You are on page 1of 1

Pesigan Vs Angeles GR L-64279 April 30, 1984

FACTS:
Petitioners Anselmo and Marcelino Pesigan, carabao dealers, transported in a 10-wheeler truck in April
1982, 26 carabaos and a calf, from Camarines Sur to Batangas. Despite the health certificate, permit to
transport, and certificate of inspection issued to them by the provincial veterinarian, provincial
commander and constabulary command, respectively, while petitioners were negotiating the town of
Basud, Camarines Norte, the carabaos were confiscated by private respondents, Police Station
Commander Lt. Zanarosa, and provincial veterinarian Dr. Miranda. The confiscation was based on
Executive Order 626-A which prohibited the transport of carabaos from one province to
another. Pursuant to EO 626-A, Dr Miranda distributed the carabaos to 25 farmers of
Basud. Petitioners filed for recovery of the carabaos and damages, against private respondent Judge
Angeles who heard the case in Daet and later transferred to Caloocan City, and dismissed the case for
lack of cause of action.

ISSUE:
Whether or not EO 626-A be enforced before its publication in the Official Gazette.

HELD:
Said executive order should not be enforced against the Pesigans on April 2, 1982 because, as already
noted, it is a penal regulation published more than two months later in the Official Gazette dated June
14, 1982. It became effective only fifteen days thereafter as provided in article 2 of the Civil Code and
section 11 of the Revised Administrative Code.

The word "laws" in article 2 (article 1 of the old Civil Code) includes circulars and regulations which
prescribe penalties. Publication is necessary to apprise the public of the contents of the regulations and
make the said penalties binding on the persons affected thereby.

You might also like