21

22

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Papacchini F, Ounsi HF. Fracture Resistance and

Failure Patterns of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Molars Restored

Using Resin Composite With or Without Translucent Glass Fiber Posts. J

Endod. 2006;32(8):752–5.

2. Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G. Direct Restoration of Endodontically

Treated Teeth: a Brief Summary of Materials and Techniques. Curr Oral

Heal Reports [Internet]. 2015 Dec 12;2(4):182–9. Available from:

http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40496-015-0068-5

3. Polesel A. ScienceDirect Restoration of the endodontically treated posterior

 23

tooth. G Ital Endod [Internet]. 2014;28(1):2–16. Available from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2014.05.007

4. Zarow M. endoprostodontics a guide for practicing dentics.pdf. Poland:

Quintessence publishing; 2017. 105 p.

5. Rocca GT, Krejci I. Crown and post-free adhesive restorations for

endodontically treated posterior teeth : from direct composite to endocrowns

Crown and post-free adhesive restorations for endodontically treated

posterior teeth : from direct composite to endocrowns. Eur J Esthet Dent.

2013;8(June).

6. Kenneth J, Anusavice; Shen, Chiayi; Rawls R. PHILLIPS SCIENCE of

DENTALMATERIAL. 12th ed. Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. 275–

336 p.

7. Hirayama S, Iwai H, Tanimoto Y. Mechanical evaluation of five flowable

resin composites by the dynamic micro-indentation method. J Dent

Biomech. 2014;5(X):1–8.

8. Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable Resin Composites : A Systematic

Review and Clinical Considerations. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2015;9(6):18–

24.

9. Rocha C, Torres G, Maria H, Re C, Perote CCC, Santos LFTF, et al.

ScienceDirect A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and

heavy flowable composites in class II restorations. J Dent. 2014;1–7.

10. Shaalan OO, Auf EA, Farid A, Zoghby E. Clinical evaluation of flowable

resin composite versus conventional resin composite in carious and

 24

noncarious lesions : Systematic review and meta ‑ analysis. J Conserv Dent.

2017;(November).

11. Doğan MS, Demirci F, Eratilla E, Eratilla V, Unal M. Evaluation of stress

distribution of a new restorative material and composite resin : a finite-

element analysis study. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip [Internet].

2017;31(6):1216–20. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2017.1373600

12. Implications C. Finite element analysis of stresses in molars during

clenching and mastication. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;591–7.

13. Alvanforoush N. A comparison between published clinical success of direct

resin composite restorations in vital posterior. Melb Dent Sch Univ Melb.

2016;

14. D SBMP, Sc M, D DWUP, D BNHP. A D V A N C E S I N D E N TA L P

R O D U C T S. J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. 2003;134(10):1382–90.

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0054

15. Meenakumari C, Bhat KM. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Newer

Nanoposterior Restorative Resin Composites : An In vitro Study. Contemp

Clin Dent. 2018;9:142–6.

16. El-safty S, Akhtar R, Silikas N, Watts DC. Nanomechanical properties of

dental resin-composites. Dent Mater [Internet]. 2012;28(12):1292–300.

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.007

17. Y Kitasako, A Sadr; MF Burrow JT. Thirty six-month clinical evaluation of

a highly-filled flowable composite for direct posterior restorations. 2015;

 25

18. Paulo J, Tribst M, Maria A, Dal DO, Ferreira C, Madruga L, et al.

Endocrown restorations : Influence of dental distribution ଝ. Dent Mater

[Internet]. 2018;6–13. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.012

19. Letícia Brandão DURANDa* JCGuimarães, JUNIORc SM, BARATIERIc

LN. Modeling and validation of a 3D premolar for finite element analysis.

Rev Odontol DA UNESP. 2016;45(1):21–6.

20. Stetiu AA, Oleksik V, Stetiu M, Oancea L. Modelling and Finite Element

Method in Dentistry Introduction The finite element method ( FEM ) allows

finding approximate solutions of partial Materials and Methods 2 . 1 .

Scanning process . The CAD-CAM technologies in dentistry are usually

used in. Rom Biotechnol Lett. 2015;20(July):10579–84.

21. Mohammed; Desai. Journal of Oral Hygiene & Health Basic Concepts of

Finite Element Analysis and its Applications in Dentistry : An Overview. J

Oral Hyg Heal. 2014;2(5):1–5.

22. Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X. Influence of remaining tooth structure and

restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated

maxillary premolars : A fi nite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent [Internet].

2017;117(5):646–55. Available from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.023

23. Posterior E. STUDY TOKUYAMA DENTAL 2010 Evaluation of Estelite

Sigma Quick and Estelite Posterior. 2010;1–17.

24. Ogura R, Kato H, Okada D, Foxton RM, Ikeda M, Miura H. The relationship
 26

between bite force and oral sensation during biting in molars. Aust Dent J.

2012;57(3):292–9.