Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Edinburgh University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Dance
Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research.
http://www.jstor.org
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor Joe Millward, Mal-
colm Cox and Neil Gibson for their help, Dance UK for financial
support and all the professional and student contemporary dan-
cers who gave up time to allow us to study them and Fiona Dick
for her editorial assistance.
ADDITIONAL READING
Introduction
0o5
1. Main FitnessComponents
in Dance
io6
I07
Io8
Muscle Power
Muscular power is the explosive aspect of strength (often called
'fast-strength' by athletics coaches) and is the sum of strengthand
speedin a movement.Thus, it is the functional application of both
speed and strength, and is a key component in most athletic
Iog
Muscular Strength
Muscular strength may be defined as 'theabilityto overcome external
resistancebyusingskeletalmuscles', and it can be assessed by simple
mechanical dynamometers and computerised equipment. In
general, dancers demonstrate lower strength levels compared to
many other sportsmen/women (Kirkendall & Calabrese, 1983;
Koutedakis & Sharp, 1990). It has also been reported (Wolman
et al., 1990) that low strength levels in female dancers are related
to decreased one density and increased susceptibility to stress
fractures.
Strength training has been part of the athletes' life for at least
2,500 years. In dance, however, such training has not been gen-
erally considered as a necessary ingredient for a successful
career. This is partly because of the widely held belief that
increased muscle strength is inevitably associated with large
increases in muscle size, an unwelcome feature for both male
and particularly female dancers. However, marked improve-
ments in muscle strength may occur without proportional
changes in muscle size (McDougall et al., 1980). In view of the
limited literature on the physiology of male and female profes-
sional dancers, one of the aims of the 'Healthier Dancer Pro-
gramme' was to investigate possible relationships between
strength levels and frequency and severity of injuries.
I I0
vs.InjuriesinDancers
2. MuscularStrength
2001:
150.
-.if i . 0 E;
5 I i^ l-,!
gramme).
III
<,10
E FEMALE
DANCERS
z
?=^~~~~~~~ + MALEDANCERS
8
o
6
0
+
. 2 +. --- +
U * * *\ + + + - +
a 0
2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.5 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.7
QUADS& HAMSTRING
(Nm/kg BW)
2: Relationships between days-off dance due to lower-body injuries, and the
sum of knee hamstrings and quadriceps peak outputs at the test speed of 1.04
rad/s in male and female dancers.
I 12
lower-body (i.e. pelvis, legs, knees, and feet) injuries, and the
sum of knee flexors and extensors peak outputs, expressed in
Nm/kg body weight, at the contraction speed of 1.04 rad/s
(expressingthe values of kg of body weight - Nm/kg - removes
the influence of body-size differences).The general trend would
appear to be that the lower the thigh-power output (or thigh-
strength), the greater the degree of injury in both male and
female dancers.We suggest that the introductionof supplemen-
tary strength training may circumvent such problems and pro-
vide a relatively cost-effective way of reducing injuries in
dancers.Indeed, it has been previouslyfound that strengthtrain-
ing is more beneficial to weaker male (Koutedakisetal., 1996b)
and female (Stalderetal., 1990) dancers than their strongercol-
leagues.
The findings in Fig. 2 are also in line with a pool of anecdotal
evidence suggesting that most of the dance-related injuries
occur towards the end of rehearsalsand/or stage performances,
and more specifically towards the end of the season, when dan-
cers are physically tired. This trend, if valid, might reflect the
fact that fatigue normally causes a breakdown in movement
mechanics which would, in turn, place dancers closer to poten-
tial injury. Thus, it would be anticipated that the weaker the
dancer, the greater the injury risk as there would be a tendency
to work closer to his/her individual fatigue threshold. Indeed,
we found that the female dancers were both weaker and showed
more severe injuries than the males. No such correlationswere
found at the higher speed of 4.19 rad/s.
I 4
12
10 +.
6
4'+....
4 \
2 +-...-I+
0
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
KNEE FI/Ext rat
3: Days-off dancing due to low-back pain versus hamstring to quadriceps
ratio (knee Fl/Extrat) in male ballet dancers before and after 3 months of spe-
cial strength training.
Conclusions
II5
Acknowledgements
REFERENCES
i 6
II7
i 8