Sanjay Bakshi

@Sanjay__Bakshi  Subscribe

a month ago, 14 tweets, 2 min read  Read on Twitter

     Bookmark  Save as PDF

What happens when someone blows the whistle?

Whistleblowers are the effective saints of civilization. They take great risk and
sometimes they lose their lives too.
It's true that many whistleblowers have an agenda. They want to take revenge for some "wrongdoing". Or
there may be a financial incentive. Or glory. Or something else. But the key thing is that they often know
about some evil wrongdoing and now they can expose it far more safely.

It's true that when a whistleblower in a listed company sends information to the regulators, they will tend
to sleep on it. But today, the world for whistleblowers has changed.

There are media outlets which will publish, if not the whole documents, then the summary of the
allegedly incriminating documents and it will spread like wildfire.

For investors to take a stand that the investigations will take a while and it will be surely be suppressed
etc etc misses an important point.

By putting the alleged incriminating information in the public domain, the whistleblower causes instant
damage. How?

The cost of capital goes up. Instantly. And sometimes, the capital becomes totally un-obtainable. That
makes some businesses, dependent on the "kindness of strangers" extremely vulnerable to collapse.
Which is just what what the whistleblower wanted.

Generally speaking, investors under-appreciate the risk of a whistleblower's action on cost of capital.
Take a look at companies (I won't name them) who had whistleblowers report on them.Look at their stock
price before the report and the stock price today. You'll see what I mean

Once a company that has done something gravely wrong, loses reputation because of a whistleblower, it's
virtually impossible to get it back.

Whistleblower actions, therefore, hurts companies where it hurts the most.

If you own shares in a Company and someone blows the whistle on it in a fairly serious manner, how
should you think about the situation,

How should you NOT think? One thing you should not think is that assume that whistleblower news is
irrelevant to the fundamentals. It isn’t. As I mentioned earlier, indecent exposure is correlated to cost of
capital...

Another way to not think is to assume that you will wait for the investigations to be completed. You have
to decide and you have to decide now. You will never have full information.

The way to think about these situation is the way Ben Graham thought about special situations. You have
to think about the downside risk of remaining invested. If that risk is too high you have to ignore the
upside
 Follow
and
Us on Twitter!
leave.  Tweet  Share
 Investing in securities is not a like being in court of law where you have to assume innocence until guilt is
proven. In the stock markets it’s often prudent to assume the opposite.

You may disagree with me. And I will be wrong on some of the occasions but statistically speaking, the
correct approach, if you want to protect your capital, is to assume guilt until innocence is
proven.Remember that lesson. It will save you money and it will save you from stress

Missing some Tweet in this thread?

You can try to force a refresh.

 Tweet  Share  Email  Embed

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Sanjay Bakshi This content may be removed anytime!

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a
available from this author! PDF, save and print for later use!

 Subscribe  Save as PDF

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily

mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner)

and mention us with a keyword "unroll"

@threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Sanjay__Bakshi see all

Sanjay Bakshi Sanjay Bakshi

@Sanjay__Bakshi @Sanjay__Bakshi

a month ago a month ago

Is mainstream media (MSM) biased? Yes indeed. How do
we know this? We know this by using many methods.
One is by carefully studying the "language" used by
MSM.
In India, if Muslims kill Hindus, for whatever reason, the
reportage of their religion is very often suppressed by
MSM. See, for example, bit.ly/2W3y3MK
But if Hindus kills Muslims, for whatever reason, they
are labelled as "lynch mobs." All violence is bad no
 Follow Us on Twitter!
Read 11 tweets
On the behavior of auditors and credit rating companies:
You would've noticed frequent downgrades by credit
raters and promptness displayed by auditors in
qualifying financial statements and sometimes even
refusing to sign them. This is a sign of the times we are
living in..
After a long a period of over-accommodative behavior
by both auditors and rating companies, we are now
seeing the pendulum swing the other way. The
f fd d ill j
 Tweet  Share
Read 7 tweets