Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Frequency Table: Kategori Umur

    Uploaded by

    Erma Yani
    13 views9 pages
    The document contains frequency tables summarizing data from a survey on child nutrition. It includes demographic information on respondents such as age, education level, occupation. It also includes information on the number of toddlers per respondent, gender, nutritional status, childcare practices, history of illness, and access to health services. A crosstab analysis shows a significant relationship between childcare practices and nutritional status, with poor practices associated with higher rates of malnutrition. A second crosstab finds a relationship between illness history and nutrition, with children who had been sick more likely to be malnourished.

    Original Description:

    eeee

    Original Title

    Frequency

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains frequency tables summarizing data from a survey on child nutrition. It includes demographic information on respondents such as age, education level, occupation. It also includes information on the number of toddlers per respondent, gender, nutritional status, childcare practices, history of illness, and access to health services. A crosstab analysis shows a significant relationship between childcare practices and nutritional status, with poor practices associated with higher rates of malnutrition. A second crosstab finds a relationship between illness history and nutrition, with children who had been sick more likely to be malnourished.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views9 pages

    Frequency Table: Kategori Umur

    Uploaded by

    Erma Yani
    The document contains frequency tables summarizing data from a survey on child nutrition. It includes demographic information on respondents such as age, education level, occupation. It also includes information on the number of toddlers per respondent, gender, nutritional status, childcare practices, history of illness, and access to health services. A crosstab analysis shows a significant relationship between childcare practices and nutritional status, with poor practices associated with higher rates of malnutrition. A second crosstab finds a relationship between illness history and nutrition, with children who had been sick more likely to be malnourished.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 9

    Frequency Table

    kategori umur

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid 20-28 58 71.6 71.6 71.6

    =>29 23 28.4 28.4 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0

    pendidikan responden

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid PT 3 3.7 3.7 3.7

    SD 15 18.5 18.5 22.2

    SMA 33 40.7 40.7 63.0

    SMP 30 37.0 37.0 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0

    pekerjaan responden

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid dagang 8 9.9 9.9 9.9

    irt 52 64.2 64.2 74.1

    pns 3 3.7 3.7 77.8

    swasta 18 22.2 22.2 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0

    jumlah balita responden

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid 1 34 42.0 42.0 42.0

    2 36 44.4 44.4 86.4

    3 11 13.6 13.6 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0


    jenis kelamin

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid L 38 46.9 46.9 46.9

    P 43 53.1 53.1 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0

    status gizi

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid Kurang 25 30.9 30.9 30.9

    Baik 49 60.5 60.5 91.4

    Lebih 7 8.6 8.6 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0

    kategori status gizi

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid Tidak Baik 32 39.5 39.5 39.5

    Baik 49 60.5 60.5 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0

    pola asuh

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid Kurang 30 37.0 37.0 37.0

    Baik 51 63.0 63.0 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0


    riwayat infeksi

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid Sakit 37 45.7 45.7 45.7

    Tidak 44 54.3 54.3 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0

    jenis penyakit

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid diare 8 9.9 9.9 9.9

    ispa 29 35.8 35.8 45.7

    tdk sakit 44 54.3 54.3 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0

    Pelayanan Kesehatan Gizi Masyarakat

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid kurang 28 34.6 34.6 34.6

    baik 53 65.4 65.4 100.0

    Total 81 100.0 100.0


    Crosstabs

    Pola Asuh * Kategori Status Gizi

    Crosstab

    kategori status gizi balita

    tidak baik baik Total

    pola asuh ibu kurang Count 22 8 30

    Expected Count 11.9 18.1 30.0

    % within pola asuh ibu 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

    baik Count 10 41 51

    Expected Count 20.1 30.9 51.0

    % within pola asuh ibu 19.6% 80.4% 100.0%

    Total Count 32 49 81

    Expected Count 32.0 49.0 81.0

    % within pola asuh ibu 39.5% 60.5% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests

    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


    Value df sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 22.813a 1 .000

    Continuity Correctionb 20.621 1 .000

    Likelihood Ratio 23.419 1 .000

    Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

    Linear-by-Linear Association 22.532 1 .000

    N of Valid Casesb 81

    a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,85.

    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


    Risk Estimate

    95% Confidence Interval

    Value Lower Upper

    Odds Ratio for pola asuh ibu


    11.275 3.890 32.683
    (kurang / baik)

    For cohort kategori status


    3.740 2.060 6.788
    gizi balita = tidak baik

    For cohort kategori status


    .332 .180 .610
    gizi balita = baik

    N of Valid Cases 81

    Riwayat Infeksi * Kategori Status Gizi

    Crosstab

    kategori status gizi

    Tidak Baik Baik Total

    riwayat infeksi Sakit Count 22 15 37

    Expected Count 14.6 22.4 37.0

    % within riwayat infeksi 59.5% 40.5% 100.0%

    Tidak Count 10 34 44

    Expected Count 17.4 26.6 44.0

    % within riwayat infeksi 22.7% 77.3% 100.0%

    Total Count 32 49 81

    Expected Count 32.0 49.0 81.0

    % within riwayat infeksi 39.5% 60.5% 100.0%


    Chi-Square Tests

    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


    Value df sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 11.347a 1 .001

    Continuity Correctionb 9.862 1 .002

    Likelihood Ratio 11.570 1 .001

    Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001

    Linear-by-Linear Association 11.207 1 .001

    N of Valid Casesb 81

    a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,62.

    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    Risk Estimate

    95% Confidence Interval

    Value Lower Upper

    Odds Ratio for riwayat


    4.987 1.903 13.066
    infeksi (Sakit / Tidak)

    For cohort kategori status


    2.616 1.427 4.797
    gizi = Tidak Baik

    For cohort kategori status


    .525 .344 .800
    gizi = Baik

    N of Valid Cases 81
    Pelayanan Kesehatan Gizi Masyarakat * Kategori Status Gizi

    Crosstab

    kategori status gizi balita

    tidak baik baik Total

    Pelayanan Kesehatan Gizi kurang Count 19 9 28


    Masyarakat
    Expected Count 11.1 16.9 28.0

    % within Pelayanan
    67.9% 32.1% 100.0%
    Kesehatan Gizi Masyarakat

    baik Count 13 40 53

    Expected Count 20.9 32.1 53.0

    % within Pelayanan
    24.5% 75.5% 100.0%
    Kesehatan Gizi Masyarakat

    Total Count 32 49 81

    Expected Count 32.0 49.0 81.0

    % within Pelayanan
    39.5% 60.5% 100.0%
    Kesehatan Gizi Masyarakat

    Chi-Square Tests

    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


    Value df sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 14.392a 1 .000

    Continuity Correctionb 12.636 1 .000

    Likelihood Ratio 14.479 1 .000

    Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

    Linear-by-Linear Association 14.215 1 .000

    N of Valid Casesb 81

    a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,06.

    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


    Risk Estimate

    95% Confidence Interval

    Value Lower Upper

    Odds Ratio for Pelayanan


    Kesehatan Gizi Masyarakat 6.496 2.365 17.839
    (kurang / baik)

    For cohort kategori status


    2.766 1.618 4.731
    gizi balita = tidak baik

    For cohort kategori status


    .426 .243 .745
    gizi balita = baik

    N of Valid Cases 81

    You might also like