You are on page 1of 4

Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR)

Vol-2, Issue-12, 2016


ISSN: 2454-1362, http://www.onlinejournal.in

A Review On: Comparison between Different


Techniques for Treating Wastewater
1
Mr. Rahul Bhargava,2 Payal Shivramwar,2 Shubham Panchal
1
Assistant Professor Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Indore Institute of Science &
Technology, Indore
2
Student, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Indore Institute of Science & Technology, Indore
Abstract: A reawaken interest in electro The chemicals used in wastewater treatment
coagulation has taken place by the search for include Alum, Ferric chloride, Ferric sulfate,
reliable , compatible, safe and versatile method for Ferrous sulfate, and Lime. The handling and
the wastewater treatment. EC present a booming disposal of the sludge resulting from chemical
and innovatory alternative process which operates precipitation is one of the greatest difficulties
on the base of the principle that cations from associated with chemical treatment. These
anodes are responsible for the increasing of the chemicals are not only expensive, but, more
coagulation of contaminants from an aqueous importantly, the net increase in the dissolved
medium. Wastewater contains high amount of constituents in the wastewater render it impractical
COD, BOD, Turbidity, SS etc. Various techniques or impossible to reuse. Total sludge generated by
are available such as coagulation, adsorption Chemical precipitation contains 49 percent added
chemical oxidation etc. for treatment of wastewater coagulant. The added sludge generated by chemical
but highest results are found from the emerging precipitation effectively doubles the sludge
ELECTRO COAGULATION technique. EC can be disposal volume.
successfully used to treat numerous wastewater
which is discussed in the paper.
1.3 Electro-Coagulation
Keywords: Wastewater, Electro coagulation,
Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical EC is an advanced economical water treatment
Oxygen Demand (COD). process that has been shown to be effective in
removing suspended solids, de polluting heavy
1. Introduction metals and breaking down emulsifiers. EC utilizes
methods that precipitate out large quantities of
Water and energy are the major concern of present contaminants in one operation, the technology is
era. Due to increased pollution souces quality of the distinct economical and environmental choice
water become a crucial problem. Among some of for industrial, commercial and municipal waste
the promising methods based on electrochemical treatment. The capital and operating costs are
technique is ELECTROCOAGULATION. usually significantly less than chemical
coagulation. The inherent disadvantages associated
1.1 Coagulation with most chemical unit processes is that they are
additive processes. This problem is eliminated in
Coagulation is the most widespread and practical the Electro coagulation process. EC uses electricity
method of removing colloidal solids from to precipitate the dissolved and suspended solids.
wastewater. This is a process of destabilizing The total dissolved solids in the liquid usually
colloids, aggregating them, and joining them decrease by 27 to 60 percent. Electro coagulation
together for ease of sedimentation. It entails the produces a cleaner water than either chemical
formation of chemical floccs that adsorb, entrap, or precipitation or sedimentation . The total sludge
otherwise bring together suspended matter, more generated by EC contains less than 0.5 percent
particularly suspended matter that is so finely added coagulant. As discharge requirements
divided as to be colloidal. become more stringent , EC will become more
essential.
1.2 Chemical Coagulation

Chemical precipitation in wastewater treatment


involves the addition of chemicals to alter the
physical state of dissolved and suspended solids 2. Literature Review
and to facilitate their removal by sedimentation.

Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) Page 2251


Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR)
Vol-2, Issue-12, 2016
ISSN: 2454-1362, http://www.onlinejournal.in

2.1 Chemical Coagulation Technique effective process.

E. Demirbas et al in the present study dealt with


treatment performances and operating cost of real
metalworking fluid wastewater (MWFW) using
chemical coagulation (CC). The optimum
coagulant dosage for COD and Turbidity removal
efficiencies from the MWFW was determined with
varying concentrations of alum, aluminium
chloride, ferric sulphate, and ferric chloride. COD
and Turbidity removal efficiencies in the coagulant
dosage range of 50–1000 mg/L were obtained as
65-97% and 49-81% for alum, 48-96% and 38-80%
for aluminium chloride, 43-92% and 36-76% for
ferric sulphate, and 55-93% and 41-77% for ferric
chloride, respectively. The aluminium-based
coagulants at a pH of 7.5 showed better
performances than ferric-based coagulants in terms Fig 1 . Combined effect of electrolysis time and
of COD and Turbidity removals. voltage on percentage of COD removal.

Dr. C.B. Shivayogimath et al. (July 2014)


Yasir Talib Hameed et al investigated Chemical examined and investigated the operating
composition and flocculation efficiency for a parameters required such as electrolysis time,
commercially produced tannin . Study was made to applied voltage & pH . During the study it was
see the effectiveness of CC process in COD and found that COD and Turbidity removal are 98.75%
turbidity removal. In the process Tanfloc was used and 97.82% in very short electrolysis time of 10
as coagulant which showed high turbidity removal minutes applied voltage 7V and pH 6 and the
efficiency of approximately 90%, while removal specific electric energy consumption of 0.00011
efficiencies of BOD and COD were around 60%. KWH/kg COD removal.

N B Prakash in the present study aims to treat a


sample of sea water for the removal of impurities
by various coagulants such as Alum, Ferric
Chloride and Ferrous Sulphate. The waste water
sample has been treated with different
concentrations of alum ranging between 0 and 200
mg/L. The pH of the water has been adjusted with
sulphuric acid/ lime from 5.0 to 8.0 and different
dosage of Alum from 60 mg/l to 180 mg/L to
obtain the optimum pH and alum dosage. The
optimum pH and dosage were observed to be 7.0 Fig 2 . Turbidity removal vs time at different
and 120 mg/L respectively. At this pH the colour voltages at pH 6
removal is more than 76% when the turbidity
removal is around 80 %. Dr. P.B. Kalburgi and Gouri Mirji (June 2014) in
electro coagulation examined the effect of PH,
electrolysis time and applied voltage. In this article
2.2 Electro Coagulation Technique aluminium and iron electrode is used as cathode
and anode which gives the greatest efficiency.
K Sahithi inc (2015) proposed use of iron Optimum value of applied voltage, pH, and
electrodes in EC process for treatment of textile Electrolysis time were 5V, 6, and 10 min
effluent in this paper. Individual and combined respectively. The batch experiment results the
effects of process parameters such as pH, voltage removal of COD and Turbidity to the extend of
and electrolysis time were studied over COD 92.6% and 95.2% respectively and the energy
removal. Maximum optimum condition for consumption was 0.0003 kwh/kg of COD removal.
99.347% COD removal efficiency were found to be
pH 7.23, voltage 8.77 V and electrolysis time of 2.3 Chemical Oxidation
84.29 min. Paper concluded that EC is a simple
operation and highly reliable which makes it a cost-

Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) Page 2252


Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR)
Vol-2, Issue-12, 2016
ISSN: 2454-1362, http://www.onlinejournal.in

Abdel-Aal et al (2015) in this work studied a effluent with less total dissolved solids (TDS)
comparison between fenton process and photo- content as compared with chemical treatments, has
fenton oxidation process as advanced oxidation the advantage of removing the smallest colloidal
processes for treatment of tannery wastewater. The particles because the applied electric field sets them
chemical oxygen demand (COD) is 554 ppm, total in faster motion, avoids uses of chemicals and so
organic carbon (TOC) is 170.8 ppm, total dissolved there is no problem of neutralizing excess
solids is 50gl-1 and the pH is 3.5. The maximum chemicals and no possibility of secondary pollution
COD removal is (82.7%) for fentonʼs oxidation caused by chemical substances as when dealt with
process and for photo-Fenton process giving chemical coagulation, the gas bubbles produced
maximum COD removal (90.1%) at pH 3 and time during electrolysis can carry the pollutant to the top
2h. of the solution where it can be more easily
concentrated, collected and removed, has no
Parveen Kumar et al (2011) in their study treated moving parts thus requires less maintenance, EC
pulp and paper industry effluent by advanced technique can be conveniently used in rural areas
oxidation. The photo-oxidation experiments are where electricity is not available since a solar panel
performed under UV radiation in a slurry-type of attached to the unit may be sufficient to carry out
reactor with optimized treatment conditions being the process.
pH 7.0, 0.5 g/L of TiO2 and 15 mm/L of H2O2 for
4 hours. The treatment for 4 hrs with 4. Conclusion
UV/TiO2/H2O2 removes the organic load of the
primary clarified effluent by 57.9 % in COD, 42.9 Minial national standards (MINAS) has been set
% in BOD, and 89.2 % in colour and of bio treated for output from treatment plants. Various
effluent by 74.8 % in COD, 52.7 % in BOD, and alternative treatment methods have been proposed
95.4 % in colour. to match these standards. EC proves to be an
promising, reliable, and cost effective method. This
technology has been widely used for the treatment
2.4 Adsorption of heavy metals, foodstuffs, oil wastes, textile and
dyes , organic matter containing wastewater. EC
Mecabih Zohra et al (2014) used Puri.bent and has the capability to overcome disadvantages of
FeAl-PILC to fix the organic matter (OM) present other techniques.
in urban wastewater. The maximum adsorption
capacity was 571.6 mg/g for puri.bent and 1120.69
mg/g for FeAl-PLC. The degree of OM removal
5. References
was 67% for puri.bent and 97% for FeAl-PILC.
1. K Sahithi, V Sujatha, V Sridevi, (2015), Removal
Ademiluyi et al (2009) investigated the adsorption of COD from textile effluent using electro
and treatment of organic contaminants using coagulation: Statistical design and modelling,
activated carbon from waste Nigerian bamboo . It International Journal of Engineering &
was found that Chemical oxygen demand (COD) Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 10, 2278-0181.
was reduced from an initial value of 378 mg/l to 2. Gouri Mirji, Dr. P.B.Kalburgi, (2014), Study of
142 mg/l for the first hour, 143 mg/l for the second Electro coagulation Mechanism on dairy
hour, 152 mg/l for the third and fourth hours, and wastewater for COD and Turbidity removal,
International Journal of Advance Engineering and
156 mg/l for the final hour.
Research Development, Vol. 1, Issue 6, 2348-
4470.
3. Dr. C.B.Shivayogimath, Vijayalaxmi R Naik,
3. Discussion (2014), Treatment of dairy industry wastewater
using Electro coagulation Technique, International
Various treatment methods although successful in Journal of Engineering Research & technology,
treating wastewater but failed in giving satisfactory 2278-0181.
4. Parveen Kumar, Satish Kumar, Nishi K. Bhardwaj
results.
, Ashutosh Kumar Choudhary, (2011), Advanced
Oxidation of Pulp and Paper Industry Effluent,
Several advantages of EC process were seen over International conference on environmental and
other traditional coagulation technique. Process agricultural engineering, Vol. 15.
requires simple equipment and is easy to operate 5. Abdel-Aal,E.A.1,Farghaly,F.E.1,Abdel-Wahed,El-
with sufficient operational latitude, wastewater Shahat, (2015), International journal of scientific
treated by EC gives palatable, clear, colourless and research in agricultural science, 2345-6795.
odourless water, sludge formed by EC tends to be 6. Ademiluyi, Amadi, Amakama, Nimisingha Jacob,
readily settable and easy to de-water, it produces (2009), Adsorption and treatment of organic
contaminants using activated carbon from waste

Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) Page 2253


Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR)
Vol-2, Issue-12, 2016
ISSN: 2454-1362, http://www.onlinejournal.in

Nigerian bamboo, J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage,


Vol. 13, 1119-8362.
7. Mecabih Zohra, Jerome Rose, Daniel Borschneck,
(2014), Urban wastewater treatment by Adsorption
of organic matters on modified Bentonite by Iron-
Aluminum, Journal of Encapsulation and
Adsorption Sciences.
8. C.B.Shivayogimath, Rashmi Jahagirdar, (2015),
Treatment of Sugar Industry Wastewater using
Electrocoagulation technique, International Journal
of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2321-
7308.
9. I.G. Rashed, (2005), Overview on chemical
oxidation technology in wastewater treatment,
Ninth international water technology conference.
10. A K A Rathi, (2002), Chemical Industry
wastewater Treatment using Adsorption, Journal of
Scientific & Industrial research, Vol. 61.

Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) Page 2254

You might also like