To Investigate Maximum Shear Stress and Total Deformation on
ATV wheel Hub
1
Roman Kalvin , Muhammad Huzaifa, Abrar Hussain, Ahmed Hassan
1
(Students, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Wah Engineering College, University of Wah)
Abstract:
Center may be a part clinched
alongside wheel gathering for
automobiles. The center will help
those mounting of the wheel and brake
circle center will be a part which takes
greatest measure of cornering loads. A
center need Different pitch circle
diameters PCD like 124.96 mm. We
bring decided 124.96mm (PCD) to our
plan. We need picked M14 center bolts
to outlining the center. We bring
computed the stacking on the center in
light of the cornering load acting on the
vehicle. The model is intended in
strong works, furthermore
examination might have been
conveyed out in Ansys workbench. For
dissection three materials were chosen,
Al-6061-T6, furthermore structural
steel individually. The purpose load is
connected looking into a standout
amongst those stud gap and the minute
is connected on the remaining three
gaps and the inward surface of the
center may be provided for as demand.
Dependent upon those proportional
anxiety What's more deformity
qualities that material suitableness to
the center will be decided which need
base anxiety Also deformity.
Introduction :
The center will be those primary Some
piece in the wheel arrangement the
place the edge will make amassed of
the center. This center will bring
different PCD in view of the amount of
bolts utilized. Those center might
bring least of 4 studs. Those regular
PCD that need aid utilized for planning
those center would 100mm and
124.96mm. We need picked
124.96mm PCD for 4 bolts. Those
center gathering comprises of the
wheel bearing Also center will mount
those wheel of the vehicle. It will be
spotted the middle of the brake rotors
What's more hub. Those jolt example
may be decided Eventually Tom's
perusing number from claiming bolts
on the wheel center. Determination
about material if a chance to be solid
sufficient should take those weight of
the auto. Wheel bearing Choice for the
center relies on the internal
Furthermore external breadth about
shaft hailing crazy. The configuration
for wheel center must a chance to be in
view of stress produced under client
usage, through operational loads
acting with respect to wheels. Those
wheel center are Exceedingly steered
safety segments which must not fizzle
under those connected stacking states.
Those primary parameters from Linear thermal 2.32×10−5 K−1
claiming wheel center gathering need expansion
aid stacking condition, manufacturing coefficient (α)
methodology Also material conduct.
Specific heat 897 J/(kg·K)
Selection of Materials: capacity (c)
Research have been done on two
different materials. The first material is Electrical properties
Aluminum alloy 6061 and the other is
Magnesium alloy for our research Volume resistivity 32.5–39.2 nOhm·m
(ρ)
Properties of Aluminum Alloy

A6061 Properties of magnesium alloy

Physical properties

Density (ρ) 2.70 g/cm3[1]

Mechanical properties

Young's modulus 68.9 GPa

(E) (9,990 ksi)

Tensile 124–290 MPa

strength (σt) (18.0–42.1 ksi) Modeling:
Those center is demonstrated over
Elongation 12–25% strong meets expectations Also further
(ε) at break those examinations might have been
conveyed out in Ansys workbench.
Poisson's ratio (ν) 0.33 Throughout demonstrating those pitch
circle breadths will be made Likewise
Thermal properties 124.96mm. Those gaps furnished of
the center the place studs would on
Melting 585 °C (1,085 °F) make press fitted need aid 14mm
temperature (Tm) breadth which is suitableness to utilize
every last one of first supplies.
Thermal 151–202 W/(m·K)
conductivity (k)
Static analysis was done in Ansys
workbench. The load is given to the
 hub. After applying the different
material properties, the analysis is
carried out.

Static Analysis:
It has been researched that two Time [s] Minimum [m] Maximum [m]
different materials. the onewhich used
0.2 6.3397e-002 3.2623
Al 6061 and the other is Mg alloy.
Here. It has been performed that 0.4 0.12679 6.5246
maximum shear stress deformation 0.7 0.22189 11.418
and the total deformation on both 1 0.31699 16.312
materials hub Mg Alloy
Maximum Shear Stress
AL6061
Maximum Shear Stress

Total Deformation

Time [s] Minimum [Pa] Maximum [Pa] Time [s] Minimum [Pa] Maximum [Pa]
0.2 0.84083 1.6961e+005 1. 1 53.38 8.3376e+005
0.4 1.6764 3.3921e+005
0.7 2.9414 5.9363e+005 Total Deformation
1. 4.185 8.4804e+005
 Manufactured hub

Time [s] Minimum [m] Maximum [m]

1. 0.50014 25.736

Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Sir Roman
Kelvin (Lecturer Mechanical
Results Engineering Department, Wah
Engineering college, University of
Wah, Wah Cantt, Pakistan) for his
cooperation.

Conclusion
The maximum shear is nearly equal so
it does not really matter. Total
deformation is less in aluminum alloy
so it will be best suitable for our hub.
Reference:
[1]. Subramanian P M, Devendra Oza,
“STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF A
VENTILATED BRAKE DISC-HUB
ASSEMBLY FOR A MULTIUTILITY
VEHICLE”, Volume2, Issue-2.
[2]. Race car vehicle dynamics by
William F. Milliken and Douglas L.
Milliken, 1995,Chapter-16, Ride and
Roll rides, page no. 579-600.
[3]. Thomas D. Gillespie,
Fundamental of vehicle dynamics
(Society of automotive engineers).
[4]. J.Senthilkumar, J. Santhakumar,
A. Praveen, P.N.D.Swarup, “Design
and load analysis of pneumatic press
machine for automobile wheel hub
assembly - A case study.
[5].http://www.scientific.net/AMR.662
.661
[6]. Guide to ASTM test methods:
2nd edition, Page no.153,154.
[7]. Tune to Win by Carroll Smith,
Aero publishers, Inc.