Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Principle of Solidarity
The Principle of Solidarity
To be solid means to be firmly united. It follows that solidarity implies unity or fellowship, arising
from common responsibility and interest. Sense of solidarity or unity characterizes quality standing of
any profession like nursing. It relates to the ability of its members to organize and standardize, the
professional values of competence, autonomy, authority, and accountability. Toward this end, there
arises the need for a cohesive professional association to solidify harmonious fellowship or relationship
of its members who work together to meet the health care needs of society. With the principle of
solidarity, one-for-all and all-for-one policy is tall order.
W.D. Ross is an English philosopher. In his book entitled, The Rights and the Good (1930), he
underscores his concern to provide a justifiable account of “cases of conscience,” or ethical situations
confronting people with a pervasive conflict or duties. Which duty take priority over other pressing
duties? To solve this dilemma and provide a defensible account of conflict-of-duty situations, he deems
it necessary to introduce the idea of “prima facie duty”. He, otherwise, intends to call it conditional
duty, which is, on its face, prevailing until overcame or overridden have no single basis, but arise or
sprung from several “morally significant relations” such as nurse-patient, physician-nurse, lawyer-client,
employer-employee, promisor-promisee, and teacher-student relationship. Each of these relationships
is the basis or foundation of prima facie duty. Where one is faced with two or more competing prima
facie duties, he/she has to make a reflective, “considered decision” and come up with only one of
these duties. This binding duty is the actual duty.
Accordingly, Ross proposes seven (7) classifications or divisions of prima facie duties. They are
as presented in the table below:
Appropriate identification, analysis interpretation, and resolution of health problems or issues are
made possible and facilitated by way of reference to relevant bioethical principle. Mappes and De
Grazia (2002) suggested and came up with four major set of principles, namely: