CASE LIST : RULE 62 – 67

JUSTICE PABLITO A. PEREZ

_______________________

Rule 62 : INTERPLEADER

Lui Enterprises Inc. v. Zuellig Pharma Corporation et al.

G.R. No. 193494, March 7, 2014 [Leonen]

Bank of Commerce v. Planters Development Bank et al.

G.R. No. 154470-71, September 24, 2012 [Brion]

Arreza v. Diaz
G.R. No. 133113, August 30, 2001 [Quisimbing]

RCBC v. Metro Container Corp.

G.R. No. 127913, September 13, 2001 [Kapunan]

Belo Medical Group v. Santos and Belo

G.R. No. 185894, August 30, 2017 [Leonen]

Rule 63: DECLARATORY RELIEF

City of Lapu-Lapu v. PEZA

G.R. No. 184203, November 26, 2014 [Leonen]

Bro. Mariano “Mike” Velarde v. Social Justice System

G.R. No. 159357, April 28, 2004 [EB]
RTC – SC by R45 on pure question of law

Erlinda Reyes et al. v. Hon. Ortiz et al.

G.R. No. 137794, August 11, 2010 [de Castro]

Panganiban v. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation

G.R. No. 131471, January 22, 2003 [Carpio]

Republic of the Philippines v. Herminio Roque et al.

G.R. No. 204603, September 24, 2013 [EB; Perlas-Bernabe]

Legends: Blue – full text 1

Yellow – digest
Rule 64: REVIEW OF JUDGMENTS, ORDERS AND RESOLUTIONS OF COMELEC AND
COA

COMELEC v. Hon. Pe-Aguirre

G.R. No. 171208, September 7, 2007 [EB; Carpio-Morales]

Pates v. COMELEC et al.

G.R. No. 184915, June 30, 2009

Osmena v. COA
G.R. No. 188818, May 31, 2011

Fortune Life Insurance Company Inc. v. COA et al.

G.R. No. 213528, January 27, 2015

RULE 65: CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS

Consigna v. Sandiganbayan, et al., G.R. No. 175750-51, June 2, 2014 [ Rule 45 v. Rule 65]

Ocampo et al. v. Enriquez et al., G.R. No. 225973, November 18, 2016 [ Marcos burial]

Dynamic Builders v. Presbetiro et al., G.R. No. 174202 , April 7, 2015 [ certiorari and
prohibition as simultaneous remedies]

Republic v. St. Vincent de Paul, G.R. No. 192908, August 22, 2012, citing Domdom v.
Sandiganbayan [extension of period to file Rule 65 petition]

St. Martin Funeral Homes v. NLRC et al., G.R. No. 130866, September 16, 1998 [ certiorari
as remedy from labor rulings]

Rule 66: QUO WARRANTO

Velasco v. Belmonte Jr. et al, G.R. No. 211140, January 12, 2016 [ quo warranto v.
mandamus]

Topacio v. Ong et al., G.R. No. 179895, December 18, 2008 [ quo warranto by relator; claim
to public office]

Liban et al. v. Gordon, G.R. No. 175352, July 15, 2009 [ petitioner's claim to office]

Hon. Aguinaldo et al. v. His Excellency President Aquino et al., G.R. No. 224302, November
20, 2016 [why Topacio v. Ong does not apply]

Republic v. Sereno, G. R. No. 237428, May 11, 2018 [ quo warranto of impeachable officers]

Legends: Blue – full text 2

Yellow – digest
Rule 67 : EXPROPRIATION

MMDA v. Bel-Air Village Association Inc., G.R. No. 135962, March 27, 2000 [ police power
v. power of expropriation]

Malonzo et al. v. Hon. Zamora et al., G.R. No. 137718, July 27, 1999 [ power of LGU to
expropriate]

Estate of Jimenez v. Philippine Export Processing Zone, G. R. 137285, January 16, 2001 [ 2
phases of expropriation proceedings]

Republic v. Fernandez, G.R. 174549, March 25, 2015 [ expropriation for government
infrastructure project]

NPC v. Posada et al., G.R. No. 191945, March 11, 2015 [ dismissal of expropriation
complaint when purpose ceases to be public]

Republic thru NPC v. Heirs of Borbon et al., G.R. No. 165354, January 12, 2015 [
compensation when expropriation proceedings are terminated]

Secretary of DPWH et al. v. Sps. Tecson, G.R. No. 179334, April 21, 2015 [ on
reconsideration from Decision dated July 1, 2013 which must be read with dissenting and
concurring opinions; re – basis of just compensation]

Republic v. Gingoyon et al., G.R. 166429, December 19, 2005, which must be read with
Republic v. Hon. Mupas et al., G.R. No. 181892/209917/209696/209731, September 8, 2015 [
expropriation of NAIA Terminal 3]

Legends: Blue – full text 3

Yellow – digest