Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Patient Outcomes
Floege J, Ketteler M. Knochen- und Mineralstoffwechselstörungen bei Nierenkranken. Der Nephrologe 2013; 1: 12
Background:
Treatment of sHPT in dialysis patients is in motion
The mission
The tools
The results
and consequences
….
Multiplicity of hormonal disturbances
early in CKD
iPTH (pg/mL) 1,25D (pg/mL) 25D (ng/mL)
50 150
45
(n=1,814)
40
†
100
25D (ng/mL)
30
25
20 †
50
15
10
5
0 0
≥80 79–70 69–60 59–50 49–40 39–30 29–20 <20
n=61 n=117 n=230 n=396 n=355 n=358 n=204 n=93
All-cause mortality
Rates (per 1,000 P-Y)
Especially pronounced at
Rates (per 1,000 P-Y)
1000-x
80 Years
AMI CHF
*
Other
Arrhythmia
Where do we start ?
What should we be concentrating on ?
• Phosphate (P)
• Calcium (Ca)
• Parathyroid hormone (PTH)
• Bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP)
• Bone morphology
Parameters:
Lowering of phosphate targets
• KDOQI 2002:
1,13 – 1,78 mmol/L
(3,5 – 4,5 mg/dL)
• KDIGO 2009:
• Reduce towards the normal range
www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/guidelines_bone/guide6.htm
http://www.kdigo.org/pdf/KDIGO%20CKD-MBD%20GL%20KI%20Suppl%20113.pdf
Parameters:
Lowering of calcium targets, KDOQI 2002
• 6.2 … calcium should be maintained within the
normal range for the laboratory used, preferably
toward the lower end
(8.4 to 9.5 mg/dL [2.10 to 2.37 mmol/L])
www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/guidelines_bone/guide6.htm
Change in calcium targets 2002 – however,
not without a long hard debate …
Calcium homeostasis
(without perspiration)
)
on vit D: 1,000 mg Ca/day
mmol
80
mg
3200 with active vit
(Delta ECFCa/week
60 D
2400
40
1600
20
800 without active vit D
0 25 50 75 100
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
mmol
Ca absorption/day ( mg )
Bushinsky DA. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5:S12–S22
Calcium balance in CKD III/IV
• No increase in calcium
excretion in the urine
Spiegel DM, Moore RH. Positive Calcium Balance in CKD, ASN 2010, Denver/USA, TH-PO162
Vessel calcification: Phosphate and calcium
Protein deficient
nutritional solution
Shroff RC et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21: 103–112
Vessel calcification: Combination of phosphate
and calcium worsens the situation
(2
mmol/l)
• Total group
Serum calcium and calcium intake very poor correlation:
r=0.14, p=0.39
In everday routine, we are blind to the
calcium damage we are causing.
• PTH < 300 pg/mL:
Corrected serum calcium and calcium poor correlation:
r=0.38, p=0.1 (=correct estimation in 1 in 7 patients)
KDIGO 2009
• iPTH levels between two to nine times the upper normal limit
for the assay
http://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/guidelines_ckd/p6_comp_g10.htm
http://www.kdigo.org/pdf/KDIGO%20CKD-MBD%20GL%20KI%20Suppl%20113.pdf
Forgotten parameters:
Bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP)
K/DOQI 2002
• High bAP: High bone turnover
• Low bAP: Adynamic bone disease.
• High bAP + high PTH increased sensitivity for diagnosis of high
turnover
• Low bAP + low PTH increased sensitivity for diagnosis of low
turnover lesions
KDIGO 2009
• Serum PTH or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase can be used
to evaluate bone disease because markedly high or low values
predict underlying bone turnover (2B)
http://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/guidelines_ckd/p6_comp_g10.htm
http://www.kdigo.org/pdf/KDIGO%20CKD-MBD%20GL%20KI%20Suppl%20113.pdf
Avoided Parameters:
Bone morphology
Phosphate PTH
• n=1.,158
• CKD 1–5
• Salem Veterans
Affairs Medical
Center
• 1990–2007
• +2 year follow up
F3C
OH
OH
H
•HCl
N
CH
3
HO OH HO OH HO OH
Hormone Prohormone
19-nor-1α,25-
dihydroxyvitamin D2
1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 1α-Hydroxyvitamin D3
Odds Ratio
6 * No VDRA therapy 6
* *
4 4
*
2 R 2 R
0 0
<10 10–30 >30 <10 10–30 >30
n = 825 HD
25D levels (ng/mL) 25D levels (ng/mL)
90 day mortality
4 4
Nested case control
Odds Ratio
Odds Ratio
* *
*
2 2
R R
0 0
<5 6–13 >13 <5 6–13 >13
1,25D (calcitriol) levels 1,25D (calcitriol) levels
(pg/mL) *p<0,05; R = reference (pg/mL)
PTH-suppression 1:3
Brown, et al. J Lab Clin Med 2002;139:279–284; Holliday. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:1857–64;
Finch, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:980–85; Balint, et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;36:789–796
14% less calcium absorption on selective VDRA
compared with calcitriol
n=22 HD
Paricalcitol
18 µg/week
iPTH: 630
-125 pg/mL
Calcitriol
6 µg/week
iPTH 882
-62 pg/mL
n=263 Calcitriol
haemodialysis
patients,
randomised
Paricalcitol
Cultured for 9
days with
Phos 3.3 mmol/L
+ TNF-ɑ
Cultured for 9
days with Lipo-
polysacharides
Left: Right:
Phos 3.3 mmol/L Lipopolysac-
+ TNF-ɑ charides
CTR CTR
PCT PCT
Ratio PCT 4:1 CTR
240:80 ng/kg Guerrero F, et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 2206-2212
Therapeutic tools of sHPT:
Active vitamin D and calcimimetics
Paricalcitol
Paricalcitol IVIVStratum
Stratum
Serum phosphate Cinacalcet
Cinacalcet IVIVStratum
Stratum
Paricalcitol / Cinacalcet Paricalcitol oral Stratum
Paricalcitol orales Stratum
IV + 0.01 / –0.01 mmol/L
Oral + 0.23 / +0.01 mmol/L Cinacalcet oral Stratum
Cinacalcet orales Stratum
Woche
Mean doses /
IV stratum Oral stratum
28 weeks
70%
Percentage of patients achieving
p=0.016 p=0.260
60% 57.7%
57,7%
54.4%
54,4%
the primary endpoints
50%
43.4%
43,4%
40%
32.7%
32,7%
30%
20%
10%
30/52 16/49 31/57 23/53
0% 1 2 3 4 5
Paricalcitol Cinacalcet
Parathyroidectomy Parathyroidectomy
1999-2004
Paricalcitol n= 2087
Dialysis Clinic Inc.
- non profit Calcitriol n= 3212
organisation
… especially as our
definitions of good and bad
are in flux due to the
complexity of body
responses.