Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Confirming the accuracy of the algorithm s outputs across the full range of the pulverizer s operating envelope,
including the determination of a bias or calibration coefficient specific to the pulverizers.
Determining the minimum safe outlet temperature setpoint that would facilitate operation with a duct heater out of
service.
Making it feasible to start pulverizers "cold," without the help of natural gas.
From an operational point of view, one of the most useful outputs of the algorithm is raw coal moisture. The use of
process variables directly related to the pulverizers yields results that are virtually real time for coal at those points.
Unfortunately, measurements made within the conveyor system — between the silos and the pulverizers — involve a
significant time lag.
To isolate the impacts of various variables, eight tests were conducted on a single pulverizer, grinding PRB coal. During
them, the pulverizer s outlet temperature and the air/coal ratio were varied across the normal full range of operation. Test
results (see table) indicate excellent agreement between algorithm-predicted raw coal moisture numbers and values
determined by laboratory analysis of grab samples collected during the testing.
A survey of five power plants burning PRB coals indicates that they use a wide range of pulverizer outlet temperature
setpoints, from 48.9C to 65.6C. Due to this variation, Nanticoke Station s management decided to conduct tests to
determine the drying performance of the plant s pulverizers before raising the percentage of PRB coal burned.
The results of the tests, all at maximum continuous rating, indicated a dew point of about 49C with the pulverizer
operating at or near full load. The original operational setpoint used at Nanticoke was 57C. Over the years, improvements
in process control and measurement accuracy have enabled the setpoint to be lowered to 53C.
However, the total moisture content of PRB coal delivered to the station changes from shipment to shipment and is
affected by seasonal variations and weather. Given this variability and the fixed limits on duct heater and PA system
capacity, the only way to maintain a fixed setpoint was to reduce the load on the pulverizer load. Of course, a far more
serious problem — plugging of coal piping — would arise if the fixed setpoint did not provide sufficient margin to handle a
spike in surface moisture.
Ge ing S ar ed
Nanticoke Station follows what is considered standard practice in the electric power industry when starting up a pulverizer
operating on PRB coal: hot air is introduced to maintain the outlet temperature above the normal operating setpoint. The
PA control system for the plant s pulverizers uses three dampers (for total flow, hot air, and tempering air) to enable
independent and stable control of total PA flow as temperature changes. The curves shown in Figure 4 are typical for a
normal pulverizer start-up at Nanticoke.
4. Hot pulverizer start-up test flows and temperatures. Source: Ontario Power Generation
.
As mentioned earlier, Nanticoke Station installed natural gas – fired duct burners to raise the heat available to the
pulverizers. Later, however, rises in the price of gas served to make unit start-ups more costly. For this reason, some
plants now use coal as a start-up fuel. But doing so early necessitates a cold pulverizer start-up.
In principle, a lower pulverizer inlet temperature will evaporate less surface moisture. As a result, the absolute humidity at
the pulverizer outlet will be much lower than in a traditional hot start. To prove the viability of cold pulverizer start-ups,
plant engineers conducted a test on a single Nanticoke pulverizer firing PRB coal. The results are shown in Figure 5.
5. Cold pulverizer start-up test flows and temperatures. Source: Ontario Power Generation
P ac ical Re l
Engineers at Nanticoke Station also developed a generic control algorithm for optimizing the steady-state drying process
of a moist solid by a hot gas. This algorithm was then made specific for coal and adjusted to account for the
psychometric performance of the drying air and predicted values of total moisture in the coal entering and leaving the
pulverizer. Measurements of the additional inputs required by the algorithm (the inlet coal temperature and the humidity of
the air leaving the pulverizer) were made on one test pulverizer.
Tests then were performed to compare the algorithm s predictions with actual performance measurements. Under steady-
state conditions, the predictions of coal moisture entering the pulverizer were within 2% of values gleaned from grab
sample analyses.
By demonstrating the ability to discriminate the fuel source entering the pulverizer, the tests confirmed that it would be
possible to automatically transfer pulverizer settings with a change in fuel source. During the tests, the algorithm was
modified to provide performance predictions during pulverizer start-up, when the coal inventory is being established and
quiescent conditions do not exist. Yet the test results confirmed that a cold pulverizer start could be executed without
saturating the air leaving the pulverizer.
With the help of displays of real-time operation on a psychometric chart, operators of Nanticoke Station now can monitor
the pulverizers drying performance. Given proper control and procedures, the use of cold pulverizer starts has become a
viable option.
Future plans include operating the pulverizers on an alternate fuel, confirming the minimum setpoint temperatures for low-
load operation, and conducting a long-term trial of the humidity instrument s survival in the pulverizer s coal air
environment.
Close Window