Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Digest
vs.
Facts
Fausta Batarra filed a complaint in court for the recovery of the damages
brought by Francisco Marcos for the breach of promise of marriage by the latter. The
defendant induced the plaintiff to submit herself to sexual relation with him on
account of such promise of marriage.
Issue
Whether or not the plaintiff can recover for the damages brought by the
defendant for the breach of promise of marriage.
Rulings
DAMAGES- Nor can an action be maintained under article 1902 of the Civil Code, for
the woman voluntarily participated in the act.
The contract is void/inexistent because it was contrary with law which stated on
“Art. 1411 When the nullity proceeds from the illegality of the cause or object of the
contract, and the set constitutes a criminal offense, both parties being in pari delicto,
they shall have no action against each other, and both shall be prosecuted…” in which
the cause of the action taken by the defendant in making a promise with the plaintiff is
based on his immoral act which constitutes a criminal offense.
The first judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant has
brought the case by bill of exceptions. The judgment of the court below is reversed
and the defendant is acquitted of the complaint, with costs of the first instance. No
costs will be allowed to either party in this court.