Professional Documents
Culture Documents
R. L. Wiegel
Professor of Civil Engineering
University of California
Berkeley, California
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
82
WATER WAVE EQUIVALENT OF MACH-REFLECTION 83
For incident angles (the angle between the direction of wave advance
and the wall) greater than 35 to 45 degrees the reflection pattern is
"normal" (Fig. l). The incident and reflected waves are slightly dis-
turbed near the wall, but the angle of reflection is equal to the angle
of incidence, and the reflected wave height is only slightly less than
the incident wave height. However, the reflected wave is followed by a
trough, except for the case in which the angle of incidence is 90 degrees.
It is interesting to note that in the latter case the wave height at the
wall was 20 percent higher than twice the incident wave height.
I : Incident wave
R : Reflected wave
o 1
>
\
\
N
\
\
\
1
i—— — < i
The author (Wiegel, 1963) has observed ocean waves with the appear-
ance of a Mach-stem occurring along a curved structure, and this led to
another series of laboratory studies. A vertical wall breakwater was
made of a piece of sheet metal. A 2 ft long straight section, starting
at one wall of the tank, was placed at a 12 degree angle with the wall
(Sigurdsson and Wiegel, 1962). This straight section was connected
tangentially to a 66 degree segment of a circle of 3-33 ft radius, to
make a total change in direction of 16 degrees (Fig. 6). Tests made with
a barrier with a smooth wavy surface (corrugated aluminum, with corruga-
tions 0.021 ft deep by 0.135 ft long, about l/2 and 3 times the incident
wave height, respectively) and with a rough barrier showed similar results
(Fig. 7)- It was observed that the amplitudes at the barrier were greater
in the hollows than in the ridges of the corrugations.
The essential feature that was determined from the series of tests
just described is that once the Mach-reflection starts, with an angle of
incidence less than the required value, the non-linear Mach-stem becomes
so strong that it continues to move around the curved barrier, normal to
the barrier, and near the end of the barrier becomes independent of the
incident wave. In this region there were essentially two separate waves,
the "incident wave" and the Mach-stem advancing at an appreciable angle
(up to 90 degrees) to the "incident wave." These two waves were connected
86 COASTAL ENGINEERING
Wave Break
(near critical angle
at which break ceases)
70
a = 0 16'
HT
60 -f
a = 0 325
(pos 8)
50
Non- Breaking Region
40
_0__ D
-c—
T3
•30 OVv,
20
E reakin g Reg on
N i\
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 I
P, degrees
(after CHEN, 1961)
60
d = 0.16'
50 d
0.275
o> 30 ^
a> "ft—1i~*v~'
•o
t> lo Ref ection
•- 20
No Re fleeted Wove
10
3.0
CREST POSITIONS
a •^ •0<
1 1 1 to
U3IMyv8 JO 0N3 0>
^
/f
<( a i
7
30 m
o
in
c
O
to
V>
•o
CO ^
a: a>
UJ (7)
or
or b
o
<
m 3
_i
<
O o
en <fr •- H
UJ ce
UJ UJ
>
< 9 1
> or
or
Ul Ul
UJ z
or o
X X
i- i-
or 1-
z < <
§ >
Om UJ
to _l
— O t\j in in <* O
00 CO — 00 oo en Ul
M * — <V CM CM Z
o UJ
0 d o 6 o o -1 >
<
•I ii ii ii H M
I
5^^^ Ul
o s
X X X l" X' X z
<
1-
2
or X
UJ <
2
GE
<
CO
1
-r-
-0-4A
< < 4 Ul UJ U.
to to to to to to
UJ UJ W Ul UJ UJ
or or or or or a:
UJ Ul Ul Ul Ul u
to to to to w to
o • e o • 0
o CO to 00 to CO to CVI O
CO CM C\j d o d o
('H/H) 1H9I3H 3AVM 1N30I0NI / 1H9I3H 3AVM
FIGURE 7
90 COASTAL ENGINEERING
by a transition zone, and in this zone the incident and stem waves were
superimposed, and there was a considerable variation in the profile.
When a barrier was made of 3/8 inch gravel to the same plan as the
impervious barrier, but with a 36 degree side slope, there was no indica-
tion of either a build up of wave amplitude at the barrier, or of a
reflected wave.
The first series of tests were made in the same tank as the one used
in the various tests described in the previous section. Most of the tests
were made using the same water depth, 0.160 ft, but some tests were made
in deeper water, 0.2^0 ft. It was found that for shallow water waves a
Mach-stem formed which was similar to the one formed by the solitary wave.
This was true even for waves in the transitional region, as can be seen
in Fig. 8a in which the phenomenon is shown for an L/d of 4.9 for angles
of incidence of 5> 10 > 15> and- 20 degrees. In these shadow photographs
the dark lines are the wave crest, and the wider the "line" the higher
the wave. In deep water a type of Mach-stem forms, but it occurs to the
rear of the incident wave and is connected to the incident wave by a
crest with a compound curve, as can be seen in Fig. 8b. In addition, a
curved Mach-reflected type of wave also occurs which is similar in appear-
ance to the Mach-reflected wave of a solitary wave when 20 degrees
< i < 35 to k3 degrees. It is different in that it locks in with the
intersection of the Mach-stem and incident wave of the following wave.
For deeper water waves, L/d < 2, it appears that the reflected wave
gradually develops into something similar to a normal type of reflection
pattern, except that there appears to be a small Mach-stem adjacent to
the barrier. For example, as can be seen in Fig. 8c for i > 5 to 10
degrees, the more or less regular reflection pattern seems to be emerg-
ing, while for i = 5 degrees only the Mach-stem occurs.
It was found that the width of the Mach-stem increased as the wave
moved along the barrier, as was the case for the solitary wave. It was
found that the longer the wave length the greater the width for a given
distance along the barrier; however, it was found that the solitary wave
had the minimum width for a given distance, which is quite surprising as
one normally thinks of a solitary wave having a long "length."
The ratio of wave height of the stem at the barrier to the incident
wave height, H/HJ, was a complicated function of distance along the bar-
rier, water depth and wave length. In general, for a given angle of
incidence it increased up to a certain distance along the barrier, and
92 COASTAL ENGINEERING
The results were similar to the results obtained through the use of
the small model basin. Color motion pictures were taken (l6 mm), and
they were studied thoroughly. Use of these motion pictures, together
with the other types of results, permitted Nielsen to determine the
details of the motion of a system of periodic waves moving along a curved
barrier. His conclusions, in graphical form, are given in Fig. 12. The
Mach-stem forms on the straight portion of the barrier (A), dropping
behind the wave crest (which is different from the case of the solitary
wave). As it moves along the curved section, a Mach-reflected wave also
forms (B). AS the wave moves still farther along the curve, the Mach-
stem and Mach-reflected waves seem to coalesce (C), and then separate
from the barrier as a free wave (D) moving nearly normally to the direc-
tion of the incident wave. At this stage the free wave is independent
of the incident wave. The effect of this transition from one type of
wave to another on the wave height along the barrier can be seen in
Fig. 13. The amplitude increases in height gradually as it moves along
the barrier, and then increases rather rapidly as the Mach-stem and Mach-
reflected waves coalesce. Then, as the wave "separates" from the barrier
the height at the barrier decreases rapidly, although the height a short
distance from the barrier is still high.
2.4-
2.2
2.0
/
v
1.8
3*7*"
o <*
1.6
o
v/ A
•
1.4 A*.
x'
r-i» a
X* "O JL
15^ A+
1.2 -S^.**!.
/
cr;? sr D
/
1.0 £_
0.8
LEGEND:
MACH STEM
MACH STEM
REFECTION
A)PURE
MACH STEM
in 0
TIVM A0y aN3 _a> CC
CO
o cc
0
ro -O HI
N i-
<
5 ^_
•x. 4-
C\J
< o u>
e UJ 0»
_o
to
a: — —
II
CD
T> c
sn
OJ
_|
<
V
in
o a>
0
*
_ Z
1-
-O
lO ce
UJ
d E
> ?i
$
a H
UJ X
O o >
cu -O
^" cc
3 _l
o UJ
Q
O
Z 5
°o q
_i o
~io
< z
in z
o
0
o I
o H o
*CM < cc
>
UJ
_l V)
0
UJ X
H-
"KT UJ <s>
O > z
< UJ
_l
UJ
2
3 3
S 5
X
< z
m s Ui
1 cc
UJ
ro u.
u.
Ul a
cc
o h u.
98 COASTAL ENGINEERING
like a Mach-stera (Fig. 13). Another photograph, showing the wave rolling
into tne town, is shown in Fig. 16.
It was found, for waves from the north, that a wave which had the
appearance of a Mach-stem was generated along the west cliff and rolled
into the town of Hilo in a manner that was similar to observations. It
was also found that the shoaling effect was about as theory predicted;
that is, the wave height increased by a factor of about k over the reef,
with respect to the wave height in the deep water portion of the tank.
After the tests had been run, it was brought to the investigator's
attention that due to refraction in the ocean, the tsunamis generated ofi
Chile would most likely approach Hilo Bay from an easterly direction,
rather than from a southeasterly direction as was originally supposed.
Because of this, the results of the model tests for the waves from the
east will be described herein. A remarkable phenomenon was observed in
the 12 to 20 minute (prototype) period range. Referring to Fig. lrfa,
the initial wave refracted to about the position shown as (l)-(l). The
northerly portion started to reflect from the coast while the southerly
portion continued to move towards shore. This resulted in the pattern
(2A)-(2A) as the reflected portion and (2)-(2) as the continuing portion.
As the reflected portion (2A)-(2A) moved down the coast, it became inde-
pendent of (2)-(2). At the same time the southerly tip of (2)-(2) dif-
fracted into the harbor, raising the water level. About at the same time
(2A)-(2A) progressed to position (3)-(3) with the portion near the coast
being considerably higher than the portion offshore. The portion near
the coast ran right along the coast, reaching positions (**-)-(4) and
(5)-(5) as a high wave running on top of the water which had diffracted
into the harbor from (2)-(2). It then ran into the town of Hilo. The
author believes that something similar to this must have happened during
the actual tsunami.
HILO
HILO
(<2A)-(2A) ana (*>)-(i) '<=• i4aeh-st«:n type of pnenomencn evolved ana because
of its strength o came inaepenaent of the normally reflected portion of
the wave. In Fi^. 1 [b are shown the successive positions of this Mach-
stfam type of wave a , it moves along tne coast. Trierf. positions were
traced f'roTi enlargements of a 16 mm motion picture taken during the model
study, for a wave of b' second period (io minute period in the prototype).
ACKNOWLfc.DGMfc.NTo
Rfc.FERfc.NCES
Perroud, Paul Henri, The solitary wave reflection along a straight ver-
tical wall at oblique incidence, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, IER
Tech. Rept. 99-3, 93 pp., Sept. 1957.