Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Breakfast Occupancy Fit Linear Additive Trend

    Uploaded by

    Shikhil Nangia
    10 views1 page
    The document compares the performance of different time series forecasting models in predicting breakfast occupancy. It reports the mean error (ME), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean percentage error (MPE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for linear, exponential, and quadratic trend models as well as ARIMA, ETS, and automatically selected ETS models. The best performing model was an ARIMA(1,0,1) model with the lowest RMSE, MAE, MPE and MAPE.

    Original Description:

    Forecasting Model Comparison

    Original Title

    Model Comparison

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares the performance of different time series forecasting models in predicting breakfast occupancy. It reports the mean error (ME), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean percentage error (MPE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for linear, exponential, and quadratic trend models as well as ARIMA, ETS, and automatically selected ETS models. The best performing model was an ARIMA(1,0,1) model with the lowest RMSE, MAE, MPE and MAPE.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views1 page

    Breakfast Occupancy Fit Linear Additive Trend

    Uploaded by

    Shikhil Nangia
    The document compares the performance of different time series forecasting models in predicting breakfast occupancy. It reports the mean error (ME), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean percentage error (MPE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for linear, exponential, and quadratic trend models as well as ARIMA, ETS, and automatically selected ETS models. The best performing model was an ARIMA(1,0,1) model with the lowest RMSE, MAE, MPE and MAPE.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    BREAKFAST OCCUPANCY

    fit linear additive trend


    ME RMSE MAE MPE MAPE
    1.48e-15 19.28 15.36 -0.8493026 7.315067
    #Exponential Trend
    ME RMSE MAE MPE MAPE
    0.89 19.3 15.37 -0.432 7.289
    ACF1
    0.6637
    Quadratic Trend
    ME RMSE MAE MPE MAPE
    0 17.83 14.31 -0.729 6.815

    AUTO ARIMA (1,0,1)


    ME RMSE MAE MPE MAPE
    -0.23 14.07 11.14 -0.554 5.26

    ETS(ANN)
    ME RMSE MAE MPE MAPE
    -0.15 15.35 11.84 -0.3423 5.58793

    ETS(AAN)
    ME RMSE MAE MPE MAPE
    0.069 15.36 11.87 -0.24 5.59
    ETS (AAA)
    ME RMSE MAE MPE MAPE
    0.069 15.36 11.87 -0.24 5.59
    ETS - Automatic
    ME RMSE MAE MPE MAPE
    -0.15 15.35 11.84 -0.34 5.58

    You might also like