Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Correspondence: Dr S. Ghourab, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, PO Box 2925,
Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia (e-mail: sghourab@ksu.edu.sa)
Received 12-6-00, Revised 3-11-00, Accepted 8-3-01
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether the angle was < 45° (Figure 1); otherwise it was referred to as
the thickness of the lower placental edge might be used to ‘thick’ edge (Figure 2).
predict the clinical outcomes in patients with placenta previa. The diagnosis of complete placenta previa was made when
the internal cervical os was covered by placental tissue; it was
defined as central if the placental edge was not visualized by
MATERIAL AND METHODS
TVS examination; it was defined as low-lying, when the
Between October 1995 and March 2000, a total of 138 con- lower edge of the placenta was within 3 cm from the internal
secutive women were referred for TVS examination because cervical os. Transvaginal sonographic examination was ini-
of suspicion of placenta previa. Of these, 118 women had tially performed at 28–32 weeks. Vascularity of the subpla-
placenta previa detected by early third-trimester abdominal cental zone and intraplacental blood flow of its lower edge
ultrasound scan and 20 women had antepartum hemorrhage was observed with gray-scale sonography and color Doppler.
(APH) and abnormal fetal presenting part. All patients were Abdominal ultrasound (TAS) and TVS were repeated every
scanned by the same operator (S.G.) with either a Kretz 2 weeks in patients with low-lying placenta, to assess fetal
Combison 310 real-time transvaginal mechanical sector condition, placental migration and the relationship of the
scanner (Kretztechnik GmbH, Zipf, Austria), with variable presenting part to both the internal cervical os and the
frequency of 5–10 MHz and a 240° sector angle or an Aloka placental edge. Transvaginal sonographic examination was
2000 (Aloka Co, Tokyo, Japan) phased array transvaginal repeated at 36 weeks’ gestation in undelivered patients with
probe, with 5-MHz frequency and a 180° sector angle, also complete placenta previa. In each case of Cesarean section,
equipped for pulsed Doppler and color Doppler imaging. the relationship between the lower placental edge and the
The transducer was inserted cautiously into the vagina, up internal cervical os was digitally assessed and documented.
to a short distance from the cervix under continuous observa- Demographic data and clinical outcomes were recorded in
tion of the image. A sagittal scan of the whole length of the all patients.
cervix and lower part of the uterus was obtained first in each A chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test were used to
patient. If the lower placental edge was not visualized in this assess the statistical significance when the incidences in
plane, the transducer was then rotated 90° in each direction thin-edge and thick-edge placental groups were compared.
to visualize any presence of placental tissue in the four quad- Student’s t-test was employed to calculate the significance of
rants of the lower uterine cavity. During rotation, adjustment differences in the means between the two groups. A P-value
of the transducer was necessary to keep the internal cervical of < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
os continuously visualized. The internal cervical os and at
least 3 cm of lower uterine wall were clearly visualized in all
RESULTS
cases. Measurements were taken by tracing the distance
between the lower edge of the placental tissue and the margin During the study period there was a total of 18 670 deliver-
of the internal cervical os in the absence of uterine contrac- ies in the Department of Obstetrics. Of these, 104 (0.58%)
tion. The shape of the lower placental edge was assessed by had placenta previa confirmed by TVS before 32 weeks’
measuring its maximum thickness within a cm of the meeting gestation.
point of the basal and chorionic plates and an estimation of A total of 368 TVS examinations were performed on the
the angle between these plates. The shape of the placental edge 138 patients with either TAS diagnosis or clinical suspicion
was defined as ‘thin’ when the thickness was ≤ 1 cm and/or of placenta previa. Transvaginal sonographic examination
Figure 1 Anterior low-lying placenta with thin edge at 37 weeks’ gestation. The head is below the placental edge. The placenta is 3 cm away from
the internal os and was 1.5 cm away at 29 weeks with decreased vascularity of the subplacental zone. The fetus was delivered vaginally. PL, placenta;
H, head; CX, cervix; I.OS, internal os; B, bladder; P, ultrasound probe.
excluded the presence of placenta previa in 34 (24.6%) patients; Thirty-three patients had complete placenta previa at initial
none of these patients had a Cesarean delivery because of examination, 15 of them had a thin-edge, and the remaining
bleeding. Gestational weeks at diagnosis of placenta previa 18 had either a thick-edge or a central placenta. Transvaginal
ranged between 28 and 32 (mean 30.3 weeks). Aggravation sonographic examination showed no change in placental
or induction of vaginal bleeding did not occur either during location at 36 weeks’ gestation. All of these patients delivered
or within 24 h of the examinations. The thickness of the by Cesarean section; at the time of surgery digital exami-
lower placental edge ranged between 0.4 cm and 1 cm in the nation confirmed the presence of placental tissues over the
thin-edge group (mean, 0.73 ± 0.18 cm) and between 1.1 cm internal cervical os in all of them. Table 3 summarizes patients
and 3.2 cm in the thick-edge group (mean, 1.9 ± 0.64 cm). and their placental characteristics and clinical outcomes of
Of the 71 patients who were initially diagnosed with a complete placenta previa. All six patients who required
low-lying placenta, 17 patients had a thick-edge placenta and Cesarean hysterectomy for severe peripartum hemorrhage
the remaining 54 had a thin-edge placenta. No statistical had had a previous Cesarean section, anterior accreta and
differences between these two groups were detected for a central or a thick-edge placenta (Figure 3). The mean
most of the known confounding factors that might affect the number of APH episodes was 1.6 ± 0.7 in the thin-edge
clinical outcome (Table 1). However, the gestational age at placenta group (Figure 4) compared to 3.8 ± 1.6 in the thick-
diagnosis was significantly earlier in the thick-edge group edge or central placenta group (P < 0.001). Also, there was
(P = 0.0001). When the two groups were compared for clinical a significant difference in the mean number of blood units
outcome, the thin-edge group had a significantly higher transfused; 1.8 ± 0.9 in the thin-edge and 3.4 ± 1.3 in the
vaginal delivery ratio and birth weight, while the thick- thick-edge or the central placenta groups (P = 0.0003). Birth
edge group had a significantly higher risk for emergency weight in the thin-edge group was 2.53 ± 0.58 compared to
delivery, peripartum hemorrhage, placenta accreta, and 1.91 ± 19 in the thick-edge and the central placenta groups
low birth weight (Table 2). (P = 0.0002).
Figure 2 Anterior low-lying placenta with very thick edge (2.8 cm). There was no placental migration and there were several episodes of antepartum
hemorrhage. An emergency Cesarean section was carried out at 34 weeks’ gestation. PL, placenta; CX, cervix; I.OS, internal os; B, bladder;
P, ultrasound probe.
Table 1 Patient and placental characteristics for 71 women with a low-lying placenta
Thin-edge Thick-edge P
placenta (n = 54) placenta (n = 17) (two-tailed test)
Table 2 Comparison of clinical outcomes between women with a thin-edge vs. a thick-edge low-lying placenta
Gestational age at delivery (weeks), mean ± SD 35.8 ± 4.3 33.2 ± 3.7 0.0281
Migration of placental edge to distance of > 3 cm 0.039
at 36 weeks’ gestation, n (%) 16 (29.6) 1 (5.8)
Fetal head at or below placental edge 0.0077
at 36 weeks’ gestation, n (%) 21 (38.8) 1 (5.8)
Number of patients with APH, n (%) 22 (40.7) 15 (88.2) 0.016
Number of APH episodes per patient, mean ± SD 1.1 ± 0.9 2.4 ± 1.8 0.0002
Vaginal delivery, n (%) 19 (35.2) 1 (5.8) 0.0152
Emergency CS before 36 weeks, n (%) 16 (29.6) 11 (64.7) 0.0208
Placenta accreta, n (%) 0 3 (17.6) 0.0119
Cesarean hysterectomy, n (%) 0 1 (5.8) NS
Peripartum blood transfusion (units), mean ± SD 1.03 ± 1.3 2.4 ± 2.6 0.0049
Mean birth weight (kg), mean ± SD 2.72 ± 0.86 1.93 ± 0.47 0.006
Figure 3 Posterior total placenta previa with very thick edge (2.2 cm). Cervical length was 3.6 cm and there was increased vascularity of the
subplacental zone. An emergency Cesarean section was carried out at 33 weeks’ gestation for severe antepartum hemorrhage. PL, placenta;
H, head; CX, cervix; I.OS, internal os; C.C, cervical canal; B, bladder; P, ultrasound probe.
Table 3 Demographic data and clinical outcomes in 33 women with In ten out of the 11 patients with placenta accreta /increta
complete placenta previa the diagnosis was suspected antenatally utilizing both TVS
and TAS with color Doppler. Previously reported criteria
Maternal age (years), mean ± SD 31.8 ± 3.7
were used to help in the diagnosis of placenta accreta10; all
Patients with previous Cesarean section, n (%) 12 (36.4)
Number of previous Cesarean sections, 1.8 ± 1.3 of these patients had previous Cesarean scars, an anterior
mean ± SD placenta and a thick-edge or central placenta.
Parity, mean ± SD 3.9 ± 2.2
Anterior placenta, n (%) 16 (48.5)
Thin-edge placenta, n (%) 15 (45.5) D ISCU SSIO N
Thick-edge or central placenta, n (%) 18 (54.5)
Accreta and previous section, n (%) 8 (24) Transvaginal sonography is the gold standard in the diagnosis
Number of patients with APH, n (%) 27 (81.8) of placenta previa as it can provide detailed and accurate informa-
Number of APH episodes per patient, mean ± SD 2.6 ± 0.9 tion about the lower placental edge, placental migration, and
Duration of admission (days), mean ± SD 29.5 ± 8.7 implantation site, and may help predict delivery outcome8,11–13.
Gestational age at delivery (weeks), mean ± SD 33.7 ± 2.3
Prediction of mode of delivery and the likelihood of APH is
Peripartum blood transfusion (units), mean ± SD 82.7 ± 1.2
Emergency Cesarean section before 36 weeks, n (%) 22 (66.7) important in planning the management of placenta previa,
Cesarean hysterectomy, n (%) 6 (18) including the method and time of intervention and the contro-
Birth weight (kg), mean ± SD 2.1 ± 0.91 versial area of outpatient management. Most cases of placenta
previa would have been diagnosed by 32 weeks’ gestation
APH, antepartum hemorrhage; SD, standard deviation.
because of widespread use of ultrasound in obstetrics. Whilst
some studies have claimed that location (anterior or posterior) serious complications (hysterectomy and sever hemorrhage)
and degree of placenta previa may indicate the delivery and than those with a thin-edge placenta (Table 2). It could be
clinical outcome8,10,13, other studies have shown that the degree speculated that the high rate of emergency abdominal delivery
of placenta previa is not predictive of clinical outcome6,14–15. and the increased incidence and severity of APH in patients
However, none of these studies have considered the shape of with a thick-edge low-lying placenta might be explained by the
the lower placental edge. This prospective study shows that abundant vasculature of the lower placental edge and the
a combination of TVS assessment of the shape of the lower subplacental zone and the interference of a thick-edge placenta
placental edge and other sonographic findings would improve with descent of the fetal head (Figure 5). To the best of our know-
the prediction accuracy of clinical outcome in placenta previa. ledge, these findings have not been reported previously and may
Women with a thick-edge low-lying placenta were a par- be important in predicting the clinical course of placenta previa.
ticularly high-risk group irrespective of degree and location None of the women with an anterior thin-edge low-lying
of placenta because, with one exception, there was no signifi- placenta had a Cesarean section for placenta previa if the lower
cant evidence of placental migration on subsequent sonographic placental edge was > 3 cm from the internal cervical os at the
examination. The presenting parts were always above the lower last TVS examination. On the other hand, vaginal delivery was
placental edge. Eleven (64.7%) patients had severe enough achieved in three out of four patients when the distance was
APH to warrant emergency Cesarean section before 36 weeks; 2–3 cm, and in one out of six when the distance was < 2 cm.
the remaining five were electively sectioned and they also had In the case of a posterior thin-edge low-lying placenta, vaginal
significantly poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes and more delivery was achieved in two out of eight patients. In both of
Figure 4 Posterior total placenta previa with thin edge and decreased vascularity of the subplacental zone. An elective Cesarean section was carried
out at 37 weeks’ gestation. PL, placenta; H, head; CX, cervix; I.OS, internal os; EX.OS, external os; B, bladder; P, ultrasound probe.
Figure 5 Anterior low-lying placenta with thick edge at 28 weeks’ gestation. The placenta is 1.6 cm away from the internal os. There was no placental
migration, the presenting part was always high, and there was increased vascularity of the subplacental zone. An emergency Cesarean section was
carried out at 35 weeks’ gestation for severe antepartum hemorrhage. PL, placenta; CX, cervix; I.OS, internal os.
them the distance between the lower placental edge and the 2 Leerentveld RA, Gilberts EC, Arnold MJ. Accuracy and safety of
internal cervical os was > 2.5 cm at the last TVS examination. transvaginal sonographic placental localization. Obstet Gynecol
1991; 76: 759– 61
The diagnosis of complete placenta previa, in 33 women,
3 Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calceron F, Redondoc C. Transperineal sono-
was confirmed at Cesarean section and there was no evidence graphy in second trimester to term pregnancy and early labor.
of change in grade of placenta. These findings support the J Ultrasound Med 1991; 10: 481–5
suggestions of Townsend et al.1 and Ancona et al.16 that 4 Farine D, Fox HE, Timor-Tritsch I. Vaginal ultrasound for ruling
dynamic placentation does not occur, and that once the out placenta previa. Case report. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96:
117– 20
placenta is implanted over the os, it remains fixed in that
5 Timor-Tritsch IE, Yunis RA. Confirming the safety of transvaginal
position. Twenty-two (66.7%) of the cases of complete sonography in patients suspected of placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol
placenta previa had severe APH and required immediate 1993; 81: 742– 4
Cesarean delivery before 36 weeks’ gestation; in 18 (82%) 6 Love CD, Wallace EM. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa:
of them, the placenta was either central or thick-edge. What is appropriate management? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103:
864– 7
Cesarean hysterectomy was required in seven cases
7 Green JR. Placenta previa and abruptio placenta. In Creasy RK,
(6.7%); all of them developed severe intrapartum hemor- Resnik R, eds. Maternal Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice.
rhage, had a previous Cesarean section scar and anterior Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1989: 592
placenta previa accreta. Six of them developed coagulopathy 8 Oppenheimer LW, Farine D, Ritchie JW, Lovinsky RM, Telford J,
and surgically uncontrollable hemorrhage and were treated with Fairbanks LA. What is a low-lying placenta? Am J Obstet Gynecol
1991; 165: 1036– 8
abdomino-pelvic packing17. Antenatal diagnosis of accreta
9 Timor-Tritsch IE, Bar-Yamy Y, Elgali S, Rottem S. The technique of
was made in 10 patients, none of whom had a thin-edge placenta. transvaginal sonography with the use of 6–5 MHz probe. Am J
Nielson et al.18 showed that the Cesarean hysterectomy rate Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 1019– 24
was as high as 16% due to placenta accreta. 10 Lerner JP, Dean S, Timor-Tritsch IE. Characterization of placenta
In addition to the placental degree and location (anterior, accreta using transvaginal sonography and color Doppler imaging.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 198– 201
posterior), the shape of the lower placental edge is an import-
11 Farine D, Fox HE, Jakobson S. Vaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of
ant sonographic finding in predicting clinical outcome in placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 159: 566– 8
women with placenta previa. Although a relatively small 12 Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Diagnosis of placenta previa by
number of patients were investigated, it was shown that sonography. Ann Med 1993; 25: 279– 83
women with a thick-edge placenta are at a higher risk of 13 Makie WC. Placenta previa. Clin Perinatol 1992; 19: 425–35
14 Newton ER, Barss V, Cetrulo CL. The epidemiology and clinical
having surgical delivery and serious complications. However,
history of asymptomatic mid-trimester placenta previa. Am J Obstet
vaginal delivery and more favorable maternal and neonatal Gynecol 1984; 148: 743– 8
outcomes could be anticipated in the case of a thin-edge pla- 15 Rosen OMB, Peek MJ. Do women with placenta previa without
centa, especially if it had an anterior location and its lower antepartum haemorrhage require hospitalization? Aust NZ J Obstet
edge were > 2 cm away from the internal cervical os in the Gynaecol 1994; 342: 130– 4
16 Ancona S, Chatterjee M, Rhee I, Sicurenza B. The midtrimester
early third trimester. To consolidate this conclusion a larger
placenta previa: prospective follow up. Eur J Radiol 1990; 10: 215 –
prospective controlled study comparing the clinical out- 6
comes of thin-edge vs. thick-edge placentae is needed. 17 Ghourab S, Al-Nuaim L, Al-Jabari A, Al-Meshari A, Mustafa MS,
Abotalib Z, Al-Salman M. Abdomino-pelvic packing to control
severe haemorrhage following Caesarean hysterectomy. J Obstet
REFERENCES Gynaecol 1999; 19: 155– 8
1 Townsend RP, Laing FC, Nyberg DA. Technical factors responsible 18 Nielson T, Hagberg H, Ljungblad U. Placenta previa and antepartum
for ‘Placental Migration’: Sonographic assessment. Radiology 1986; haemorrhage after previous caesarean section. Gynecol Obstet
160: 105 – 8 Invest 1989; 27: 88– 90