You are on page 1of 2

Hatchery sanitation and

chick mortality
HATCHERY

Sanitation in the hatchery


influences the hatchability
of eggs and subsequent quality
of the chicks hatched. By
following basic sanitation
and hygiene practices, even
hatcheries with limited access
to sanitation products and
technology can significantly
reduce chick losses.

By Dr. A.A. Qureshi, Pakistan

A
ttaining high chick quality brings
many factors into play. Aside from the
environmental parameters of temper-
ature, relative humidity, turning and gas
concentrations, hatchery sanitation and hy-
giene play an important role in attaining
high chick quality. Small differences in tem- Chick quality is greatly influenced by the standards of hygiene and sanitation in the
perature during incubation can produce a incubator environment.
large change in hatchability and thus rela-
tive humidity has a role. Turning eggs dur-
ing incubation has again a definite effect on Under poor hygienic incubation conditions, ic death, leading to an overall average
livability whilst gas exchange (oxygen & car- the egg yolk sac is easily infected with a hatchability of 80% under such conditions.
bon dioxide) imbalance reduces hatchabili- number of bacteria and chicks often hatch It is also found that 15% to 20% of un-
ty with a subsequently lower chick quality. in a devitalised state with increased watery hatched eggs show bacterial contamina-
A 57g egg requires five litres of oxygen to at- yolk and consequent multiplication of tion, while during summer months it leads
tain embryonic maturity while at the same Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, to the so called “exploding” eggs from
time it evolves three litres of carbon diox- Clostridium sporogenes, Clostridium Mycoplasma-infected flocks that are often
ide. Normal fresh air contains 0.03% carbon welchii, Escheresia coli and Psedomonas found piped and dead in the shell.
dioxide but for normal chick development spp., which often cause chick mortality dur- Small, weak, thin chicks with poor body
0.1 to 0.45% carbon dioxide is required in ing the three days post hatch. Moreover, weight are considered as “poor quality
the incubators and 0.5% in the hatcheries. such contamination can easily spread to chicks”, and these usually have a higher
Hatchability is markedly reduced if it is in- other sections of the hatchery through mortality during the brooding stage at the
creased to 1%. Hatchability is also related to build-up of contaminated fluff, which can farm, which under normal conditions
egg size and various other factors including be spread by mechanical carriers or even should not exceed 2% to 3% whereas in de-
feed & nutrition but as general rule small circulating air. veloping countries average broilers mortali-
eggs hatch earlier whereas larger eggs take Hatchery ventilation systems are almost ty for 49 days is considered to be 10-12% in-
longer with an increasing possibility of de- non-existent in many developing countries, cluding “starve-outs”. Weak chicks usually
hydrated chicks. though at least eight air changes per hour result from dehydration during and after
are recommended for both setters and hatching as nearly 50% of chicks are
Sanitation - the basics hatchers, which can be monitored by hatched 9-15 hours after the first chick is
Hatchery sanitation starts on the farm, checking carbon dioxide levels in the ma- hatched and all remain inside the hatchery
since dirty contaminated eggs coming to chines. In fact, hatchery ventilation is re- until final pull out.
the hatchery can easily cause hygienic con- quired to provide sufficient oxygen to the
ditions inside to deteriorate. Entry of dirty embryos and to remove products of respira- Bacteria - the enemy within
eggs into the hatchery leads to increased tion. It also helps in maintaining positive and without
candling waste through heavy embryonic or airflow through the hatchery from the egg Bacterial and fungal infections in the hatch-
chick mortality, because of bacterial pene- store to the chick dispatch room. In addi- ery are first indicated by early deaths within
tration into the egg shell leading to a lower tion it should prevent backtracking of all the first seven days of chick life. Such infec-
hatchability and poor quality chicks. In contaminated fluff to reduce any possibility tions are commonly brought in from the
such cases commercial farms usually report of recycling of the infection inside the farm where nesting box sanitation should
increased early chick mortality during the hatchery operation. It has been found be looked into, as dirty eggs carry a heavy
first week of brooding. However, nest hy- through years of research that at least 20% load of micro-organisms. Floor eggs always
giene, egg packing and fumigation at farm of hatching eggs are wasted during incuba- have lower hatchability and poorer quality
level can help in reducing such situations. tion, mainly due to infertility and embryon- chicks. Inside the hatchery the most critical

24 WORLD POULTRY - Elsevier Volume 18, No 3. '02


Table 1. Grading of hatchery equipment and air by total
bacterial count (TBC)

Grading Bacterial colony count Mould count

Machines Rooms
Excellent 0 - 10 0 - 15 0
Good 11 - 25 16 - 36 01 to 03
Average 26 - 46 37 - 57 04 - 06
Poor 47 - 66 58 - 76 07 - 10
Bad 67 - 86 77 - 96 10 - 12
Miserable ≥87 ≥97 ≥13

Table 2. Qualitative grading of hatchery fluff


by quantitative bacterial count

Grading Total bacterial count/g


Excellent < 75,000
Good “ 150,000
Fair “ 300,000
Chick quality is usually seen in the uniformity and high hatchability of the incubated eggs. Poor “ 500,000
Bad > 500,000

Figure 1. Average weekly mortality of A and B grade chicks


pipes with worn galvanised coatings and
3.5
high iron content. Many hatchereymen in
B GRADE CHICKS developing countries come across the prob-
3 lem of “exploders” particularly during the
summer months, which is caused by the
2.5 presence of Pseudomonas in water or in-
WEEKLY MORTALITY

side the eggs. The putrefied egg contents


2 are spread over an area of almost one me-
tre, spoiling other eggs/embryos and conse-
1.5 quently contaminating the whole hatch
from setters to hatchers.
1
It is interesting to note that hatching eggs
0.5 A GRADE CHICKS
at zero day of incubation carry a total bac-
terial count (TBC) of 350,000 to 450,000 that
0 is reduced to 50,000-100,000 by the 4th day
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 but on the 8th day of incubation their num-
AGE IN WEEKS
ber once again goes up to 300,000 to
350,000. However, during the final stage of
areas from a hygiene and sanitation point mon fungal infection, causing incubation, on the 15th and 18th days the
of view, would therefore require a proper gasping/laboured respiration of chicks in TBC has been recorded to be 45,000 to
disinfectant or a fumigant. Hatchery sanita- the chick trays. Pseudomonas aeroginosa, 60,000 and 13,500 to 15,500 respectively,
tion and hygiene monitoring requires labo- Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas though much depends upon hygiene, sani-
ratory testing to measure the level of bacte- putida and Pseudomonas maltophilia are tation and fumigation at farm and hatchery
rial and fungal contamination. Hatching the most common contaminants in a level.
eggs, chick fluff and dead embryos are hatchery, which have been found to be re- The bacterial colony count of air samples
checked to see the effectiveness of terminal sistant to many common antibiotics and for setters, hatchers and rooms is common-
fumigation with formalin, while hatchery disinfectants. Consequently much care is ly scored as shown in Table 1, to check the
building walls, floors, tables and trays are required in selecting a disinfectant. Some standard of hygiene. Similarly the qualita-
checked by swabbing at regular intervals of viral infections like Newcastle disease, tive and quantitative bacterial counts of
at least two weeks. Air inlets for both setters Infectious bronchitis, Encephalomyelitis, hatchery fluff are scored according to the
and hatchers are checked by the settle plate Infectious laryngeotracheatis and Egg Drop number of organisms present per gram of
method while hatcher trays, buggies and Syndrome often lead to poor hatch and fluff sample collected, before the hatch is
sexing tables, etc. are checked both by swab poor quality of chicks. pulled out and is often scored as shown in
or contact plates for further bacteriological Bacteriological examination of the water Table 2.
results. The water supply to the hatchery is supply to the hatchery for incubation Presently formalin is the most commonly
also checked for its total bacterial count equipment and washing purposes should used egg fumigant in developing countries
(TBC), coliform count and total dissolved meet the standard of drinking water for hu- as it is the cheapest and most easily avail-
salts (TDS) which gives a measure of water man consumption with a zero coliform able, but during the last few years other fu-
hardness. count and a minimum range of TBC. Where migants and disinfectants have been made
Amongst the most common bacterial dis- local chlorination of water at 5ppm is car- to the hatchery and farm. Good chick quali-
eases in any hatchery having problems of ried out, TBC would never increase beyond ty is equally related to a good disinfection
low quality hatch and chicks, microbes like 200-300 per ml of water. However and fumigation. Poor quality chicks cause
Salmonella, E. coli, Pseudomonas, Pseudomonas can survive and multiply un- an enormous economic loss to the farmer,
Stapylococci and Mycoplasma may be re- der a wide variety of conditions, particular- which can be avoided by improving hatch-
sponsible but Aspergillosis is another com- ly in water storage tanks and old water ery conditions and incubation situations. □

WORLD POULTRY - Elsevier Volume 18, No 3. '02 25

You might also like