This document compares the performance of random forest and logistic regression models on a diabetes dataset using different classification thresholds. Random forest achieved the highest accuracy of 0.8566 and AUC score of 0.8339 at a threshold of 0.5, outperforming logistic regression which had lower accuracy, AUC, precision, recall, and F1 scores at all thresholds tested on the same diabetes data.
This document compares the performance of random forest and logistic regression models on a diabetes dataset using different classification thresholds. Random forest achieved the highest accuracy of 0.8566 and AUC score of 0.8339 at a threshold of 0.5, outperforming logistic regression which had lower accuracy, AUC, precision, recall, and F1 scores at all thresholds tested on the same diabetes data.
This document compares the performance of random forest and logistic regression models on a diabetes dataset using different classification thresholds. Random forest achieved the highest accuracy of 0.8566 and AUC score of 0.8339 at a threshold of 0.5, outperforming logistic regression which had lower accuracy, AUC, precision, recall, and F1 scores at all thresholds tested on the same diabetes data.