The document discusses implementing a peer-review technique in an EFL paragraph writing course at the State Islamic University of Padang, Indonesia. The researchers modified the curriculum and implemented peer-review to provide students an opportunity to practice real communication through writing and encourage instructors to develop strong writing skills. They studied 41 students over 14 weeks who participated in peer-review when writing first drafts. They found that less than half of students (35%) took advantage of peer-review by revising their drafts based on peer comments, while most did not provide reviews for various reasons. Those who did peer-review produced improved final drafts based on peer feedback.
The document discusses implementing a peer-review technique in an EFL paragraph writing course at the State Islamic University of Padang, Indonesia. The researchers modified the curriculum and implemented peer-review to provide students an opportunity to practice real communication through writing and encourage instructors to develop strong writing skills. They studied 41 students over 14 weeks who participated in peer-review when writing first drafts. They found that less than half of students (35%) took advantage of peer-review by revising their drafts based on peer comments, while most did not provide reviews for various reasons. Those who did peer-review produced improved final drafts based on peer feedback.
The document discusses implementing a peer-review technique in an EFL paragraph writing course at the State Islamic University of Padang, Indonesia. The researchers modified the curriculum and implemented peer-review to provide students an opportunity to practice real communication through writing and encourage instructors to develop strong writing skills. They studied 41 students over 14 weeks who participated in peer-review when writing first drafts. They found that less than half of students (35%) took advantage of peer-review by revising their drafts based on peer comments, while most did not provide reviews for various reasons. Those who did peer-review produced improved final drafts based on peer feedback.
Researches in ESL/EFL learning to write have proved that collaborative learning
improved students’ writings of various genres. However, there have been much more left behind these findings dealing with future practices of such learning, especially in Indonesian Undergraduate English programs. To deal with this issue, we have modified and implemented several instruments including the curriculum of Paragraph Writing (PW) and Peer-Review practices at State Islamic University – Imam Bonjol of Padang. We argue that this approach does not only provide students with the opportunity to learn and practice the real communication on paper, but also encourage the instructors to develop noble characters and supreme skills as advocated by professional writers. The current study seeks to uncover the advantages of Peer-Review for both teachers and students and examine aspects of learning related to language and cultural awareness. A group of students (41 students) was a common base for the study in which peer-review technique was exposed during a period of 14 weeks. All of the students’ first drafts were collected together with the results of their reviewer comments and revision they made as the final drafts. Aspects of the comment and suggestion were counted under sub-categories such as content, organization, vocabulary, language, and mechanics. We found out that very few students or less than half of the students (35%) took advantages of peer-review; while most did not perform the reviews for many reasons. Those who successfully performed peer review produced the final draft based on peers’ comments and together with other resources.
Key words: Peer review, paragraph writing, comments, revisions, final draft