Frequencies

Statistics

usia jenis kelamin pendidikan pekerjaan

Valid 59 59 59 59
N
Missing 0 0 0 0
Std. Error of Mean .033
Minimum 1
Maximum 2
25 1.00

Percentiles 50 1.00

75 1.00

                                Statistics

dukungan dukungan dukungan dukungan kepatuhan diet

emosional instrumental informasional penilaian atau rendah garam
penghargaan

Valid 59 59 59 59 59
N
Missing 0 0 0 0 0
Std. Error of Mean
Minimum
Maximum
25

Percentiles 50

75
Frequency Table

usia

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Lansia muda 55 93.2 93.2 93.2

Valid Lansia tua 4 6.8 6.8 100.0

Total 59 100.0 100.0

jenis kelamin

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

laki-laki 17 28.8 28.8 28.8

Valid perempuan 42 71.2 71.2 100.0

Total 59 100.0 100.0

pendidikan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

sd 21 35.6 35.6 35.6

smp 12 20.3 20.3 55.9

Valid sma 17 28.8 28.8 84.7

perguruan tinggi 9 15.3 15.3 100.0

Total 59 100.0 100.0

pekerjaan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

tidak bekerja 21 35.6 35.6 35.6

buruh 6 10.2 10.2 45.8

petani 13 22.0 22.0 67.8

Valid
wiraswasta 10 16.9 16.9 84.7

pns 9 15.3 15.3 100.0

Total 59 100.0 100.0

 dukungan emosional

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

baik 35 59.3 59.3 59.3

Valid tdk baik 24 40.7 40.7 100.0

Total 59 100.0 100.0

dukungan instrumental

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

baik 27 45.8 45.8 45.8

Valid tdk baik 32 54.2 54.2 100.0

Total 59 100.0 100.0

dukungan informasional

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

baik 19 32.2 32.2 32.2

Valid tdk baik 40 67.8 67.8 100.0

Total 59 100.0 100.0

dukungan penilaian atau penghargaan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

baik 21 35.6 35.6 35.6

Valid tdk baik 38 64.4 64.4 100.0

Total 59 100.0 100.0

 kepatuhan diet rendah garam

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

patuh 26 44.1 44.1 44.1

Valid tdk patuh 33 55.9 55.9 100.0

Total 59 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

dukungan emosional *
kepatuhan diet rendah 59 100.0% 0 0.0% 59 100.0%
garam
dukungan instrumental *
kepatuhan diet rendah 59 100.0% 0 0.0% 59 100.0%
garam
dukungan informasional *
kepatuhan diet rendah 59 100.0% 0 0.0% 59 100.0%
garam
dukungan penilaian atau
penghargaan * kepatuhan 59 100.0% 0 0.0% 59 100.0%
diet rendah garam
dukungan emosional * kepatuhan diet rendah garam

Crosstab
kepatuhan diet rendah garam Total
patuh tdk patuh
Count 21 14 35
Expected Count 15.4 19.6 35.0
% within dukungan
60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
baik emosional
% within kepatuhan diet
80.8% 42.4% 59.3%
rendah garam
% of Total 35.6% 23.7% 59.3%
dukungan emosional
Count 5 19 24
Expected Count 10.6 13.4 24.0
% within dukungan
20.8% 79.2% 100.0%
tdk baik emosional
% within kepatuhan diet
19.2% 57.6% 40.7%
rendah garam
% of Total 8.5% 32.2% 40.7%
Count 26 33 59
Expected Count 26.0 33.0 59.0
% within dukungan
44.1% 55.9% 100.0%
Total emosional
% within kepatuhan diet
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
rendah garam
% of Total 44.1% 55.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.861a
1 .003
Continuity Correctionb 7.343 1 .007
Likelihood Ratio 9.285 1 .002
Fisher's Exact Test .004 .003
N of Valid Cases 59

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.58.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
dukungan instrumental * kepatuhan diet rendah garam

Crosstab
kepatuhan diet rendah garam Total
patuh tdk patuh
Count 18 9 27
Expected Count 11.9 15.1 27.0
% within dukungan
66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
baik instrumental
% within kepatuhan diet
69.2% 27.3% 45.8%
rendah garam
% of Total 30.5% 15.3% 45.8%
dukungan instrumental
Count 8 24 32
Expected Count 14.1 17.9 32.0
% within dukungan
25.0% 75.0% 100.0%
tdk baik instrumental
% within kepatuhan diet
30.8% 72.7% 54.2%
rendah garam
% of Total 13.6% 40.7% 54.2%
Count 26 33 59
Expected Count 26.0 33.0 59.0
% within dukungan
44.1% 55.9% 100.0%
Total instrumental
% within kepatuhan diet
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
rendah garam
% of Total 44.1% 55.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.315a 1 .001
Continuity Correction b
8.693 1 .003
Likelihood Ratio 10.598 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .002 .001
N of Valid Cases 59

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.90.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
dukungan informasional * kepatuhan diet rendah garam

Crosstab
kepatuhan diet rendah garam
Total
patuh tdk patuh
Count 14 5 19
Expected Count 8.4 10.6 19.0
% within dukungan
73.7% 26.3% 100.0%
baik informasional
% within kepatuhan diet
53.8% 15.2% 32.2%
rendah garam
% of Total 23.7% 8.5% 32.2%
dukungan informasional
Count 12 28 40
Expected Count 17.6 22.4 40.0
% within dukungan
30.0% 70.0% 100.0%
tdk baik informasional
% within kepatuhan diet
46.2% 84.8% 67.8%
rendah garam
% of Total 20.3% 47.5% 67.8%
Count 26 33 59
Expected Count 26.0 33.0 59.0
% within dukungan
44.1% 55.9% 100.0%
Total informasional
% within kepatuhan diet
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
rendah garam
% of Total 44.1% 55.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.973a 1 .002
Continuity Correction b
8.279 1 .004
Likelihood Ratio 10.189 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .002 .002
N of Valid Cases 59

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.37.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
dukungan penilaian atau penghargaan * kepatuhan diet rendah garam

Crosstab
kepatuhan diet rendah garam
Total
patuh tdk patuh
Count 16 5 21
Expected Count 9.3 11.7 21.0
% within dukungan
76.2% 23.8% 100.0%
baik penilaian atau penghargaan
% within kepatuhan diet
61.5% 15.2% 35.6%
rendah garam
dukungan penilaian % of Total 27.1% 8.5% 35.6%
atau penghargaan Count 10 28 38
Expected Count 16.7 21.3 38.0
% within dukungan
26.3% 73.7% 100.0%
tdk baik penilaian atau penghargaan
% within kepatuhan diet
38.5% 84.8% 64.4%
rendah garam
% of Total 16.9% 47.5% 64.4%
Count 26 33 59
Expected Count 26.0 33.0 59.0
% within dukungan
44.1% 55.9% 100.0%
Total penilaian atau penghargaan
% within kepatuhan diet
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
rendah garam
% of Total 44.1% 55.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 13.650a 1 .000
Continuity Correction b
11.701 1 .001
Likelihood Ratio 14.105 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
N of Valid Cases 59

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.25.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table