Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 Page 1 of 4
Continuation of Complaint
Introduction
Grand Rapids, Michigan. I began my career with HSI in September 2007 and prior
to joining HSI, served as a probation and parole officer for the Michigan
as both criminal and administrative violations of the customs and immigration laws
relevant facts. I have not included each and every fact known to me concerning the
made for the purpose of establishing probable cause that Joseph Francis BRISSON
my training and experience and the training and experience of other officers.
Probable Cause
his pursuit of a position as a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer. As part
CBP contacted HSI special agents in the Eastern District of Michigan who arrived
to interview BRISSON.
6. BRISSON, his girlfriend, and Minor Victim 1,1 all reside together at a
child but is his girlfriend’s daughter. BRISSON’s girlfriend has two adult children
7. BRISSON told CBP interviewers and HSI special agents that he had
Minor Victim 1 getting into and out of the shower. BRISSON said he downloaded
1The identity of Minor Victim 1 is known to law enforcement but is not included
herein to protect her privacy.
the videos from the camera onto his home desktop computer. He also took stills
photographs of the computer screen when the naked stills were displayed.
BRISSON did this so that he could have copies of the images on his iPhone. He
stored those images in a portion of a Snapchat account labeled “My Eyes Only.” “My
Eyes Only” is a setting in Snapchat that allows a user to password protect any
“Snaps” (i.e. videos or images) that a user does not want other people to see.
10. Special Agent Chad Cable of HSI is a computer forensic agent who has
reviewed BRISSON’s iPhone 6. BRISSON gave HSI agents consent to review his
phone and provided all necessary unlock codes, account passwords, etc.
appear in the “My Eyes Only” tab of the Snapchat account on BRISSON’s iPhone 6.
Two of these appear to meet the federal definition of child pornography; these two
images depict Minor Victim 1 fully nude. She is framed from about her chin through
her thighs and is clearly a pubescent teenager. Her naked breasts and pubic area
are exposed in the photographs. The setting of the images is clearly a bathroom and
the viewer can tell that Minor Victim 1 is stepping into or out of a shower. These
images appear to be still shots of a video that were cropped by BRISSON. Minor
13. BRISSON gave investigators his consent to search his home and
retrieve the desktop computer on which he saved the videos. That search is ongoing
Conclusion