i have an ontological question regarding the account of autobiographical

registeration as a temporal data i.e. is it the moment i write self-referring

pronoun, thereon the registeration is autobiographical. if not, what sort of
extensions are there which establishes the ontology of an autobiography.
zizek talk about registeration, everybody may know an implicit sense but the moment
it is actualised in speech is the moment of registeration. there can be various
modalities of registeration. This implicit sense is possible in all works which are
just refraining from registering a self-referring pronoun which is implicitly
there.
various types of registerations can be there i.e. philosophophical, sciemtnfic,
poetic, constitutions

(idea of a women who chops wood and carries water) and karl marx(activated and
registered concepts one sees out there and the implict sense which is the autos
i.e. the way one actually survives day to day, brings about the content of autobio)
how does this account account for the imapct of that autobios or phil work?(the
impact lies in the nature of content i.e. what J Krishnamurti said, the human
consciousness is its content only i.e. the content is actually similar)

Stephen Mulhall 2009 suggests autobios and phil inquiry are similar reference:The
Philosophy of Autobiography ed. by Cowli (intro.)

the serious impact of such enquiry or saying that all that we write is
autobiographical, what about documents such as constitution which are authored by
selves.