Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 5
Variance and
Expected
Standard
Return
Deviation
Covariance
and
Correlation
Expected Return and
Variance
What is the expected return and variance of
Slowpoke and Supertech?
X ARA X B RB Rp
The Return and Risk of
Portfolios
The variance of a two asset portfolio:
Var(portfolio) X A A 2 X A X B A, B X B B
2 2 2 2
X SuperSuper X SlowSlow
The Risk and Return of
Portfolios: Diversification
As long as Correlation is <
1, the standard deviation
of a portfolio of two
securities is less than the
weighted average of the
standard deviations of the
individual securities.
The Return and Risk of
Portfolios: Many Securities
Asset Standard Deviation
DJ Euro Stoxx 50 Index 13.10%
Carrefour SA 41.08
Fortis 65.55
Vinci SA 35.17
Intesa SanPaolo 31.53
Saint Gobain 48.80
Telecom Italia 32.22
Arcelormittal 41.07
Credit Agricole 57.92
Adidas 29.47
The Efficient Set of Two
Assets
The Efficient Set for Two
Assets
10% Slowpoke
90% Supertech
50% Slowpoke
50% Supertech
Minimum Variance
Portfolio
90% Slowpoke
10% Supertech
Efficient Set for Two Assets:
Changing Correlations
Efficient Set for Two Asset Portfolios:
US and Non-US Equities
The Efficient Set for Many
Securities
Two Asset vs Many Asset
Portfolios: Comparison
Diversification: An
Example
Assumptions
All All
All
securities securities
covariances
possess the are equally
are the
same weighted in
same.
variance the portfolio.
Diversification: An
Example
What happens as we increase the number
of securities to infinity?
1 1
P
2
var 1 - cov
N N
P
2
cov
Diversification: An
Example
Diversification: An
Example
Systematic
Risk
Total Risk
Unsystematic
Risk
Riskless Borrowing and
Lending
Risk-
Free
Asset
?
Risky
Asset
Example 3: Riskless
Lending and Portfolio Risk
Ms. Bagwell is considering investing in the equity of
Merville Enterprises and will either borrow or lend at the
risk-free rate.
Equity Risk-Free
of Merville Asset
Expected return 14% 10%
Standard deviation 0.20 0
Variance of Portfolio:
2
X Merville 2Merville 2 X Merville X Risk-freeMerville, Risk-free X Risk-free
2
2Risk-free
P2 X Merville
2
Merville 0.35 (0.20 ) 0.0049
2 2 2
Homogeneous Heterogeneous
Expectations Expectations
• All investors • Investors have
have the same different
information and information and
the same ability different abilities
to analyse it to analyse the
information
Market Equilibrium
In a world with
homogeneous
This portfolio is also
expectations, all
known as the market
investors would hold
portfolio
only one portfolio of
risky assets
Example 4: Beta
Return on Return on
Type of Market Jelco plc
State Economy (percent) (percent)
I Bull 15 25
II Bull 15 15
III Bear -5 -5
IV Bear -5 -15
Example 4: Beta
Assume that a bull and bear market are equally likely:
Return on
Type of Market Expected Return on
Economy (percent) Jelco plc (percent)
Bull 15% 1 1
20% 25% 15%
2 2
Bear -5% 1
-10% -5% (-15%)
1
2 2
Example 4: Beta
Estimates of Beta for
Selected Companies
Stock Beta
Alcatel-Lucent 1.44
L’Oreal 0.45
SAP 0.56
Siemens 1.51
Daimler 1.25
Philips Electron 0.92
Renault 1.64
Volkswagen 0.40
A Quiz
Question 1 Question 2
Expected
Expected
Return on an
Return on the
Individual
Market
Security
Expected Return on the
Market
RM RF Risk Premium
If the risk-free rate, estimated by the current
yield on a one-year Treasury bill, is 1 percent,
and the risk premium is 8.5% the expected
return on the market is:
E ( Ri ) R f E( Rm ) - R f i
This is the Capital Asset Pricing
Model (CAPM)
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/emtn.asp
Example 5: CAPM
The shares of Aardvark Enterprises have a beta of 1.5 and
that of Zebra Enterprises has a beta of 0.7. The risk-free
rate is assumed to be 3 percent, and the difference
between the expected return on the market and the risk-
free rate is assumed to be 8.0 percent. What are the
expected returns on the two securities?
Aardvark
• 15.0% = 3% + 1.5 x 8.0%
Zebra
• 8.6% = 3% + 0.7 x 8.0%
Criticisms of the CAPM:
Roll’s Critique (1977)
It is practically impossible to construct a
portfolio that contains every single security (i.e.
the true market portfolio), any test of the CAPM
that uses a market proxy (e.g. FT 100, DAX,
CAC 40, etc.) will be testing that specific
portfolio, and not the true market portfolio.
This means that, for all intents and purposes,
the CAPM is empirically untestable because the
underlying market portfolio is unobservable.
Any tests of the CAPM that use market proxies
will be affected by this criticism.