Fracture Mechanics

FRACTURE MECHANICS OF
CONCRETE & SIZE EFFECT
 Introduction

  
Fracture Mechanics
 Fracture mechanics is a branch of solid mechanics which deals with the
behavior of the material and conditions in the vicinity of a crack and at the
crack tip.

 Applying fracture mechanics to concrete design can provide much insight

on how the size of a structural element may affect the ultimate load
capacity, if a given crack in a large structure such as a concrete dam will
propagate catastrophically under certain loading conditions.

 predicts that a crack will propagate when the stresses reach the ultimate
tensile strength of the material.
 Introduction
 Why Fracture Mechanics in Concrete?
 Design of concrete structures has already passed through two
important phases in its historical evolution. The first phase
of development took place until 1930s with the elastic no-
tension analysis and in its second phase during 1940–1970,
the plastic limit theory was introduced.
 Since concrete structures have been designed and
successfully built according to national codes of practice
without using the concept of fracture mechanics, it might
seem unnecessary to change the current design practice.
 Introduction
 However, a reasonable consensus has appeared from the researchers and
professionals around the world to explore the possibility of introducing the
fracture mechanics into the design practices.
 The most important reasons (ACI Committee-446 1992, Karihaloo 1995, Bažant
and Planas 1998) for the need of evoking fracture mechanics are briefly
mentioned as below:
 Lack of energy criterion for the crack development and its growth in the existing
national design codes.
 Application of fracture mechanics will avoid the unobjectivity in the results.
 The existing failure theory cannot give information on the post-peak response in
order to obtain the energy absorption under the complete load–deflection curve.
This information can be conveniently determined using fracture mechanics
theory.
Introduction
 The concrete structures exhibit size effect due to various reasons including
boundary layer or wall effect, diffusion phenomena, hydration heat,
statistical size effect, fracture mechanics size effect, and fractal nature of
crack surfaces (Bažant and Planas 1998).
 Due to lack of yield plateau

figure (1) Load Deflection Diagram of Ductile and

Brittle Structure.
Introduction
 Figure (2) Progressive Nature of Failure Illustrated for Punching Shear
of a. Slab.
Introduction
 There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:
Mode I fracture – Opening mode (a tensile stress normal to the plane of the
crack),
Mode II fracture – Sliding mode (a shear stress acting parallel to the plane of
the crack and perpendicular to the crack front),
Mode III fracture – Tearing mode (a shear stress acting parallel to the plane of
the crack and parallel to the crack front).

Figure (4) Modes of Fracture.

Size Effect

  size effect is, for design engineers, probably the most compelling reason
 The

for using fracture mechanics
 The size effect is defined through a comparison of geometrically similar
structures of different sizes, and is conveniently characterized in terms of the
nominal stress at maximum (ultimate) load, Pu. When the -values for
geometrically similar structures of different sizes are the same, we say that
there is no size effect.

Figure (5) Fracture Mechanics Size Effect.

 Size Effect
 Failures governed by linear elastic fracture mechanics exhibit a rather
strong size effect which in Fig (6) is described by the inclined dashed
line of slope -1/2. The reality for concrete structures is a transitional
behavior illustrated by the solid curve in Fig(6).

 This curve approaches the horizontal line for the strength criterion if
the structure is very small, and the inclined straight line for linear
elastic fracture mechanics if the structure is very large.
 Size Effect

Figure (6) Fracture Mechanics Size Effect for Geometrically Similar Structures
of Different Sizes.
Construction and Loading of the Large Wide Beam,
Explanation of Size Effect On Ductility
Structural action is normally a combination of series and
parallel couplings of the cracking zones and the uncracked
(elastic) zones. The size effect on ductility is explained by
the series coupling aspect. Consider a cracking element
coupled with an elastic element as shown in Fig(7).

Figure(7) Change in Post-Peak Load-Deflection Diagram Due to Series Coupling

with Elastic Element
Explanation of Size Effect On Ductility
 Since the force in both elements is the same and the deformations are superimposed,
the response of both elements combined is obtained by passing a horizontal line at
each level P and summing the corresponding deformations a and b, as shown in Fig
(7).

 The snapback behavior is unstable even under displacement control, and the
structure fails at the maximum displacement, labeled as ucr. This displacement
represents a ductility limit for the system.

 Since the addition of an elastic element is equivalent to increasing the size of

the structure, it is clear that an increase of size tends to decrease ductility.
Ductility is not a material property but a structure property which is governed
by fracture mechanics and depends on structure size (as well as the type of
concrete)
Size Effect Law for Maximum Nominal Stress

  We consider geometrically similar structures or specimens with
geometrically similar notches or cracks. We will now illustrate the analysis
for similarity in two dimensions, although the results are the same for
similarity in three-dimensions (Bazant, 1987a). The nominal stress at
failure (maximum load) may be defined as⁚

in which = ultimate load, b = thickness of the structure, d = certain chosen

characteristic dimension of the structure, and = coefficient introduced for
convenience.
(1)
Size Effect Law for Maximum Nominal Stress

  This represents the size effect law expressed in terms of material
parameters (Bazant and Kazemi, 1988).

 It is further useful to rewrite the size effect law in the form

 Here and D may be interpreted as the shape-independent nominal stress

at failure and the shape-independent characteristic dimension of the
structure (Bazant and Kazemi 1988‘ Bazant, Gettu and Kazemi, 1989).
Brittleness Number
To 
 characterize the brittleness of the structural response
quantity, various definitions of the so-called brittleness
numbers have recently been proposed by Hillerborg,
Carpinteri and Bazant. This brittleness number is defined as

In which = effective structural dimension., effective

extension of crack length for infinitely large specimen
plastic limit analysis
0.1 nonlinear fracture mechanics
linear elastic fracture mechanics

theuse of the brittleness number can considerably simplify failure

calculations.
Other Size Effects and Limitations
 Effect of Residual Ductile or Frictional Limit
 In Brazilian tests of split cylinder strength, Hasegawa et al.(1985)
observed that the nominal stress at failure (the split cylinder strength)
decreased with increasing diameter of the cylinder, however, beyond a
certain large size of cylinder, no further decrease of the strength was
observed (this behavior has now been confirmed by tests of Bazant ,
Kazemi et al 1990).
 The reason might be that for large sizes the maximum load is decided
by friction on a small wedge-shaped region under the load application
points. For small specimen diameters, the load to cause the splitting
crack is much higher than the load to cause frictional slip of the wedge
shape region and therefore the brittle mechanism of cracking decides.
 However, If the Size is very large about 100 �_� the nominal stress at
which the splitting fracture occurs becomes very small, smaller than the
nominal stress which causes the frictional slip of the wedge
  Effect of Aggregate Size

  If the aggregate size is changed, the fracture parameters and the size
effect law parameters change. As proposed by Bazant, the size effect
law needs to be adjusted as follows (see also Bazant and Kim, 1984)⁚

in which is the direct tensile strength, is the direct tensile strength for
maximum aggregate size , and is constant empirical constant.
 Effect of Aggregate Size

   size effect curves for different da may intersect, as shown in
the
Fig (8) Thus , for a sufficiently small specimen size, a higher
nominal strength is obtained with smaller aggregate size , while
for a sufficiently large specimen size, a higher nominal strength is
obtained With larger aggregate sizes.
 For small beams and slabs, this fracture a analysis would suggest
using small aggregate. Concrete dams are so large that the larger
the aggregate the better