Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOMESTICATION OF ANIMALS
Structure
4.0 Objectives
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Neolithic Stage of Culture
4.3 The Earliest Farmers
4 3.1 Nile Valley
4.3.2 Early Farmers of Western Asia
4.4 Early Farmers of the Indian Sub-Continent
4.4.1 North Western Region
4.4.2 Neolithic Culture of Kashmir Valley
4.4.3 Early Farmers of the Belan Valley
4.4.4 Neolithic Culture of Bihar/Mid Ganp Valley
4.4.5 Early Farmers of Eastern India
4.4.6 Early Farmers of South India
4.4.7 NwlitbicCulture of Upper. Central and Western Deccan
4.5 Let Us Sum Up
4.6 Key words
4.7 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
4.0 OBJECTIVES
ThisUnit deals with the origins of agriculture and beginnings of domestication of animals
before the stage when metals came to be used. Cultivation of cereals and developments in
agriculture transformed the nomadic hunter-gatherer into a sedentary farmer. This led to the
beginning of village settlements and manufacturing of new types of tools. This stage of human
development is referred to as the Neolithic stage. After studying this Unit., you will be able to
learn about :
the characteristic features of the Neolithic stage of culture,
the archaeological evidence in the forms of new types of stone tools, cultivated plants etc..
which demonstrates the beginning of cultivation,
the patterns of agriculture in West Asia and the Indian sub-continent, and
the various crops which were cultivated in different regions of the Indian sub-continent.
4.1 INTRODUCTION
In the earlier Unit you have seen that human communities in general survived for the longest
span of their existence as hunters/gatherers. This stage of their existence is revealed by their
stone tools classified by archaeologists as :
i) Palaeolithic, and
ii) Mesolithic i
as also by the remains of a n i k l s hunted and eaten by them.
Human communities entered a new stage ofculture when, instead of depending entirely on the
resources of nature for sutvival, ey started broducing their own food by cultivating cereals
9
like barley, wheat and rice and started domesticating some species of animals-both for
supplies of milk and meat as well ps for harnessing their labour for various purposes.
Beginnings of this stage of human culture are r~vealedby new type of stone tools which are
called Neolithic tools or tools of the New Stonq Age. Neolithic tools and various aspects of
human life associated with the stage wheh these tdols were produced constitute the various
t c n * ~ n m md Early Pm*ems d eiements of the stage of the Culture in which Neolithic communities lived. The characmistics
~daptath
and spread of Neolithic culture in the Nile Valley and West Asia have been dealt with briefly
in this Unit as a background to the study of the Neolithic stage in the Indian sub-continent.
Domestication of plants and animals has been considered as one of the main characteristic
features of the Neolithic stage of culture. The tern Neolithic was coined by Sir John Lubbock
in his book Prehistoric Times (first published in 1865). He used this term to denote an Age in
which the stone implements were more skillfully made, more varied in form and often
polished. Later on V. Gordon Childe defined the Neolithic-Chalcolithic culture as a self-
sufficient food producing economy; and Miles Burkitt stressed that the follovring characteristic
traits should be considered to represent the Neolithic Culture :
Practice of agriculture
Domestication of animals
Grinding and polishing of stone tools, and also
The manufacture of pottery.
The concept of what is Neolithic has been undergoing some change in recent years. A recent
study mentions that the term Neolithic should represent a culture of the pre-metal stage wherc
the inhabitants had assured supply of food by cultivation of cereals and domestication of
animals and led a sedentary life. However, the Ground stone tools remain the most essential
characteristics of a Neolithic culture.
Domestication of plants and animals led to:
Till recently it was believed that the w w i n g of domestication of plants and animals took
place in Western Asia and from there it spread to various other regions of the world through
difkkm. But nay, on the basis of the archaeological evidences recently obtained from the Nile
Valley in Egypt , p d other regioos, such views may have to be modified.
What is significant about this evidence is that they are all upper Palaeolithic sites located in the
Nile Valley and are not Neolithic sites.
These sites are dated between 14500-13000 years before present by archaeologists.
The evidence obtained from the Nile Yalley raises some important issues :
As there is no evidence of animals, domestication at the Egyptian sites it may be concluded
that the cultivation of cereals preceded the domestication of animals in this region.
Domestication of plants and domestication of animals are thus not necessarily inter-related.
As cultivation of cereals is associated with late palaeolithic tools it may be concluded that
food production in some cases may have preceded the Neolithic culture with which ground
stone tools are associated.
Cultivation of cereals gave rise to Neolithic revolution and preceded it.
As the Kubbaniya sites lie far outside the known range of both wild wheat and wild barley,
it may be concluded that food production did not necessarily originate in areas where the
plants existed in wild forms.
Domestication of plants did not originate in Western Asia as believed earlier.
In Western Asia crop cultivation and domestication of animals are inter-related at certain sites
whereas in some regions agriculture came before the domestication of animals.
Environment and Farly Patterns of Check Your Progress 1
Adaptation
1 Discuss in about 10 lines the main characteristics of Neolithic stage of culture.
2 Discuss some of the main issues relating to early farming which excavation in the Nile
Valley have raised.
The history of domestication of plants and animals in the sub-continent practically began with
the emergence of neolithic cultures. Except for ground stone axes all the neolithic cultures of
the sub-continent can be classified into the geographical regions as mentioned in Chart-2
Beginning of agriculture and domestication of animals in Baluchistan (in Pakistan) are attested
by archaeological excavatrons. The Kachi plains in Baluchistan have several advantages which
contributed to the appearance of early farming economy in the region. Located between the
barren ranges of inner Baluchistan. the small valleys consisting of fertile alluvium brought by
the streams from the hills and perennial river systems make irrigation easy on stretches of land
which had vegetation.
It is in this ecological setting that the ancient site of Mehrgarh is located at about 150 Km
from Quetta. Excavations at the site have revealed a long cultural history for the region
ranging from the pre-pottery.Neolithic to the mature Harappan Period. The Neolithic levels at
Mehrgarh have been classified into two phases, (i) the early aceramic without pottery and
(ii) the later phase.
The cereals cultivated here included two varieties of barley and three varieties of wheat.
charred seeds of plum and also of date were found from the very . of the settlement.
During the excavations, the earliest, layers of the Neolithic period (Period-I) yielded bones of
wild animals like gazelles, swamp deer. antelopes, sheep, goat and cattle. But the top layers
(later phase of the Neolithic deposits) yielded bones of domesticated cattle, sheep and goat
I
besides bones of wild gazelles. pig and onager. Thus , there is clear cut evidence that the
process of the domestication of sheep and goat was done locally. Here, the beginning of the
pre-pottery settlement phase has been fixed to about 6000 B.C.
The subsistence pattern of the Neolithic period is characterised by a mixed economy based on
early farming and domestication of animals supplemented by hunting. The inhabitants lived in
rectangular houses of mud-bricks. Some of the structures were divided into small square
compartments and used for storage. The tool kit included one stone axe, five stone adzes,
twenty five grinding stones and sixteen mulers supplemented by abundant microliths of typical
blade industry. Some of the blades show sheen which is chamcteristic of flint used to cut
grains.
On the basis of evidence from Mehrgarh it appears that Kachi plains may have been an
independent epi-centre (centre of origin) for cattle and sheep domestication and for cultivation
of wheat and barley. Period-I1 at Mehrgarh represents the Chalcolithic phase (5000 B.C.),
from which cultivation of cotton and grape is attested in addition to the cultivation of wheat
Village settlements appeared in the Kashmir valley by about 2500 B.C. Excavations at
Burzahom and Gufkral throw significant light on the Neolithic culture of this region. The
Neolithic stage of this region has been classified into two phases at Burzahom and three at
Gufiral. At the latter site the earliest phases is aceramic (pre-pottery,) discovered for the first
time in India. The Neofithic culture of Kashmir valley is characterised by pit-dwellings with
well made floors smeared with red-ochre as well as dwellings in the open. The presence of a
large number of unique bone tools suggests that the economy was predominantly a hunting
economy.
At Gufkral, iqPhase-I charred wild grains of lentil, masur, pea, wheat and barley were found
besides bones of wild animals such as cattle, sheep, goat, ibex, red deer and wolf. Phases I1 and
I11 are characterised by the presence of domesticated plants and animals. Other notable objects
found from the later phases are lodg celts, stone points, sophisticated bone tools (harpoons,
arrowheads, etc.) and perforated harvesters. Dog burials placed along some of the human
burials have also been reported. These findings indicate how an essentially hunting- gathering
economy of Phase I gradually developed into a well settled agricultural economy in Phase 11.
It is worth mentioning here that the Neolithic culture of Burzahom displays affinities with
Sarai Khola and Ghaligai of Swat valley in pottery, bone and stone objects. Pitdwellings,
harvesters and dog burials are characteristics of the North Chinese Neolithic culture. Contact
with the pre-Harappans is also indicated by the pottery found at Bunahom.
The available C-14 dates from the two sites indicate a time range off 2500-1500 B.C. for the
Neolithic culture of the Kashmir Valley.
At Chopani Mando a three-phase sequence from epi- palaeolithic to late Mesolithic or proto-
Neolithic period has been established by archaeologists. Phase 111 (advanced mesolithic) is
characterised by semi-sedentary community life and specialised hunting-gathering economy.
Beehive type of hutments. common hearths, unportable anvils, geometric microliths, large
number of ring-stones and hand-made impressed pottery were found here. Querns and mullers
of wide range in forms and sizes indicate emphasis on food gathering. The phase also yields
significant evidence of the presence of wild rice and bones of wild cattle, sheep and goat.
Single culture site refers to an archaeological site which was occupied for a single phase of
culture like Neolithic or Chalcolithic. There are however other sites which were occupied
through different cultural phases. If a site, after excavations, shows that it was under
occupation during Neolithic, Chalcolithic and Iron-using phases, then it would be
considered a multiculture site and the Neolithic phase would be called Period I, the
Chalcolithic phase period I1 and the Iron-using phase period 111. These periods would show
the chronological sequence of cultures at the site.
The Neolithic culture of the Belan Valley sbows a developed and advanced sedentary life with:
It has been suggested that Neolithic farmers of the Belan Valley emerged as the earli& rice
farming community in India (6th millennium B.C.), although the suggestion is not accepted by
all. The transition from gathering to farming economy is also clearly documented in this
region. However, pottery makes its appearance in the late mesolithic/prot~neolithicphase at
Chopni Mando (circa ninth-eighth millennium B.C.). This is indicative of primacy of '
manufacture of pottery over domestication of plants (rice) and animals (cattle, sheep/goat and
horse).
Chopni-Mando provides the earliest evidence of the use of pottery in the world.
The lower central Gangetic valley with all its flora and faunal resources was occupied by
sedentary village settlements much later (2000-1600 B.C.). Excavations at Chirand, Chechar,
Senuwar and Taradib, etc. throw significant light'on the life pattern of the Neolithic people of
this region. At Senuwar (Distt. Rohtas) the neolithic farmers cultivated rice, barley, field pea,
lentil and some millets. From this site a variety of wheat and grass pea have also been found
from upper levels of hamtion. The neolithic levels at Chirand (Distt. Saran) situated on the
left bank of the Ganga revealed the structural remains of mud floors, pottery, microliths,
ground celts, bone tools and beads of semi- precious stones, besides terracotta human
figurines. Both Chirand and Senuwar are known for their remarkable bone tools. The grains
cultivated at Chirand were wheat, barley. rice and lentil.
The later Neolithic-Chalcolithic people at Senuwar also started cultivating gram and moong in
addition to the crops raised by the earlier people.
The area comprises the hills of Assam including north Cachar, the Garo and the Naga hills.
Ecologically the area falls in the monsoon zone with heavy rainfall.
The Neolithic culture of this region is characterised by shouldered celts, small ground axes of .
rounded form and cord-impressed pottery, heavily tempered with quartz particles. Excavations
at Deojali Hading in north Cachar hills have yielded all the objects noted above. These objects
are the types which have extensive distribution in China and ~out6-%t Asia with a long
ancestry there. Yet the affinlty of Assam Neolithic traits with china or§puth East Asia has not
been finally settled as there is a wide chronological gap. The Assam ~ e 6 1 i t Gculture phase
has been tentatively dated around 2000 B.C.
Ori@no f Agriculture and
Domestication of Animals
South Indian Neolithic culture has been classified into three phases by archaeologists. The
earliest phases is represented at Sangankallu and Naga rjunakonda. The faint traces of
dwellings, crude handmade pale reddish brown pottery with slipped outer surface, blade tools
of chert and ground stone tools found at Nagajunakonda, demonstrate that the people had only
r u f f t m t a r y knowledge of cultivation. Ptobably they did not domesticate animals. This phase e
In Phase I1 besides the continuation of the features of Phase I, the pottery is mainly of red
ware fabric. However, Lapidary art and domestication of animals are the pew features. Now
the microliths were made of quartz crystals.
Ia Phase 111 (datable to around 1500 B.C.) grey ware pottery, is predominant. The red ware
and short blade industry of quartz crystals of Phase I1 continued into this phase. Neolithic toolo
of various types are also found in this phase. These indicate greater practice of.agrieul$ue with
food gathering and hunting now assuming a subcidiary rote.
Environment and Early Patterns or The Ltter two phases are characterised by dwelling pits at Nagajunakonda with roofs
Adaptation
supported by wooden'poles. Wattle-and- daub houses are reported from other sites.
Millet (Ragi) was one of the earliest crops cultivated by the Neolithic farmers of South India.
It is cultivated even today and forms an important source of food for the poor classes. It is also
used as fodder for the cattle. It is generally believed that the domesticated Ragi came from
East Africa. The wild Ragi, which grew as weeds along with the domesticated variety. was not
the direct ancestor of thelatter. But the wild ragi was ancestrally associated with the African
variety. Other crops cultivated by the Neolithic farmers of south India were wheat, horsegiam,
and moong (green gram). Date palm was also gown. Termcine seems to have been an
important feature of the method of cultivation during this period. It was employed for making
tiny fields for growing crops.
The nature of animal bones found from the excavations indicates that the animals were used
for draught-work or putting heavy material, and ploughing the fields. It is clear from the
excavations at Nagarjunakonda that domestication of plants preceded the domestication of
animals. Domesticated animals like cattle, sheep and goat, buffalo, ass, fowl, swine and horse
are also reported from some sites. Sambhar deer, bara singha, spotted deer and gazelle were
hunted and pond snails and tortoise were caught for food by the people.
Many ashmounds (compos-ed of ash) are found in the vicinity of Neolithic sites like Utnur,
Kodekal and Kupgal. Some of the them are also f a d in forests, remote from any settlement.
It has been suggested that these ashmounds were the sites of the Neolithic cattle-pens. From
time to time the accumulated dung was burned either by design as a part of some ritual or by
accident. Some of the ashmounds in rem0te.r areas may suggest seasonal migrations to the
forest grazing grounds by the people.
Further northwards in the Tapti and Narmada valleys of north Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh
and Gujarat no clear-cut Neolithic phase was found. Only a small number of triangular axes
with pointed buttend of South Indian affiliation found at Eran in the Bina Valley and at
Jokha in South Gujarat are Neolithic finds from this region.
In the Chambal, the Banas and the Kali Sindh Valleys there is scarcely any evidence of the
presence of ground stone tools. In1 spite of the fact that during an earlier mesolithic context
domestication of animals had started, sedentary settlements started in this region only after
copper-bronze implements became known.
4.5 LET US S U M UP
This Unit has made you aware of the basic characteristics of the s t a g characterized by
transition to cultivation of plants and domestication of animals. The transition from
hunting/gathering to cultivation brought about many changes. Generally speaking these
included fashioning of pottery which was obviously needed for storing grains as well as eating
food processed from them, refined tools which were ground and effective for agricultural
operations. settled villages communities, etc
Recent evidence seems to suggest that the earliest farming operations started in the Nile valley
and in Western Asia.Theseoperations emerged at a later date. In certain regions the process of
cultivation of crops and domestication of animals went side by side whereas in some regions
cultivation of crops preceded domestication of animals.
In the Unit you have also been familiarised with the geographical regions in which evidence of
, the Neolithic stage of culture has been found in the Indian sub~ontinent.The Neolithic
cultures in these regions emerged at different points of time, and their duration were also
different. Due to ecological variations within the sub-continent. the crops grown also varied.
The emergence of Neolithic cultures and variations between them have been shown by
archaeologists through extensive excavations at various ancient sites.
4.6 KEY W O R D S