Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/309668081
CITATIONS READS
0 78
1 author:
Hasan Taherkhani
University of Zanjan
46 PUBLICATIONS 95 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Hasan Taherkhani on 04 November 2016.
Abstract
Unbound aggregates are the most common type of materials used for construction of the base layer of
flexible pavements in Iran and worldwide. Due to the lack of binder, the performance of the compacted
unbound aggregates is highly dependent on the properties of the gravel (particles remaining on sieve
4.75mm, sand (particles passing sieve 4.75mm and remaining on sieve 0.75mm), and fines (particles passing
sieve No. 200) fraction of the mixture. As the bearing capacity and permeability are the main properties
influencing the performance of the base layer; in this research, the effects of the angularity of gravel and
sand, and the content and plasticity of fines on the bearing capacity and permeability of the compacted
unbound aggregates have been investigated. The bearing capacity of the materials in dry and saturated
conditions has been measured using CBR test, and the permeability has been measured using constant head
permeability test method. The results showed that the CBR of the compacted mixture decreases with
decreasing the percentage of angular sand and gravel in the mixtures. The strength of the mixture was shown
to be optimum at a certain amount of fine content and decreases with increasing the plasticity of the fine
fraction. It was found that the saturated CBR of the mixtures with non-plastic fines is higher than that of the
dry CBR. It was also found that the angularity of the sand is more effective than the angularity of gravel on
the CBR. The permeability of the mixtures is shown to increase with decreasing the angularity of the gravel
and sand fraction in the mixture.
Corresponding author E-mail: Taherkhani.hasan@znu.ac.ir
1-Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
2-MSc. Grad., Department of Civil Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
International Journal of Transportation Engineering,
Vol 3/ No. 2/ Spring 2015
151
An Investigation on the Effects of Aggregates Properties on the Performance of ...
unbound aggregates is measured by standard test mode in the second pattern is by exhaustion of
method using repeated load triaxial testing. ductility or static plastic collapse [Barber and
However, due to the complexity of the repeated Ciavarella, 2000]. Several studies have used the
load triaxial tests, most agencies don’t routinely shakedown concept to characterize the behavior of
measure the resilient modulus using the triaxial unbound aggregates under repeated loading
testing, but, rather estimate it by empirical [Garcia-Rojo and Herrmann, 2005; Nazzal,
equations correlating the physical properties or Mohammad and Austin, 2011; Tao et al. 2010;
simpler tests results, such as California Bearing Werkmeister, Dawson and Wellner, 2001, 2005].
Ratio (CBR), to the resilient modulus. There are After the elastic limit, the deformation behavior of
some correlation equations between the resilient unbound aggregates can be classified into three
modulus and CBR [Powell et al., 1984; Heuklon categories: plastic shakedown (A), plastic creep
and Klomp, 1962]. However, in the CBR test, the (B), and incremental collapse(C). The permanent
resistance against penetration is measured, which deformation behavior within these three categories,
is an indirect measure of shear strength, while the as shown in Figure 1, is explained as follows
resilient modulus is a measure of elastic properties. [Werkmeister, Dawson and Wellner, 2004]:
Therefore, the resilient modulus is not a simple
function of CBR [Brown, Loach and Reilly, 1987]. x Plastic shakedown (range A): the response of
But, nevertheless, partially due to its simplicity and unbound granular materials is plastic for a
well-acceptance among pavement engineers, the finite number of load applications, with a
CBR test is widely used for evaluating pavement rapid decrease in permanent strain rate;
materials and correlation to resilient modulus afterward the response becomes purely elastic
[Brown, Loach and Reilly, 1987]. and no further permanent deformation occurs.
The main mode of failure in unbound granular x In range B (plastic creep), unbound granular
materials is the permanent deformation. Unbound material experiences high permanent strain
aggregates are elastic-plastic materials, which rate in the early loading cycles which
undergoes shakedown process under repeated decreases later to low or constant strain rate.
loading [Johnson, 1985]. If the elastic limit is not After a high number of loading cycles, the
exceeded, which is the case under light loads or material may experience progressive increase
thick pavements, an elastic–plastic material in permanent strain and advances toward an
undergoes purely elastic behavior with no plastic incremental collapse (range C).
deformation. When the elastic limit is initially x In range C (Incremental collapse), the
exceeded, the material experiences initial plastic material experiences progressively increasing
deformation which produces residual stresses. In increments of permanent strain with each load
subsequent load applications, the behavior of the cycle, leading to failure after a relatively low
material is dependent on the combined action of number of loading cycles. The desirable
the applied load and the residual stresses produced behavior of a well-designed unbound
by previous load applications. After a certain aggregate is to be within the plastic
number of load repetitions, the residual stresses shakedown or the plastic creep categories with
build up to a value that leads to a steady state with an acceptable total permanent deformation
entirely elastic deformation under subsequent load [Sharp, 1985; Werkmeister, Dawson and
applications (shakedown limit). When the Wellner, 2004].
shakedown limit is exceeded, the material The stiffness and resistance against permanent
experiences incremental plastic deformation under deformation is affected by the moisture content,
repeated loading. For repeated loads above the which in turn, affected by the permeability of the
shakedown limit, an elastic– plastic material may mixture. The higher the permeability of the
undergo two deformation patterns: cyclic plasticity aggregates mixture, the less the materials are
or progressive increase in plastic deformation exposed to the moisture. The permeability of the
(ratcheting) [Barber and Ciavarella, 2000]. unbound aggregates in base layer is an indication
Depending on the pattern, the failure mode will be of the ability of that layer to drain the water
different. In the first deformation pattern, the infiltrated from the upper layers. Inadequate
failure is governed by low-cycle fatigue, the failure permeability of unbound base layer results in
remaining water in that layer for a longer time, In this research, with the objective of improving
leading to decrease of stiffness and resistance the understanding of the bearing capacity and
against permanent deformation, or find way to the permeability of the unbound aggregates used in
underlying layers which may cause their base layer of flexible pavements, the effects of
weakening against the imposed loads. The some properties of the gravel, sand and fines
permeability of the unbound aggregates depends fractions of unbound aggregates on the
on the physical properties of the materials and the permeability and CBR are experimentally
properties of the water [Das, 2008]. investigated.
Incremental
IIn
nccrreem
meen
nta
nta
tal Collapse
Coollllap
C apssee
Zone
Zo
Z onnee
al permanent
an
ma neen st raiin
nt strain
stra n
Pllas
P
Plastic
asttiic C
Cr
Creep
ree
ee p Z
Zo
Zone
onnee
Total
Tota perrm
pe
Pllaassttiic S
P
Plastic Sh
Shakedown
haak
keed
doow
wn Zone
Zoone
Z
Numb
Number
mber
mb er of
of load
load
load cycles
cyyccle
les
es
Figure 1.Permanent deformation behavior of unbound granular materials according to shakedown concept
[Werkmiester et al. 2004]
Loss in Magnesium
Sulfate Solution %
Sand Equivalent%
Test ASTM-C131
AASTM-D4318
Density ASTM-
Plasticity Index
ASTM-D2419
ASTM-D5821
Absorption %
ASTM-C88
C127,128
Flakiness
Moisture
BS 812
,D854
%
Materials
Coarse aggregate - 21 - 100 1.6 2.607 12 1
Fine aggregate 53 - N.P - 2 2.593 - 1
Filler - - N.P - - 2.72 - -
120
gradation of mixtures
Percentage passing %
100
standard lower limit
80 standard upper limit
60
40
20
0
0.075 0.425 2 4.75 9.5 19 25
Sieve size (mm)
Figure 2. Gradation of the mixtures used in this research
3. Experimental Works four different mixtures with 0.5, 2.7, 7.2 and 9.5%
3.1 Tests Program of fines content were made. And, finally, with the
16 different mixtures were investigated in this same angularity of sand and gravel, and fines
research. The mixture with angular gravel and content, as those of the control mixture, 3 different
sand, and 5% of non-plastic fines was selected as mixtures with the plasticity indices of 7, 14 and 20
the control. The effects of four variables, including were made.
the angularity of gravel and sand, the amount of For making the mixtures with different
fines and the plasticity index of the fines, on the percentages of angular gravel and sand, the
dry and saturated CBR, and the coefficient of required amount of the angular sand or gravel
permeability have been investigated. With the between two successive sieves were replaced with
same fines content and plasticity index as those of the rounded sand or gravel, between the same
the control mixture, 25, 50, 75 and 100% of the successive sieves. For making the mixtures with
angular gravel and sand were replaced with smooth different percentages of fines, the difference
surface natural gravel and sand. With the same between the weights of the fines with the
angularity of sand and gravel and the plasticity control mixture was compensated by the weight of
index of the fines as those of the control mixture, sands.
Table 2. The maximum dry density and the optimum moisture content of the mixtures
A B C D
4. Test Results and Discussion CBR, both in dry and saturated conditions, have a
Figure 6 shows the variation of the dry and maximum value at 5% of fines content, which is
saturated CBR of the unbound aggregates with the for the control mixture. This amount of fines
percentage of fines passing sieve No. 200. It content is the required amount to fill the voids
should be noted that, in this mixes, the plasticity between the mix of gravel and sand particles,
index of fines is 0, and the angularity of sand and beyond which their contact is lost and the shear
gravel is 100%. As can be seen, for all the strength is decreased, and, for the fines content
mixtures, the CBR in saturated condition is higher lower than the optimum content, the friction
than that in the dry condition, which seems to be component of the strength is decreased, resulting in
due to the shear strength enhancement due to the a lower CBR.
surface tension of the water in voids [Carrier,
2003; Chapuis, 2004]. It can also be seen that, the
200
Saturated CBR
180 Dry CBR
160
140
120
CBR %
100
80
60
40
20
0
0.5 2.7 5 7.2 9.5
200 185.5
Saturated CBR
180
157 Dry CBR
160
140
120
CBR %
100
79
80 64
54 58.5
60
40 25 20
20
0
0 7 14 20
PI
Figure 7. Variation of dry and saturated CBR with the plasticity index of fines
200
180 Saturated CBR
Dry CBR
160
140
120
CBR %
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Figure 9 shows the variation of the dry and In order to compare the effect of gravel and
saturated CBR of the unbound aggregates with the sand angularity on the strength of compacted
percentage of angular gravel in the mixtures. As unbound aggregates, the variation of the saturated
can be seen, similar to the effect of sand CBR with the percentage of angular sand and
angularity, the dry and saturated CBR of the gravel is shown in Figure 10. It can be seen that
mixtures increase with increasing the percentage of the saturated CBR is more sensitive to the
angular gravel in the mixture. These results angularity of sand fraction. Although sand and
indicate that, to obtain a stiffer base layer with a gravel constitute 40% and 55% of the mixtures,
higher resistance against permanent deformation, respectively; however, sand has a higher specific
angular crushed coarse aggregates be used instead area and surfaces in contact. Therefore, using a
of rounded natural gravel with smooth surfaces. sand with a lower percentage of angular particles
The Iranian code limits the minimum angularity of results in a higher reduction in the friction
coarse fraction of base aggregates to be 75%. component of shear strength and CBR.
200
Saturated CBR
180
Dry CBR
160
140
CBR % 120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
200
180 sand gravel
160
Saturated CBR %
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
100 75 50 25 0
Figure 11 shows the variation of the coefficient of be achieved by using a lower fine content in the
permeability of the unbound aggregate mixture mixture. However, as described in previous
with the percentage of the particles finer than sections, the reduction of fines in the mixture
0.075mm in the mixture. As can be seen, up to a results in a reduction in the strength, which is not
certain level of fine content, the permeability of the desirable. Therefore, in the Iranian code for the
mixture decreases with increasing the fine content, gradation of unbound aggregate base, the
after which, the trend reverses. With the increase percentage of the particles finer than 0.075mm is
of finer particles the voids between the coarser limited in the range of 2 to 8%, which does not
particles are filled which leads to reduction of provide a significant coefficient of permeability.
permeability. This trend continues up to a certain Figure 12 shows the variation of the coefficient of
amount of fines, after which the increase of fine permeability of the mixture with the plasticity
particles prevents appropriate densification index of fines. As can be seen, the permeability of
resulting in increase of voids content in the mixture the unbound aggregates decreases with increasing
and permeability. In order to discharge the the plasticity index. It should be noted that in these
infiltrated water from the base layer, a higher mixtures, the percentage of the particles finer than
coefficient of permeability is desirable, which can 0.075mm is the same value of 5%, and 100% of
International Journal of Transportation Engineering,
Vol 3/ No. 2/ Spring 2015
160
Hasan Taherkhani, Mehdi Valizadeh
3.5
2.5
1.5
1.17504 1.17504
1.0368
0.91584
1
0.5
0
0.5 2.7 5 7.2 9.5
12 11.232
10 9.504
Permeability (cm/day)
8
6.912
4 3.456
0
75 50 25 0
the coarse fraction are angular particles. The of smooth surface sand particles adversely affects
decrease of the permeability with increasing the strength, it is not recommended to use such
plasticity index is attributed to its effect on the composition.
voids ratio, which is directly related to the Figure 14 shows the variation of the coefficient of
permeability. Therefore, in order to have a higher permeability with the percentage of angular gravel
permeability without detrimental effect on the particles in the mixture. As can be seen, similar to
strength, the use of non-plastic fines is the effect of smooth surface natural sand, the
recommended. permeability of the mixture increases with
Figure 13 shows the variation of the coefficient of increasing smooth surface gravel particles in the
permeability with the percentage of angular sand mixture. similarly, it can be described by the
particles in the mixture. As can be seen, the reduction of contact surface area between particles
permeability of the unbound aggregates increases with the increase of smooth surface particles,
with increasing the percentage of natural sand with resulting in the increase of voids ratio and
smooth surface, in the mixture. This is attributed to permeability. However, the comparison of the
the decrease of surface area of the particles in Figure 12 and 13 reveals that, the effect of the
contact, which results in the increase of void ratio angularity of sand particles on the permeability is
and permeability. Although the increase of much higher than that of the gravel. For example,
permeability is desirable; however, as the increase the mixture with 100% of its sand of natural
12 11.232
Cofficient of permeability
10 9.504
(cm/day) 8 6.912
4 3.456
2 1.0368
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
2.5
1.96128
Cofficient of permeability
2
1.70208
1.5 1.32192
(cm/day)
1.14048
1 1.0368
0.5
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
materials with smooth surface is approximately 6 investigated. Brief results are represented as
times higher than that of the mixture with 100% of follows:
smooth surface gravel particles. This is because of x The maximum dry and saturated CBR can be
the higher specific surface area of the sand achieved at a certain level of fines content,
compared with that of gravel. It should be noted which is associated with the amount of fines
that gravel and particles constitute 55% and 40% for which the maximum density can be
of the mixture, respectively. achieved.
x The dry and saturated CBR decreases with
5. Conclusions decreasing the percentage of angular sand and
The effects of the percentage of angular sand gravel, and increasing the plasticity index of
and gravel, the fines content and the plasticity the fines.
index of fines on the dry and saturated CBR, x For the mixtures with non-plastic fines and
and the coefficient of permeability have been 100% of angular sand and gravel the saturated
CBR was found to be higher than the dry loading" J. Construct Build Mater Elsevier Sci;
CBR. This finding needs more investigation. 28(1):pp. 79–87.
x Due to the higher specific area, the effect of
-Chapuis, R. P. (2004) "Predicting the Saturated
the sand angularity on the strength is higher
Hydraulic Conductivity of Sand and Gravel Using
than that of the angularity of gravel. Effective Diameter and Void Ratio", Canadian Journal
Therefore, it is recommended that requirement of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 785–
be set in codes to limit the minimum 595.
angularity for sand.
x The coefficient of permeability of unbound
aggregates decreases with increasing the fines -Das, B. N. (2008) "Advanced soil mechanics-Third
up to a level, beyond which the trend reverse. Edition", CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, New York,
x The permeability of the unbound aggregates USA.
decreases with increasing the plasticity index
-Garcia-Rojo, R. and Herrmann, H. (2005) "Shakedown
of the fines, and the percentage of the angular of unbound granular material" Granular Matter,
sand and gravel in the mixture. 2005;Vol. 7. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; (Issue 2–3,
x The coefficient of permeability of the pp. 109–18
unbound aggregates is more sensitive to the
angularity of sand than that of gravel. -Heukelom, W. and Klomp, A. J. G. (1962) "Dynamic
testing as a means of controlling pavements during
and after compaction", Proceedings of the First
6. References International Conference on Structural Design of
-American Association for State Highway and
Asphalt Pavements, University of Michigan.
Transportation Officials [AASHTO] (1993) "Guide
for design of pavement structures", AASHTO, -Huang, Y. (2004) "Pavement analysis and design",
Washington D.C.
Prentice Hall, Kentucky.
-Barber, J.R. and Ciavarella, M. (2000) "Contact -Iran Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, Vice
mechanics”, J Solids Struct, Elsevier Sci, 37(1–2): pp.
Presidency for Strategic Planning and Supervision.
29–43.
Code 234. (2011) "Iranian Asphalt Pavement Code",
Tehran.
-Bilodeau, J. P. and Dore, G. (2012) "Relating resilient
behaviour of compacted unbound base granular -Johnson, K. L. (1985) “Contact mechanics", Cambridge
materials to matrix and interlock characteristics" University Press, New York, USA.
Journal of Construction and Building Materials, Vol.
37, pp. 220-228. -Lekarp, F. and Dawson, A. (1998) "Modeling permanent
̄ deformation behavior of unbound granular materials"
-Brown, S. F., Loach, S. C. and O Reilly, M. P. (1987)
Journal of Construction and Building Materials, 12,
"Repeated loading of fine grained soils", TRRL
pp. 9-18
Contractor Report72.
-Lekarp, F., Isacsson, U. and Dawson, A. (2000) "State of
-Carrier III, W. D. (2003) "Goodbye Hazen; Hello
art: resilient response of unbound aggregates", Journal
Kozeny-Carman", Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-
of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. (1),
environmental Eng., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., vol. 129, no.
Jan/Feb.
11, pp. 1054–1056.
-Mishra, D. (2012) "Aggregate characteristics affecting
-Cetin, A., Kaya, Z., Cetin, B. and Aydilek, A. H. (2014)
response and performance of un-surfaced pavements
"Influence of laboratory compaction method on
on weak sub-grades", Ph.D. Dissertation, University
mechanical and hydraulic characteristics of unbound
of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
granular base materials", Journal of Road Materials
and Pavement Design, Vol. 15, Number 1, pp. 220-
-Nazzal, M., Mohammad, L. and Austin A. (2011)
235. "Evaluation of the shakedown behavior of unbound
granular base materials" Geo-Frontiers 2011,
-Cerni, G, Cardone F, Virgili, A. and Camilli, S. (2012) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE); pp.
"Characterization of permanent deformation behaviour 4752–4761.
of unbound granular materials under repeated triaxial
International Journal of Transportation Engineering,
Vol 3/ No. 2/ Spring 2015
163
An Investigation on the Effects of Aggregates Properties on the Performance of ...
-Powell, W. D., Potter, J. F., and Mayhew, H. C. and -Werkmeister, S., Dawson, A. and Wellner,,F. (2001)
Numm, M. E. (1984) "The Structural Design of "Permanent deformation behavior of granular
Bituminous Roads", TRRL Report LR 1132. materials and the shakedown concept" Transport Res
Rec: J Transport Res Board, Transport Res Board
-Sharp, R. (1985) "Pavement design based on shakedown (TRB);1757: pp. 75–81.
analysis", Transport Res Record: J. Transport Res
Board, Transport Res Board (TRB); 1022: pp. 99–107. -Werkmeister, S., Dawson, A. and Wellner, F. (2004)
"Pavement design model for unbound granular
-Soliman, H. and Shalaby, A. (2015) "Permanent materials", J. Transport Eng Am Soc Civil Eng
deformation behavior of unbound granular base (ASCE); 130(5): pp.665–74.
materials with varying moisture and fines content",
Journal of Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 4, pp. 1- -Werkmeister, S., Dawson, A. and Wellner, F. (2005)
12. "Permanent deformation behavior of granular
materials" Road Materials and Pavement Design.
-Tao, M., Mohammad, L., Nazzal, M., Zhang, Z. and Wu, Taylor & Francis, 6(1), pp. 31–51.
Z. (2010) "Application of shakedown theory in
characterizing traditional and recycled pavement base -Xiao, Y., Tutumluer, E. and Siekmeier, J. (2011)
materials", J. Transport Eng Am Soc Civil Eng "Mechanistic empirical evaluation of aggregate
(ASCE);136(3): pp. 214–22. base/granular subbase quality affecting flexible
pavement performance in Minnesota", 90th Annual
-Tuumluer, E. (1995) "Predicting behavior of flexible Meeting of the Transportation Research Board,
pavements with granular bases", Ph.D. Dissertation, January 2011, Washington, DC., US.
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
Georgia, Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.