Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: D. W. Hamacher & C. O’Neill (2013) The discovery and history of the Dalgaranga meteorite crater, Western
Australia, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences: An International Geoscience Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 60:5,
637-646, DOI: 10.1080/08120099.2013.815274
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the
publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or
warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed
by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with
primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings,
demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly
in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction,
redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly
forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-
conditions
TAJE_A_815274.3d (TAJE) 09-08-2013 11:22
The Dalgaranga meteorite crater, 100 km northeast of Yalgoo, Western Australia, was one of the first
impact structures identified in Australia, the smallest isolated crater found in Australia, and the only con-
firmed crater in the world associated with a mesosiderite projectile. Seventeen years passed before the
Dalgaranga meteorites were described in the scientific literature, and nearly 40 years passed before a
survey of the structure was published. The reasons for the time gap were never explained and a number
of factual errors about the discovery and early history remain uncorrected in the scientific literature.
Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 20:28 29 January 2014
Using historical and archival documents, and discussions with people involved in Dalgaranga research,
the reasons for this time gap are explained by a series of minor misidentifications and coincidences. The
age of the crater has yet to be determined, but using published data, we estimate the projectile mass
to be 500–1000 kg.
KEY WORDS: impact structures, Dalgaranga, mesosiderite, history of meteoritics.
Figure 1 Panoramic image of Dalgaranga crater. Image courtesy of Megan Argo, taken November 2009.
(Wellard 1983, p. 95). Most of them were collected in the The Simpson Study
immediate vicinity of the crater, but some were found up
The eventual study of meteorites from Dalgaranga was
Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 20:28 29 January 2014
Figure 2 (a) A. R. Richardson (Wellard 1983, p. 20), (b) G. E. P. Wellard (Wellard 1983, p. 35), (c) B. Seward (Wellard 1983, p. 36),
(d) E. S. Simpson (Geological Survey of Western Australia), (e) H. H. Nininger (Nininger 1972, p. 96), (f) A. Nininger (Carlsbad
City Library), (g) G. I. Huss (Doris Banks), (h) R. M. Pearl (Wilson 2012), (i) E. M. Shoemaker (Wikimedia Commons).
collection of specimens had been lost, but Wellard was Wellard no longer managed or resided at Dalgaranga).
able to secure a 40 g fragment (Figure 3) from the current Simpson stated that Wellard’s description of the crater
station manager and gave it to Simpson (by this time, confirmed rumours he had heard when he visited Yalgoo
TAJE_A_815274.3d (TAJE) 09-08-2013 11:22
should be noted that the label on the Murchison Downs mesosideritic (stony-iron) and sideritic (iron) materials.
fragment gave the donor’s name as ‘Richardson,’ Nininger also concluded that the impactor, which he and
although it is uncertain if this is a reference to Wellard’s Huss estimate had a mass of 10–20 tonnes, had not under-
uncle, A. R. Richardson (A. Bevan pers. comm. 2012). gone vaporisation but instead impacted at a relatively
On 13 February, the team came upon an Aboriginal low speed, completely shattering the meteorite and cre-
camp near Leonora, WA, where many of the locals had ating the shallow crater (Nininger & Huss 1960, p. 639;
collected tektites, which they colloquially called ‘meteor- Nininger 1972, p. 215). Nininger & Huss (1960) claimed
ites’ (Kelly 1961, p. 162). Nearly everyone at the camp that the reason so few meteorite fragments remained is
knew about them, and Nininger was able to purchase that much of the stony components had eroded away,
two samples. Apparently, Aboriginal people had been leaving behind iron components.
collecting them for years to sell to museums or white col- Huss cut down the largest mulga bush in the centre of
lectors. Kelly explains that as the demand for tektites the crater and counted the growth rings, which num-
waned, many of the Aboriginal people simply lost or dis- bered 54 (Huss 1962b, p. 14). This means the tree germi-
carded their collections (Nininger 1972, p. 213). nated around 1905—roughly consistent with Simpson’s
Because the expedition covered such a large area, sev- estimate based on the bush’s height of 4.5 m as cited by
eral months passed before Nininger was able to properly Wellard. The tree had germinated on top of a 1.6 m layer
study the specimens from Dalgaranga. When he did, he of breccia fill, and no fill had accumulated around the
realised these were not octahedrite (Ni–Fe) meteorites as roots, showing conclusively that the age of the crater far
classified by Simpson, but rare mesosiderite (stony-iron) exceeded the age of the tree. Examining the rocks on the
Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 20:28 29 January 2014
meteorites (Nininger & Huss 1960). This was significant crater wall and the fill exposed from the excavation of
as no other impact crater in the world was associated the crater floor, Nininger & Huss (1960) estimated that
with this type of meteorite. Upon discovering this, the crater formed some 25 000 years ago.
Nininger realised that they had relied too heavily on There was no communication between Wellard and
Simpson’s paper (Nininger & Huss 1960, p. 623). The com- Nininger’s team during the expedition. Wellard had long
bination of their tight schedule, the intense heat and the since sold the lease for Dalgaranga Station and moved
various technical issues meant that they had missed an 700 km away to Yladgee station near Gnowangerup,
opportunity to investigate the site in detail. This would about 300 km southeast of Perth (Barunha 1934; Kelly
have aided in answering pertinent questions about the 1961, p. 149). In fact, Nininger & Huss (1960) and Huss
impact cratering process, so Nininger was eager to return (1962b) cite Wellard’s name as ‘Willard’ and include the
to Dalgaranga to conduct a more in-depth survey. same historical inaccuracies that were recorded in the
Nininger organised the second expedition to Australia, Simpson paper, simply because they did not know this
and on 18 October 1959 Nininger arrived at Dalgaranga information was in error.
with his son-in-law, Glenn I. Huss (Figure 2g), a geologist Nearly 40 years after the crater’s discovery, it was
and director of the American Meteorite Laboratory in finally surveyed, and the true nature of the Dalgaranga
Denver, Colorado (Nininger 1972, p. 213). They remained impactor was reported in the scientific literature.
at the site for nearly two weeks, making detailed measure- Further studies of the meteorites and crater would be
ments and maps of the crater, collecting 207 additional undertaken (e.g. McCall 1977; Shoemaker et al. 1990,
specimens, clearing the trees within the crater and exca- 2005; Consolmagno & Britt 1995; Smith & Hodge 1996;
vating the crater floor to search for the main projectile Hidaka & Yoneda 2011). But a year after Nininger &
they thought lay within (Nininger & Huss 1960, pp. 627– Huss’s paper was published, an extraordinary coinci-
628; Cleverly 1962; Huss 1962a, b; McCall & de Laeter 1965, dence occurred that linked everyone involved.
p. 28). The results of both surveys were published in 1960
(Nininger & Huss 1960). Huss (1962b) described the crater
An Extraordinary Coincidence
as square in shape, similar to the Barringer ‘Meteor’ cra-
ter in Arizona. In August 1961, Wellard and his wife, Katherine (ne e
According to Huss (1962b), he and Nininger noted that Clifton), decided to take a trip to England on the Royal
the crater displayed a bilateral symmetry. At an azimuth Dutch Mail Line ship Johan van Oldenbarnevelt (Wellard
of 289 (northwest), the rim lay flat and revealed almost 1983, p. 97). After three days at sea, Wellard’s wife became
no rim rubble. The rim tilted increasingly until at points engaged in a conversation with a ‘Mrs Pearl.’ The woman
90 on either side, the rim was 40 to the horizontal mentioned that her husband was a professor of geology
before levelling out again to almost flat at a point just in the United States with a special interest in meteorites.
south of due east. The highest concentration of ejecta Mr Wellard, who had joined the conversation, mentioned
corresponded with the areas where the rim displayed that he also had an interest in meteorites. The woman
the greatest tilt. The ground some 15–20 m from the was sure her husband would like to meet him. A few
southwest rim showed a fairly heavy layer of coarse, dis- days later, Wellard met up with the woman’s husband, a
integrated granite. The northeast rim revealed a large ‘Professor Pearl.’ Pearl explained that he and his wife
quantity of large blocks of laterite. A thick layer of had flown to Perth from America for the sole purpose of
ejected laterite extended 45–60 m to the north-northeast studying a special meteorite and visiting a unique
and east side of the crater (Huss 1962b). Based on their impact crater called Dalgaranga to meet the man who
geological mapping, it seems the impactor struck the found the meteorite, a ‘Mr Willard.’ He conceded that
edge of a small mound or hillock of laterite. while he had studied the meteorite, he was very disap-
Among their findings was the realisation that the pro- pointed that he was unable to locate Willard. Somewhat
jectile consisted of mainly stone (90%) with nests of taken aback, Wellard told Pearl that he was now talking
TAJE_A_815274.3d (TAJE) 09-08-2013 11:22
to the very person he was unable to find! Pearl promised twofold unconsolidated deposit composed of soil and
to send Wellard a copy of the report on the Dalgaranga granite and laterite boulders at the top and a metre of
meteorite he had studied, which he honoured to the joy course stratified grits of granite detritus at the base (pos-
of Wellard. sibly of eolian origin). McCall did not reach the bottom of
The identity of ‘Professor Pearl’ was not given in these sediments using the second pit dug by Nininger,
Wellard’s memoirs. Further investigation reveals that which had a depth of 1.37 m. Based on the depth and
this was in fact Professor Richard Maxwell Pearl nature of the sediment, McCall reports that the crater is
(Figure 2h) from Colorado College in Colorado Springs of considerable age, although he does not provide an esti-
(Wilson 2012). Professor Pearl was well known for his mate. He cites the slope of the wall of granite rock at
studies of minerals, gems and meteorites, and was a 50–60 and notes that the rim is higher to the east with
member, and later Fellow, of the Society of Research on no marginal raised mound above the level of the sur-
Meteorites, which later became the Meteoritical Society rounding plain to the north. McCall’s favourite experi-
(Bostick 2002). Richard and his wife, Mignon, were ence (McCall pers. comm. 2012) was the 1969 Australian
friends and colleagues of Harvey Nininger. Pearl and Institute for Mining & Metallurgy (AusIMM) meeting in
Nininger had collaborated on various projects, and it is Cue, WA. As part of the meeting, a session was held at
now evident how Pearl came to learn of Dalgaranga. the crater in which the attendees sat along the rim while
Glenn Huss published a two-part account of the second McCall spoke from the crater’s focus.
survey in which he participated (Huss 1962a, b). He con- The primary goal of the expedition was to collect
firmed that in early 1962, Wellard had met Richard and meteorite fragments, but pickings were slim, and the
Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 20:28 29 January 2014
Mignon Pearl on the ocean liner to Amsterdam. McCall team was only able to collect a handful of ‘small
Information from Wellard’s book is included on a chips of iron.’ Henderson was allowed to take all of the
tourist sign at the crater, although many pieces of the recovered material on the condition that a specimen of
story we have provided here are not included, and some mesosiderite material be given to McCall for analysis. In
of the details on the sign are inaccurate. It is noteworthy 1965, McCall published the first thin-section analysis of a
that Dalgaranga was not Wellard’s final encounter with Dalgaranga mesosiderite, using specimens collected dur-
newly discovered meteorites. Around 1976, a 33.6 kg ing the survey (McCall 1965). Given the mineralogical
meteorite was discovered near Gnowangerup, WA by a composition of the fragment, McCall estimated that the
road worker and given to Wellard. He donated it to the projectile was only 1–2 tonnes (for reasonable higher-
Western Australian Museum in October 1979 (de Laeter impact velocities, and assuming no atmospheric frag-
1982, p. 137). mentation), not 10–20 tonnes as quoted by Nininger &
After Nininger and Huss published their survey of Huss (1960).
Dalgaranga crater, a ‘Mr Latham’ conducted a follow-up William Cleverly and Maitland Keith Quartermaine
excavation on the southern side of the crater floor. visited the crater in 1962 (Cleverly 1962). According to
Latham sent two small specimens to Jack Nevill, who Cleverly, Simpson’s claim that the impactor came
sent the fragments to F. William G. Power, a mine inspec- from the southeast was unsupported by the apparent
tor and WWII POW from Geraldton, who forwarded excavations conducted by Nininger, since they seemed to
them to geochemist William H. Cleverly, also at the be in the opposite direction in the crater. Nothing about
School of Mines and an honorary associate at the this trip or survey was published in the literature except
Western Australian Museum (Bevan 1997). It is apparent a photo of the crater, which was published in Bevan
from correspondence that Jack Nevill obtained some (1996, p. 426).
20 kg of meteorites from Dalgaranga, which he shipped
to Nininger in Sedona, Arizona in 1959 (Nininger 1959b).
Samples of the material collected by Latham and Nevill SITE PROTECTION
are currently located in the Western Australian Museum
(catalogue number WAM 12365) and the Western On 25 July 1962, Cleverly (1962) wrote a letter to William
Australia School of Mines in Kalgoorlie, WA. D. L. ‘David’ Ride, then Director of the Western Austra-
lian Museum and President of the Royal Society of West-
ern Australia, encouraging him to lodge an application
The McCall Expedition
to establish the crater and the surrounding area as a pro-
In September 1963, University of Western Australia geol- tected reserve. In the letter, Cleverly pointed out several
ogist Gerard J. H. ‘Joe’ McCall led a two-day expedition areas of concern regarding the preservation of the crater
to Dalgaranga, accompanied by Edward P. Henderson, and of the material within. These included fire hazards
curator at the U.S. National Museum, and E. Car, a biolo- by the mulga scrub, damage caused by prospectors and
gist at the Western Australian Museum (McCall 1963). researchers, and litter from visitors. Much of this is com-
McCall notes that Nininger’s measurements were accu- pounded by the fact that the crater is very small and that
rate, citing a rim-to-rim diameter of 21.3 m, and a maxi- further excavations could erase important evidence
mum depth of 3.2 m from the rim to the top of the regarding the history of the fill-material.
breccia fill. McCall (1963) noted that the granite and lat- The application was successful, and the crater was
erite separated by a layer of ‘thin shaly iron’ showed a declared a Ministerial Temporary Reserve (3232H)
regular outward pit of 30 from the crater centre. He through the Western Australia Department of Mines on
then described the sediment within the crater, which 9 June 1965 (Cleverly 1962; A. Bevan pers. comm. 2012).
had not previously been published. Using the pit dug by Dalgaranga is registered as a protected site under the
Nininger, McCall explains that the crater is infilled by a Mines Department and permission to collect must be
TAJE_A_815274.3d (TAJE) 09-08-2013 11:22
gained from the Minister for Mines. Meteoritic material analysed soil samples from Dalgaranga to study the
is registered in the collection at the Western Australian small meteoritic particles that are formed as the projec-
Museum in accordance with the Museum Act 1969. tile passes through the atmosphere and strikes the
The Dalgaranga crater is now classified as a State Earth. The high abundance of these particles in the soil
Geoheritage Reserve (Grey et al. 2010). at Dalgaranga, their size (0.4–0.1 mm) and the fact that
they are heavily weathered and unmelted are consistent
with fragmentation as opposed to vapourisation. Based
THE SHOEMAKER STUDY on the mass of the fragments, Smith & Hodge (1996) esti-
mate the impactor mass was on the order of 4000 kg—
In 1986, Eugene Shoemaker (Figure 2i) and his astrono-
double the upper estimate of McCall (1965).
mer-wife, Carolyn, visited Dalgaranga crater and
An impactor of the order of 1 m in diameter is likely
conducted an in-depth study of the structure and associ-
to have lost over half of its kinetic energy during its pas-
ated meteorites (Shoemaker et al. 1990, 2005). The
sage through the atmosphere, making final estimates of
Shoemakers mapped the site and excavated the interior,
its size uncertain (Melosh 1989). However, we can apply a
using the original pit dug by Nininger near the eastern
Pi-Group scaling approach for sensible estimates on the
edge of the crater floor. The bilateral symmetry of the
impactor and target rock to obtain some quantitative
ejecta is consistent with laboratory experiments of low-
assessment of the robustness of the previous estimates.
angle impacts (Gault & Wedekind 1978), suggesting the
Using this approach, the final diameter of the impactor
projectile impacted at a low incidence angle of 10–15
L is derived using Collins et al. (2005, their equations 21
from the horizontal (Shoemaker et al. 2005, p. 542).
Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 20:28 29 January 2014
have varied widely. Using pi-scaling equations, we esti- archival materials. This research made use of the
mate it is on the order of 500–1000 kg. Estimates of the National Library of Australia’s Trove archival database
crater’s age vary by two orders of magnitude, from a few (trove.nla.gov.au), the NASA Astrophysics Data System
hundred years to a few hundred thousand years. Its age (adsabs.harvard.edu), and Ancestry.com. We would also
remains a mystery, and we encourage future work to like to acknowledge the referees for their helpful and
help solve this piece of the puzzle. Historical photos from useful comments. O’Neill acknowledges DP110104145,
the Nininger & Kelly expedition, a detailed account of FT100100717, and Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust
this trip by Allan Kelly, and correspondence between Fluid Systems (CCFS) support from the Australian
William Cleverly and David Ride are provided in a Research Council.
supplementary paper.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS REFERENCES
ANONYMOUS 1923. Yalgoo Notes. Geraldton Guardian (Geraldton,
We thank Amy Davis, Gary Huss, Peggy Schaller, Alex Western Australia: 1906–1928), Tuesday 31 July 1923, p. 3.
Bevan, Joe McCall, John Goldsmith and Peter Downes ANONYMOUS 1924. Announcements—births. Western Mail (Perth,
for their assistance, advice and comments. We are Western Australia: 1885–1954), Thursday 8 May 1924, p. 27.
indebted to the Carlsbad City Library (California), ANONYMOUS 1931. The death of Mr. A. R. Richardson. The West Austra-
lian (Perth, Western Australia: 1879–1954), Thursday 7 May 1931,
Arizona State University Library, the State Library of p. 12.
Western Australia, the Geological Survey of Western ANONYMOUS 1937. Meteorites exhibited. The West Australian (Perth,
Australia, and the Western Australian Museum for Western Australia: 1879–1954), Friday 11 June 1937, p. 15
TAJE_A_815274.3d (TAJE) 09-08-2013 11:22
ANONYMOUS 1998. Register of heritage places—Assessment documenta- KELLY A. O. 1961. Down under and off to one side. Unpublished
tion: Melangata. Perth: Heritage Council of Western Australia. manuscript. Carlsbad, CA: Allan O. Kelly Archives, Carlsbad City
BARUNHA 1934. Stock and station. The West Australian (Perth, Western Library.
Australia: 1879–1954), Tuesday 3 July 1934, p. 7. MCCALL G. J. H. 1963. Report of the visit to the Dalgaranga crater,
BEVAN A. W. R. 1996. Australian crater-forming meteorites. AGSO September 1963. Unpublished report, Museum of Western
Journal of Australian Geology & Geophysics 16, 421–429. Australia, Perth.
BEVAN A. W. R. 1997. Obituaries—William Harold Cleverly. Journal of MCCALL G. J. H. 1965. New material from, and a reconsideration of,
the Royal Society of Western Australia 80, 289. the Dalgaranga meteorite and crater, Western Australia. Mineral-
BEVAN A. W. R. & GRIFFIN B. J. 1994. Re-examination of the Murchison ogical Magazine 35, 476–487.
Downs meteorite: A transported fragment of the Dalgaranga MCCALL G. J. H. 1977. New Material from, and a reconsideration of,
mesosiderite? Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 77, the Dalgaranga Meteorite and Crater, Western Australia.
45–49. In: McCall G. J. H. ed. Meteorite craters, p. 39. Benchmark Papers
BOSTICK M. 2002. Collector’s corner—the catalog of Colorado meteor- in Geology, Volume 36. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson &
ites. Meteorite Times Magazine 1(8). Online <http://www. Ross.
meteorite-times.com/Back_Links/2002/November/colectors_ MCCALL G. J. H. & DE LAETER J. R. 1965. Catalogue of Western Austra-
corner.htm>. lian meteorite collections. Special Publication No. 3. Western Aus-
BRITT D. T. & CONSOLMAGNO G. J. 2003. Stony meteorite porosities and tralian Museum, Perth.
densities: A review of the data through 2001. Meteoritics and McCall G. J. H., Bowden A. J. & Howarth R. J. eds. 2006. The history of
Planetary Science 38, 1161–1180. meteoritics and key meteorite collections. Special Publications No.
BROWN P. L. 1975. Comets, meteorites and men. The Scientific Book 256. London: Geological Society.
Club, London. MELOSH H. J. 1989. Impact cratering: a geologic process. Oxford: Oxford
BUCHWALD W. F. 1975. Handbook of iron meteorites: Their history, distri- University Press.
bution, composition, and structure. Volumes 1, 2 & 3. Berkeley: NININGER H. H. 1959a. Another meteorite crater studied. Science 130,
Downloaded by [University of Sydney] at 20:28 29 January 2014