The letter discusses production orders issued by legislative bodies to allow detained members to attend proceedings. It notes that the rules allowing these orders have lower legal status than acts of parliament. Actions taken against members under valid acts should not be halted by these rules. Additionally, the absence of one or two members does not undermine proceedings, as members often take leave anyway, and those attending via production orders rarely contribute. The letter argues the production order system should be abolished.
The letter discusses production orders issued by legislative bodies to allow detained members to attend proceedings. It notes that the rules allowing these orders have lower legal status than acts of parliament. Actions taken against members under valid acts should not be halted by these rules. Additionally, the absence of one or two members does not undermine proceedings, as members often take leave anyway, and those attending via production orders rarely contribute. The letter argues the production order system should be abolished.
The letter discusses production orders issued by legislative bodies to allow detained members to attend proceedings. It notes that the rules allowing these orders have lower legal status than acts of parliament. Actions taken against members under valid acts should not be halted by these rules. Additionally, the absence of one or two members does not undermine proceedings, as members often take leave anyway, and those attending via production orders rarely contribute. The letter argues the production order system should be abolished.
The provision for issuing production orders by the speakers of the
national and provincial assemblies and the senate chairman flows from the rules made by these Houses and not from any duly enacted act of parliament. The status of these rules is inferior to that of an act of parliament. An action initiated under an act cannot be halted, intervened or detracted by or under these rules. The action initiated against an MNA, MPA or a senator under a valid act should not be disturbed under the guise of the above said rules. Moreover, the absence of one or two members from a house will not subvert the proceedings, nor does every member of the house make useful contributions. Do they not seek usual leaves from their respective houses,even when the assemblies and senate sessions are in progress? What input have the members who benefited from production orders made in house proceedings?
In my opinion the production order system must be done away with.