You are on page 1of 12

Frequency Table

pengetahuan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid rendah 16 22.9 22.9 22.9
sedang 25 35.7 35.7 58.6
tinggi 29 41.4 41.4 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0

duk_suami
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid baik 43 61.4 61.4 61.4
kurang 27 38.6 38.6 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0

IMD
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid dilakukan 40 57.1 57.1 57.1
tidak dilakukan 30 42.9 42.9 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0

duk_tekes
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid baik 47 67.1 67.1 67.1
kurang 23 32.9 32.9 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0

usia ibu
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid < 20 tahun 1 1.4 1.4 1.4
20 - 35 tahun 59 84.3 84.3 85.7
>35 10 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0
paritas
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid primipara 44 62.9 62.9 62.9
multipara 16 22.9 22.9 85.7
grandepara 10 14.3 14.3 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0

pendidikan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid tidak sekolah 3 4.3 4.3 4.3
pendidikan dasar 36 51.4 51.4 55.7
pendidikan menengah 25 35.7 35.7 91.4
pendidikan tinggi 6 8.6 8.6 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0

pekerjaan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid bekerja 38 54.3 54.3 54.3
tidak bekerja 32 45.7 45.7 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0

apgar
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid tanpa asfiksia 61 87.1 87.1 87.1
asfiksia sedang 7 10.0 10.0 97.1
asfiksia berat 2 2.9 2.9 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0

bb_bayi
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid <2500 gr 5 7.1 7.1 7.1
2500 - 4000 gr 63 90.0 90.0 97.1
>4000 gr 2 2.9 2.9 100.0
Total 70 100.0 100.0
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pengetahuan * IMD 70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

duk_suami * IMD 70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

duk_tekes * IMD 70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

usia ibu * IMD 70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

paritas * IMD 70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

pendidikan * IMD 70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

pekerjaan * IMD 70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

apgar * IMD 70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

bb_bayi * IMD 70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

pengetahuan * IMD
Crosstab

IMD

dilakukan tidak dilakukan Total

pengetahuan rendah Count 2 14 16

% within pengetahuan 12.5% 87.5% 100.0%

% within IMD 5.0% 46.7% 22.9%

% of Total 2.9% 20.0% 22.9%

sedang Count 15 10 25

% within pengetahuan 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%

% within IMD 37.5% 33.3% 35.7%

% of Total 21.4% 14.3% 35.7%

tinggi Count 23 6 29

% within pengetahuan 79.3% 20.7% 100.0%

% within IMD 57.5% 20.0% 41.4%

% of Total 32.9% 8.6% 41.4%

Total Count 40 30 70

% within pengetahuan 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 18.923a 2 .000

Likelihood Ratio 20.331 2 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 17.408 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 70

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 6,86.

duk_suami * IMD
Crosstab

IMD

dilakukan tidak dilakukan Total

duk_suami baik Count 25 18 43

% within duk_suami 58.1% 41.9% 100.0%

% within IMD 62.5% 60.0% 61.4%

% of Total 35.7% 25.7% 61.4%

kurang Count 15 12 27

% within duk_suami 55.6% 44.4% 100.0%

% within IMD 37.5% 40.0% 38.6%

% of Total 21.4% 17.1% 38.6%

Total Count 40 30 70

% within duk_suami 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .045a 1 .832
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .045 1 .832
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .513
Linear-by-Linear Association .045 1 .833
N of Valid Casesb 70
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,57.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

duk_tekes * IMD
Crosstab
IMD
dilakukan tidak dilakukan Total
duk_tekes baik Count 35 12 47
% within duk_tekes 74.5% 25.5% 100.0%
% within IMD 87.5% 40.0% 67.1%
% of Total 50.0% 17.1% 67.1%
kurang Count 5 18 23
% within duk_tekes 21.7% 78.3% 100.0%
% within IMD 12.5% 60.0% 32.9%
% of Total 7.1% 25.7% 32.9%
Total Count 40 30 70
% within duk_tekes 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 17.532a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 15.445 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 18.120 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 17.282 1 .000
N of Valid Casesb 70
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,86.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

usia ibu * IMD


Crosstab
IMD
dilakukan tidak dilakukan Total
usia ibu < 20 tahun Count 0 1 1
% within usia ibu .0% 100.0% 100.0%
% within IMD .0% 3.3% 1.4%
% of Total .0% 1.4% 1.4%
20 - 35 tahun Count 34 25 59
% within usia ibu 57.6% 42.4% 100.0%
% within IMD 85.0% 83.3% 84.3%
% of Total 48.6% 35.7% 84.3%
>35 Count 6 4 10
% within usia ibu 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 15.0% 13.3% 14.3%
% of Total 8.6% 5.7% 14.3%
Total Count 40 30 70
% within usia ibu 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.372a 2 .504
Likelihood Ratio 1.734 2 .420
Linear-by-Linear Association .300 1 .584
N of Valid Cases 70
a. 3 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is ,43.

paritas * IMD
Crosstab
IMD
dilakukan tidak dilakukan Total
paritas primipara Count 29 15 44
% within paritas 65.9% 34.1% 100.0%
% within IMD 72.5% 50.0% 62.9%
% of Total 41.4% 21.4% 62.9%
multipara Count 4 12 16
% within paritas 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 10.0% 40.0% 22.9%
% of Total 5.7% 17.1% 22.9%
grandepara Count 7 3 10
% within paritas 70.0% 30.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 17.5% 10.0% 14.3%
% of Total 10.0% 4.3% 14.3%
Total Count 40 30 70
% within paritas 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.806a 2 .012
Likelihood Ratio 8.931 2 .011
Linear-by-Linear Association .710 1 .399
N of Valid Cases 70
a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 4,29.

pendidikan * IMD
Crosstab
IMD
dilakukan tidak dilakukan Total
pendidikan tidak sekolah Count 1 2 3
% within pendidikan 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
% within IMD 2.5% 6.7% 4.3%
% of Total 1.4% 2.9% 4.3%
pendidikan dasar Count 18 18 36
% within pendidikan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 45.0% 60.0% 51.4%
% of Total 25.7% 25.7% 51.4%
pendidikan menengah Count 18 7 25
% within pendidikan 72.0% 28.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 45.0% 23.3% 35.7%
% of Total 25.7% 10.0% 35.7%
pendidikan tinggi Count 3 3 6
% within pendidikan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 7.5% 10.0% 8.6%
% of Total 4.3% 4.3% 8.6%
Total Count 40 30 70
% within pendidikan 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.823a 3 .281
Likelihood Ratio 3.916 3 .271
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.447 1 .229
N of Valid Cases 70
a. 4 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 1,29.

pekerjaan * IMD
Crosstab
IMD
dilakukan tidak dilakukan Total
pekerjaan bekerja Count 24 14 38
% within pekerjaan 63.2% 36.8% 100.0%
% within IMD 60.0% 46.7% 54.3%
% of Total 34.3% 20.0% 54.3%
tidak bekerja Count 16 16 32
% within pekerjaan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 40.0% 53.3% 45.7%
% of Total 22.9% 22.9% 45.7%
Total Count 40 30 70
% within pekerjaan 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.228a 1 .268
Continuity Correctionb .750 1 .387
Likelihood Ratio 1.229 1 .268
Fisher's Exact Test .335 .193
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.211 1 .271
N of Valid Casesb 70
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

apgar * IMD
Crosstab
IMD
dilakukan tidak dilakukan Total
apgar tanpa asfiksia Count 32 29 61
% within apgar 52.5% 47.5% 100.0%
% within IMD 80.0% 96.7% 87.1%
% of Total 45.7% 41.4% 87.1%
asfiksia sedang Count 6 1 7
% within apgar 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%
% within IMD 15.0% 3.3% 10.0%
% of Total 8.6% 1.4% 10.0%
asfiksia berat Count 2 0 2
% within apgar 100.0% .0% 100.0%
% within IMD 5.0% .0% 2.9%
% of Total 2.9% .0% 2.9%
Total Count 40 30 70
% within apgar 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.380a 2 .112
Likelihood Ratio 5.449 2 .066
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.184 1 .041
N of Valid Cases 70
a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is ,86.

bb_bayi * IMD
Crosstab
IMD
dilakukan tidak dilakukan Total
bb_bayi <2500 gr Count 4 1 5
% within bb_bayi 80.0% 20.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 10.0% 3.3% 7.1%
% of Total 5.7% 1.4% 7.1%
2500 - 4000 gr Count 35 28 63
% within bb_bayi 55.6% 44.4% 100.0%
% within IMD 87.5% 93.3% 90.0%
% of Total 50.0% 40.0% 90.0%
>4000 gr Count 1 1 2
% within bb_bayi 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 2.5% 3.3% 2.9%
% of Total 1.4% 1.4% 2.9%
Total Count 40 30 70
% within bb_bayi 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.173a 2 .556
Likelihood Ratio 1.273 2 .529
Linear-by-Linear Association .968 1 .325
N of Valid Cases 70
a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is ,86.

You might also like