Mgnrega Project Analysis

Rural Infrastructure Development Projects Under MGNREGA for siho r Block
A Project Report - I
of
Rural Infrastructure Development Projects (RIDP)
under
MGNREGA
for
Ghanghali,Bordi,Sarkadiya (son),Rajpara,Ramdhari,Chorvadla Villages, SIHOR Taluka
Institute: SHANTILAL SHAH ENGINEERING COLLEGE
1
Gujarat Technological University
Ahmedabad, Gujarat
A Project Report - I
of
Rural Infrastructure Development Projects (RIDP)
under
MGNREGA
for
GhanGhali, Bordi, Rajpara Khodiyar, Sarkhediya (son) & Sarvedi Villages, Sihor Taluka
Submitted By: Enrolment Nos.:

1. JOSHI BAHVIN J. 110430106046
2. KACHHADIYA SAGAR P. 110430106059
3.SAVALIYA HARDIK R. 110430106052
Guided By (Nodal Officer):

1. PROF. M.V.CHAUHAN
2.
2
Certificate
This is to certify that the following students of Degree/ Diploma Engineering have successfully submitted
Project Report - I for SIHOR Block for RIDP under MGNREGA
in partial fulfillment of the project offered by
GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, CHANDKHEDA
during the academic year 2014 -15. This project work has been carried out by them under our supervision and guidance.
Name :JOSHI BHAVIN J. Enrollment No.: 110430106046
Date of Submission: 14/11/2014
Nodal Officer : M.V.CHAUHAN

Institute name : SHANTILAL SHAH ENGINEERING COLLEGE
3
Abstarct
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is considered as a “Silver
Bullet” for eradicating rural poverty and unemployment, by way of generating demand for productive labour force
in villages. It provides an alternative source of livelihood which will have an impact on reducing migration,
restricting child labour, alleviating poverty, and making villages self sustaining through productive assets creation
such as road construction, soil and water conservation work, etc. For which it has been considered as the largest
anti-poverty programme in the world. But the success of this Act depends upon its proper implementation.
Thus, the present study attempts to critically examine the implementation process of this programme and its
impact on tribal livelihoods i.e. to what extent MGNREGS has given justice in sustaining the livelihoods of poor
tribal communities in a tribal dominated area of sihor taluka, Bhavnagar. The study reveals that there is little
impact of MGNREGA on tribal livelihoods. The faulty implementation strategy has ruined the spirit of this
programme. Religion and street biasness and favouritism in case of distribution of job card, dominance of
dominant families, defective leadership and improper coordination among the stakeholders have stood as major
hurdles in this programme.
4
Acknowledgement
The heart beating outcry of socially negligence in implementation of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural
Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) drew our attention to focus our study on it.
First of all, We would like to express our gratitude and sincere thanks our principal Dr. M.V.Bhatt and
Head of Civil Department Prof. H.M.GANDHI for allowing us to undertake this project work .
we would like to extend our sincere gratitude to our supervisor Mr Mukesh V. Chauhan, Assistant
Professor, Department of Applied Mechanics, Shantilal shah Engineering College, Bhavnagar , who help us to fine
tune this project and made this entire project a very useful and learning process; without his academic support,
constant guidance and this study would have not been possible and the project on “Mahatma Gandhi National
Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)
we are highly indebted to Mr.kishor boricha(TECH. ASSIT.) and Mr. anirudhsing gohil (T.D.O-Sihor) for
providing necessary information regarding the project and also their support in completing the project.
5
Index
1. Introduction
1.1 Background …………………………………………………………………………..………………….…8
1.2 Need of the Study…………………………………………………………………….………………….…9
1.3 Objectives of the study……………………………………………………………………………………10
1.4 Scope of the Study……………………………………………………………………..……………….…11
1.5 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………...……………….…13
1.6 Chapterization………………………………………………………………………..…………...…….…15
2. Literature Review
2.1 MGNREGA: Introduction………………………………………………………………………..………16
2.2 Infrastructure Projects under MGNREGA ……………………………..………………………..…….…18
2.3 Case Studies (Success of MGNREGA) ………………………………………………………..…………20
2.4 Approach So Far(Government Schemes, Projects implemented for village Development) …...…………23
6
3. Study Area (Block) Profile

3.1 Study Area Location …………………………………………….……………………….……………….24
3.2 Physical & Demographical Growth……………………………….………………………………………25
3.3 Villages under MGNREGA………………………………………………………………………………25
3.4 Village Selection Parameters………………………………………...……………………………………26
3.5 Selected Villages ………………………………………………...…………………………………….…27
4. Data Collection & Analysis

4.1 Approach……………………………………………………………………………………………….…28
4.2 Present scenario: Projects in villages……………………...………………………………………………29
4.3 Issues……………………………………………………………………………...………………………30
4.4 SWOT Analysis : Projects ………………………………………………..………………………………31
4.5 Analysis: Technical Parameters ( Location, Material, Labour, Quality & Other) ……….………………33
5. Recommendations & Suggestions……………………………………………………..……………………54
6. Alternative Planning Proposal

6.1 Observations & Findings…………………………………………………………………………………56
6.2 Alternative Design Proposals……………………………………..………………………………………57
7. Work to be Done in Phase-II……………………………..…………………………………………………60
7
Introduction
1.1 Background
The present study is focused on MGNREGA activities in Gujarat (SIHOR BLOCK). It will look at the
five most popular MGNREGS activities in five panchayats, across one block . In all, this implies a study of a
minimum of 14 worksites. rural development in sihor block particularly on increasing water availability and allowing
farmers to increase cropping intensity and diversity, thereby leading to greater biomass production, greater soil
nutrient production, and greater incomes. Like several other parts of India the scheme for its twin objectives of
employment generation and asset creation, our block has managed to work towards both these objectives by not only
generating substantial employment, but employment which has led to the creation of useful assets which lead to
ecological regeneration and economic development of its villages. It has achieved this through the convergence of
various programmes such as the Rajiv Gandhi Watershed Mission and through the creation of focused sub-schemes
such as Indira Avas Yojna, Nirmal Bharat, Nirmal Neer, etc.
The study shall focus on developing a methodology for environmental evaluation which
would feed into future planning and evaluation of NREGA from an environmental perspective. This would ensure
that, in future, activities undertaken under NREGA are planned not only to ensure provision of employment
8
opportunities, but also to ensure diversification of employment as well as to undertake activities which lead to
maximization of environmental benefits to the community - local and global.
1.2 Need Of Study
 Village Development
 Provide Basic facilities for village
 Migration
 Easy transportation facilities
 Development of Road
 Flood Control
9
1.3 objective
The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) aims at enhancing the livelihood security of
the people in rural areas by guaranteeing hundred days of wage employment in a financial year, to a rural
household whose members volunteer to do unskilled manual work. The Act also seeks to create durable assets and
strengthen the livelihood resource base of the rural poor. The choice of works suggested in the Act address causes
of chronic poverty like drought, deforestation, soil erosion, so that the process of employment generation is on a
sustainable basis.
 For Visit Site And Collecting The Data Of On Going Works
 To Survey The Work At Technical Standards
 For Detailing Which Type Of Materials Used In Construction Work
 To Know Which Type Of Equipment Used In Project
 To manage different phase of work for completing the project within specific time period.
 Field data collection for site selection process.
 Proposal/ suggestions for the Material selection process with respect to durability and affordability parameters.
 Skilled supervision for the ongoing/ upcoming infrastructure development projects with respect to quality
improvement
 Selection of Appropriate technology for quality improvement with the optimum time frame
 Estimation & Costing and Rate analysis part for the upcoming Projects if needed
 Design proposals/ alternative solutions for the projects covered under MGNREGA for the village
 To know about how many workers are needed for this project
10
 Selection of Appropriate technology for quality improvement with the optimum time frame.
1.4 Scope of the Study
The present study is focused on MGNREGA activities in gujrat (SIHOR BLOCK). It will look at the five
most popular MGNREGS activities in five panchayats, across one block . In all, this implies a study of a minimum
of 14 worksites. rural development in sihor block particularly on increasing water availability and allowing
farmers to increase cropping intensity and diversity, thereby leading to greater biomass production, greater soil
nutrient production, and greater incomes. Like several other parts of India the scheme for its twin objectives of
employment generation and asset creation, our block has managed to work towards both these objectives by not
only generating substantial employment, but employment which has led to the creation of useful assets which lead
to ecological regeneration and economic development of its villages. It has achieved this through the convergence
of various programmes such as the Rajiv Gandhi Watershed Mission and through the creation of focused sub-
schemes such as Indira Avas Yojna, Nirmal Bharat, Nirmal Neer, etc.
The study shall focus on developing a methodology for environmental evaluation which would feed into
future planning and evaluation of NREGA from an environmental perspective. This would ensure that, in future,
activities undertaken under NREGA are planned not only to ensure provision of employment opportunities, but
also to ensure diversification of employment as well as to undertake activities which lead to maximization of
environmental benefits to the community - local and global.
11
MGNREGA project giving us,
 Field knowledge
 Knowledge of work execution
 Increase skill of intrapersonal communication skill.
 Increase management knowledge
12
1.5 Methodology:
FIG:1. - METHODOLOGY
13
 Data Collection
Data was collected both from primary and secondary sources. Primary data was collected from all the
stakeholders/at sites of MGNREGA. Questionnaire surveys with the different stakeholders engaged in
MGNREGA in the study site were organized. Transect walk into the MGNREGA worksites were conducted to
have firsthand experience on the MGNREGA works at the community level.
For gathering quantitative data meeting was conducted with tech. persons at taluka panchayat. The
secondary data was collected from official records, policy documents, published reports of similar projects,
journals and literature form social science discipline.
 Data Analysis
Both qualitative and quantitative data was analyzed in the backdrop of the project objectives. Qualitative
data was interpreted based on the information collected from the field. of the study will help in understanding the
problem of implementation of the project. It will help in formulating the better policy and strategy for the future.
14
. 1.6 Chapterization
The first chapter deals with the introduction. It explains about the feature of NREGA. It also discussed the
objective and methodology of the project. The second chapter deals with the literature review of NREGA. The
third chapter deals with study area of block profile. The fourth chapter provides a brief data collection & analysis.
The fifth chapter provide information about recommendations & suggestions. The next chapter is about alternative
planning & proposal. The last chapter is about work to be done in phase 2.
15
Literature Review
2.1 MGNREGA : Introduction
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is considered as a “Silver
Bullet” for eradicating rural poverty and unemployment, by way of generating demand for productive labour force
in villages. Rural poverty and unemployment in India have grown in an unprecedented manner during the last few
decades. There is a growing incidence of illiteracy, blind faith, hungry people, mal-nourished children, anaemic
pregnant women, farmer suicides, starvation deaths, migration resulting from inadequate employment, poverty,
and the failure of subsistence production during droughts. In order to make solution of these problems and to
provide livelihood security to rural unemployed, Government of India (GOI) enacted the National Rural
Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) in 2005.
It is the biggest poverty alleviation programme in the world which is started with an initial outlay of Rs.
11,300 crore in year 2006-07. This Act is now called as Mahatma Gandhi NREGA. The Act provides a legal
guarantee for 100 days of employment in every financial year to adult members of any rural household will to do
public work related unskilled manual work at the statutory minimum wage. Thus it is a universal programme. This
minimum wage varies from state to state, in some states it is Rs. 80 whereas in other it is Rs. 125 or Rs. 120.
According to the Act the minimum wage cannot be less than Rs. 60. The 100 days of work figure was estimated 16
because the agricultural season is only supposed to last roughly around 250 days and unskilled workers have no
alternative source of income in the remaining parts of the year.
NREGA has come after almost 56 years of experience of other rural employment programmes, which
include both Centrally Sponsored Schemes and those launched by State Govt. These comprise the National Rural
Employment Programme (NREP) 1980-89; Rural Landless Employment Guarantee Programme (RLEGP) 1983-
89; Jawahar Rojgar Yojana (JRY) 1989-1990; Employment Assurance Scheme (EAS)1993-99; Jawahar Gram
Samridhi Yojana (JGSY) 1999-2002; Sampoorna Grameen Rojgar Yojana 2 (SGRY) from 2001;National Food
For Work Programme (NFFWP) from 2004 were national rural employment schemes. Among these, the SGRY
and NFFWP have been merged with NREGA in 2000.
17
2.2 Infrastructure Project Under MGNREGA
Types of works
The research team found that five (05) major type of work executed or implemented under the MGNREGA as
given below. They more or less confirm to the list approved by the program guidelines.
 Water conservation
1. Irrigation channel
2. Water tank
3. Water storage units
4. Dipping pond
 Land Development
1. Playground Development
2. Protection wall
3. Land terracing
4. Construction of shed
 Plantation and Afforestration
1. Orange Plantation
2. Tree plantation
3. Bagayat
18
 Road Connectivity
1. Footpath Development
2. Motor-able road development (Kachcha work)
 Utility construction
1. Toilet block
19
2.3 Case studies ( Success of MGNREGA )

SUCCESS STORY ON THE RURAL CONNECTIVITY PROJECTS UNDER MGNREGA
SCHEME
INTRODUCTION
The water of the temporary “Cause Way” near the village Sarkadiya ( Son ) under Sarkadiya G.P.
flowing without any utilization except the public use by the villagers. Keeping in view the above objectives, the
project “construction of cause way at Sarkadiya” was selected during the year 2013-14 with an estimated cost Rs.
5.00 Lakhs.
Works executed
1. Foundation
2. Approach road
3. Earthen canal
4. Concrete vent
5. Dwarf wall
Item Executed
1. Earth work
2. R.C.C. (1:4:8)
3. P.C.C. (1:2:4)
20
PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
21
Social benefits
1. By taking the project, not only the ST inhabitants of SARKHEDIYA village and other labours residing near by
villages got employment but also they are obstructed to migrate to other places for works.
2. The people of the locality are delightful and there is growing demand for taking such beneficial projects in the
locality where there is perennial source of water.
3. Cause way is very much useful in monsoon time.
Project profile
Name of the Project : Construction of cause way

Village : Sarkhediya son
Gram Panchayat : Sarkhediya
Block : Sihor
District : Bhavnagar
Name of the Scheme : MGNREGA
Estimated Cost : 1st Phase ( 2013-14) = Rs. 5.00 Lakhs.
Total mandays generated : 5700 Nos.
22
2.4 Approach so far :

Under MGNREGA scheme , there are so many projects which were completely done successfully in sihor
block which is helpful to increase aesthetic beauty as well as development of the block.
Out of this, best projects which were visited by us are listed below :
 Ghanghali
Dipping pond
 Bordi
vanikaran,bagayat, tarfencing, excited pond site and future work of dipping pond.
 Sarakadiya ( son )
cause way and tarfencing
 Rajpara ( khodiyar )
Metling road and tarfensing site
 Ramdhari & Chorvadla
road ,pond, and future required dipping pond site.

23
Study Area (Block) Profile

3.1 Study area location
Sihor taluka is 23km apart from Bhavnagar And our villages are ( ghanghli,bordi,sarkadiya sen,rajpara,ramdhari
and chorvadla ) in sihor taluka.
24
3.2Physical and Demographical growth
Sihor is located at 21.425277°N 71.573604°E. It has an average elevation of 60 metres (196 feet).
As of 2001 India census Sihor had a population of 46,943. Males constitute 53% of the population and
females 47%. Sihor has an average literacy rate of 66%, higher than the national average of 59.5%: male literacy is
74%, and female literacy is 58%. In Sihor, 14% of the population is under 6 years of age.
3.3 Villages under MGNREGA

The list of villages under MGNREGA project as below :
Agiyali,Amargadh,Ambla,Bekdi,Bhadli,Bhangadh,Bhankhal,Bholad,Bhutiya,Bordi,Budhana,Chorvadala,Devgana
,Dhankan,Kunda,Dhrupka,Dhundhsar,Gadhula,Ghanghali,Gundala,Ishvariya,Jambala,JunaJaliya,Kachotiya,Kajav
adar,Kanad,Kantodiya,Karkoliya,Karmadiya,Khakhariya,Khambha,Khari,Lavarda,Limbaddhar,Madhada,Maglana,
Mahadevpara,Malvan,Meghvadar,MotaSurka, NanaSurka, NavaJaliya, Navagam(Mota), Nesda, Padapan,
Paldi,Rabarika,Rajpara (Khodiyar),Rajpara (Tana), Ramdhari, Sakhvadar, Sandhida, Sanosara, Sar,Sarkadia
(Tana),Sarkadiya (Songadh), Sarvedi, Sedarda, Songadh, Tana,
Tarakpaldi,Thala,Thorali,Toda,Todi,Ukharla,Usrad,Vadiya, Valavad,Varal,Vav,Vavdi (Gajabhai),Vavdi
(Vachhani),Zariya.
25
3.4 Village Selection Parameters

As per guidance provided by the nodal officer we visited five villages which have successful under the
MGNREGA project and surveyed the job earlier done.
We Had Planned To Visit 5 Different Villages To Survey But Since No Work Was Going On Therefore
We Shifted Our Focus To Other Village.
Hence We Have Visited Village Ghanghali ( TA-sihor ) With TECH ASSISTANT ( Boricha Kishor )
Which Are Under MGNREGA Project And Visited At 5 Sites Of Toilet Blocks. after that we have visited village
Bordi and saw different sites of road, vanikaran,bagayat, tarfencing, excited pond site and future work of dipping
pond.
At Sarakadiya ( son ) village we visited one site of cause way after that we have visited Rajpara ( khodiyar
) and inspect some Metling road and tarfensing site then we visited ramdhari village and survey of the road ,pond,
and future required dipping pond site.
26
3.5 Selected Villages
 Ghanghali
Toilet Block
 Bordi
vanikaran,bagayat, tarfencing, excited pond site and future work of dipping pond.
 Sarakadiya ( son )
cause way and tarfencing
 Rajpara ( khodiyar )
Metling road and tarfensing site
 Ramdhari & Chorvadla
road ,pond, and future required dipping pond site.
27
Data Collection & Analysis

4.1 Approach
As per the permission granted by the DDO of Bhavnagar district permission forwarded to sihor taluka TDO
then we collected the data of respective villages from tech. Assit. Of taluka office and surveyed the same villages.
After collecting the data we surveyed all villages and seen the actual site existed or existing work and
compared the office data. We also check the reliability of all works and we check the technical parameters with our
best knowledge.
28
4.2 Present scenario : Projects In Villages

Currently under the MGNREGA project in village GHANGHALI and BORDI the following projects were undertaken,
1. Toilet block
2. Deeping pond
Moreover the already completed work were surveyed.
29
4.3 issues
During Our Survey We Found Detailed Issues That House Owner/ workers are Facing.
 Non-discrimination in the wage rate between men and women creates a negative feeling among men in related to the type of work
where the work involves hard physical effort, which is mostly done by men.
 Lack of technical expertise in the planning and executing the work sometimes reduces the technical quality of the work.
 The supervision of NREGA works also found not well managed because of the lack of proper training of the supervisor.
 The stakeholders are not aware of the full and comprehensive objective of NREGA, i.e. why-, what for- NREGA, which is
needed to be understood by them for success of the scheme in long-term future.
And We Found Other Issues Like
 Cost Of Construction Is Insufficient For Proper Work
 No Water Supply In Toilet Block
 Lake Of Quality Standard
 Proper Methodology
 Improper Mix Design. 30

4.4 swot analysis
Strength Weakness
 Employment  Low wages
 Infrastructure development  Improper guideline
 Reduction in migration  Poor skill
 Increase prosperity  Lack of supervision
Opportunities Threads
 Women empowerment  ill-literacy
 Provide employment  Politics

 View of people
 Conflict between authorities
31
Strength:-
 Giving employment to the people
 No need of any skill
 Rural-urban migration is reduced
 Scheme provide wage within 15 days.
Weakness:-
 Poor awareness of people
 Lack of skill labour
 Lack of constant supervision
 No continuous works.
Opportunity:-
 Widow or housewomen also work in scheme.
Threats:-
 Low literacy of the people in village area
 Politics play role in giving job cards

32
 Conflict between people and authority.
4.5 Analysis : Technical Parameters
The MGNREGA gave employment opportunity to the rural people. Most of the laborers consider that
MGNREGA is their primary source of income. Most of the laborers who used to migrate towards the nearby cities
are now working in the MGNREGA. Reducing migration is one of the main objectives of the act and according to
the researcher this objective has been fulfilled to a great extent in the sample selected. Now there are very few
people who migrate from the village, most of them work in the MGNREGA and after that in the agricultural work.
The act is changing the social structure of the village.
As the guidance provided by nodal officer we visited 5 villages which are successful under the MGNREGA
project and Surveyed The job as below :-
33
NAME OF VILLAGE :- GHANGHALI
NAME OF WORK :- CONSTRUCTION OF TOILET BLOCK
NATURE OF WORK :- Utility Services FINANCIAL YEAR :- 2014-15
EXPENDITURE IN LACKS :- 0.10000
UNSKILLED IN RS :- 5400 SEMI SKILLED IN RS :- 00 SKILLED IN RS :- 00
MATERIAL IN RS :-4600
PERSON DAYS :- 18
CONTINGENCY :-0
MATERIAL USED :- bricks, cement, sand
OTHER COMMENTS:- scheme should see the drainage facility
34
35
NAME OF VILLAGE :- BORDI
NAME OF WORK :- CONSTRUCTION OF ETERNAL STREETROAD OF BORDI
NATURE OF WORK :- Rural Connectivity FINANCIAL YEAR :- 2010-11
PERSON DAYS :- 260
CONTINGENCY :-0
MATERIAL USED :-coarse aggregate, soil, water
OTHER COMMENTS:-scheme should see the first drainage line facility before giving permission
36
37
NAME OF WORK :- BORDI GAME SMASHAN NI BAHAR VANIKARAN 2012
NATURE OF WORK :- Drought Proofing FINANCIAL YEAR :- 2012-13
EXPENDITURE IN RS :- 0.67778
UNSKILLED IN RS :- 45690.3 SEMI SKILLED IN RS :- 00 SKILLED IN RS :- 00
MATERIAL IN RS :-92014.3
PERSON DAYS :- 388
CONTINGENCY :-0
MATERIAL USED :-
OTHER COMMENTS:- water facility should be provided
38
39
NAME OF WORK :- KASHMIRI TALAV UNDU UTARVANU KAM
NATURE OF WORK :- Water Conservation FINANCIAL YEAR :- 2013-14
PERSON DAYS :- 6415
CONTINGENCY :-0
MATERIAL USED :-
OTHER COMMENTS:- no comments
40
41
NAME OF VILLAGE :- SARAKADIYA ( SON )
NAME OF WORK :- CAUSE WAY
NATURE OF WORK :- Rural Connectivity/D.P. FINANCIAL YEAR :- 2014-15
EXPENDITURE IN LACKS :- Aprro. 5 LACKS
42
NAME OF VILLAGE :- RAJPARA ( KHODIYAR )
NAME OF WORK :- FENCING AT SMASAN PLOT VISTAR RASTE
PERSON DAYS :- 185
CONTINGENCY :-0
MATERIAL USED :- cement pole, cement, sand and aluminium wire
OTHER COMMENTS:- no comments
43
44
NAME OF VILLAGE :- RAJPARA ( KHODIYAR )
NAME OF WORK :- RAJPARA KHO SHREYU ROAD
PERSON DAYS :- 2365
CONTINGENCY :-0
MATERIAL USED :- coarse aggregate, soil, water
OTHER COMMENTS:-
45
46
NAME OF VILLAGE :- RAMDHARI
NAME OF WORK :- TALAV UNDUUTARVANU KAM BUS STAND NI BAJUMA
NATURE OF WORK :- Water harvesting FINANCIAL YEAR :- 2013-14
EXPENDITURE IN LAKHS :- 4.97
PERSON DAYS :- 5208
CONTINGENCY :-00
MATERIAL USED :- cement pole, cement, sand and aluminium wire
OTHER COMMENTS:- No comments
47
48
NAME OF VILLAGE :- RAMDHARI
NAME OF WORK :- SITE CLEARING AND TARFENCING
EXPENDITURE IN LAKHS :- 1.59679
PERSON DAYS :- 250
CONTINGENCY :-00
MATERIAL USED :-
OTHER COMMENTS:- No comments
49
50
NAME OF VILLAGE :- CHORVADLA
NAME OF WORK :- CHORVADLA METLING ROAD
PERSON DAYS :- 2747
CONTINGENCY :-0
MATERIAL USED :- coarse aggregate, soil, water
OTHER COMMENTS:- need repair works
51
52
NAME OF VILLAGE :- BORADI
NAME OF WORK :- TALAV UNDU UTARVANU KAM ( FUTURE TASK )
NATURE OF WORK :- Water harvesting FINANCIAL YEAR :- 2014-15
EXPENDITURE IN LACKS :- Not Estimated
53
Recommendation & Suggestion
 Provide Money To Labourer As Per Work Done Not Per Day Rate
 Give Flexibility For Overtime
 Develop Methodology For Proper Inspection Of Material
 If Any Other Government Project Is Also Running At Same Village Then MGNREGA Has To be Provide
More Money Then Others.
 Some amount of the expenses should be contributed from owner, in cases of NREGA work undertaken in
private property.
 Hence, each and every stakeholder of NREGA should be trained in this theory and be acquainted with its
practice.
 The selection of workers can be made flexible, which can be decided in the gram-sabha/VEC, to ensure proper
match between the type of work and assignment of work to male and female workers.
54
 The GRS or work supervisors should be imparted basic technical training in addition to the work supervision
training for ensuring the technical quality of the work supervised.
As per nature of work we find other suggestion as below:
Vanikaran:-
 Proper method of a forestation should be employed
 Constant supervision should be done by the villagers after the vanikaran
 Sufficient care should be taken
Deeping pond:-
 Embankment wall should be well rammed and compacted.
Toilet block:-
 Proper method should be employed
 Skilled labour should be employed
 Construction material should be of good quality
 No compromise on quality of material and construction
55
Alternative planning proposal

6.1 Observation & Findings
After Analyzing The Whole Site We Find Various Problems As under.
 Improper Grade Of Bricks
 Improper Clay/Sand
 Improper Grade Of Cement
56
6.2 Alternate Design
57
58
As seen in the figure first one is about cause way which is executed in sarakadiya (son) village Where we
visited and we get this design from the technical assistant. And in figure two is about toilet bock design we
conducted a visit to ghanghali village and found that the design of toilet need modification as shown in figure.
59
Work to be done in phase 2

In phase 2 we wish to conduct a visit to another village & provide a cost estimate as per guideline
Our Vision Is If In Case Any Work Gets Started We Will Do
 In a coordinated manner, we will visit to a future assigned works on going in villages.
 Provide them proper design of the project which is fulfilled all type of requirement.
 Properly analyze the site and give proper suggestion to improve quality of work.
 Give them proper suggestion to control quantity of material with good quality works.
 We will discuss with technical assistant to improve the facilities of labours.
 We also discuss about design for creating a perfect development of villages.
60

Mgnrega Project Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mgnrega Project Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rural Infrastructure Development Projects Under MGNREGA for siho r Block

Ghanghali,Bordi,Sarkadiya (son),Rajpara,Ramdhari,Chorvadla Villages, SIHOR Taluka

Institute: SHANTILAL SHAH ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Submitted By: Enrolment Nos.:

Guided By (Nodal Officer):

Name :JOSHI BHAVIN J. Enrollment No.: 110430106046

Date of Submission: 14/11/2014

Nodal Officer : M.V.CHAUHAN

3. Study Area (Block) Profile

4. Data Collection & Analysis

5. Recommendations & Suggestions……………………………………………………..……………………54

6. Alternative Planning Proposal

7. Work to be Done in Phase-II……………………………..…………………………………………………60

1.2 Need Of Study

1.4 Scope of the Study

MGNREGA project giving us,

 Knowledge of work execution

 Increase skill of intrapersonal communication skill.

 Increase management knowledge

2.2 Infrastructure Project Under MGNREGA

2.3 Case studies ( Success of MGNREGA )

Name of the Project : Construction of cause way

Total mandays generated : 5700 Nos.

2.4 Approach so far :

cause way and tarfencing

Metling road and tarfensing site

 Ramdhari & Chorvadla

road ,pond, and future required dipping pond site.

Study Area (Block) Profile

3.2Physical and Demographical growth

3.3 Villages under MGNREGA

3.4 Village Selection Parameters

3.5 Selected Villages

cause way and tarfencing

Metling road and tarfensing site

 Ramdhari & Chorvadla

road ,pond, and future required dipping pond site.

Data Collection & Analysis

4.2 Present scenario : Projects In Villages

And We Found Other Issues Like

 Cost Of Construction Is Insufficient For Proper Work

 No Water Supply In Toilet Block

 Lake Of Quality Standard

 Improper Mix Design. 30

4.4 swot analysis

 Women empowerment  ill-literacy

 Provide employment  Politics

 Giving employment to the people

 No need of any skill

 Rural-urban migration is reduced

 Scheme provide wage within 15 days.

 Poor awareness of people

 Lack of skill labour

 Lack of constant supervision

 Widow or housewomen also work in scheme.

 Low literacy of the people in village area

 Politics play role in giving job cards

4.5 Analysis : Technical Parameters

NAME OF VILLAGE :- GHANGHALI

NAME OF WORK :- CONSTRUCTION OF TOILET BLOCK

NATURE OF WORK :- Utility Services FINANCIAL YEAR :- 2014-15

EXPENDITURE IN LACKS :- 0.10000

UNSKILLED IN RS :- 5400 SEMI SKILLED IN RS :- 00 SKILLED IN RS :- 00

MATERIAL USED :- bricks, cement, sand