You are on page 1of 10

Technology Technology

Railway Technology Today 5 (Edited by Kanji Wako)

How Bogies Work


Isao Okamoto

Role of Bogie
Figure 1 Wheel and Axle Set

Railcar bogies usually go unnoticed by rail


passengers, but despite their obscurity, Wheel tread
Flange
they are very important in safe railway
Tread
operations and perform the following Wheel Axle gradient
functions:
• Support railcar body firmly Wheel
• Run stably on both straight and curved diameter
track
• Ensure good ride comfort by absorbing
vibration generated by track irregulari-
Rail
ties and minimizing impact of centri-
fugal forces when train runs on curves
at high speed Gauge
• Minimize generation of track irregulari-
ties and rail abrasion
To help clarify the basic mechanism of
bogies, this article explains bogies used affect the running performance and and some express trains of the Odakyu
on conventional railcars. Bogies used on strength of the bogie frame, so none are Line in suburban Tokyo. Although the
shinkansen will be discussed in more de- used for passenger railcars in Japan today. articulated bogie has some disadvantages,
tail in the next article in this series. Non-articulated and articulated bogies such as a complex structure, increased
Bogies can be classified into non-articu- axle load due to the support of one body
lated and articulated types according to by one bogie, and difficult maintenance,
Bogie Configurations the suspension. Two non-articulated it offers various advantages including a
bogies usually support one railcar body lower centre of gravity, better ride com-
Types (Fig. 3a), but one articulated bogie sup- fort because car ends do not overhang
Bogies are classified into the various types ports the back end of the forward car and bogies, and less effect of running noise
described below according to their con- the front end of the rear car (Fig. 3b) as on passengers because seats are not over
figuration in terms of the number of seen in the Spanish Talgo, French TGV, bogies.
axles, and the design and structure of the
suspension.
Number of axles
Since bogies run on two steel rails, the Figure 2 Comparison of Effect of Track Irregularity between
Single-Axle Bogie and Two-Axle Bogie
minimum structural requirement is an axle
and two wheels, which are usually
pressed onto the axle (Fig. 1). Bogies are
Smaller effect of
classified into single-axle, two-axle, three- track irregularity
axle, etc., based on the number of axles. on car suspension point
The two-axle bogie is most common. In
addition to its relatively simple structure, Car suspension
it has the advantage of decreasing the point
Car suspension
impact of track irregularities on the rail- point
car at the car suspension point, in com-
parison to the single-axle bogie which
transmits the impact to the car directly Single-axle bogie Two-axle bogie
(Fig. 2). The three-axle bogie has a more
complex structure that tends to adversely

52 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved.
Figure 3 Non-articulated Bogie and Articulated Bogie Figure 4 Swing Hanger and
Small Lateral Stiffness
(a) Non-articulated cars
Bolster Spring Bogies

Swing Hanger Bogie

Centre pin
Non-articulated bogie
Upper Side bearer
swing
(b) Articulated cars bolster
Bogie frame
Bolster
anchor Bolster spring
Swing Lower
hanger swing bolster

Small Lateral Stiffness Bolster Spring Bogie

Articulated bogie

Centre pin

Swing hanger bogie and small lateral Bolster and bolsterless bogies Side bearer
Bolster
stiffness bolster spring bogie Bolster and bolsterless bogies (Fig. 7) are
Bolster Air bolster
Based on the structure of the suspension differentiated by their suspension gear. anchor spring
gear, bogies are classified into two types: The bolster bogie was developed first. A Bogie
frame
the swing hanger type, and the small fundamental characteristic of the bogie is
lateral stiffness bolster spring bogie type that it must rotate relative to the body on
(Fig. 4). To ensure good ride comfort on curves, while retaining high rotational
passenger cars, the bogie must absorb the resistance during high-speed running on reducing the number of parts and the
rolling motion that passengers are most straight sections in order to prevent bogie weight (the bolsterless bogie for
sensitive to. Conventional swing hanger wheelset hunting (Fig. 8) that reduces ride shinkansen was commercialized in the
bogie designs support the body by using comfort. To achieve these characteristics, 1990s). In recent years, most narrow-
lower swing bolster beams suspended the bolster bogie has a centre pivot that gauge and shinkansen cars use the
from the bogie frame by means of a link serves as the centre of rotation, and side bolsterless bogie, which permits rotational
consisting of two vertical members that bearers that resist rotation. displacement on curves through the hori-
widen toward the bottom, together with In the 1980s, a bolsterless bogie was com- zontal deformation of bolster springs (also
bolster springs and upper swing bolster mercialized to improve performance by known as secondary suspension springs)
beams (to support vertical movement).
Although the swing hanger type (Fig. 5)
achieves good ride comfort by minimiz- Figure 5 Swing Hanger Bogie
ing horizontal stiffness of the suspension
gear, its maintenance is relatively difficult
due to the complex structure and large
number of wearing parts. In the 1960s,
bolster bogie with air spring that absorbs
vibration due to its small lateral stiffness,
was developed (Fig. 6). It soon replaced
the swing hanger type and was used in
the first shinkansen in 1964, contributing
greatly to their size and weight reduction.
Most recent bogies are of the small
lateral stiffness bolster spring bogie type Swing hanger
because of its simplified suspension (Author)
design.

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 53
Technology

Figure 6 Lateral Stiffness Bolster Bogie

discussion focuses on the bolsterless DT50


Centre plate type (Fig. 9) which is widely used in com-
muter passenger railcars of JR companies.
The DT50 was first commercialized in
Centre pivot
1985 by the former JNR when it was used
Bolster
for the Series 205 railcars.
Centre pivot
wearing plate Suspension gear
The suspension gear (bolster spring, trac-
Bogie frame tion transfer device, anti-yawing damper,
and lateral damper) plays an important
role in supporting the body, allowing the
bogie to rotate relative to the car body on
curves, isolating the body from vibration
(including high harmonics) generated by
the bogie, and transmitting traction force
from the bogie to the body. For these
Bolster anchor
purposes, the bolsterless bogie has air
Wheelset Traction motor
Air spring under bolster springs that permit large horizontal dis-
placement, as well as a traction transfer
Gears Axle spring device (classified into permanent-link
type, the Z-link type and laminated-
rubber type) at the virtual rotational
centre of the bogie for transmitting the
on both sides of the bogie. Rotation is tractive force to the car. In addition, the
resisted by longitudinal anti-yawing bolsterless bogie used for express trains
Figure 7 Bolster and dampers on both sides of the bogie, and shinkansen has anti-yawing dampers
Bolsterless Bogies
resulting in better rotational resistance (Fig. 7) at the outer side of the side beam
Bolster Bogie
than conventional side bearers. of the body and bogie frame (parallel to
the side beam) to prevent wheelset hunt-
ing that reduces ride comfort.
Basic Bogie Elements Coil springs were originally used as
Air bolster
spring
bolster springs to support the body, but in
This section describes key components the 1960s, air springs were commercial-
Bolster anchor
and parts of the bogie, including their ized for railcars in Japan and were used
Bolster
structure and performance. However, it for high-speed trains. Since the 1980s,
Side bearer
Bogie
frame Centre pivot should be noted that the parts vary widely they have been used for commuter and
according to the bogie type, and this short-distance trains in order to take
Bolsterless Bogie

Figure 8 Wheelset Hunting

Traction
transfer
device

Air bolster
spring
Anti-yawing
damper Bogie frame

54 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved.
Figure 9 DT50 Bogie
for Series 205 EMU
advantage of their improved ride comfort
and ability to maintain body height.

Bogie frame
Traction transfer device
The bogie frame accommodates various Series 205 EMU (Author)
bogie equipment and is generally fabri-
cated by welding together two side beams Brake equipment Bolster spring

and two cross beams into an H-shaped


frame, (Fig. 10). In 1955, compound side Bogie frame
(side beam,
beams were developed using press weld- cross beam)

ing and this structure is used to manufac-


ture most bogie frames in Japan. The
thickness of the side and cross beams was
increased from 6 mm (used in some
Lateral damper
frames around 1960) to 9 mm. It was in-
creased again to 12 mm in the 1970s, Traction motor

when some bogie frames of express trains


were found to have minor faults. How-
ever, since the DT50, as a result of Axle bearing and axle box
simpler construction and improved weld- Axle spring, axle box suspension
ing technology, bogie frames use 8 or 9
(Brake disc for trailing bogie)
mm plates to reduce weight. Finally,
around 1980 (1976 for shinkansen), the Wheelset

material of major bogie frame members


Gear
for narrow-gauge railcars was improved
from SS400 (rolled steel for general struc-
tures) to SM400B (rolled steel for welded
structures).
Brake disc
Some bogie frames since the DT50 use
seamless steel pipes for cross beams to
reduce weight and cost.

Axle box suspension Figure 10 Bogie H-Frame


This device supports the axle via the bear- Cross beam

ing from the bogie frame. It is a critical


component determining the running per-
formance of the bogie, ride comfort and
bogie frame construction, due to the sus-
pension method and support rigidity.
Various designs are used (Fig. 11). The
pedestal swing spring design supports the
axle box using sliders around the pedes-
tal on the bogie frame and was used
widely in a variety of railcars of the former
JNR. While its construction is simple, the
sliders wear with time, creating play in
the suspension and cause wheelset hunt-
(Author)
ing, so it is not suitable for high-speed op- Side beam
eration. The IS type was developed for

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 55
Technology

Figure 11 Various Axle Box Suspensions

(1) Pedestal swing spring type (2) IS type


Axle box
Axle box

Axle
spring
Cushion rubber Axle spring Leaf spring
Sliders Cushion rubber

(3) Leaf spring type (4) Axle beam type (5) Coil spring with
cylindrical laminated rubber type
Axle spring Axle spring

Leaf spring
Axle box
Axle box Guide arm Cylindrical
Cushion rubber Axle spring laminated
Axle box rubber
(6) Conical laminated rubber type (7) Roll rubber type

Roll rubber

Conical
laminated
rubber
Axle box

Axle box

shinkansen and its good cushion rubber Wheels, axles and bearings have been made since 1984 to hold the
stiffness effectively eliminates play Wheels of conventional railcars are a solid imbalance per wheel to below 25 kgf•cm
between the axle and bogie frame. How- rolled type, and generally 860 mm in and to balance the wheels when pressing
ever, it has several disadvantages, such as diameter when new. Corrugated wheels them onto the axle.
increased bogie frame length and severe (Fig. 12) with a corrugated outer face have The axle is generally solid, but hollow
maintenance requirements for leaf springs. been commercialized to boost rigidity, types are used for weight reduction with-
As a result, recent bolsterless bogies for while reducing plate thickness and out affecting bending strength. Hollow
shinkansen use other types, including the weight. They have been used for com- axles with a central void were used for
coil spring with cylindrical laminated rub- muter and short-distance trains since the high-speed electric railcars and passen-
ber type. Similarly, narrow-gauge railcars 1980s. The wheel tread is heat-treated ger cars in the late 1950s, but their use
are increasingly using the conical lami- and has the profile shown in Fig. 13. was abandoned due to manufacturing
nated rubber type, the roll rubber type Wheels are susceptible to mass imbal- problems. Around 1975, to improve
(serving both as the axle box suspension ance, which causes vibration of the axle reliability, a hollow axle was developed
and axle spring) and axle beam type in and wheel and is transmitted to the body, by boring a solid axle (Fig. 14). It was
order to simplify construction and reduce producing uncomfortable resonance at first used in 1981 to make lighter drive
manufacturing costs. certain speeds. To prevent this, efforts axles for high-speed diesel railcars

56 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved.
Figure 12 Corrugated Wheel

operating in Hokkaido. It was later used


for bolsterless bogies of shinkansen,
contributing to reduced unsprung mass.
Axle bearings have traditionally combined
a cylindrical roller bearing (to take radial
loads) and a ball bearing. Since 1965, a
single sealed flanged cylindrical roller
bearing (able to take both radial and thrust
loads) has been used increasingly to
facilitate bearing weight and size reduc-
tion as well as to obtain longer periods (Author)

between overhaul.

Transmission
The transmission consists of gears and
flexible couplings to transmit motive Figure 13 Basic Wheel Tread Profile for Narrow-Gauge JR Lines (upper)
power generated by the motor or engine and Circular Arc Wheel Tread Used Widely Today (lower)
to the axle. For EMUs, the nose suspen-
sion device, which supports the traction Profile of wheel tread for narrow-gauge JR lines
motor with the bogie frame and the axle Centre distance of wheel pair 560
(via support bearings), was used until the 60 65
1950s (Fig. 15a). The nose suspension 53
3' 20 30 15
device was large and heavy to withstand 1/10 1/20
vibration generated by the axle and also 2
2
due to the slow speed of the motor, re-
14R 15R 15R
sulting in large bogie mass and unsprung
mass. Around 1957, the parallel cardan
driving device (Fig. 15b and c) was put 59'21"

into service by mounting a smaller, high- Profile of corrected circular arc wheel tread
speed motor on the bogie frame supported 125
by axle springs and transmitting the
motive power to the gear via a flexible 60 65
coupling. It enabled reduction of the
bogie wheelbase as well as significant size
400R

30 26.0 16
and weight reduction of the entire bogie, 24.85 15.5 14
and contributed greatly to the develop- 12
ment of shinkansen and conventional
900R

80R

10

express cars.
320R

1/100
DMUs use either electrical or mechani- 14R
27

14R 14R
cal transmission. While the former is used 33.86
primarily in other countries, the latter is
used mostly in Japan. In this case, the 29
motive power from the engine is trans-
65'
mitted via a torque converter and flexible
couplings to the axle using a right angle
cardan driving device (Fig. 15 d).
Unit: mm

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 57
Technology

Figure 14 Hollow Bored Axle

recently, forged steel is used for high-


speed railcars to prevent disc cracking
caused by frictional heating. In Japan, disc
(Author)
brakes were first used on some express
trains of the Odakyu Line, and they have
been used primarily for trailer cars on
Brake equipment causing the wheel temperature to rise to narrow-gauge lines. Nevertheless, disc
The brake is used to stop at the desired critical levels. This presents a risk of brakes are costly to manufacture and
position. This section focuses on cracking and makes them unsuitable for maintain, so commuter (Fig. 9 inset) and
mechanical braking equipment such as high-speed operations. Disc brakes use short-distance railcars that run at relatively
wheel tread brakes and disc brakes. disks at both sides of the axle or wheels; low speeds often use motor braking as a
Wheel tread brakes use block-shaped at braking, the discs are clamped by brake means of halving the number of discs to
brake shoes that are pushed against the pads on the calipers to impede rotation. one (reinforced type) per axle.
wheel tread. Although they have a simple Traditionally, cast iron has been used for
construction, they generate large amounts the disc due to its superior frictional char- Major Characteristics of Bogies
of frictional heat at high running speeds, acteristics relative to the pads. However,
in Recent Narrow-gauge Railcars
This section focuses on the design and
key features of new bogies designed for
Figure 15 Transmissions
narrow-gauge lines in Japan, such as the
(a) Nose suspension device bogie for commuter trains, the pendulum
bogie and the steering bogie (used for
Traction motor express trains).

Support bearing Bogies for commuter trains


Since commuter or short-distance trains
Wheel gear use a large number of bogies, the design
must be simple to cut manufacturing
Pinion costs and maintenance requirements. As
Traction motor a result, bogies for recent commuter trains
mostly use the bolsterless suspension
Nose receiver system. As far as possible, straight side
beams are used for the bogie frame and
seamless pipes are used for the cross
beams. Also, conical, laminated rubber,
or roll rubber suspension systems are used
(b) Hollow-axle parallel (c) Parallel cardan (d) Right angle cardan for the axle box and also serve as axle
cardan driving device driving device driving device springs. Otherwise, the relatively simple
axle beam suspension type is used. Axle
K
bearings are generally sealed flanged
M cylindrical roller bearings. Unit brakes are
M M K K used increasingly as part of the ongoing
effort to reduce the number of parts,
M: Traction motor thereby lengthening the service life
K K: Flexible coupling
K between inspection and overhaul.

Bogies for express trains


Bogies for express trains have the same
design concepts as bogies for commuter

58 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved.
Figure 16 Roller Type Tilt System

trains in terms of simple construction to


cut manufacturing costs and save labour
related to maintenance. However, new Tilt centre
bogie designs are required to meet the
demand for higher speeds, thereby cut-
ting travel times and making trains more (Car)
competitive with planes and cars. Narrow-
Tilt angle,±5°
gauge lines in Japan are dominated by
many sections with tight curves, and travel Compressed air Bolster spring
times can be reduced by increasing run-
Tilt beam
ning speeds on curves instead of increas-
ing maximum speeds. Two types of bogies
Roller
have been developed to achieve this aim: Air cylinder for
the tilting bogie, which increases running Bogie frame controlling tilt
speed on curves without affecting ride
comfort, and the steering bogie, which
permits higher speeds on curves by mini- Track
mizing the lateral force on the rail. They Cant
are described below.
Tilting bogie
When a train runs at a high speed over a
curve, the generated centrifugal force tilt railcars (Series 381) were introduced with the body tilt centre. When the bogie
adversely affects ride comfort by pushing in 1973 on the western section (Nagoya runs on a curve, centrifugal force acting
passengers toward the outside of the to Nagano) of the Chuo Main Line. Figure on the centre of gravity causes the body
curve. The tilting car has been developed 16 shows the bogie design concept. The to tilt up to 5° towards the inside of the
to minimize lateral forces acting on bogie consists of a body tilting system curve. This is called the ‘roller type, natu-
passengers by tilting the body toward the supporting the body on two 170-mm ral tilt system’. The Series 381 railcars
inside of the curve, rather like a motor- diameter rollers and bow-shaped tilting were subsequently introduced on other
cycle taking a curve. In Japan, the first beams with a centre of curvature aligned lines (Kisei and Hakubi Lines), often

Test run of roller type controlled tilt system using JR Shikoku used the controlled tilt system in its DMU Series 2000 express train (right) and EMU Series 8000
Series 381 express EMU. Car body is tilted. (Author) express train. (Author)

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 59
Technology

contributing greatly to reduced travel


times and improved riding comfort. How-
Figure 17 Principles of Controlled Tilt System ever, they were not a success on sections
with many frequent tight curves where
ATS ground unit
body tilting was either delayed or oc-
All curve data transmitted
from CC unit to TC unit
Running direction curred too abruptly.
before departure 50 m
To ensure smooth tilting in these circum-
CC Xm
TC TC TC
Beginning of transition curve stances, the ‘controlled tilt system’ (Fig.
Beginning of circular curve
A point
17) was developed. This system incorpo-
Onboard ATS unit
Car tilting started rates air cylinders into the body tilting
CC unit: Command Controller by command from TC unit
system. An onboard controller stores data
TC unit: Tilt Controller Tilting timing command Ym
sent from CC unit to TC unit about all curves on the section where the
Restoration of tilted car
started by command from TC unit train operates, including curve radius,
End of circular curve alignment, elevation, distance between
End of transition curve ATS (Automatic Train Stop) ground units
and starting point of transition curves,
lengths of transition curves and circular
curves, etc. The controller is activated
by ATS ground units and controls the
timing and degree of body tilting 30 to 40
Figure 18 Link-Type Forced Steering Bogie m before entering curves by referring to
the stored curve data and computing the
running distance to the curve using the
axle revolutions from the nearest ATS
Tilt beam
ground unit.
Car tilt control cylinder
The controlled tilt system was first intro-
Tilt control cylinder
duced in 1989 on JR Shikoku DMU Se-
ries 2000 express trains. It was soon
introduced by all other JR companies due
to its good reputation including ride com-
Bolster anchor
fort.
In fact, the controlled tilt system increased
Control
valve running speeds over curves with a radius
of 300 to 600 m from 80–110 km/h
achieved by the natural tilt system to 85–
Steering beam 120 km/h.
In addition, the body tilting system was
modified to reduce tilt resistance by
using a large number of smaller bearings,
in place of the conventional rollers,
thereby achieving a smaller lighter bear-
Axle box ing guide type tilting mechanism, which
Cushion rubber is used in recent tilt cars.
Steering link Steering bogie
Steering lever As a train runs on a curve at high speed,
Steering link the wheels exert high lateral force on the
Axle box
Cushion rubber rails causing wear and tear of wheel
flanges and rails, and resulting in derail-
ing in extreme cases. This lateral force

60 Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved.
Figure 19 Alignment of Link-Type Forced Steering Bogie on Curved Section

Bogie frame

can be reduced by various methods,


including use of self-steering bogies. Steering beam (equivalent to carbody)
As shown in Fig. 1, normal wheels are
press-fitted onto the axle and have a tread
gradient. This gradient provides some Steering lever and linkage

degree of steering over a curve by allow-

e
ur
ing the centre of the axle to move towards

at
rv
cu
the outside of the curve as a result of the

of
us
di
centrifugal force. The steering bogie is

Ra
designed to make the most of this ability
by reducing the stiffness of the axle box
suspension and increasing the tread
gradient to maximize the difference in
diameter between left and right wheels
Centre of curvature
on the same axle. These features allow
the wheels and axle to move more freely
without sacrificing running stability. This
concept is used in most recent bogie
designs, ranging from those for commuter Figure 20 Lateral Forces of Link-Type Forced Steering Bogie and Non-
trains to express trains. Nevertheless, with Steering Bogie on Rails
this self-steering design, care should be Radius of curvature = 302
Cant = 105
taken to avoid excess reduction of stiff- 60 Non-steering bogie
Maximum lateral force (kN)

ness of the axle box suspension and ex- outside rail lateral force
50
cessive tread gradients. These concepts 10kN

may be effective in reducing lateral force 40 10kN


on the rail, but they can adversely affect inside rail
30
running stability due either to small
Link-type forced steering bogie
changes in tread gradient caused by wear 20
outside rail lateral force
and tear, or to slight play in the wheel 10kN 5kN

suspension, both of which risk generat- 10


10kN -5kN
ing wheelset hunting. inside rail
0
To deal with the drawbacks of the self- 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Running speed (km/h)
steering bogie, the link-type forced steer-
Steering bogie
ing bogie has been developed (Fig. 18) Non-steering bogie Unit: mm
and is currently used on JR Hokkaido
Series 283 DMU express trains. The
operating principle is to transmit rotation-
al displacement of the bogie relative to Kanji Wako
the body to the axle via a linkage, so the Mr Kanji Wako is Director in Charge of Research and Development at RTRI. He joined JNR in 1961 after graduating in

axle centre line is aligned on the radius engineering from Tohoku University. He is the supervising editor for this series on Railway Technology Today.

of curvature (Fig. 19). This mechanism


cuts lateral force on the rail to one half or
one third that of conventional bogie Isao Okamoto
designs (Fig. 20). ■ Mr Okamoto is General Manager of the Vehicle Technology Development Division of the JR Railway
Technical Research Institute. He joined JNR in 1972 after obtaining a masters in mechanical
engineering from the graduate school of Waseda University. He worked in the Rolling Stock Design
Office of JNR before transferring to RTRI.

Copyright © 1998 EJRCF. All rights reserved. Japan Railway & Transport Review 18 • December 1998 61

You might also like