BEFORE THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, RAWALPINDI BENCH
RAWALPINDI
[Link] No._____________‘2014
Faizan S/o Muhammad Afzaal, caste Awan, resident of Mohra
Shah Wali Shah Tehsil Taxila, District Rawalpindi.
(Presently confined in District Jail Adiala Rawalpindi).
………….Petitioner
Versus
The State
………Respondent
CASE FIR NO.455 DATED 27.06.2014,
OFFENCE U/S 9-C CNSA, P.S. TAXILA.
PETITION FOR POST-ARREST BAIL U/S 497
CR.P.C.
Respectfully submitted:-
1- That petitioner has been falsely implicated in the
above-mentioned case and presently confined into District
Jail Adiala Rawalpindi.
2- That it has been alleged in the FIR that petitioner,
being suspicious, was searched and during this course,
contraband material i.e. Charas weighing 1165 grams was
allegedly recovered from his possession.
3- That the allegations leveled in the FIR against
petitioner are absolutely false, baseless, concocted and ill
founded and petitioner is quite innocent. The local police
fabricated the instant case against the petitioner with
malafide intention and ulterior motives.
4- That in fact, police raided upon residential house of
petitioner at late night on 27.06.2014 and outraged
modesty of females. The police also snatched the purse of
lying-in female containing a gold Kanta and cash amount
worth Rs.25,000/- and later on entangled petitioner in the
instant case. Malice of police is very much evident from
the fact that police showed arrest petitioner from Mohallah
whereas petitioner was apprehended from his residential
house. Even otherwise, police registered separate cases
against other family members of petitioner on the same
day by setting wider-net including petitioner’s aged father,
uncle and brothers.
5- That the petitioner is victim of malicious prosecution
having no concern whatsoever with the alleged offence.
Nothing was recovered from petitioner and alleged
recovery is planted one.
6- That alleged recovery is 1165 grams which is on the
border line of section 9-B/9-C of CNSA and apparently,
the case falls under the ambit of section 9-B/CNSA which
does not fall under the prohibitory clause of Cr.P.C.
7- That in circumstances, case against petitioner falls
under the ambit of further enquiry. That investigation into
the case is complete in all respects and person of
petitioner is no longer required for the purposes of further
investigation.
8- That petitioner belongs to respectable family, has the
blotless career and is also a previous non-convict.
Moreover, he is a minor and student as well having no
concern whatsoever with such like acts. Even otherwise,
petitioner falls under the ambit of Section 497 (I) Cr.P.C.
for the purpose of bail.
9- That petitioner preferred his bail petition before the
Learned ASJ Taxila who dismissed the same without any
cogent and lawful reason.
10- That petitioner is ready to furnish adequate sureties
to the entire satisfaction of this Honourable Court.
It is therefore, respectfully prayed that
petitioner may kindly be admitted to post-
arrest bail till the final disposal of the case.
Petitioner
Through
SH. MUHAMMAD YAQUB
Advocate
Supreme Court of Pakistan
CC No.16462
CERTIFICATE:
This is the first bail petition on behalf of the
petitioner, before this Honourable Court.
Counsel
BEFORE THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, RAWALPINDI BENCH
RAWALPINDI
[Link] No._____________‘2014
Faizan Versus The State
PETITION FOR POST-ARREST BAIL U/S 497 Cr.P.C.
I N D E X
[Link]. Description of documents Page No. Annexure
1. Bail petition 1-4
2. Copy of FIR a/w better
copy.
3. Impugned order of ASJ
Taxila dismissing bail
petition
4. Copy of bail petition
5. Copy of birth certificate
6. Application for
dispensation
7. Vakalat Nama
…Petitioner
Through:-
SH. MUHAMMAD YAQUB
Advocate
Supreme Court of Pakistan
CC No.16462