You are on page 1of 23

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: JOHN REY G. INMENZO Name of Rater: ROWENA ALLERA ACAYLAR
Position: Secondary School Teacher I Position: OIC - Department Head of Mathematics/ Master Teacher II
Department of Education/ Division of Occidental Mindoro
Bureau/Center/Service/ Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Rating Period: School Year 2018 - 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING


Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives TimelineWeight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge No acceptable
Education Knowledg knowledge of content and its content and its content and its of content and its evidence was shown
Services e and content integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within
Pedagogy within and across subject areas as across subject areas across subject areas as and across subject
across Quality shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with areas as shown in
curriculum rating of 7 with a rating of 6 a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating
teaching of 4
areas.
7.5%
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV 1 using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and the given MOV evidence was shown
and supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
Efficiency of the other given MOV the other given MOV the other given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
Education range of different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was shown
Services teaching strategies that promote strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies reading writing and/or promote reading promote reading promote reading
that enhance numeracy skills as writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
learner Quality shown in MOV 1 with a numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
schievement rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
in literacy and a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
numeracy
skills

7.5%
schievement
in literacy and
numeracy
skills
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner- Submitted 2 learner- Submitted 1 learner- No acceptable
7.5% learner-centered lessons centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as evidence was shown
as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported any of the other
by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other given MOV
Efficiency MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives TimelineWeight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a Used different teaching Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education Knowledg range of strategies that develop teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was shown
Services e and teaching critical and creative that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
Pedagogy strategies to thinking skills and/or and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking
develop other HOTS as shown in skills and/or other skills and/or other skills and/or other
critical and MOV 1 with a rating of 7 HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in
creative Quality MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a rating
thinking, as of 6 5 of 4
well as other
higher order
thinking skills.
7.5%
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons as Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as evidenced by as evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 as evidenced by any evidence was shown
MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported by and supported by any of the other given
by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other 1 of the other given MOV
Efficiency given MOV given MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. 4. Managed Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Education Learning classroom management strategies management management management evidence was shown
Services Environme structure to that engage learners in strategies that engage strategies that engage strategies that
nt and engage activities/tasks as shown learners in learners in engage learners in
Diversity learners, in MOV 1 with a rating activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
of individually or of 7 shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
Learners in groups, in Quality a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
meanigful
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on
activities
within a Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
range of lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of evidence was shown
physical 7.5%
MOV 1 and any 1 of the and any 1 of the other and any 1 of the other the acceptable MOV
learning other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments Efficiency
.

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Education learner management strategies management management management evidence was shown
Services behavior of learner behavior that strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner
constructively promote positive and behavior that behavior that promote behavior that
by applying non-violent discipline as promote positive and positive and non- promote positive
positive and shown in MOV non-violent discipline violent discipline as and non-violent
non-violent submitted with a rating as shown in MOV shown in MOV discipline as shown
discipline to Quality of 7 submitted with a submitted with a in MOV submitted
ensure rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4
learning-
focused
environment
7.5%
positive and shown in MOV non-violent discipline violent discipline as and non-violent
non-violent submitted with a rating as shown in MOV shown in MOV discipline as shown
discipline to Quality of 7 submitted with a submitted with a in MOV submitted
ensure rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4
learning-
focused
environment
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least 4 of Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
the given strategies as the given strategies as the given strategies as the given strategies evidence was shown
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons as observed in only 1
lessons lesson

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives TimelineWeight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 2. 6. Used Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied No acceptable
Education Learning differentiated, teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to differentiated evidence was shown
Services Environme development address learner diversity address learner address learner teaching strategies to
nt and ally as shown in MOV 1 with diversity as shown in diversity as shown in address learner
Diversity appropriate a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of diversity as shown in
of learning Quality of 6 5 MOV 1 with a rating
Learners experiences of 4
to address
learners’
gender,
needs,
strengths, Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
interests and differentiated teaching differentiated differentiated teaching differentiated evidence was shown
experiences. strategies in at least 2 teaching strategies in strategies in 2 lessons teaching strategy in
7.5% lessons as evidenced by at least 2 lessons as as evidenced by MOV only 1 lesson as
MOV 1 and supported evidenced by MOV 1 1 and supported by evidently shown in
by any 1 of the other and supported by any any 1 of the other any 1 of the
acceptable MOV 1 of the other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Efficiency acceptable MOV
Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Planned, Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Education Curriculu managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was shown
Services m and implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
Planning development sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
ally learning process as and learning process and learning process and learning process
sequenced Quality shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
teaching and rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
learning
processes to
meet
curriculum
requirements
and varied Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
teaching developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was shown
contexts. 7.5% sequenced teaching and sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
learning process as and learning process and learning process and learning process
evidently shown in MOV as evidently shown in as evidently shown in as evidently shown in
1 and supported by any MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported any 1 of the given
1 of the other given by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other MOV
Efficiency MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives TimelineWeight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 3. 8. Consistently participated Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated in No acceptable
Education Curriculu Participated in LACs/FGDs/meetings participated in participated in LAC/FGD/ meeting to evidence was shown
Services m and in collegial to discuss LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/ meetings discuss
Planning discussions teacher/learner to discuss to discuss teacher/learner
that use feedback to enrich teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
teacher and instruction as shown in feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as shown
learner Quality the MOV submitted instruction as shown instruction as shown in in the MOV
feedback to in the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
enrich
Basic 3. 8. Consistently participated Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated in No acceptable
Education Curriculu Participated in LACs/FGDs/meetings participated in participated in LAC/FGD/ meeting to evidence was shown
Services m and in collegial to discuss LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/ meetings discuss
Planning discussions teacher/learner to discuss to discuss teacher/learner
that use feedback to enrich teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
teacher and instruction as shown in feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as shown
learner Quality the MOV submitted instruction as shown instruction as shown in in the MOV
feedback to in the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
enrich
teaching
practice.
7.5%
Participated in at least 4 Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable
LACs/FGDs/meetings as LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/meetings LAC/FGD/meeting as evidence was shown
evidently shown in any 1 as evidently shown in as evidently shown in evidently shown in
of the given MOV any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given
Efficiency MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No acceptable
Education developed, varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and evidence was shown
Services organized and learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
used including ICT, to address including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
appropriate learning goals as shown address learning goals address learning goals address learning
teaching and in MOV 1 with a rating as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 goals as shown in
learning Quality of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating
resources, of 4
including ICT,
to address
learning
goals.

7.5% Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
varied teaching and teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning evidence was shown
learning resources, resources, including resources, including resource, including
including ICT, as ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently shown ICT, as evidently
evidently shown in MOV shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and shown in any of the
1 and supported by any supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of acceptable MOV
1 of the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
Efficiency
including ICT, as ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently shown ICT, as evidently
evidently shown in MOV shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and shown in any of the
1 and supported by any supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of acceptable MOV
1 of the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
Efficiency

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives TimelineWeight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable
Education Assessme selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was shown
Services nt and organized and diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative
Reporting used and summative and summative and summative and summative
diagnostic, assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment strategies assessment
formative and consistent with consistent with consistent with strategies consistent
summative curriculum curriculum curriculum with curriculum
assessment requirements as shown requirements as requirements as requirements as
strategies in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
consistent of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
with
curriculum Quality
requirements.

7.5%

Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable


varied assessment tools assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was shown
as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
Efficiency any 1 of the acceptable any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the acceptable
MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
Efficiency any 1 of the acceptable any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the acceptable
MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 11. Consistently monitored Frequently monitored Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable
Education Monitored and evaluated learner and evaluated learner monitored and and evaluated evidence was shown
Services and evaluated progress and progress and evaluated learner learner progress and
learner achievement using achievement using progress and achievement using
progress and learner attainment data learner attainment achievement using learner attainment
achievement Quality as shown in the MOV data as shown in the learner attainment data as shown in the
using learner submitted MOV submitted data as shown in the MOV submitted
attainment MOV submitted
data.

7.5%
Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at least 4 combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was shown
Efficiency of the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV

Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was shown
Timeliness quarters quarters quarters quarter

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives TimelineWeight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic 4. 12.Communic Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed No acceptable
Education Assessme a ted prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear evidence was shown
Services nt and promptly and communication of the communication of the communication of the communication of
Reporting clearly the learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, the learners’ needs,
learners’ progress and progress and progress and progress and
needs, achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
progress and stakeholders, including stakeholders, stakeholders, including stakeholders,
achievement parents/ guardians as including parents/ parents/ guardians as including parents/
to key shown in the MOV guardians as shown in shown in the MOV guardians as shown
stakeholders, submitted the MOV submitted submitted in the MOV
including Quality submitted
parents/
guardians.

7.5%
stakeholders, submitted the MOV submitted submitted in the MOV
including Quality submitted
parents/
guardians.

7.5%

Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


combination of at least 4 combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was shown
Efficiency of the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV

Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was shown
Timeliness quarters quarters quarters quarter

Basic 5. Plus 13. Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Education Factor Performed various related various related performed various various related evidence was shown
Services various work/activities that work/activities that related work/activities work/activities that
related contribute to the contribute to the that contribute to the contribute to the
works/activiti teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
es that process as shown in the process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in
contribute to Quality MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
the teaching-
learning
process. 10%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of kinds of acceptable kinds of acceptable the acceptable MOV evidence was shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory JOHN REY G. INMENZO ROWENA ALLERA ACAYLAR
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater
OMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
ROWENA ALLERA ACAYLAR
OIC - Department Head of Mathematics/ Master Teacher II
April 5, 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Rating
Actual Results Ave Score
Q E T
Showed knowledge #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
of content and its
integration within
and across subject
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 6

Submitted 2 lessons
using MOV 1 and
supported by any 1
of the other given
MOV

Facilitated using #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


different teaching
strategies that
promote reading
writing and/or
numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 6
Submitted 2 learner-
centered lessons as
evidently shown in
MOV 1 and
supported by any 1
of the other MOV
given

Rating
Actual Results Ave Score
Q E T
Used different #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
teaching strategies
that develop critical
and creative thinking
skills and/or other
HOTS as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 6

Submitted 2 lessons
as evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by
any 1 of the other
given MOV
Used classroom #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/tasks as
shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 6

Submitted 2 lessons
supported by MOV 1
and any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV

Applied teacher 5 3 4.000 0.300


management
strategies of learner
behavior that
promote positive
and non-violent
discipline as shown
in MOV submitted
with a rating of 7
and non-violent
discipline as shown
in MOV submitted
with a rating of 7

Submitted at least 4
of the given
strategies as
observed in 2 lessons

Rating
Actual Results Ave Score
Q E T
Applied #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
differentiated
teaching strategies to
address learner
diversity as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 5

Submitted at least 4
differentiated
teaching strategies in
at least 2 lessons as
evidenced by MOV 1
and supported by
any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV
Planned and #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
implemented
developmentally
sequenced teaching
and learning process
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6

Submitted 2
developmentally
sequenced teaching
and learning process
as evidently shown in
MOV 1 and
supported by any 1
of the other given
MOV

Rating
Actual Results Ave Score
Q E T
Consistently #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
participated in
LACs/FGDs/meetings
to discuss
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction as shown
in the MOV
submitted
Consistently #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
participated in
LACs/FGDs/meetings
to discuss
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Participated in at
least 4
LACs/FGDs/meetings
as evidently shown in
any 1 of the given
MOV

Developed and used #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


varied teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 7

Submitted at least 4
varied teaching and
learning resources,
including ICT, as
evidently shown in
MOV 1 and
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV
including ICT, as
evidently shown in
MOV 1 and
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV

Rating
Actual Results Ave Score
Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
evidence was shown

Submitted 3 varied
assessment tools as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
evidently shown in
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

Consistently #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


monitored and
evaluated learner
progress and
achievement using
learner attainment
data as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted a
combination of at
least 4 of the
acceptable MOV

Submitted MOV were


distributed across 3
quarters

Rating
Actual Results Ave Score
Q E T
Consistently showed #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
prompt and clear
communication of
the learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians as shown
in the MOV
submitted
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted a
combination of 3 of
the acceptable MOV

Submitted MOV were


distributed across 4
quarters

Occasionally #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


performed various
related
work/activities that
contribute to the
teaching learning
process as shown in
the MOV submitted

Submitted 2 different
kinds of acceptable
MOV

RATING FOR OVER-ALL


ACCOMPLISHMENTS #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

GLECILDA AGUILAR URIETA


Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: JOHN REY G. INMENZO Name of Rater: ROWENA ALLERA ACAYLAR
Position: Secondary School Teacher I Position: OIC - Department Head of Mathematics/ Master Teacher II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/ Division of Occ. Mindoro Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Rating Period: School Year 2018 - 2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings


KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 3 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 4 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5 3 4.000 0.300
Objective 6 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 7 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 9 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 10 7.5% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Objective 12 7.5% 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

JOHN REY G. INMENZO ROWENA ALLERA ACAYLAR GLECILDA AGUILAR URIETA


Ratee Rater Approving Authority

You might also like