Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Last Roman Emperor and The Mahdī
The Last Roman Emperor and The Mahdī
Introduction
The religious context of the Late Antique and early Islamic Near East was
two adjacent confessional milieus viz., Muslims and Christians, the fulfiller of
these aspirations. (Alexander, 1985; Kraft, 2013)
While there can be little doubt that the notion of the Last Emperor had
blossomed by the turn of the seventh century AD, there has been a perennial
controversy as to where it came into being for the first time.
Introduction
Literature Review
Some Scholars posit a fourth-century origin, believing the Tiburtine Sibyl to be the
ultimate source for the Last Emperor tradition.
Others ascribe the crystallization of the tradition to the seventh-century
Introduction
Literature Review
That said, some scholars carry the existence of the intense apocalyptic beliefs back to
the time of the Prophet Muḥammad himself. (Donner, 2010; Shoemaker, 2014)
Motivated by the occurrence of certain parallels in the Islamic and Christian
Literature Review
The wide circulation enjoyed by the Tiburtine Sibyl prior to the emergence of Islam
was, according to Shoemaker, the principal source of inspiration for the “apocalyptic
political ideology that seems to have fueled formative Islam.” (Shoemaker, 2014).
Attributing an early forth-century date to the Tiburtine Sibyl, Donner likewise stresses
the influence that the Christian eschatological thought supposedly have had on the
early community of the Believers (mu’minūn). (Donner, 2010)
Recently, Kraft has propounded the theory that the Mahdī and the Last Roman
emperor are “structurally isomorphic (messianic) topoi”, whose formation and mutual
correspondences should be understood in the light of the politico-religious context of
the late seventh-century Mesopotamia.
Literature Review
According to Kraft, The Doctrine of Mahdīsm was articulated, as was the notion of the
Last Roman Emperor, in response to the current regime of the Caliphate, a belief
representing the hopes and apprehensions of the factions hostile to the Caliphal
system.
This apocalyptic view, he states, would “mean the struggle for the Caliphal office for
one party (the Zubayrid cause), while it could mean the repulsion of the Muslim
occupation for another (Byzantines).”
The fact that Muslims and Christians were cognizant of their respective messianic
view, avers Kraft, gave rise to Muslims-Christians polemics in the centuries to come.
(Kraft 2013)
Literature Review
Similar to this view is Cook’s contention that the Last Roman Emperor’s portrayal
within Muslim texts is monstrous, as opposed to the salvific picture painted by the
Christian texts. “This is one of the most common themes in apocalyptic as a whole: to
take the figure adored by one’s opponent and use him for the demonic or satanic
figure in one’s own story line,” asserts Cook.
This may explain why in Muslim texts, supernatural creatures and inhuman foes are
prevalent on the Byzantine side. (Cook, 2002)
It worth highlight in this context Möhring’s view that there is no indication of the
Literature Review
The messianic beliefs in Muslim milieu owes its existence, according to Möhring, to a
mélange of the Jewish, Christian, Zoroastrian and South-Arabian (Himyarite) ideas in
whose dissemination a significant role is to be ascribed to none-Arab mawālīs. (Möhring,
2000)
Having surveyed our extant academic literature, it is to be noted that the present essay
does not strive to readdress, let alone to settle the vexatious problem of the Last Roman
Emperor’s genesis, nor does it attempt to argue in favour of the emergence of the Islamic
Apocalypticism in the Second Fitna or rather in the Prophet’s era.
For the research in both areas seems to have been embroiled in “so many indecisive
debates”. It might be wise to postpone further studies on these topics to the appearance
of more conclusive evidence.
Literature Review
We may deal in turn with “the trajectory of [these notions’] subsequent development”, the issue
addressed by Kraft which he rather tentatively asserts to have been dominantly influenced by
the inter-confessional dialectics. The issue one may call into question is the extent to which
these apocalyptic expectations may have been fashioned by virtue of inter-religious polemics.
This is not, however, to say that the polemic played an unimportant part, for Pseudo-
Methodius’ work and those of later Christian apocalyptists vehemently directed against Islam.
But there are other, subtler points in the development of Muslim and Christian messianism that
should likewise be taken into consideration.
What this theory appears to have taken for granted is each party’s knowledge of the “Other’s
eschatological scenario” which eventuated in the stereotypical repetition of certain apocalyptic
motifs in the Islamic and Christian texts.
Kraft’s argument about the Muslims and Christians’ close acquaintance with the other’s
apocalyptic scheme is based on a single tradition in the Tribulations of Nu‘aym and one
episode in the the Baḥīrā Legend.
This does not entail, however, that they were “well aware” of their respective doctrine in
the course of their history. Called “rudimentary” by Kraft himself, his suggested
“structural isomorphism” between the medieval Islamic and Christian saviours seems
nonetheless insufficient for postulating the hypothesis of direct barrowing.
To begin with, the Pseudo-Methodian Last Emperor is of an incontrovertibly
eschatological role, a point which is entirely lacking in the character of the victorious
ruler of the Qatāda ḥadīth.
Muslim audience, as he speaks of the “utopian” Mahdī (b. Fātima) who, though without
This facet of the Christian apocalyptic scenario demands an explanation other than polemic, and,
as Roggema aptly puts it, should be considered as the “intricacy of the interaction between
“The mutually exclusive character” of the Mahdī and the Last Roman Emperor is not, pace Kraft,
one may grasp from the sources. The polemic did play a significant part, but to belittle the
The messianic conviction of a nation may at times owe more to its own socio-religious
In what follows, we shall deal with certain aspects of Muslim and Christians messianism which
Our foremost focus will be directed towards the Shī’ī messianism that adopts a quite pacifying
Had there been any direct influence, the integral component of the Last Emperor’s character,
his messianic role, would likely have been present in the Qatāda ḥadīth’s Mahdī?
Some other parallels also sound tenuous and do not seem to speak in favour of Christian and
Muslim apocalyptists’ having been cognizant of the other’s scenario.
One may reasonably quibble, for instance, with the assertion that “the paramount attention paid
to the genealogy of the Mahdī” would have been inspired by the Last Roman Emperor’s illustrious
pedigree reaching back, through a Kushite princess, to Alexander the Great.
The seven-year-old reign of the Mahdī has been arbitrarily reckoned correspondent with the Last
Emperor’s rule which elapsed circa 10 years.
Moreover, Kraft can be said to have blurred the line between the “incipient uses” of the idea of
the Mahdī and what later came to be evolved, according to previous scholarship, around the
triumphant ruler spoken of in the Qatāda ḥadīth.
The Anti-Arab Nature of The Mahdī And The Last Emperor’s Uprising
Having been penned in the wake of the Muslim conquests, the Apocalypse of Pseudo-
Methodius and its successors are vivid indications of the Christians’ fervent hopes rested
on a messianic ruler who was to annihilate the Arab invaders. (Alexander, 1985)
This “polemical attitude towards the Arab conquerors” came to be “an integral part of
the subsequent tradition” of the Last Roman Emperor, recurring persistently in the
ensuing wave of the Byzantine apocalyptic material. (Reinink, 2008; Kraft, 2012)
It should come as no surprise that the Byzantines would have adopted a belligerent
position towards the Arabs, but that the Arabs themselves are castigated in their own
apocalyptic tradition may well sound peculiar.
The Anti-Arab Nature of The Mahdī And The Last Emperor’s Uprising
In Shī’ī view, the Arabs are the Islam’s formidable apocalyptic foes whose evil deeds would
ultimately unleash the divine wrath. Among the most overt manifestation of this anti-Arab
sentiments is a groups of traditions which, despite exhibiting minor variants in wording, all
considered the Mahdī’s appearance to be the harbinger of a cataclysm for the Arabs.
The sixth Shī‘ī Imām, Ja‘far al-Ṣādiq is quoted as saying: “woe unto the Arabs (wailun li-l-Arab)
from evil drawing near.” Elsewhere we hear of the Arabs’ paucity in the Mahdī’s army: “Caution
the Arabs, there will be bad tidings (khabara saw’in) for them, as none of them is to be join al-
Qā’im’s revolt”.
The Mahdī is believed to launch a fierce onslaught against the Arabs (‘ala l-Arabi shadīd) and
“there will be nothing between him and the Arabs but the sword” viz., an intense battle.
The Shī’ī tradition’s acrimonious passion for the Arabs is to be elicited in the light of the Shī’ī-
Sunnī struggle for legitimacy.
The Anti-Arab Nature of The Mahdī And The Last Emperor’s Uprising
The words “Arabs” or “Arabs of Quraysh” in Shī’ī apocalyptic traditions should then be treated
synonymous with the Arab Caliphs and their followers. (al-Nu’mānī, al-Ṭūsi, Ibn al-Babawayh)
Strikingly enough, the wailun li l-Arab tradition appears likewise in the Sunnī compendia, but the
apocalyptist has situated this extortive statement in fundamentally different contexts, which, as
we shall see, could be taken as an attempt to invent a counter-context, and in so doing, to
disparage the Shī‘ī version of wailun li l-Arab tradition.
“The Prophet awoke from sleep with a reddened face and said,” we are told, “‘Woe to the Arabs
because of the evil that is imminent. Today part of the rampart of Gog and Magog is opened like
this,” and he made a round with his thumb and the next finger.
Zaynab bint Jaḥsh said: ‘Oh Prophet! Shall we perish even if there are righteous people among us?’
He said: ‘Yes, for there is much wickedness.’” (Ibn Ḥanbal, d. 855; al-Bukhārī, and Muslim)
The Anti-Arab Nature of The Mahdī And The Last Emperor’s Uprising
It is within the framework of Gog and Magog’s advent that the Sunnī recension of the tradition
“defines” the impending catastrophe facing the Arabs. These invasive nations’ menace is tightly
linked here with the “wickedness” or in the more general term, the moral degradation in the
society.
There is no mention whatsoever of the Mahdī’s rage against the Arabs. Gog and Magog’s threat
can be said to have been given the role which in the Shī‘ī tradition is fulfilled by the Mahdī’s
appearance.
The imminent disaster for the Arabs is identical in some other Sunnī traditions with the End-time
fitan: “Woe unto the Arabs from an impending evil, (i.e.) The Tribulations (Fitan) like the pitch-dark
night. A man wakes up a believer and becomes a disbeliever at night. People sell their faiths for the
vanities of this world.” (Nu‘aym; Cook, 2017)
The Anti-Arab Nature of The Mahdī And The Last Emperor’s Uprising
This tradition speaks neither of the rebellious nations of Gog and Magog nor of the Mahdī’s
fury against the Arabs. The imminent threat is relegated here to the infidelity and apostasy
of the believers. In sum, the Mahdī’s appearance inaugurates, for the Shī‘īs, the demise of
the “hostile autocratic government”, the Arabs of Quraysh under whose oppression they
lived and flourished.
While the Shī‘ī apocalyptic tradition bears a bitter hostility towards the Arabs, the Sunnī
apocalypses’ animosity is centered to a considerable extent upon the Byzantine Empire, the
fearsome adversary of the Caliphal office.
Though efficient in providing us with a convincing explanation as to the anti-Byzantine
Sunnī material, Kraft’s hypothesis falls short of satisfactorily justifying the anti-Arab facet of
Shī‘ī messianism, as it has nothing to do with the polemics with the Christian neighbor.
The Anti-Arab Nature of The Mahdī And The Last Emperor’s Uprising
This Shī‘ī character owes its existence to a totally domestic interaction, unlike the anti-
Byzantine nature of the Sunnī apocalyptic texts that were articulated in response to an
extrinsic parameter.
To conclude, suffering the oppression at the hands of the Arab caliphs was the Shī‘īs’
impetus behind the expectation of a sviour who is to rise suddenly in response to a long
period of the Arabs’ bloodshed, injustice, pains and tribulations, and obliterate the their
tyrannies.
And, it need not to be stressed that the Muslim-Christian dialectics cannot account for
this observation.
The “demon child” who is to wrest control of Byzantium, and a Roman captain being born
to a jinnīyya, are notable instances adduced by Cook in favour of this argument. (Cook,
2002)
The autobiographical account ascribed to Malīka, the slave-girl (jārīya) of the eleventh Shī’ī
Imām, Hasan al-Askarī, is illustrative in this respect.
Malīka supplies us with a good deal of information on the Shī’ī hagiography, introducing
herself as the progeny of Jesus’ executor (waṣī) and the granddaughter of a Roman Caesar
(variously designated in the Arabic as “Ghayṣar”,” “Malik al-Rūm,” and “Ghayṣar Malik al-
Rūm”).
She is mentioned in this tradition as having been taken into captivity in a war between
the Arabs and Byzantium and subsequently brought to Samarrā where she is bestowed to
Hasan al-Askarī and gives birth to a son of his. (al-Ṭūsi, Ibn al-Babawayh).
Though not an end-time prophecy, this tradition has much to tell us about the Shī’ī
messianism. Unlike the Sunnī material’s widespread tendency of demonizing the figures
on the Roman side, Malīka’s autobiography claims the Roman origin for the Mahdī
himself.
The notion of claiming a Christian Roman descent for an Islamic saviour is scarcely a
familiar one, standing in stark contrast with the Sunnīs’ inexorable hostility with
Byzantium and the Christian world as a whole.
To investigate into the roots of the belief on the Mahdī’s “Royal and apostolic
lineage”, one needs to compare some testimonies about the maternal lineage of the
Shī’ī Imāms in general and of the Shī’ī saviour in particular.
The last sixth Imāms were born from the slave-girls (jawārī), of differing ethnic and
religious background. These jawārī’s ancestry and erstwhile religion is central in the
Shī’ī faith to the “matrilineal nobility” both of the Imāms and the Mahdī. (Dann, 2018)
These jawārī, according to an oft-repeated statement in each of these women’s
biographical traditions, were to give birth to “the best amidst the people of the
earth” (khayru ahl al-arḍ), the expected Mahdī. (Pierce, 2016; Dann, 2018).
Not unexpectedly, the whole scene would dramatically change if one turns to the
Shī’ī apocalyptic texts. Here, there is no indication of an innate animosity with the
Rūm.
with the former’s giving the latter to the Mahdī’s generals that the struggle comes
to a rather amicable end.
“When al-Qā’im arises,” it is reported, “he would dispatch his army to Syria (al-
Shām) against the Banū Ummaya who has fled to Byzantium (al-Rūm).
The latter informs them that they are not given asylum unless they convert to
Christianity. The Umayyads admit, hang the crosses around their necks and enters
the country. Upon arriving al-Qā’im’s troops, the Byzantines sue for peace but they
are demanded the surrender of the Banū Umayya so they give them to al-Qā’im’s
entourages.
It is with respect to this circumstance that God Almighty has said: ‘Flee not,
but return to that (existence) which emasculated you and to your dwellings,
that ye may be questioned.’”
As was the case for Byzantium, one discerns a dichotomy between the Sunnī
following the conquest of Egypt, and the occasional clashes between the latter
and its Christian neighbor have left their traces in the Sunnī apocalyptic
material.
Though apparently less serious than threat of the Rūm, the menace posed by
the Nubians to the Muslim-held territories has been accompanied by the Sunnī
apocalyptists’ concern over the issue of the Nubian (Ethiopian) invasion.
conviction of the Shi’i saviour’s association with different confessional and cultural
groups.
Thus we hear in the Shī’ī texts not only of the Mahdī’s Nubian and Roman origin, but
To recapitulate, the medieval Christian and Shī’ī messianic figures are alike in
their Nubian descent, but what has brought about this resemblance ought
aspirations.
Conclusion
Aside from the religious polemics, there are certain subtle points in
development of Muslim and Christian messianic notions that should be
taken into consideration.
The messianic conviction of a nation may at times owe more to its own
socio-religious concerns than the religious polemics with other
confessional communities.
This seems to be the case for the Shī’ī messianism whose defining
features have been fashioned in response to totally domestic interactions.
Conclusion
To say that “the trajectory” of the messianic hopes’ evolution has been
merely determined by the polemic runs the risk of oversimplifying a
complicated issue.
The lack of political polemics in the Shī’ī faith with respect to the
Christian Byzantine neighbour, has brought about a relatively pacifying
attitude towards the Byzantines and the Christian world as a whole, at
least vis-à-vis the Sunnī worldview.
Hadi Sabouhi
University of California-Irvine,
hsabouhi@uci.edu