Performance Indicators Rating

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Q E T Ave
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic 3. Curriculum and 7. Planned, managed Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Education Planning and implemented implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
sequenced teaching sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
and learning teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
processes to meet learning process learning process learning process learning process
curriculum as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
requirements and 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 1 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating of 4
varied teaching
contexts.

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
7.5 sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown 5 5 5 0.375
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process learning process learning process learning process
as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidently
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any 1 of
and supported by and supported by and supported by the given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable
collegial discussions participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
that use teacher and LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
learner feedback to meetings to meetings to meetings to teacher/learner
enrich teaching discuss discuss discuss feedback to enrich
practice teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner instruction as
feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich shown in the MOV
instruction as instruction as instruction as submitted
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted

7.5 1 2 1.5 0.1125

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ meeting evidence was
meetings as meetings as meetings as as evidently shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in shown in any 1 of
any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given the given MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Q E T Ave
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Basic 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Education Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
Services strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing shown
planning and developmentally - developmentally - developmentally - developmentally -
management of sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process learning process learning process learning process
and learning as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
processes to meet 1 with a rating of 8 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of 6 1 with a rating of 5
curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts.
7.5 5 5 5 0.375
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
4 lessons as lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable
colleagues, teacher collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
and learner feedback reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
to plan, facilitate and and learner and learner and learner and learner
enrich teaching feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
practice. evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
7.5 reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher review of teacher shown 5 5 5 0.375
and learner and learner and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
supported by any supported by any supported by any acceptable MOV
1 of the 1 of the 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness