Bb3 Bg4
16.Nd4 Qd7
17.Qc4!
The light squares are simply too weak.
17... Rf8
17... 0-0-0 18.Qf7!? intending 19.h3. 18... BhS 19.Ne6.
18.h3 Bxd4
19.Bxd4 Bh5
20.Qc3 Bf7
Black has beaten back the initial attack, but his

development is hideous and his king is stuck in the
center.
21.Bc2 Be6
22.f4 b6
23.Bf2 0-0-0
The king escapes, but to territory which is every bit as
dangerous as the land he has fled.
24.a4! Kb7
25.Qe3 Kb8
25...Nc8 26.a5 c5 27.axb6 axb6 28.Qa3+-
26.bS NcB
26 ... c5 27.a5 NcB 28.axb6 axb6 (28 ... Nxb6 29.e5 gives
White more than enough compensation.) 29.e5 fxeS
30.Bh4! Rde8 31.Be4 dS 32.Bxh7 Rh8 33.Qxe5+ Qd6
(33 ... Nd6 34.Bg6 Rxh4 35.Bxe8) 34.Qxd6+ Nxd6 3S.fS Rxh7
36.Bg3+/-.
29.f51 dxe4?
Not 29 ... Bd7 30.exd5 QxdS 31.Bg3+ Nd6 32.13e4!+- but
29 ... Bf7!? would have held out a little longer.
30.BbS Qd5
31.fxe6 Qxe6
32.a5
Black has three pawns for t11e piece, but his king is still
under fire.
32 ... f5
33.axb6 Nxb6
34.Bg3+ Ka8
35.Bc7! Rb8
36.Qc5 Rfc8
According to Sergeant, Charousek actually announced
the mate in 5 here.
37.Qc6+ Qxc6
Chapter 3; 4 .. .Bb4+ 25
38. Bxc6+ Rb7
Now Black gets everything his position deserves!

39.Rxa7+!! Kxa7
40.Ral+ Na4
41.Rxa4+ 1-0
Kirste-Knorr
Correspondence 1990
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Bb4+ S.c3 dxc3 6.0-0 Qe7?!
7.a3 BcS 8.Nxc3 Nf6
A classical example of development conlpensating for

a missing pawn.
9.Bg5!
The pin allows White to occupy dS.
9... 0-0
IO.b4 Bb6
11.Nd5 Qxe4
11 ...Qd6 12.Nxf6+ gxf6 13.Qxd6 cxd6 14.Bxf6 ReB 15.Rfel
would not have been much fun, with the development of
the Be8 virtually impossible to achieve.
12.Nxf6+ gxf6
13.Bd3
It doesn't take much to see that the attack is going to be

brutal.
13.H Qg4
14.Bxf6 Qf4
15.BgS Qd6
16.Qc2 h6
17.Radl!
This is the kind of move one hates to encounter. The
queen is bound and gagged and waiting for the
executioner-and her mate has a similar fate!
17... Nd4
18.Nxd4 hxg5
19.Nf5 Qf6
20.Rfel d6
Finally, the bishop can join the game, but it is too late.
21.Ne7+ Kh8
22.Nd5 Qh6
23.Nxc7 RbB
23 ... Bxc7 24.Qxc7 Bg4 25.f3 BhS 26.Qxb7 Bg6 27.Qd5 Bxd3
28.Rxd3 Rad8 29.Re7 Qf6 30.Qd4 Qxd4+ 31.Rxd4+-
Chapter 3: 4 .. .Bh4+ 27
24.Qc3+ Qg7
25.Qxg7+
and Black abandoned the game, because after 25 ... Kxg7
26.Ne8+ the endgame is hopeless. 1-0
Kirste-Plath
Correspondence 1990
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Bb4+ 5.c3 dxc3 6.0-0 cxb2
7.Bxb2 f6? 8.a3 BaS
··i·~@~~~j *
~~ . .•.•. . ..U~
t -..,.:.~.
.....-P ................. ~~fl;;;fi1Ji1j
~:::=.J;...
l:···"" .:~: .::;:::::. ;.:.;;:.;(;:,::::{A:~:f'~:'

lj§i~ 11 mi~l.fl.1tm~i~L~j~~ _
9.Nl14!
Opening up a path to h5, and effectively ending the
game.
9... d6
9... g6 was necessary, though even then it isn't pretty.
10.QdS Nh6 11.e5 fxeS 12.BxeS Rf8 13.Bg7+-
10.Qh5+ Kf8
11.Qf7+# 1-0
Hopfer-Troester
Correspondence 1988-1989
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Bb4+ S.c3 dxc3 6.0-0 cxb2
7.Bxb2 Nf6
"
This seemingly solid position is also unfavorable for

Black.
8.Ng5 0-0
9.e5 Nxe5!
9... d5?! 10.exf6 dxc411.QhS h6 12.fxg7 Re813.Qxh6 +/-
9 ... h610.exf6 hxg511.fxg7 ReB 12.Qh5 +/-
9 ... NdS 10.QhS h6 11.Nxf7 l~xf7 12.Bxd5 Qe7 13.Bxf7+
Hopfer. 13 ...Qxf7 14.Qxf7+ Kxf7 15.a3 + / - -Analysis.
10.BxeS d6
The problem with this move is that the pawn occupies
a square which might otherwise be used by tile bish<.)p.
If lO ... dS!, then:
a) 11.Bd3 Ng4 12.Nf3 NxeS 13.Nxe5 Qf6 14.f4 c5!?
(14 ... Bc5+ lS.Kh1 g6 16.Be2=-Steinitz.) IS.a3 BaS 16.Qc2
+ / - -Analysis.; or
b) 11.Be2! This move was suggested by Steinitz. It
guards the important g4 square. 11 ... I3e6 12.Qc2 g6 13.Qb2
Be714.Qxb7+= cS 15.Nc3 h6 16.Nf3 +/- -Analysis.
11.Bc3 Bxc3
11 ... Bc5 12.Nd2 Ng413.Nde4+/-
12.Nxc3 Ng4
13.Qd2! Ne5
14.Bb3 h6
15.Nge4 BfS
16.Rfdl+=
Chapter 3: 4 .. .Bh4+ 29
Black's three pawns are not being used, and White's

pieces enjoy plenty of scope. Therefore White's chances
must be preferred.
16... Qe7?!
16 ... Qd7!?
17.NdS Qd8
cxdS
22.Rd3! Nxd3
23.Bh7+ Kh8
24. Bg6+
This is why the knight had to be deflected from e5.
24... KgB
25. Qh7+ Kf8
26.Qxf7+# 1-0
Schlechter-Nyholm
Baden 1914
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 BcS
This obvious developing move is met by a gambit

continuation which insures an initiative for White.
5.c3! d3
6.b4! Bb6
7.a4 as
7 ... a6 8.Qb3 Qf6 9.aS Ba7 10.0-0 d6. Necessary, since
10... NeS fails to Il.Nxe5 and 12.Bxf7+. 11.b5
a) 11 ... axb5 12.a6! bxa6 I3.BdS Bb7 (13 ... Nge7
14.Bg5+/-) 14.Rxa6! Bxf2+ 15.Rxf2 Rxa6 16.Ng5 with an
unstoppable attack;
b) 11 ... Ne5 12.Nxe5 dxe5 13.bxa6 bxa6 14.Qa4+! (A
fine move which disrupts the Black position, since the
bishop belongs at b7, not d7.) 14 ... Bd7 I5.Qdl Ne7
16.Qxd3+= Sveshnikov-A.Petrosian, USSR 1974.
Chapter 3: 4 .. . Bb4+ 31
B.b5 Qe7
8 ... Nce7 9.NeS dS lO.exd5 Nxd5 11.Nxf7 Kxf7 12.Qf3+
Ke6 13.Qe4++ / - and White recovers his piece with
interest.
9.0-0
White is better developed with control of the center

and more space.
9 ... Nd8
10.Nd4!
Headed for f5.
10... d6
11.NfS Qf6
11 ... BxfS 12.exfS Qf6 13.Qxd3 Ne7 14.Rel 0-0 15.Qe4 ReB
16.g4 and Black cannot escape the pin on the e-file. 16 ... h6
17.Ra2+/ - intending Ra2-e2.
12.Bxd3 Ne6
13.Qc2 Ne7
14.Nd2 Bd7
15.Nc4! Bc5
15 ... Nc816.Ba3 0-0 17.eS!+/-
16.Be3 b6
16 ... Bxe3 17.fxe3 Qg5 18.Ncxd6+ cxd6 19.Nxd6+ KfB
(19 ... Kd8 20.Nxf7++-) 20.Rxf7+ Kg8 21.Qf2 with compen-
sation.
17.f4! Bxe3+
18.Ncxe3 ReB
White's domination of the center and superior

development are decisive here.
19.eS! Nxf5
20.exf6 N xe3
21.Qe2 1-0
Chapter 4
4 ... Bc5
Sveshnikov-Kupreichik
Hastings 1984-5
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Bc5 S.c3 dxc3
If Black takes up the challenge, then White can react in

Romantic style.
6.Bxf7+!? Kxf7
7.Qd5+ Kf8
8.QxcS+ d6
8 ... Qe7 9.Qxc3 Qxe4+ 10.Be3 is well known to theory,
which holds that White has compensation whether Black
advances his d-pawn to d6 or dS. Unfortunately, few
players have dared to face this line over the board!
9.Qc4!?
White plays positionally, taking control of the light-
squares.
9... Bg4
10.Nxc3 Bxf3
Is it really wise for Black to give up a tempo and his
developed piece? White also gains the g-file for the attack.
11.gxf3 Qf6
33
12.£4! Qf7
Black would obviously like to exchange queens, but
White does not oblige.
13.Qb5 Nd4
14.Qd3 Ne6
IS.fS!
The dance continues, with each side gaining a little
initiative only to be beaten back. But already one must like
the White position, with more active pieces and a secure
position for his king.
15... NcS
Qc4
Nf6
18... ReB
19.f3+=
Black has gained time for development by targeting the
e-pawn, but now that square is under White's control and
Black has not solved the problem of his rook.
19... Ncd7
20.Rd4 Qc6
21.Khl Re7
22.Qe2 Ne5
23.Bg5!
The Black kingside is defended by knights, both of
Chapter 4: 4 .. .8c5 35
which are under attack.
23... Qc5
24.Rhdl Nc6
25.Rc4 Qe5
26.Nd5!
The pin allows White to bring his pieces to more
effective squares.
26... Rf7
Black breaks the pin, but it will cost significant
material, because d6 is under fire, protected primarily by
the pawn at c7, and that pawn is about to make a hasty
exit.
28.Nxc7! Rxc7
29.Bxd6+ Re7
30.e5! Nd7
31.f4
White is in no rush. His position is overwhelming,
and he is still effectively a rook ahead because the Rh8 is
out of play. Black tries to remedy this, but it is already too
late.
31... h5
32.Qd3 Rh6
33.Bxe7+! Kxe7
33 ... Qxe7 34.Qxd7 Qxd7 3S.Rxd7+-
34.Qa3+ Kf7
3S.e6+ Rxe6
3S ... Kf6 36.Rxd7 intending Rc3.
36.fxe6+ Qxe6
37.Qd3 Nf6
38.f5 QeS
The double exchange advantage is simply too much.
39.Rc2 KgB
40.Re2 QcS
41.a3 Kh7
42.Rg2 NeS
43.Qc2 Qe3
44.Rdgl Neg4
and Black resigned, presumably during adj()urnment
1-0
ChapterS
4 ... Bc5 5.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2
Aviles-Elzagheir
Novi Sad 01 1990
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 BcS 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+
7.Bd2 Qe7?! 8.0-0 Bxd2 9.Nbxd2 d6
~~ ~~ ~~j~~rf~~\.•~;:[If~ ~~i~
~; .:.:.,." ':.1:'' ' ' ' '.:.:. .:.: ':lII',' ,.:.,.:.:.
:'g:'
J.~ '~!f :[1 .®.:}~
~i ~::~.:)~}'~1:~: 1 ~~: ilIiri~~ :~: (. =::
This position is also much too passive, though Black

could have put up better resistance than in the game.
IO.Rel Bg4
11.Qb3 Rb8?
11 ... 0-0 12.Qxb7+/-
12.e5 dxeS
13.NxeS 1-0
Analysis based on Greco

1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+
7.Bd2
37
.\H How to Play the Scotch Gambit
7... Nxe4
7... d5 8.exdS Bxd2+ 9.Qxd2 NxdSl0.0-0 0-0 11.Nc3+=
8.Bxb4 Nxb4
9.Bxf7+! Kxf7
10.Qb3+ d5
11.Ne5+! KgB?!
11 ... Kf6? 12.£3 cS 13.fxe4 dxe414.0-0++-
11 ... Ke6 12.Qxb4 c5 13.Qa3! Suggested by Keres, but
Ravinsky later showed that the position is by no means
clear. 13 ... cxd4 14.Nf3 Qb6 15.0-0 Kf7 16.NeS+!+=-
Zagorovsky. (16.Rdl d3 17.NeS+ Kf6 18.Nxd3 Bg4 19.Rel
Qd4 unclear-Ravinsky.)
12.Qxb4 Qf6
13.0-0 c5
14.Qb5 b6
lS.Qe8+ QfB
16.Qc6 Ba6
17.QxdS+ Qf7
18.Qxf7# 1-0
Bastian-Eng
West Germany 1984
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 BcS 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+
7.Bd2 Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 dS 9.exd5 Nxd510.Qb3 Nce7
11.0-0 0-0 12.Rfel Nb6?!
Chapter 5: 4.. .Bc5 S.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 39
13.Bd3 BfS
14.Rxe7! Bxd3
IS.Rae1 Bg6
IS ... BfS 16.NgS (16.Nh4!) Bg6 I7.Ngf3 was equal in
Leonhardt-Suchting, Vienna 1908, but one senses that the
players were not in the mood for a fight.
16.Nh4 NcB
17.N xg6 hxg6
IB.R7e5+/-
19.Nf3
Black seems to have consolidated, but White's active

pieces are more than enough compensation for the pawn.
21.Qb4! f6
21 ... RaeB 22.Qh4!
22.Re7 QbS
23.Rxg7+!! J<xg7
24.Re7+ Rf7
2S.Rxf7+ Nxf7
26.Ne6+ 1-0
Nun-Sarwinski
Naleczow 1987
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 BcS 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+
7.Bd2 Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 dS 9.exdS NxdS 10.Qb3 Nce7
11.0-0 0-0 12.Rfel Nb6?! 13.Bd3 NedS
13 ... Nc6 14.Racl Kh8 lS.Bbl!+:::: with strong pressure on
the kingside.
14.Ne4 BfS
15.NcS Bxd3
16.Qxd3
".-.- .....
_..
White controls more space and has an annoying threat

at b7. Black's blockade at dS is useful, but the threat of a4-
as can weaken his control.
16... Rb8
17.NeS Nf6
17... c6 18.a4 Nb4 19.Qh3 as (Or else a4-aS and a knight
will enter at d7; if 19 ... Qxd4 20.Ned7 Nxd7 21.Nxd7 Nc2
22.Nxf8 Nxel 23.Qxh7+ Kxf8 24.Qh8+ Ke7 25.Rxel+ Kd7
26.Qxb8+-) 20.Re4+=
Chapter 5: 4 ... 8c5 S.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 41
18.Radl Qd5
19.a4
A queen is rarely a good blockader, and White not only
controls the dark squares in the center, but also has a good
grip on the light squares thanks to the more active
knights.
19... Nbd7
20.Qc3! c6
20 ... Nxc5 21.dxc5 Qa2 (21 ...Qe6 22.Nd7 Qxel+ 23.Qxel+-)
22.b3 Rbd8 23.Qc4 Rxdl 24.Rxdl Qb2 25.Nxf7! Rxf7
26.Rd8++-
21.b4 Rfe8
White exploits the overworked knight to retain the

initiative.
24... RfB
2S.N xb7 Qxd4
26.Qb3! Qb6
27.Nd6+
White's advantage is not only his superior pawn
structure, but also his pressure at f7 and control of the e-
file with a better endgame.
27... c5
28.Qdl!
White makes no attempt to hang on to his b-pawn, but
counts on the endgame to bring him success.
28... cxb4
29.Re7! Qd8
30.Qel Nf6
31.NfS
32.h3
33.Qe5!
35.Qg3 Nh5
36.Nh6+! Kh8
37.Nxf7+ KgB
38.Nh6+ Kh8
39.Qg5 Qc6
Now 40.QxhS fails to 40 ... Qd6+ 41.Qe5 QxeS+ 42.Rxe5
RxeS, but there is a killer move which deflects the Black
queen from the defense of e8.
40.Qd5!! Qg6
41.Nf7+ 1-0
Buckle-Anderssen
London 1851
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 BcS 4.c3 Nf6 S.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+
7.Bd2 Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 dS 9.exd5 NxdS 10.Qb3 Nce7
Chapter 5: 4 .. .BcS S.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 43
11.0-0 0-0 12.Rfel
This is the key position in the variation where Black

exchanges at d2. The best move is 12... c6, and others can
meet wi th disas ter.
12... Nf4
13.Re4!
14.Rael
15.Ne5!
I
,.:!.•.-:.~.l.._._.';I:T.'.J"":"_._ J
Black seems to be attacking, but the pressure at £7 is
much more important.
16.Bxf7+! Kh8
16...Rxf7 17.Qxf7+ Kh8 18.Qe8+
17.Nxg6+ hxg6
18.Qg3! Qxg3
19.hxg3 Rxf7
20.Rxf4 Rxf4
21.Re8+ Kh7
22.gxf4
Black is powerless against 23.Nf3, 24.NgS, 25.Rh8. 1-0
Rossolimo-Riceman
Puerto Rico 1967
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+
7.Bd2 Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 dS 9.exd5 Nxd510.Qb3 Nce7
11.0-0 c6 12.Rfel 0-0 13.a4 b6?!
This weakens the queenside pawn structure and Black

never gets time to consolidate.
14.Ne5! Bb7
IS.aS! ReB
16.Ne4 Qe7
Black's pieces have been driven back, and now the

kingside attack can begin.
18.Qh3! Nf4
19.Qg4 NedS?!
Chapter 5: 4 .. .Bc5 5.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 45
Black is moving his defensive forces away from the
king-not a good idea.
19 ... Nfg6 20.Nxf7 Rxf7 21.Bxf7+ Kxf7 22.NgS+ KgB
23.Qe6+ Kh8 24.Nf7+ KgB 2S.Nd6+; 19 ... Neg6 20.Nxf7 Rxf7
21.Bxf7+ Kxf7 22.NgS+ KgB though ugly, was relatively
best.
20.Ra3! Ne6
21.BxdS cxdS
22.Nf6+ Kh8
And now for one of the most picturesque finishes in

all of chess history:
23.Qg6!! Qc2
23 ... hxg6 24.Rh3+23 ... fxg6 24.Nxg6+ hxg6 25.Rh3+
24.Rh3 1-0
Sutterer-Hylkema
Baden-Baden 1987
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 BcS 4.c3 Nf6 S.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+
7.Bd2 Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 d5 9.exdS NxdS 10.Qb3 Nce711.0-0
0-0 12.Rfel c6 13.a4 Rb8?!
This move frees the Be8 from its defensive chores, but
with b5 under control of the White pieces it will not work.
14.aS! a6?
Missing the point.
15.Bxa6 b6
16.Bxc8 Qxc8
17.a6 Qg4
18.Ne5!
The invasion of the knight brings threats of many
forks, and a pawn is a small price to pay for the initiative.
18... Qxd4
19.Ndf3! Qb4
20.Qxb4 Nxb4
21.Nd7
22.N xb8 Rxb8

23.a7 1-0
Chapter 5: 4 .. . BcS S.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 47
Schlechter-Breyer
Baden 1914
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Bc5 S.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+
7.Bd2 Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 dS
8 ... Nxe4 9.Nxe4 dS 10.Qe2! 0-0 11.0-0-0 Bg4 12.h3 Bxf3
13.gxf3 dxc4 14.Qxc4 Qh4 15.Kbl!+ ' was seen in Mednis-
Fischer, USA ch 1964. Although Fischer eventually
outplayed his opponent, the position is objectively better
for White who owns the center and has a kingside attack,
while his own monarch is safe.
9.exd5 NxdS
10.Qb3 Nce7
11.0-0 0-0
12.Rfel
13.a4
The old move is the best move! Black defends the

queenside without creating any weaknesses.
14.Racl Qf4
15.Ne4
15.Re4 might be an interesting alternative, as the rook
might be effective on the h-file.
15 ... BfS
16.Nc5 b6
17.Nd3 Bxd3
18.Bxd3 1~ad8
This position is balanced, but the evaluation of full

equality seems a bit generous for Black, although it is hard
for White to make progress.
19.Rc2 Qd6
20. Rce2 Ng6
21.g3 Qb4
22.Qc2
22.Qxb4 Nxb4 23.Bbl was worth considering, intending
h2-h4.
22... Qd6
23. Bxg6 Qxg6
24.Ne5
This leads to a general liquidation of pieces and a dead
draw.
24 ... Qxc2
25.Rxc2 Nb4
26.Rc4 as
27.Nxc6 Nxc6
28.Rxc6 Rxd4
29.Rxb6 I{xa4
1/2-1/2
Sufferer-AI Awadhi
West Germany vs. Kuwait 1987
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 BcS 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4
Chapter 5: 4 .. .Bc5 5.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 49
t
We have now reached a position from the Italian

Game, where Black has good chances for equality, if he
plays very carefully.
6... Bb4+
6 ... Bb6?! 7.dS Ne7 B.eS Ng4 9.d6!+ / - was proposed by
Keres.
7.Bd2 Bxd2+
This capture is the standard move, as recommended by
most opening books ..
8.Nbxd2 d6?!
This is too passive. 8 ... d5! is the best defense.
9.d5 Ne7
10.0-0 Bg4
11.Qb3!
A standard reply, when the enemy bishop abandons
his queenside post.
11... Bxf3
12.Qxf3 0-0
13.Qb3!
13... Qd7
14.Rfel !
14.Qxb7 RfbS 15.Qa6 I~b2=+
14... Ng6
15.g3 Ne5
16.Bfl I{fe8
17.f4 Neg4
If Black could get to the a7-g1 diagonal he might be able
to do some damage, but this feeble attack is easily
repulsed.
18.h3 Nh6
19.Bg2 b6
20.g4+ / - Nhxg4
21.hxg4 Qxg4
22.Qf3 Qh4
23.Qf2 Qg4
24.Re3
Now White will have the better kings ide attack, as
well as the material.
24... Re7
25.Rg3 Qd7
26.e5 Ne8
27.e6! QbS
27...fxe6 28.dxe6 Qxe6 29.Bxa8
28.Qd4 Qe2
Chapter 5: 4 .. .Bc5 S.c3 Nf6 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 51
29.Bf3 (2b5
30.Ne4
and Black resigned because of the threat of 31.Nf6+
Nxf632.(2xf6. 1-0
Chapter 6
5.e5 Ng4
IIlescas-Sanz
Leon 1989
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS Ng4 6.Qe2 Qe7
7.Bf4 f6 8.exf6 Nxf6
~1~~~~I:l~\lt~~
~]~:~:lt'j\:'~ 1~:!.:)~j1I~: : i
~il~;t.:)fl~~::::::JI:j~~:~))*t::.::::J
~.ltl1lil.~. .Mntl'1·fn~I))j@~l
~§~~t 1) fii~jIj ~OIi m~lt} t\ ~
Gligoric gave his seal of approval to this m()ve in ECO,

but as we shall see the resulting variatil)nS are clearly in
White's favor.
9.Nbd2 d6
lO.Nb3 Bg4
11.Qxe7+ Bxe7
12.Nfxd4 Nxd4
13.Nxd4
White already stands better, according to Zagorovsky.
The center is balanced, with the Pd6 supporting the e5
square, but the Be7 lacks scope and the Nd4 is well placed
for action on either side of the board.
13... 0-0-0
52
53
13 ... d5! is preferred by Harding. 14.Bd3 c6 (14... 0-0-0 is

no better here than at the last move. 15.h3 Bh5 16.Nf5 BfB
17.Ng3 Bf7 gives White a slight advantage in mobility and
space, although I cannot agree with Sveshnikov.l who
considers the position after 15.h3 significantly better for
White; 14... c5 15.Bb5+ Bd7 16.Bxd7+ Kxd7 17.NfS is given
by Sveshnikov. 17 ... BfB 18.0-0-0 Kc6 19.Rhel gives White a
clear advantage, e.g., 19 ... Re8 20.Rxe8 Nxe8 21.Rel Nd6
22.Re6 Kd7 23.Rxd6+ Bxd6 24.Nxd6 RfB 25.Bg3+/-) 15.h3
Bd7 ( 15... Bh5 16.Nf5 BfB 17.Nd6+ Bxd6 18.Bxd6 Kd7 19.BcS
Rae8+ 20.Kd2 Ne4+ 21.Bxe4 l{xe4 22.Bxa7+=) 16.Nf5 BxfS
17.Bxf5 0-0 18.Be3 and the bishop pair gave White the
advantage in Sveshnikov-Berkovicll, Moscow Cham-
pionship 1983.
14.f3
Sveshnikov prefers 14.h3 followed by Ne6, which is
also a good plan.
14... Bd7
15.0-0-0
15.Ne6 Bxe6 16.Bxe6+ Kb8 is also better for White, but
there is no rush to obtain the bishop pair.
15... Rde8
16.Rhel d5
17.Bd3 Bd8
Black's lack of mobility forces him into passivity .
17... Bc5 18.Nb3 Bf2 19.Rxe8+ Rxe8 20.Rfl ReI + 21.Rxel
Bxel 22. Be3! creates a nasty threat of g2-g3, trapping the
bishop. If Black runs away, then White can safely go
pawn-grabbing on the queenside: 22 ... Bh4 23.Bxa7 b6
24.Ba6+ Kd8 25.g3 Bg5+ 26.£4 Bh6 27.Nd4 g5 28.fxgS Bxg5+
29.I<bl Ng4 30.h4 Bf6 31.Nf3+=
18.Be5 F:P
19.Re2 Rhf8
20.Rdel
*
White completely dominates the center, and can

operate on either wing.
20 ... a6
21.b4 Ne4
Black attempts to introduce tactical complications to
compensate for his positional disadvantages, but they do
not work.
22.Bg7 Nc3
23.Rxe8 Rxe8
24.Rxe8 Bxe8
25.Kd2!
A powerful pawn sacrifice which traps the Black
knight on the edge of the board.
25... Nxa2
26.c3 Bg5+
27.Kc2 Ncl
28.Bfl!
55
Black may have thought that his knight was going to

escape, but this move puts paid to that plan.
28... Ba4+
29.Kb2 Bdl
30.Be5 Bd2
31.g3 Be3
32.Nc2! Bd2
33.Bf4! Bxf4
34.gxf4 Ne2
Finally the knight escapes, but Black pays a very high
.
prIce.
35,Ne3! Nxc3
36.Kxc3 Bxf3
37.Bh3+ Kd8
38.Kd4
Black's pawns are no match for White's active pieces.
38... c6
39.Ke5 b6
40.Kd6 as
41.Nc2 axb4
42.Nd4 1-0
Estrin-Boey
10th World Correspondence Championship 1978
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS Ng4 6.Qe2 Qe7
7.Bf4 f6 8.exf6 Qxe2+ 9.Kxe2!
I·~:::::::;:
""~~
1 :::::::x * :::::.-::!
._ ~li1i .... ~: ~ __. ~ j,
. ::'I'-'~
IJI, !~~, tim ~t:;~ ~i! mi7

. """r·· .·.w.· _ .. ·.WO.". 11. " N• •••• til
:Jll!~ :iJI :::~! :;fr!;~

;d~~1(il@~t ·51:@~I·i·\~w~
w~tflfl ,; ; : ~~:@tj~:rtlJ
9... Nxf6
9 ... gxf6 IO.Bxc7
a) IO ... d6 II.BbS Bd7 12.Bxc6 Bxc6 I-larding gives
only I2 ... bxc6 13.Nxd4 with insufficient compensation.
13.Nxd4 Kd7 14.BaS (14.Nxc6 bxc6 IS.Ba5+=) Bxg2 I5.Rgl
Re8+ 16.Kd2 Bh6+ 17.Kc3 Nxf2 18.Rxg2 Ne4+ +/-;
b) 10 ... NgeS is suggested by Harding, who provides
the following analysis: 11.Bxe5! fxe5 (11 ... Nxe5 12.Nbd2
intending RhI-el, Ke2-fl.) 12.c3 dxc3 13.Nxc3+/- Harding
comments that even though the pawns are no longer
doubled, White has a lead in devel<.)pment and control of
dS. I consider the position a crush, because Black's pawns
are weak and he cannot develop confortably.
10.Rel d6
11.Kfl+ Be7
12.Nbd2
Chapter 6: 5.e5 Ng4 57
12... a6
12... Bd7 13.Nb3 h6 14.Nbxd4 g5 15.Bd2+= Georgadze-
Katalimov, USSR 1975. Black has significant weaknesses
at e6 and f5.
13.Nb3 bS
14.Bd3 Bd7
14 ... Bb715.NgS+/- Nd8 16.Nxd4 Be8 17.13f5
15.Nbxd4 Nxd4
16.Nxd4 Kf7
17.c4!
I ~~ . ~Ij~f --'-'il~t . . ill
:Z~:; ~:~l~':::.::i
..,......-.. . . . . . D. . . . . .,ll . .w.T....
l::I ~:;~:@i§·:i~~ :.·11Itl
17... Rhb8
Estrin provided the following analysis in Fernsehach:
17...b4 I8.cS! dxc5 19.Be4+ Kf8 20.Ne6+ Bxe6 21.Rxe6+/-
17... e5 18.Nf5 Bxf5 19.BxfS bxc4 20.Be6+ Kf8 21.Radl+/-
17 ... bxc4 18.Bxc4+ dS 19.Bb3 c5 20.Nf3 c4 21.NeS+ Kf8
22.Bc2+/-
18.Rael bxc4
19.Bxc4+ dS
20.Bb3 Rb4
21.BeS
White controls most of the critical squares in the
center, and now seeks to complete his domination by
undermining the support of d5.
21... c5
22.Nc2!
22.Bxf6 Kxf6 23.Bxd5 cxd4 24.Bxa8 Rxb2 is unclear
~~... c:4
23.Bxf6 Kxf6
23 ... Bxf6 24.Nxb4 cxb3 25.Nxd5 Bxb2 26.Rbl Be6 ~7.Rxb2

(~7.Rxe6? Kxe6 ~8.Nc7+ Kd7 29.Nxa8 bxa2!-/ +) Bxd5
28.axb3+-
~4.Rxe7! Kxe7
2S.Nxb4 cxb3
26.NxdS+ Kd6
27.Rdl BbS+
27...bxa2 28.Nb6++-
28.Ke 1 bxa2!?
28... Re8+ 29.Ne3+ Kc:5 30.Rcl+ Kb4 31.a3+ Ka4 32.Rc7!
Rg8 33.Rf7 intending Rf7-f4-b4 and the b-pawn falls.
29.Nb6+ KcS
30.Nxa8 Kb4
31.Nc:7 Kb3
32.Kd2!
Chapter 6: S.eS Ng4 59
White cannot save the b-pawn, so he brings his king
over to help with the defense. It doesn't matter whether
Black captures immediately, so he tries to help out his
kingside pawns.
32... g5
33.Ne6 g4
34.f4 gxf3
35.gxf3 Kxb2
t.,.,,,..•f .,.,.,.,.,. C...,.,.,.,.:/. . . ·,·,·,·>:·t '!'1

[~~W~;! ~;t~;~;~ b1 tt~~~j ftl_,
Now White c()mes up with a brilliant idea, based on

the fact that his f-pawn can be guided to the queening
square by the knight on its own.
36.Ral!! Bc4
36 ... Kxal 37.Kc1 and the f-pawn flies.
37.Nd4 as
38.f4
and Black resigned. Harding gives further: 38 ... a4
(38 ... Kxal 39.Kcl a4 40.Nc2#) 39.f5 a3 40.Nc2 Bb3 41.f6 Bf7
42.Rel Bg6 43.Re7? but now he has the incomprehesible
43 ... Bxc2 44.Rxa2+, which is clearly illegal. 43.Nal! is the
correct path to tIle win. 43 ... Bbl 44.f7 Kxal 45.Kc3 h5 46.f8Q
h4 47.Qf6 h3 48.Kb3#.
Sveshnikov-Kuzmin
Tashkent 1980
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS Ng4
6.Qe2 Qe7 7.Bf4 d6
hO How to Play the Scotch Gambit
7... b5 8.Bb3! Suggested by Otto Hardy, but the analysis
needs to be extended. 8 ...Qb4+ 9.Bd2 QcS IO.O-O! Ngxe5?
11.NxeS Nxe5 (11 ... Qxe5!? Given a ? by Harding, perhaps
unfairly. 12.QxeS+ Harding stops here with lIetc." I but it
isn't quite that simple. 12... NxeS 13.Rel d6 14.Bd5 Rb8 15.f4
f6 Black will have three pawns for the piece, but White
can retain a small edge. 16.fxeS dxe5 17.h4+= intending c3.)
12.Rel d6 13.f4 d3+ 14.Qf2 Harding stops here. 14 ... Qxf2+
IS.Kxf2 dxc2 16.Bxc2 f617.Nc3 c6 18.fxeS dxe519.Be4+/-
8.cxd6 Qxe2+
9.Bxe2 Bxd6
lO.Bxd6 cxd6
1] .Na3
r··i rrml!····ri;t····';:;"l···r
r
f ;:;;>
wrtr t ~~ff~~ ~~~I""'j
:1
nt]S'~¥M:;<~':}:t~;'llf~
Black has tried a number of moves in this position.
11... BfS
Alternatives are considered in the game Hug-Gorla.
12.NbS! 0-0-0
13.Nbxd4 Nxd4
14.Nxd4 Bd7
15.Bxg4!
This forcing sequence has established a positional
advantage for White, since the knight is an effective
blockader of the isolated pawn, and there is often the
threat of NbS, attacking a7 and d6.
15... Bxg4
16.f3 Bd7
17.Kf2 Rhe8
18.Rhdl!
White does not want to exchange rooks yet. Even
though the knight is clearly better than the bishop, the
rooks are still needed to put pressure on d6.
18... ReS
19.Rd2 Rde8
20.Radl Kc7
21.Ne2!
Now the knight begins its journey to d5, which will be
reinforced by the advance of the c-pawn.
21... Bc6
22.b3 1{8e6
23.c4 as
24.h3 Rf6
25.Nc3 g5
26.a3
More preliminaries-Whi te advances his a- and b-
pawns.
26 ... h5
27.b4 g4
28.Nd5+!
28... BxdS
29.RxdS
The rook ending is much better for White.
29... axb4
30.axb4 gxf3
31.gxf3 Rfe6
32.Rld4 Rg6
33.f4!+/- RxdS
34.Rxd5 h4
35.Rg5! Re6
35... Rxg5 36.fxgS Kc6 37.Ke3 dS 38.c5 b6 39.Kd4+-
36.Kf3 Rel
37.RfS Rgl
37... Re7 38.Kg4+-
38.Rxf7+ Kc6
39.b5+ Kb6
40.f5! Rg3+
41.Kf4 Rxh3
42.Rd7 Rhl
43.Rxd6+ Kc5
44.Rd7 Kxc4
45.Rxb7 h3
46.Kg3 h2
47.Rf7 Kxb5
Chapter 6: S.e5 Ng4 63
48.Kg2 Rgl+
49.Kxh2 RgB
50.Kh3 KcS
51.Re7 RgS
52.Re5+ Kd6
53.Kh4! Rgl
54.Re2+- Kd7
5S.KhS RgB
56.Kh6 1-0
Hug-Gorla
Bad Rogaz 1991
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS Ng4 6.Qe2 Qe7
7.Bf4 d6 8.exd6 Qxe2+ 9.Bxe2 Bxd610.Bxd6 cxd611.Na3
11... NgeS
11 ... a6 12.Nc4 Ke713.Nb6 Rb8 14.Rdl Nge5 15.Nxd4 Be6
16.0-0+= Nesterenko-Zimmerman, Correspondence 1963.
11 ... Be612.NbS 0-0-0 13.Nfxd4 Rhe814.0-0 Nf61S.Radl+==
d6 is a weak square, Hromada-Adams, Correspondence
1977.
12.Nb5 Nxf3+
This is an attempt to improve on a previous game
which saw White obtain an easy ending after:12 ... d3
13.Nxe5
a) 13... dxe2
h,1 How to Play the Scotch Gambit
al) 14.Nxd6+! Ke7 15.Nxc6+ Kxd6 (15 ... bxc6
16.Nxc8+ Raxc8 17.Kxe2+/-) 16.Nd4 ReS 17.Nxe2 BfS
18.0-0-0++ /-;
a2) 14.Nxc6 bxc6 15.Nc7+ Kd7 16.Nxa8 Ba6 17.b3
d5 18.Rel RxaB 19.c4 dxc4 20.bxc4 ReB 21.Rc2 Re4 22.Rxe2
Rxe2+ 23.Kxe2 Bxc4+ 24.Ke3 Bxa2 25.Ral BdS 26.Rxa7++=;
b) 13 ... dxeS 14.Bxd3 0-0 15.0-0-0+== Lebovich-
Umansky, Kaluga 1968.
13.Bxf3 Ke7
14.0-0-0!+ /-
fi-{¥@? i f~~i~~!-' --ti~~~fJ --"Ti~1
f'ii.: ff.J~:::: .t:i~:)ll~:'!'.l
There is no rush to reclaim the pawn. White's superior

pawn structure guarantees his positional advantage.
14... NeS
15.Rhel f6
16.Rxd4 Rd8
17.Be4! Bd7
18.Nc3
Now Black decides to part with a pawn to relieve the
pressure and establish some counterplay, but the
investment does not payoff.
18... Kf7
19.Bxb7 Rab8
20.BdS+ Kf8
21.Bb3
The White king has more than enough protection.
21... BfS
22. Red 1 Rb6
23.h3 h5
24.f4! Ng6
25.NdS
Even if White didn't have an extra pawn, his complete

control of the center and powerful outpost at d5 gives him
a tremendous game.
25... Rc6
26.Ne3 Be8
27.Nc4 Ke7
28.Ba4 Rc7
Now the d-pawn falls, and the rest is simple.
29.Nxd6 Kf8
30.Nxc8 Rdxc8
31.Rd8+ Rxd8
32.Rxd8+ Ke7
33.Rd4 Nh4
34.g4 Nf3
3S.Re4+ Kd6
36.Re3 Nd4
37.Rd3 Kc5
38.Rc3+ Kd6
39.Rxc7 Kxc7
40.Kd2 hxg4
How to Play the Scotch Gambit
41.hxg4 Nf3+
42.Ke3 Nh2
43.g5 Kd6
44.Bb5 Ng4+
45.Kf3 f5
46.Bd3 Ke6
47. Bc4+ Kd6
48.Bf7 Nh2+
49.Ke2 Ng4
50.BhS 1-0
Chapter 7
5.e5 Ne4
Kupreichik-Belyavsky
USSR Championship 1981
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS Ne4 6.0-0 Be7
6 ... Nc5!? is an interesting, and perhaps undervalued
alternative, since the knight can take up a solid position
on e6. 7.Nxd4
a) 7 ... Nxe5? 8.Rel;
b) 7 ... Ne6!? is suggested by Harding. 8.Nxe6 dxe6
(8 ... fxe6 9.Rel BcS 10.Qh5+ g6 11.Qh6 looks better for
White, since pressure at f2 can be eliminated by Bcl-e3.)
9.Qxd8+ Nxd8 lO.Nc3 a6 11.Be3 and White is way ahead in
development as space.;
c) 7 ... Nxd4 8.Qxd4 d6?! (8 ... Ne6 9.Qg4 d6 10.Rdl!?)
9.Bf4 d5
cl) 10.Bxd5! is stronger, as noted by Zagorovsky:
10 ... BfS (lO ... c6? 11.Bxf7+ Kxf712.Qxd8);
c2) 10.Qxd5 QxdS 11.BxdS Bf5 12.b4 c6 13.bxcS cxdS
14.Nc3 0-0-0 brought Black equality in Kuzmin-
Romanishin, Tallinn 1979.
7.c3
67
7... dS
7... dxc3 8.Qd5 leads to immediate disaster.
8.Bb3 Nc5
8 ... dxc3 9.BxdS cxb2 lO.Bxb2 Nc5 11.Bxc6+ bxc6 12.Nd4 is
suggested by Harding. I think that White has
compensation for the pawns. 12 ... Bb7 (12 ... Bd7 13.Qf3 Rb8
14.Nxc6 Bxc6 15.Qxc6+ Qd7 16.Qxd7+ Nxd7 17.Bc3 and the
weak pawn at c7 will become a target . White will place his
knight at e4 and one or two rooks on the d-file.) 13.Qf3
Qd714.Rdl.
9.cxd4 Nxb3
10.Qxb3 Rb8
This is a typical idea introduced by Chigorin almost a
century ago. The rook acts as a defender of tlle pawn, and
can support a later advance. Now Bc8-e6 will be possible.
11.Nc3 Be6
12.Be3 0-0
13.Rad11+=
White is better here because he can olav on tho

Chapter 7: S.e5 Ne4 69
kingside, while Black has no source of effective
counterplay.
13... NaS
14.Qc2 Bg4
15.Qe2 Nc4
It is not clear that Black achieves anything by sending
the knight on such a long journey to eliminate the Be3.
The plan is to eventually undermine the White center
with c7-cS, but it is very slow.
16.h3 Nxe3
17.Qxe3 Be6
18.Nh2! £6
18...b619.f4 c5 20.f5 cxd4 21.Rxd4 Bc5 22.f6! Bxd423.Qxd4
g6 24.Qh4 h5 25.QgS+-
19.exf6 Rxf6
20.Nf3 Qd6
21.Rdel+/-
The control of the e-file, and especially the eS-square,
gives White a clear advantage.
21... ReB
22.NeS Bf8
23.f4 c5
24.Khl Qb6
Black creates threats at d4 and b2, but the White attack
continues unabated.
25.Ng4 RfS
26.Qg3
White threatens 27.Nh6+.

26... Kh8
27.Ne3
Now the d-pawn falls.
27... Rf7
28.Nexd5 Qc6
29.dxc5 Bxd5
30.Rxe8 Bxg2+
30... Qxe8 31.Nxd5 and Black is just two pawns down.
31.Qxg2 QxeB
32.Ne4 Qd7
33.Qf3
The bishop has no scope and the rest is just a mopping
up operation.
33 ... h6
34.Rdl Qc6
35.Rd8 Kh7
36.Kh2 Be7
37.Rd3 Bxc5?
38.Rc3 Qb6
39.Rxc5 Qxb2+
40.Kg3 Qd4
41.Rc2 1-0
Chapter 8
S.eS Ne4 6.0-0 dS
Estrin-Sadomsky
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS Ne4 6.0-0 d5
7.BbS Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.Nxd4 c5
;I~~ :::~\jj~!f~I[~/:f.\jJ.~l:~!.1
<t~I:.,,:·:·I·w, :·:·>:·:·*·:&(:·,,, 1 .J
l§~~f 1.) t1Si~ rr fJm ~ llcl1...
.,.r••
J
This advance weakens the dS-square, and White can

take advantage of this quickly.
lO.Nb3 c6
11.c4! dxc4
11 ... d4 12.f3 Ng5 13.f4 Nc4 (13 ... Ne6 14.£5 Nc7 lS.e6!-
Estrin.) 14.Rel BfS (14 ... f5 15.ex£6) 15.g4
12.N3d2 Nxd2
13.Nxd2 Be6
14.Qa4 Qb6
71
Now if 15.Nxc4 Black can achieve equality with

15 ... Qb5! But White is in no hurry to go after the weak
pawns, since the enemy king is exposed. 14... Bd5 15.Nxc4
Bxc4 16.Qxc6+! Ke717.Qxc5+ KeB 18.Qxc4
15.Qc2! Qa6
Black should have developed his Bf8 and castled
instead of worrying about pawns.
16.Ne4 0-0-0
16 ... Be7 17.Be3 Qb5 IB.f4 DdS 19.Nc3 Qb4 20.f5 with a
strong initiative.
Qb5
Rd5
Now White finishes with a simple tactical trick.

19.Nxf7! Bxf7
20.QfS+ 1-0
Chapter 9
5.e5 d5
Tseitlin-Yuneyev
Leningrad Championship 1979
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS d5 6.BbS Nd7
This is simply too passive and White gets a good game

by straightforward means.
7.0-0 Be7
7... Bc5 8.BgS Be7 9.Bxc6 bxc6 (9 ... Bxg5 lO.Nxd4 bxc6
11.Nxc6 and the queen is trapped.) 10.Nxd4! Bb7 (10 ... Bxg5
11.Nxc6 as in the previous note.) 11.Bxe7 Qxe712.f4 with a
strong initiative for White. 7... Nb6 8.Nxd4 Bd7 9.e6!
creates many weaknesses in Black's position. 9 ... fxe6
10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.QhS+ g6 12.QeS Rg8 13.Nxe6 and the threat
of a double check leads to a win for White. (Analys:s by
Harding.)
8.Bxc6 bxc6
9.Nxd4 Nb8
9 ... Nxe5? 10.Bf4 Ng6 11.Nxc6 Qd7 12.Nxe7 Kxe7
13.Rel+ Kd8 14.Bg3 gives White a clear position, as he can
pry open the central files.
lO.Nc3
10.£4 cS (10 ... Ba6 II.ReI (with the threat of e5-e6) 11 ... cS
I2.NfS Bf8 13.Nc3 and White has a very strong game.)
73
11.Ne2 is considered better for White by Kasparov (BCa
II). 11 ... g6 12.Nbc3 c6 13.Ng3 and Black will be unable to
prevent the advance of the f-pawn, Salygo-Mizkevich,
Correspondence 1965.
10... 0-0
10... c5 11.Ndb5 c6 12.Nd6+ Bxd6 13.exd6 0-0 (13 ...Qxd6?
14.Rel+ Be6 15.Ne4 Qe716.BgS Qf8 17.c4! (playable because
of the mate threat at dB) 17... d4 18.b4 cxb4 19.Qxd4 Nd7
20.Nd6+#) 14.Bf4 Be6 15.Qd2 Nd7 16.Rfel Nb6 17.b3 NcB
18.Na4 and the pressure in the center gave White a clear
advantage in Barczay-Smejkal, Raach 1969.
11.Qf3 Qd7
12.h3 RdB
13.Rel Na6
14.e6!
With the Black forces lying passively on the queenside,

a combinative finish is unleashed.
16.Nxg7!! Rf8
16... Kxg7 17.QhS Rf8 18.Bh6+ KgB 19.Re3!
17.Qh5 Kxg7
18.Bg5 Bd6
19.Bh6+ Kh8
20.Bxf8 Bxf8
21.Re8 Bb7
Chapter 9: 5.eS d5 75
22.Rxa8 BxaB
Black's bishop is truly pathetic, and his king is still in a
desperate situation.
23.Rel Bb7
24. ReB KgB
25.Ne2
The threat is simply Ne2-g3-fS-h6.
25... Qf7
26.QgS+ Qg6
26 ... Kh8 27.Qe5+ KgB 28.Ng3 NcS 29.NfS
27.Qd8 Qd6
28.Qg5+! Kf7
29.I{d8 Qe7
30.QfS+ KgB
31.Rd7 Be8
32.Qg4+ Bg7
33.Rxe7 Bxg4
34.hxg4 1-0
Chapter 10
S.eS dS 6.BbS Ne4 7.Nxd4 Bd7
Malinin-Ibragimov
Voronezh 1991
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS dS 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 Bxc6 9.0-0
9... Bd7!?
9 ... Bc5 10.f3 Ng5 11.f4 Ne6 12.c3 Bb5 13.I~f2 Bxd4 14.cxd4
c5 15.dxc5 Nxc5 16.Nc3 with a clear advantage for White
thanks to the weak Pd5, Vooremaa-Rozhdestvensky,
Estonia 1965.
10.f3 Ng5
11.Nc3 c6
12.f4?!
This seems to lead by force to a good game for Black.
12.BxgS Qxg5 13.f4!? would have maintained the
initaitive, though at the cost of the bishop pair.
12... Ne6
13.Kh1
Because White no longer has the pawn advance c2-c3
to protect the d4-square, he is forced to allow exchanges
which benefit Black.
76
Chapter 10: S.eS d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bd7 77
13... Nxd4
14.Qxd4 Bf5
15.Be3 Qd7
16.Rf2 h5
17.b4 Be7
White launches a minority attack as demanded by the
structure, but Black is attacking quickly on the other wing.
18.b5 h4
bxc6
h3
21... O-O!
Black has delayed castling long enough to make it clear
in which direction the king must flee.
22.Kgl Rfb8!
After serving its purpose on the h-file, the rook now
grabs the only open file on the queenside.
23.Nc5 Bxc5
24. QxcS RbS
25.Qd6 Qb7
26.e6
Desperation.
26... fxe6
27.Bd4 c5
28.g4 Bxg4
29.fS cxd4
30.Qxe6+ Qf7
31.QeS ReB
32.Qg3 Re4
33.Kfl Qf6
0-1
Tamm-Niedermaier
Bundesliga 1984
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS d5 6.BbS Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 Qh4
The Black queen is needed for defense, and there is no

real kingside attack against White's solid formation.
10.f3 NcS
11.Be3
11.£4 is a reasonable alternative. Estrin gives the
following line: 11 ... g6 12.Be3 Ne6 13.Nd2! intending N2f3
or N2b3. 13... Nxd4 14.Bxd4 cS 15.e6!
11... g6
12.Nc3
White's idea is similar to that of the previous note
except that f3-f4 is delayed until the e4-square is covered.
12... Ne6
13.Nxe6 Bxe6
Chapter 10: 5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bd7 79
14.Qd2 Bg7
15.f4
The desired structure is achieved. White's Be3 is

actually better than the Bg7 and the critical squares d4 and
c5 are firmly under control.
15... 0-0
16.BcS Rfe8
17.Rael £6
Since the Ra8 is tied to the defense of the a-pawn, there
was no way to improve the position before taking this
decisive measure.
18. Bd4! fxeS
19.Bxe5 BxeS
20. Rxe5
White keeps capturing with a piece, rather than with
the pawn, because he owns the e-file and wants to be able
to play f4-f5 later.
20... Bf7
21.Rfel Qf6
22.Na4!
Black is invited to exchange rooks, but White issues a
reminder tha t the knigh t is much stronger than the
bishop in any endgame.
22 ... Rxe5
23.Rxe5 ReB
HO How to Play the Scotch Gambit
24. Rxe8+ Bxe8
25.Qe3!
The endgame is clearly much better for White, who

dominates the only open file and has a much more
cohesive pawn structure.
25... Kf7
26.Qxa7 Qxf4
27.Qf2
Now White has a passed pawn as well, and the minor
piece endgame is easy.
27... Qxf2+
28.Kxf2 Ke7
29.Nc5 g5
30.a4 Kd8
31.aS Kc8
32.Ke3 Bg6
33.c3 h5
34.Ne6 Kb7
35.Nxg5 c5
36.Ne6 Kc6
37.a6 Kb6
38.Nxc5 Kxc5
39.a7 Be4
The last trick fails, since 40 ... d4+ is met by 41.cxd4 with
check!
40.a8Q 1-0
Bryson-Alarcon
Novi Sad Olympiad 1990
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS dS 6.BbS Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 g6
10.f3 Nc5
11.£4 Ne6
12.b3
Black can rarely afford to weaken his position like this.
12.fS!? is also good: 12 ... Nxd4 13.Qxd4 Bxf5 14.e6! f6 15.Nc3
Bg7 16.Rel Qe7 17.Qa4 and White's more active pieces
give him a clear advantage, Shipov-Solintsev, Moscow
1964.
12... Bc5
13.Be3 0-0
14.Nc3 Qe7
15.Qd2 Bb4
Otherwise White plays Na4 and c3.
16.a3! Bxa3
17.Nxe6 fxe6
18.Na4
The Ba3 is a virtual prisoner.
18... Rf7
19.c3 Bd6
White was preparing to play b4, after which the
execution would soon take place.
20.exd6 cxd6
._. [~Im~~~ ·tJ1HI~~
.
r-lf~IHI~I -·-·,rJ~~~
~~: 1~~ .1: ~Iri ~~~~~f!.:i
t~~I~~~~ 1 f \l 1 tti~ 1 ~tt~
.,~,.,pJ . .,Jat.7..,ftJ .~~:

i~§l Jiltl.]f!~~ ij. ~~f . _J
21.Nb6!
Exploiting the pin and bringing the game to a rapid
conel usion.
21... Rb8
22.Rxa7 Qd8
23.Rxd7 1-0
Chapter 10: S.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bd7 83
Okhotnik-Didishko
Eger open 1989
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.8c4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS d5 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 Be710.f3 Nc5 11.£4 Qb8
A recent attempt to improve play for Black, but it does

not succeed if White reacts correctly on the queenside.
12.fS Qb6
13.a4!
This gains important space on the queenside. Black
should probably limit the amount of territory allowed to
White by playing 13 ... a5.
13 ... O-O-O?!
14.a5 Qa6
15.Nc3 I~he8
16.Qf3!
Black is suffocating here, with virtually no
counterplay.
16... g6
16 ... Bf8 17.Bg5 Be7 18.Bxe7 Rxe7 19.Qg3 is very strong
for White.
17.Be3 Qc4
18.Bf2
White threatens to trap the wayward Black queen.
18... Ne4
16.a3! Bxa3
17.Nxe6 fxe6
18.Na4
The Ba3 is a virtual prisoner.
18... Rf7
19.c3 Bd6
White was preparing to play b4, after which the
execution would soon take place.
20.exd6 cxd6
~~~ m'l~r~~l\;:':::~/'~I~T~[l
pi ",,:::(J~::":::::~l::::": ..... ::::::::::l
21.Nb6!
Exploiting the pin and bringing the game to a rapid
concl usion.
21... Rb8
22.Rxa7 Qd8
23.Rxd7 1-0
Okhotnik-Didishko
Eger open 1989
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS d5 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 Be710.f3 Nc511.f4 Qb8
:'~.f,,-.-..-..-,,", *
A recent attempt to improve play for Black, but it does

not succeed if White reacts correctly on the queenside.
12.f5 Qb6
13.a4!
This gains important space on the queenside. Black
should probably limit the amount of territory allowed to
White by playing 13 ... a5.
13 ... O-O-O?!
14.aS Qa6
15.Nc3 Rhe8
16.Qf3!
Black is suffocating here, with virtually no
counterplay.
16... g6
16... Bf8 17.Bg5 Be7 18.Bxe7 I{xe7 19.Qg3 is very strong
for White.
17.Be3 Qc4
I8.Bf2
White threatens to trap the wayward Black queen.
18... Ne4
84
18... Bf819.Ncb5! cxb5 20.b3 Qb4 21.c3

19.e6! fxe6
20.fxe6 Bc5
21.exd7+ Rxd7
22.Radl!
This leads to a queen sacrifice which results in a
material advantage for White.
22 ... Nxf2
23.Qxf2 I{f8
24.Qxf8+ Bxf8
25.I{xf8+ Kb7
25 ... Rd8 26.I{xd8+ Kxd8 27.Kh 1 WOllld be a fairly easy
win for White.
26.Ne6!
This sets up Na4, since Qxa4 will be met by Nc5+.
Therefore White will be able to establish a knight at the
strong square c5.
26... c5
27.Na4 Rd6
28.NaxcS+ Kc6
It was perhaps worth a pawn to gain some space for the
king, but since the Rd6 has nowwhere to go Black is still
lost.
29.Rc8 Rxe6
Forced.
30.Nxe6 Kd6
31.Rxc7! Qe2
32.Rc6+! KeS
Not 32... Kxc6? 33.Nd4+.
33.Ral ?!
33.I{xdS+! was the most efficient route to victory:
33... Ke4 (33 ... Kxd5 34.Nf4+ Kxc6 35.Nxe2) 34.Rc4+! Qxc4
(34 ... Kxd5 3S.Nf4+ Kxc4 36.Nxe2) 3S.Rd4+ Qxd4+ 36.Nxd4
Kxd4 37.c3+ Kc4 38.b4 Kxc3 39.bS+-
33... h5
34.h4 Qe4
3S.Rfl Qxh4
36.Nf4 Qg3
37.I~e6+ 1-0
Carr-Horne
Guernsey 1987
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Nf6 S.eS dS 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 Be710.f3 Nc5 11.f4 Ne4
Here Harding prefers 12.f5 as the main line, but I feel

confident that this developing move offers White
excellent chances at no risk.
12.Nc3 Nxc3
12... c5 13.Nb3 Nxc3 14.bxc3 c4 15.Nd4 cS 16.Ne2 Bc6
17.Be3 is better for White, since Black must devote all of
his attention to holding his precarious central pawns.
17... Qd7 I8.fS! d4 19.cxd4 QdS is only a chimera. There is
no real attack because Black can muster no force to add to
the battery of queen and bishop. 20.Nf4 Qe4 21.Qf3! cxd4
22.Qxe4 Bxe4 23.Bxd4 0-0-0 24.e3 Bxf5 25.Nh5 g6 26.Ng7!
Be6 27.Nxe6 fxe6 28.Bxa7 with an easy win in the endgame
in Biro-Zsinka, Budapest 1985. 12 ... fS!? was suggested by
Keres. Harding doesn't comment, but I don't see the reply
to the simple advance of the e-pawn. 13.e6 BeB 14.Nxc6
a) 14 ... Nxc3 15.bxc3 Qd6 16.Nxe7 Kxe7 17.Qd4 Rg8
18.a4! Qxe6 19.Ba3+ Kf7 20.Rael Qd7 21.Re7+ Qxe7 22.Bxe7
Kxe7 23.QxdS Bd7 (23 ... Be6 24.Rel) 24.Rel ++-;
b) 14... Qd6 15.Nxe7 Nxc3 16.Nxf5 Nxdl 17.Nxd6+
cxd618.f5! g6 19.Rxdl gxfS 20.Rxd5 Bxe6 21.Rxd6 Ke722.B£4
and the bishops of opposite colors can't save this one!
13.bxc3 c5
13 ... Bc5 also failed to bring equality in Stanciu-Kovacs,
Dublin 1969. 13 ... 0-0 transposes to previously games
analyzed above.
14.Ne2 Bb5
Because Black has not yet castled, White can simply

continue his aggression on the e- and f-files.
IS.fS! d4
16.cxd4 cxd4
17.Rf3
Avoiding 17.Qxd4? Bxe2.
17... BcS
18.Khl
White eliminates Black's only threat, and despite the
seemingly active bishops Black is in deep trouble, because
his king is exposed and the d-pawn is weak.
18... Bc6
19.Rg3 Qd5
Again we see this attacking theme-and again it is
useless because there is no way to increase the pressure.
20.Nf4! Qe4
20 ... QxeS 21.Nd3 Qd6 22.Bf4 Qf8 23.Bxc7 Kd7 24.Be5 f6
25.Nxc5+ Qxc5 26.Rxg7++-
21.Nd3 Be7
22.Qfl!
White carefully guards all of his assets while preparing
to develop the Bel and play Ral-el.
22... 0-0-0
The Black king will never be safe in the center, nor on
the kingside. But now White can attack along the b-file.
23.Rbl h5
24.h3 g5
25.f6! Qh4
The bishop has no good retreat.
25 ... Bf8 26.Bxg5 Bh6 27.NcS! with Qa6+ to follow.
26.fxe7 Qxg3
27.exd8Q+ l<xd8
28.Kgl
Now White is simply a piece ahead.
28... f6
29.NcS Rd5
30.Qa6+ Kd8
31.Bf4 gxf4
32. Qxc6 Qe3+
33.Khl 1-0
Edelman-Vucic
Manhattan 1989
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Nf6 S.eS dS 6.BbS Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 Be710.f3 Nc5 11.f4 0-0 12.fS
Ne4 13.Nc3 Nxc3 14.bxc3 cS 15.Nb3 c4 16.Nd4 f6
An attempt to improve on previous theory.

16 ... Re8 17.Qf3 cS 18.f6!
a) 18 ... gxf6 19.Bh6! I<h8 (19 ... Bf8 20.Bxf8 Kh8 21.exf6
Chapter 10: S.eS d5 6.BbS Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bd7 89
[even better is 21.BxcS-Magar1 cxd4 22.Qg3+-) 20.exf6 Bxf6
21.Qxf6+ Qxf6 22.Rxf6 cxd4 23.cxd4 Be6 24.Rf4 and White
retains a strong attack, according to Estrin.;
b) 18... cxd4 19.fxe7 Qxe7 20.cxd4 Be6 21.Qg3 and
White's superior bishop gave him the advantage in
Estrin-Polyak, 1954. 16 ... BcS 17.QhS £6 18.e6 Be8 19.Qh4
Qe7 20.Rf3 Rb8 (Cited by Harding as a game Berezin-
Goldberg) 21.Be3! (Suggested by Estrin) 21 ... Rb2 22.Rh3 h6
23. Bxh6!-Harding.
17.e6 Be8
18.Qg4
Black's plan has led to a disastrt)us position. The pawn
wedge ties down the pieces and the White knight has an
excellent post at d4. All that is needed now is a successful
kings ide attack.
18... h5
19.Qg3 Bd6
20.B£4 Bxf4
21.Qxf4 c5
A major concession, as now the Pd5 is very weak.
22.Ne2 Qb8
23.Rabl Qe5
The endgame after 23 ... Qxf4 would have been quite
hopeless for Black.
24.Qd2!
24.QxeS fxeS 2S.Rb7 d4 26.Rc7 d3 27.cxd3 cxd3 28.Ng3 h4
29.Ne4 BhS 30.RxcS Be2 31.Rf2 Rab8 provides some
counterplay.
24... Bc6
2S.Rbel Qd6
26.Nf4
White's play is logical-he takes control of the
important e-file and puts more pressure on dS. There is
no pOint in trying to save the doomed h-pawn.
26... d4
27.NxhS Rfe8
28.Rf4 Re7
29.Rg4
Threatening Nxf6+. The pin on the Pd4 paralyzes
Black.
Black thinks that he has avoided Nxf6+, but he hasn't!

30.Nxf6+! gxf6
31.Rh4+ KgB
32.Qh6 1-0
Okhotnik-Zaid
USSR 1978
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 BcS 10.f3 Ng511.f4
11... Bg4
11 ... Ne612.Be3
a) 12 ... f6 13.Kh1 Nxd4 14.Bxd4 Bxd4 15.Qxd4 0-0
16.Nd2 Qe7 17.c4+=;
b) 12 ... Bxd4 13.Bxd4 0-0 Harding-W.Cummings,
Correspondence 1986. 14.a4+=;
c) 12 ... Bb6 13.a4 as Grobe-Turk, Correspondence
1984. 14.Nf5!-Harding. 14 ... 0-0 (14 ... Bxe3+ 15.Nxe3 0-0
16.c4+=) 15.Bxb6 cxb6 16.Nd6+==;
d) 12... 0-0 13.c3 f5 14.Nd2 Bb6 15.b4+= Bxd4? 16.Bxd4
Nxd4 17.cxd4+/- See Messere-Nyman for the conclusion.
12.Qxg4 Bxd4+
13.Khl Ne4
I-Ilt
$""' ··--lW;
:"r.;;;;: ,.m.. * ~f~1 ·-··I~I···¥··~~~
,~t /.{.,.,.!:~ .~.,.,.,.:: :~
~. ·.R.·I~:[~r.i."l. l~ · . 'i\~1a
·~l
/~ ~~~ .fJ Hlt
~w
·Im]
,w,.•
.....
,f~~tl b\ JJ@~i
"f.).·.
n ...
14.Qxg7!?
14.Nd2 may be best. 14 ... Nf2+ 15.Rxf2 Bxf2 16.Qxg7 Rf8
17.Nf3 Qd7 18.Qg5 Sveshnikov-Barrera, Cienfuegos 1979.
The Black bishop will find it difficult to make a contribu-
tion and White can develop his remaining pieces quickly.
14... Qh4
15.Nc3 0-0-0
16.Nxe4 dxe4
17.Qxf7?!
A bit too greedy. Zaid and Gufeld show that there was a
better way: 17.Qg5! QxgS 18.fxgS Bxe5 19.c3 Rd3 20.Bf4!
Although they do not provide an evaluation, the
weakness of the Black pawns makes it clear that Black has
an uphill struggle. The rook ending would be awful:
20 ... Bxf4 21.Rx£4 ReB 22.Rxf7 e3 23.Rel (23.Rxh7? e2 24.Rel
Rd1-+) e2 24.Kgl Rd1 2S.Kf2 Rd2 26.Rxh7 Rxb2 (26 ... Rf8+
27.Ke3+-) 27.Rf7 Kd8 28.g6 Rxa2 29.g7+-
17... Qg4-/ +
*
Black has more than enough compensation for his

pawns.
18.f5
18.Qb3 Rhg8! 19.Qh3 Qxh3 20.gxh3 e3 21.Re1 e222.Bd2
Bxb2 23.Rabl Rxd2 24.Rxb2 Rd1 25.Rbl Rxbl 26.Rxb1 Rd8!-
+-Zaid and Gufeld.
18... RhgB
19.Qe6+ Rd7
20.g3
Chapter 10; 5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bd7 93
Now 20 ... Rg6! would have sealed the victory, but

instead Black blunders.
20... e3??
21.Qxc6!
The mate threat at a8 is enough to turn the tide.
21... Kb8
22.Bxe3 Bxe3
23.Rael
and now the pawns decide.
23... Bd2
24.Re4 Qg7
Or 24...Qh3 25.QbS+ Ka8 26.Rh4+-.
25.c3 as
26.QbS+ 1-0
Sveshnikov-Milos
Rio de Janeiro 1985
1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.Bc4 Nf6 S.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8. Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 Bc5 lO.f3 Ng5
11.f4 Ne4 12.Be3 Bb6!
This is the critical variation.

13.Nd2 Nxd2
13 ... c5 14.N4b3 d4?! (14 ... Nxd2 transposes to the main
line.) 15.Nxe4 dxe3 16.c4! BfS is given by Harding, who
now gives the illegal 17.Nb3. He presumably means
17.Ng3. 17.Ng3 Qxdl 18.Raxdl Bc2 19.I{del Bxb3 20.axb3
0-0-0 21.Rxe3 Rd2 22.Re2 Rd3 23.Rf3 Rdl+ 24.Kf2+/-
14.Qxd2 c5
15.Ne2 d4
16.Bf2
Black's dark-squared bishop is a mere spectator and

although theory claims the positions lead to unclear play,
I think White has the better chances.
16... 0-0
16... Bc6 17.c4 Qc8 18.Qd3?! (18.h3!? makes more sense,
in view of what follows. White can continue with Bf2-el
and Nd2-g3, for example: 18 ... QfS 19.Bel Qe4 20.Ng3 Qg6
21.f5 Qh6 22.Qxh6 gxh6 23.NhS+/-) Qg4 19.Bg3 g6 20.h3 Qf5
21.QxfS gxfS unclear Fernandez-Westerinen, Alicante
1989.
17.c4 f5
The alternative 17... f6 is examined in Fernandez-
Boudre.
18.a4 as
Harding indicates that this is an interesting move, but
it seems almost forced because the alternative weakens
the d6-square.18 ... c6 19.a5 Bc7 20.b4 cxb4 (20 ... Qe7 21.bxc5
QxcS 22.Qxd4+/-) 21.Qxb4 Rb8 22.Qc5+=
19.h3 Bc6
20.Kh2 Qd7
21.b3 Rae8
22.Bh4!
"-' ......
.~ .Of ..•...• -,.... .
'~"'"i'''
@~ r.;$ ~n~[!:rli'!. r~t ~

."""'...." .,11. ..·.·r'' '·· ..... <It····
rlJ ~~ fA: ~:~~t@~ ~~ ilr::::~
,~ ~~ ~i1 :jt :~)I* l!~ ~ifJ:nt
••• ...... ••••• -JY~' .. ..... u •••• ) ..........
;~~t~~~ ~~ ..........
_i..J:.:
.••-:.",' .... a ••••••_••••
~~~~r~~ R ?'~~
f)_...... ~. u ••••••••••
;~ !;~ ~tt~ Jf~~~~! § t~~t~!
22... Qf7
23.Ng3 Bb7
24.Radl Qg6
25.Qe2 Kh8
26.Rd3
The position is very complex. But White's advantages
are of a more permanent nature, involving the pawn
structure. Given the blockades, though/ it is difficult to see
a clear plan to make progress.
26... Qc6
27.NhS Re6
28.Rg3 Rg6
29. ReI Rxg3
30.Nxg3 Qe6
31.Rdl Bc6
32.Rd3 Be8
This takes away the entry square at h5.
33.Nhl!?
The intention is presumably to station this knight at
d3.
33... Bc6
34.Bel Bb7
35.Rg3 Bc6
36.Bd2 Bd7
37.Rg5 Qf7
38.Nf2 Be6?!
Not good, because it allows the White queen to take
command of the a8-h 1 diagonal.
39.Nd3
39... Qe8
40.Qf3!Bd7
41.Qg3 Qe7
White cannot make any progress this way, so he tries
another tack.
42.Qel Ra8
43.Bcl ReB
44.Bd2 Ra8
Having pinned down the Black rook to the defense of

the pawn, White can now launch a kingside attack.
4S.g4! Qf7
46.gxf5 Bxf5
47.Qe2 I{b8
48.Rg3 Qe7
49.Nf2 Rf8
SO.Ne4 Qd8
51.Ng5 Qe7
51 ... h6!? 52.Qh5?! (S2.Nf3 and White can try the same
plan as in the game.) Qe8 53.Qh4 c6 and White cannot
make progress.
52.Qel h6
53.Nf3 Rb8
54.Rg2 Qf7
55.Nh4!
Now White zeroes in on the weakness at g6.
55... Bh7
56.Qg3 ReB
57.f5! c6
57... Bxf5?? 58.NxfS Qxf5 59.Qxg7#
58.e6 Qf8
59.Bxh6! 1-0
Fernandez-Boudre
Pau 1988
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.8c4 Nf6 S.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 BcS 10.f3 Ng5 11.f4 Ne4
12.Be3 Bb6 13.Nd2 Nxd2 14.Qxd2 c5 15.Ne2 d4
16.Bf20-0 17.c4 f6?!
This plan is logical, but leads to disaster.

18.Bh4! g5
Or else exf6 will be very strong.
19.fxg5 fxeS
20.Ng3
intending Ng3-hS-f6.
20... Be8
21.Rxf8+ Kxf8
22.Rfl+ KgB
23.Ne4!
There is another path to f6!
23... Bg6
24.Nf6+ Kh8
2S.Bg3
Black resigned, since the e-pawn falls, or if 2S... e4, then
26.Be5 creates too many potential threats, as the Black king
cannot get away from the diagonal. 1-0
Mansurov-Sagalchik
Roslavl 1989
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS dS 6.BbS Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bd7 8.Bxc6 bxc6 9.0-0 Bc5 10.f3 NgS
11.f4 Ne4 12.Be3 0-0
White has a good game, if he can just eliminate the

threats along the a7-g1 diagonal and finish his
development.
13.Nd2 f6
Alternatives are examined in Kijk-Bokan.
14.N xe4 dxe4
15.Qe2 Qe7
15... Bg4! is better, but White still manages to obtain a
superior position. 16.Qf2
a) 16 ... QdS? 17.Nxc6! Ba3 (17 ... Bxe3 18.Ne7+ Kh8
19.Qxe3 Qd7 20.QcS fxeS 21.fxeS intending Ng6+.) 18.exf6
Rxf6 19.NeS Qxe5 20.fxe5 Rxf2 21.Bxf2 Bxb2 22.Rael Bf5
23.BcS g6 was played in Sveshnikov-Keres, USSR
Championship 1973. Now with 24.g4! Bxg4 25.Rxe4 BfS
tOO How to Play the Scotch Gambit
26.Re3 White would have obtained a clear advantage.;
b) 16... Qe8 17.Nb3 Bb6 (17... Be7?! 18.Bd4 as 19.Qe3 £5
20.NcS! Bxc5 21.Bxc5 Rf7 22.Qb3+= Keffler-Gibbs, Corre-
spondence 1978.) 18.c4 Bxe3 19.Qxe3 Qg6 (19 ... fxeS 20.Qxe4
exf4 21.Rxf4 Qxe4 22.Rxe4 Bf5 23.Re7 Rf7 24.Rxf7 Kxf7
2S.Nd4+=) 20.Rael fxeS 21.Qxe4 exf4 This position, from
Bredewout-Karaklajic, Beverwijk 1967, has been evalu-
ated as even, but Harding is correct in his analysis which
shows an that in the endgame White will stand better:
22.Qxg6 hxg6 23.Re7 Rac8 24.NcS reducing the scope of the
Bg4 and threatening h2-h3. 24 ... g5 25.Rfel+=
16.Qc4+
16.Nb3!? suggested by Estrin, also gives White a good
game.
16... Kh8
17.Rael ExeS
18.Nxc6! Bxe3+
19.I{xe3 Bxc6
20. Qxc6 Qb4
21.b3
Once again White's better pawn structure gives him
the better game.
21 ... Rad8
22.Rxe4 Qd2
23.f5! Rd4?!
24.QcS! RfdS
Chapter 10: 5.e5 dS 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bd7 101
25.Qxe5 Rxe4
26.Qxe4+/- h6
27.h3 1-0
Chapter 11
5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Ne4 7.Nxd4 Bc5
Kijk-Bokan
Tallinn 1989
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Nf6 S.eS dS 6.BbS Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bc5 8.0-0 Bd7 9.Bxc6 bxc6 lO.f3 Ng5
11.f4 Ne4 12.Be3 0-0 13.Nd2
13... Nxd2
13... f5 14.Nxe4 fxe4 (14 ... dxe4 15.Qe2 and Black has no
compensation for the doubled pawns.) 15.Qd2 Qe7
(15 ... Bb6 16.Nb3 as 17.a4 Qe7 18.Kh1 += Vistaneckis-Uusi,
Vilnius 1960.) 16.Nb3 Bb6 17.Qc3+ / - with control of c5,
Okhotnik-S.Sokolov, USSR 1981. 13 ... Qe7 14.Nxe4! dxe4
15.Qel Bb6 16.Nb3 c5 17.Qf2 c4 18.NcS+=-Harding.
14.Qxd2 f6
14 ... Qe7 15.Nb3 Bb6 16.Rae1 BfS (16 ... f6? 17.e6! Bxe6
18.Bxb6 axb6 19.f5) 17.Qe3 and again White controls c5 and
thereby gains the upper hand, e.g., 17 ... Qd7 18.Bc5 Rab8
19.Rf2! Rfd8 20.Rd2+= Adorjan-Kluger, Hungarian
Championship 1966.
15.Nf3!?
IS.Rfel is also good: 15 ... fxeS 16.fxe5 Bb6 17.e6 Be8
102
Chapter 11: 5.eS d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bc5 103
18.Nxc6 Qd6 was played in Belinkov-Donchenko,
Moscow 1963. Here Estrin points out that White can win a
pawn. 19.Qxd5! Bxe6 (19 ... Qxd5 20.Ne7+ Kh8 21.Nxd5 Bxe6
22.Bxb6 Bxd5 23.Bxc7 Rac8 24.Re7 Rf7 25.Rael Rxe726.Rxe7
Bxa2 27.Be5+/-) 20.Qxd6 cxd6 21.Bxb6+-
15... Bb6
16.Rael fxeS
17.NxeS
:'J(JIf··:·~·Jll1.ji~~
1:¥£Y ~:l/i.jil:~:l~ M~:~:~::fjli\~l~~
Iiill~' ;'@~~Fl~~ ffj]F~~;: @Jit:;~~'l
,··tt" _. ~: : : : l
z§> -,.' ::::::::::
~~!:! ~~fl: ~mll: f ! ~ j .

\ni] fi1§ :. ·"'~~11 'r j~j ~. ,.~
, . : ~ i
It:.:.;a. __ .loU -I""~"_ M~1"
White has a dominating position in the center and can

work against the weak pawns.
17... Be8
18.c3 c5
19.Rdl c6
20.Qf2 Qd6
21.a4! I{f6
21 ... aS?! 22.b4!
22.a5 Bxa5
23.Bxc5 Qb8
With Black's forces in disarray and far from the White
can now go on the attack.
24.Ng4! Rf7
25.Qg3 Kh8
26.NeS Rf6
27.h4 Bb6
2B.Qe3 BxcS
29. QxcS Qb6
30.Rd4 QxcS
31.bxcS
Despite the passed pawn, it is simply a matter of good
knight vs. bad bishop here.
31... Re6
32.Ral gS
33.g3 gxf4
34.gxf4 Bg6
3S.Kf2 as
36.Rda4 Rf6
37.Ke3
The key to White's advantage is his ability to use the
dark squares in the center.
37... Raf8
38.Rfl
38.Rxa5?! Rxf4 39.Nxc6 Re4+ 40.Kd2 Rf2+ 41.Kdl BhS+
42.Kcl Rel+
38... RaB
39.Rf2 Be4
40.Rfa2 Kg7
40 ... Raf8 41.RxaS Rxf4 42.Nxc6 Rf3+ 43.Kd4 Rd3+
44.KeS Rxc3 45.Ne7 ReB 46.Kd6+ / -
41.Rxa5 Rxa5
Chapter 11: S.eS dS 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bc5 105
42.Rxa5 Rh6
43.Ra7+ KgB
44.Kd4 Rf6
45. Ra8+ Kg7
46. Ra7+ KgB
47.Rc7 Rxf4
48.Nxc6 Rf2
49.Ra7 Rd2+
50.Ke5 Rc2
51.Ne7+ Kf8
S2.c6 Bg2
53.c7 Bh3
54.NfS Re2+
S5.Kf6 ReB
56.Rb7 Bfl
S7.Rb8 Ba6
58.Nd6! 1-0
Messere-Nyman
7.Nxd4 BcS 8.0-0 Bd7 9.Bxc6 bxc6 10.Be3 0-0 11.f3 Ng5
12.f4 Ne6 13.c3 f5 14.Nd2 Bb6 15.b4 Bxd4
16.Bxd4 Nxd417.cxd4 Qe7
18.Nb3!
A very strong positional pawn sacrifice which achieves
the goal that runs thematically throughout the games in
this section-the control of c5.
18... Rfb8
18... Qxb4 19.Nc5 Be8 20.I{bl Qa5 21.Rb7 Qxa2 22.Rxc7
Rf7 23.Rxf7 Bxf7 24.e6 Be8 25.Qd3 g6 26.g4! fxg4 27.£5+ /-
19.a3 Rb6
20.Rf3 Be8
21.Qc2 g6
22.Rc3
White's game almost plays itself.
22... Ra6
23.Qd3 Rb6
24.Racl RabB
25.NaS
1- rll--l~~~~~~ -. PW{• f~~~1
~{f:t~i~~;;ff.~·~
1mirlff[~mill:'~:lQf~
[1!~r~~/Uili~t§if~lti\~~i~flmM@~
,w·'.fg,t··-·..¥.};:~:······"'IX;\'t·····t·:·>:·l
,Siiipt@ii~M"~{t.i;~~'lI(;
And the pressure pays off.

25... Qe6
Chapter 11: 5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bc5 107
26.Qc2 Ra6
27.Nxc6 Rbb6
28.Na5 c6
29. ReS h6
30.Qd3 Qd7
31.Qh3 Qg7
Black is completely immobilized, and his rooks cannot
get back to the kingside so White goes for the jugular.
32.g4 fxg4
33.Qxg4 Bd7
34.Qh4 g5
35.fxg5 hxg5
36.QhS+ / - g4
37.Rfl Rb8
38.Rf6 1-0
Estrin-Brglez
7.Nxd4 BcS 8.Be3 Bxd4
IIfr
I 1~~fI5'l~l~11~l/l~~
. . . '" ..
~ "'""ii~ .... . . . . . . . . "-"'. .,
~,
H~~~~i ~:@I~l.l ~~f: l~M m~! ~l@ll

:::~~I! ~ ;~/I ::~::l~~·
:::::i~t u:· .:: ::::::::;:: ~...!
:: ::: ZJ
9.Qxd4
9.Bxd4!? 0-0 (9 ... Bd7!? may be stronger.) 10.Bxc6 bxc6
11.Nd2 Qg5!? A bit fancy. Perhaps Black should simply
capture at d2. 12.Nxe4 dxe4 13.Qd2 Qxd2+ (13 ... Qxg2
14.0-0-0+/-) 14.Kxd2+= as suggested by Shneider and V.
Gurevich.
9... 0-0
10.Bxc6 bxc6
11.Nc3 NgS
11 ... BfS 12.Nxe4 Bxe4 13.0-0 is suggested by Harding,
who notes that the most important positional factor is
White's control of c5. 13... Qd7 (13 ... Bxc2?! is the only move
considered by Harding. 14.Rfcl+/-) 14.c4 Rfd8 15.f3 Bf5
16.Rfdl+= (Analysis). 11 ... Nxc3 12.Qxc3 Qd7 13.0-0-0 Ba6
14.h4+= White's attack was more effective in Espig-
Walter, GDR Championship 1973.
12.Qa4 Bd7
White's control of the dark squares makes it safe for

him to castle queenside and then concentrate his efforts in
the center.
13.0-0-0! N e6
14.Qa3! £6
14... Re8 lS.f4 Qe7 16.Qa5!+ /-
15.exf6 Qxf6
16.Ne4!
This takes advantage of a pin to secure total control of
c5, after which Black has no counterplay.
16... Qg6
17.Nc5 NxcS
18.Bxc5 Rf4
Chapter 11: 5.e5 d5 6_BbS Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bc5 109
18 ... Rfe8 19.Rhel Qxg2 20.Rgl Qe4 21.Qg3 is clearly
better for White because of the weakness at c7.
19.Bd4 ReB
19...Qxg2?! 20.Rhgl"Qe4 21.Rxg7+
20.g3 Rfe4
21.Qc3 BfS
22.b3 Re2
23.Rd2 Rxd2
24.Qxd2 c5
Desperation.
25.Bxc5 Qc6
26.Bd4 Qe6
27.Kb2 a6
28.Rdl h6
29.Qc3 c6
30.Bxg7 cS
31.Bxh6!
and Black resigned, since if he takes the bishop, he
loses the remaining pawns. 1-0
Honfi-Perenyi
Hungarian Championship '1974
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS dS 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 BcS B.Be3 0-0
Castling is a natural move, but White can trade off

pieces and disrupt Black's pawn structure.
9.Nxc6 bxc6
lO.BxcS NxcS
11.Bxc6
!jlr;~~ 1'I~t ···-·IIfl·····I~
~ t-·-·-.. .;.· .•.
••-:••r ••
*filIl
J:.......'. . .,.: ". .·.,. . J~-·-···. .-1
r ••••••
fll,. .~.~ ~)l:\. . WJlll. ~jXl.!. · 7.".
~1@r !.f.:l~~i n~jfj~~ @r~m~

r:~~l~ '~lftr~~tt=:tl~I~i~i~!j
~,~.::~ i~:i~1~
Now if Black moves the rook, he can get into trouble
quickly.
11... Ba6
11 ... Rb8 12.0-0! (12.Nc3 d4 gave Black a good game in
Malinin-Yuravin, USSR 1991. White should delay the
development of the knight.) Rxb2 13.Bxd5 Qe7 (13 ... Bf5
14.Qd4 Rxc2 15.Na3 c6 16.Nxc2+/- ) 14.Rel Rd8 15.Nc3 c6
16.Qcl! Rb617.Bf3+/- Analysis by Otto Hardy.
12.Nc3
12.Qxd5? Qg5 13.Nc3 Rad8! 14.h4 Rxd5 15.hxgS RxeS+
16.Kd2 Rd8+ 17.Kcl RxgS-/ +
12... Rb8
The alternatives require a bit of analysis. 12 ... QgS
13.Qd4 Rab8 (13 ...Qxg2 14.0-0-0!-Harding; 13 ... Ne6 14.Qe3
Chapter 11: 5.eS d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Be5 111
Qxg2 lS.0-0-0-Harding; I3 ... Rae8 14.Bxe8 Rxe8 15.f4 Qg4
16.h3 Qg3+ 17.Qf2+- Barden-Janetschek, Clare Benedict
Teams 1960.) 14.QxcS QxeS+ lS.Qe3+- Khenkin-Vasyukov,
Leningrad 1954.1 2... d4 13.Bxa8 dxc3 (13 ... Qxa8 14.Qxd4 Rd8
15.Qg4+/- intending Rdl-Keres.) 14.Qxd8 Rxd8 15.b4!
Ne6 16.Bc6 Bc4 (16 ... Nd4 I7.Ba4!+/- Maciejewski-Bielczyk,
Dublin 1974.) 17.Rdl! Nd4 18.Ba4! Harding's important
improvement which guarantees a big advantage for
White. The analysis which follows is all from Harding
(1991). 18... gS (18 ... Bxa2 19.Rd3; 18 ... f6 19.f4) 19.Bb3 Bxb3
20.cxb3
a) 20 ... Nc2+ 21.Ke2 Rxdl (21 ... Nd4+ 22.Ke3 Nc2+
23.Ke4) 22.Rxd1 Nxb4 23.Rd8+ Kg7 24.Kd1 Nc6 (24 ... Nxa2
25.Kc2) 2S.Rd7 Nxe5 26.Rxc7+-;
b) 20 ... c2 21.Rcl
bI) 21 ... Rd5 22.f3! Kg7 (22 ... Rxe5+ 23.Kd2 intending
Rhel.) 23.Kf2 Rxe5 24.Rhel Rb5 25.a3 cS 26.Re5 cxb4
27.RxbS NxbS 28.axb4 Nd4 29.Ke3+-;
b2) 21 ... Rb8 Harding stops here, but it is clear that
White is better, as the following line shows. 22.Kd2 Rxb4
23.Kc3 c5 24.Rhel Kg7 25.g3 f6 26.f4 gxf4 27.gxf4 NbS+
28.Kb2 Rxf4 29.exf6+ Rxf6 30.Rxc2+ /-
13.Qd4
I3.QxdS is also good: 13 ... Qxd5 14.Bxd5 Rxb2 15.0-0-0
Rb4 16.Rhel Rfb8 17.Bb3+/- Estrin-Gurevich, Moscow
1972.
13... Ne6
14.Qa4! NcS
15.Qa3 d4
lS ... Ne6?? 16.Qxa6 15... Qe7 16.0-0-0+ /-
16.QxcS dxc3
17.Qxc3
White can't castle, but that isn't worth two pawns!

17... Rb6
18.£4 Qe7
18...Qb8 19.0-0-0+ / -
19.0-0-0 RfbB
20.1{d7! Qe6
21.Rhd 1 ! RfB
21 ... Rxc6? 22.Rd8+ Qe8 23.Rxe8+ Rxe8 24.Qxc6+-
22.Rxc7 Qxa2
23.Qa3 Qxa3
24.bxa3 Be2
25.Rd6 1-0
Kurajica-SmekjaJ
Novi Sad 1982
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 S.eS dS 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 BcS 8.Be3 Bd7 9.Bxc6 bxc6 lO.Nd2 Qh4
Chapter 11: S.eS d5 6.BbS Nd4 7.Nxd4 BeS 113
~*
This piece of pseudo-aggression should lead to a good

game for White, if properly played. lI.N4f3 Bxe3!!
12.Nxh4 Bxd2+ 13.KfI BaS 14.Qe2 gS l5.Nf3 Bb6 l6.c3 Nxf2
unclear Kotronias-Barbero, Budapest 1988. There is no
need to enter into this mess!
ll.N xe4 Qxe4
12.0-0 0-0
12 ... Bb6 was suggested by Kurajica, but I-farding refutes
it. 13.ReI 0-0 (13 ... QxeS 14.Nxc6 Bxc6 I5.Bxb6+-) 14.Nxc6
Qh4 l5.Bxb6 axb6 16.Nd4; 12... Qg6 13.f4 0-0 14.f5-Analysis.
13.Rel Qg6
r--onTnf-'" nuoj .. r.... _....'.. ~· ~
I~:I\~:'~~~ -.-Lm
: '1.1~ ~.j:.j.t.l'r.:.e~. .~.:'.:..1
.-•.,.,.,.,. •• - ?oW.
j~l~ ~ jf@~ ~I: r'li®:~11~i~i[fa'~~~f:

;'R~Jf: ~:.~~ttS. .~~~!j.:::.:.!I:m:1\'ll.. :::.:.:J
, Jff:~~:
..·.·.·.·.f·~~ ...¥:"•••
t~~t
u
§ili '" mtm nt@~~J . it'll. . .

f~~~ff:l~ ~~:(?t~
········:-~f~:t& .·.:..·.·.·f·:(·~·l
••••
14.Ne6! Bxe6
15.Bxc5 Rfb8
IS ... Rfd8!? comes into consideration.
16.b3 Bh3
16... BfS allows a powerful pawn sacrifice. 17.Re3! Bxc2
18.Qd4 intending Rg3.
17.Qf3 BfS
17... Bg4 18.Qg3 Bf5 19.Qxg6 hxg6 (19 ... Bxg6 20.e6! Bxc2
21.exf7+ Kxf7 22.Re7+ KgB 23.Bd4 g6 24.Rg7+ Kf8
2S.Rxh7+/-) 20.Re2 intending f2-f3, g2-g4.
18.Qc3! Be4
18 ... Bxc2 19.e6! fxe6 20.Bd4 and Black has too many
pawn weaknesses, while the threat of Re1-e3-g3 is also
very inti~idating.
19.f3
20.e6!
21.Racl ?!
21.Bd4!+/- would have been stronger, with ideas
similar to that of the previous note, save that the rook
will move to eS, followed by doubling on tIle e-filc.
21... BfS
22.Bd4 e5!
23.Rxe5 I{e8
and Black is able to relieve the pressure, leading to a
drawn game.
24.Ree1
24.Qxe6 Qxc6 25.Rxc6 RxeS 26.BxeS ReB 27.Bxc7 ReB
28.Rcl Kf7 29.Bf4 Rxcl+ 30.Bxcl Bbl 31.a3 J3a2 32.b4 d4=
24... Rxe5
25.Rxe5 ReB
26.Bxa7 Ra8!
27.Qd4 Bh3!
Chapter 11: 5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bc5 115
28.Re2
28 ... Bxg2!
29.Rxg2 Qbl+
30.Kf2 Qxa2+
31.Kfl Qbl+
32.Kf2 Qa2+
1/2-1/2
Spiriev-Lengyel
Budapest 1989
1.e4 eS 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Nf6 S.eS dS 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bc5 8.Be3 Bd7 9.Bxc6 bxc6 lO.Nd2 Nxd2 11.Qxd2
Originally evaluated as better for White by Kurajica,

and his opinion has stood the test of time. White will get
rid of the Black dark-squared bishop. 11 ... 0-0 12.0-0 f6?!
(Better 12... Qe7, transposing back to the text.) 13.Nxc6! Bxc6
(13 ... Bxe3 14.QxdS++-) 14.BxcS ReB 15.exf6 Qxf6 16.Bd4+/-
Romero Holmes-Campos, Leon 1989.
11... Qe7
12.0-0 Bb6
13.Nb3 0-0
14.Qc3!
White now has control of the central dark squares.
14... Rfe8
14 ... Rae8 15.Bc5! Bxc5 16.Nxc5 Bf5 17.Rael+= The
knight is better than the bishop. Black pawns are weak and
his pieces lack mobility. Krebs-Binder, Correspondence
1983 saw White obtain a very good game in a few more
moves: 17... f6 18.exf6 Qxf619.Qxf6 gxf6 20.c3+/-
15.f4 f6
This allows White to win queen for rook and Black

never gets his attack going.17 ... Qh4 18.Nd2 d4 19.Qa3
intending Nf3-Harding, who notes that Black dare not
take the pawn: 19 ... Rxe5 20.Bxb6 cxb6 21.Nf3
18.Rf8+! RxfB
19.QxeS Rae8
20.Qg3 Rf6
21.Rfl Rg6
22.Qf3 Rf6
23.Qd3 Rxf1 +
24.Kxfl Re4
Chapter 11: S.eS dS 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 Bc5 117
25.Qf3 h6
26.Qf8+ Kh7
27. Bxb6 cxb6
2B.Qf7 Bg4
29.Qxa7 1-0
Van Wijgerden-Lengyel
Amsterdam 1983
l.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Nf6 S.eS d5 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 BcS 8.Be3 Bd7 9.Bxc6 bxc6 10.Nd2 Qe7 11.Nxe4 dxe4
..
-':'U~l --~'r~~~r :~tl@t~. J]I.~·
~~ 11_ _ wJ_
L, ~iml¥1 ~.e..~.s.._l~ .3··l@~·J·
..• J:_''''''':i1_:.
White now plays a dynamic pawn sacrifice.

12.e6! Bxe6?!
The superior move 12 ... fxe6! is examined in
Dzhindzhichashvili-Garcia.
13.Nxe6 Bxe3
13 ... fxe6? 14.Qh5+ g6 15.QxcS+-
14.Nxg7+ Kf8
15.Nf5! Bxf2+
15 ... Qb4+ 16.c3 Bxf2+ 17.Kxf2 Qxb2+ IB.Qe2 Qxc3
19.Rhfl RgB 20.Kgl+- ReB 21.QhS Re6 22.Radl Qf623.Nh6
Qg6 24.QcS+ 1-0, Van der Werf-Van der Weij, Dieren
1990.
16.Kxf2 Qg5
17.Ne3 Rd8
18.Qe2 Qf6+
19.Kgl+/-
White has a locked-in rook, but Black has insufficient
material compensation and his pawns are very weak.
19... Qxb2
20.Rd1 Rd6
21.g3 h5
22.Kg2 h4
23.Rhfl Rh7
24.Rbl!
Black now sacrifices his queen. It is a temporary

sacrifice, but when the smoke clears llis position is hope-
less.
24... hxg3
25.Rxb2 Rxh2+
26.Kxg3 Rxe2
27. Rb8+ Ke7
28.Nf5++- Ke6
29.Nxd6 cxd6
30.Rf2 1-0
Dzhindzhichashvili-Gil. Garcia
New York Open 1988
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Nf6 S.eS d5 6.Bb5 Ne4
7.Nxd4 Bc5 8.Be3 Bd7 9.Bxc6 bxc6 lO.Nd2 Qe7
Chapter 11: 5.eS d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 BcS 119
11.Nxe4 dxe4 12.e6! fxe6!
This is Black's best continuation, but White can now

force a small advantage.
13.Nxc6! Bb4+
13... Bxc614.Qh5+ g615.QxcS+/- and Black's pawns are a
mess.
14.Nxb4 Qxb4+
15.Qd2 Qxb2?!
15... Qxd2+ 16.Kxd2+= was the better choice for Black,
but I would hate to have to face Dzindzi over the board in
this position, even though he might draw it as Black
against me!
16.0-0 Qb5
16 ... Bc6 17.Bd4 QbS 18.Bxg7 RgB 19.Qh6 e3 20.Rael!+/-
or 16... 0-0-0 17.Rfhl Qf6 18.Bxa7+-
17.Rfd1!
The pressure on the d-file severely limits Black's

options.
17... as
18.Rabl Qa4
19.Bc5
intending Qg5.
19... 0-0-0
20. Be7! Rde8
21.Qe2! Qc6
21 ...Rxe7? 22.Qa6+ Kd8 23.Rb8# (or 23.Qa8#).
22.Qe3
intending Qa7. Now Black really has to grovel.
22... Qa8
23.QcS Bc6
Black is facing an attack on three files, and the Be7
limits his activity. White will now swing a rook to c3. In
the end, Black has to give up the queen for a rook &
bishop in order to survive, and then it is just a matter of
technique.
24.Rb3 e3
25.fxe3 Bxg2
26.Rc3! Qc6
27.QeS!
27... Rxe7
28.Rxc6 Bxc6
29.Qxa5 Rd7
30.Qa6+ Bb7
Chapter 11: 5.e5 d5 6.Bb5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 BcS 121
31.Qxe6
The pin is the final nail in the coffin.
31... RhdB
32.Rxd7 Rxd7
33.QgS+ Rd8
34.Qxh7 Bd5
35.a4 Kb7
36.Qd3 Rd6
37.QbS+ Ke8
38.aS Rg6+
39.Kfl Bg2+
40.Kf2 Kd8?
41.Qd3+
and now if 41 ... Rd6, then 42.Qxd6+ cxd6 43.Kxg2 is an
easy win, so Black resigned. 1-0
Index of Games
Aviles-Elzaghcir 37 Malinin-lbragirnov 76
Bastian-Eng 38 Mansurov-Sagalchik 99
Breycr-Fahrni 18 Maroczy-Porges 3
Bryson-Alarcon 81 Messere-Nyman 105
Buckle-Anderssen 42 Nun-Sarwinski 40
Carr-Horne 8S Okhotnik-Didishko 83
Charousek-Exncr 14 Okhotnik-Zaid 90
Charousek-Porges 22 Owens & Staunton-I-Jorwitz &
Dzhindzhichashvili-Gil. Garcia 118 Loewenthal 8
Edelman-Vucic 88 Rossolimo-Riceman 44
Estrin-Boey 56 Schlechter-Breyer 47
Estrin-Brglez 107 Schlechter-Nyholm 30
Estrin-Sad om sky 71 Spiricv-Lcngycl 115
Fernandez-Boudrc 98 Stcinitz-Lang 11
Honfi-Percnyi 109 Suttercr-·Al Awadhi 48
Hopfer-Troester 27 Suttcrcr--Hylkcma 45
Hug-Gorla 63 Svcshnikov-Kuprcichik 33
Illescas-Sanz 52 Svcshnikov-Kuzmin 59
Kijk-Bokan 102 Sveshnikov-MiIos 93
Kirste-Knorr 25 Tamm-Nicdcrmaier 78
Kirste-Plat h 27 Tscitlin-Yuncycv 73
Kupreichik-Belyavsky 67 Van Wijgcrden-Lcngycl 117
Kurajica-Smekjal 112
122

Pub How To Play The Scotch Gambit

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pub How To Play The Scotch Gambit

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How to play

"C.i... L... , .."

Copyright © 1992 by Eric Schiller

Printed in the United States of America

Editor: B.G. Dudley

Set in Palatino and Avant Garde by Adobe; and Reykjavik Laserfont

Manuscript completed October 31, 1991.

Part One: Black does not play 4 ... Nf6!

Part Two: Black plays 4 ... Nf6!

These early queen deployments never succeed in the

The endgame favors White because he already has

Owens & Staunton-Horwitz & Loewenthal

Black has finally developed, but there is now a major

The attack at h6 deflects the queen and the d-pawn

Black's pinned and overworked pieces are no match

This is less risky than 4 ...Qf6?!, but is also inadequate,

White's queen isn't really a major part of the attack

This move is so obscure that it isn't even in the books,

Now White can eliminate the important defender and

Now Black must finally accept doubled pawns on the

* -."1I: .... r~- ••

I W~i, ~f~J~ !~~n '~fI

This endgame is a technical win-and Charousek

This plan makes a little more sense than Exner's

White has organized his pieces well, and Black is

White can respond to this with a strong, if typical,

Black has beaten back the initial attack, but his

Now Black gets everything his position deserves!

A classical example of development conlpensating for

It doesn't take much to see that the attack is going to be

l:···"" .:~: .::;:::::. ;.:.;;:.;(;:,::::{A:~:f'~:'

This seemingly solid position is also unfavorable for

Black's three pawns are not being used, and White's

This obvious developing move is met by a gambit

White is better developed with control of the center

White's domination of the center and superior

If Black takes up the challenge, then White can react in

This position is also much too passive, though Black

Analysis based on Greco

Black seems to have consolidated, but White's active

White controls more space and has an annoying threat

White exploits the overworked knight to retain the

This is the key position in the variation where Black

This weakens the queenside pawn structure and Black

Black's pieces have been driven back, and now the

And now for one of the most picturesque finishes in

22.N xb8 Rxb8

The old move is the best move! Black defends the

This position is balanced, but the evaluation of full

We have now reached a position from the Italian

Gligoric gave his seal of approval to this m()ve in ECO,

13 ... d5! is preferred by Harding. 14.Bd3 c6 (14... 0-0-0 is

White completely dominates the center, and can

Black may have thought that his knight was going to

IJI, !~~, tim ~t:;~ ~i! mi7

:Jll!~ :iJI :::~! :;fr!;~

23 ... Bxf6 24.Nxb4 cxb3 25.Nxd5 Bxb2 26.Rbl Be6 ~7.Rxb2

t.,.,,,..•f .,.,.,.,.,. C...,.,.,.,.:/. . . ·,·,·,·>:·t '!'1

Now White c()mes up with a brilliant idea, based on

There is no rush to reclaim the pawn. White's superior

Even if White didn't have an extra pawn, his complete

White is better here because he can olav on tho

White threatens 27.Nh6+.

;~ !;~ ~tt~ Jf~~! § tt~!

!:! fl: ~mll: f ! ~ j .