Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Before the start of “Snatched,” stars Amy Schumer and Goldie Hawn do a brief bit thanking the
audience for viewing their movie in the theatre, truly the best way to experience a film. I’d like
to send them a video asking for my money back. “Snatched” is better suited to bored late night
What may have been on ode to female empowerment falls flat, relying on clichés and
tired tropes. Playing mother and daughter, Hawn and Schumer rehash stereotypes of the lonely
divorced woman and self-absorbed millennial. The eternally youthful Hawn, 71, plays Linda, a
divorcee who has given up on love and lives for her kids – a woman who in her daughter’s words
does nothing more than “check the locks all day and change the kitty litter.” Linda lives alone
with her cats who have free reign of the house, happily walking on the dining room table. When
we first see Linda, she’s wearing a cat t-shirt, talking to her feline friends and reading an article
on how to cheer up a depressed cat (we have to wonder, “is it the cat who’s depressed?”). Linda
tries to write a Match.com profile, but can’t follow through. Her daughter Emily, played by
Schumer, is an irresponsible, tramp-stamped millennial who spends her time taking selfies so
The plot begins predictably – Emily is dumped days before a romantic getaway to
Ecuador. Her boyfriend accuses her of having no direction in life. He’s not wrong. She’s just
been fired from the Contempo Casuals style boutique where she spent most of her shift as a
salesgirl shopping for herself. Linda, learning about her daughter’s recently single status on
Facebook (where else?), posts the words of encouragement every woman with a ticking
biological clock longs to hear, “don’t worry, you still have two years left to find someone.”
old photo album (filled with gorgeous pics of a young Goldie Hawn). Emily glimpses the fun,
vibrant woman her mom once was and invites her to come along. Linda’s not interested –
international travel is dangerous, and she’s got books to read. Plus “everyone knows you need at
least a year to plan a vacation.” Then she learns it’s non-refundable, and the ladies are on their
way.
Predictably, Linda has reason to worry. Not long after arriving in Ecuador, the women
are kidnapped by South American mobsters who demand ransom from Emily’s brother Jeffrey,
an agoraphobic man-child played by “The Mindy Project’s” Ike Barinholtz. Comedy is intended
to ensue, but many of the jokes in this ostensibly feminist film are insulting to women.
Schumer’s Rubenesque looks are often played for laughs with references to her “puffy face” or
“too heavy” physique. A Colombian bartender puts the women’s minds at ease when it comes to
being sold into sex slavery. It’s only the “young, beautiful” girls they want, after all. Clichéd
jokes like “you look great.”…”thanks, I got a tapeworm” fill up much of the tired dialogue. The
tapeworm scene alone is enough to drive even the most ardent feminist straight to the nearest
The males don’t fare much better. In nearly all cases, the men are inept – from the
adventure guide, played by Christopher Meloni (“I’ll go first because I’m the man”), to the state
department contact who can’t be bothered to leave his desk to the consulate worker, three-days
on the job who has yet to be trained on the phone system. He’d like to help Emily, but admitted
he “can’t be that dude.” He needs Emily “to be that girl who leaves before drawing any more
attention to the fact that I don’t know what I’m doing.” Ah, chivalry. And then of course, there
are the evil, incompetent Colombian mobsters. The film has actually been accused of racism for
its portrayal of the Colombians. They’re one-note villains – stupid and greedy, angry at tourists
like Linda and Emily who come to their country only to take but give back nothing. And Emily’s
brother Jeffrey is initially too frightened to leave the house to be of any help.
There is no Prince Charming to swoop in and save Linda and Emily. In fact, the film’s
supposed prince leads the women to their predicament in the first place. Clearly, it’s up to
mother and daughter to save themselves. And they do, repeatedly – with some assistance from
the scene stealing duo of Ruth and Barb (a delightful Wanda Sykes and hilariously silent Joan
Cusack). Barb, a former CIA special ops agent, cut off her tongue to prevent spilling secrets, but
her body language says plenty. Ultimately, the women save the day while the men repeatedly
come up short.
On the plus side, the film passes the sacred Bechdel Test. A film must have at least two
women who talk to each other about something other than a man, a seemingly low-bar that has
been surprisingly difficult for many films to meet. And we need to give the filmmakers credit for
featuring a women over 70 (!) in a leading role. Hawn makes 71 look good (I made mental note
that all of the sunscreen her character slathers on may be good idea).
explored the challenges of relationships in the age of texting and swiping. Schumer’s flawed
character was relatable – a journalist with a varied love life, not afraid to go after what she wants,
but ultimately, unhappy. In the crude but clever “Trainwreck,” Schumer’s protagonist shows
growth, learning trust and self-acceptance. “Snatched” attempts a message – “girl power” – but
the women are too one-dimensional, and often unlikeable, for it to resonate.
Schumer’s built her brand on saying and doing the outrageous and not being afraid to
challenge the patriarchal world of stand-up comedy. She’s also been a powerful voice for
feminism, openly discussing female sexuality and addressing issues like sexual abuse in the
military. Her Comedy Central hit “Inside Amy Schumer” pushed limits with sketches like “12
Angry Men,” a parody where jurors deliberate whether Schumer is hot enough for TV.
I wish “Snatched” had some of that verve. This film just feels like a trainwreck.