Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Solution Executive Shirt Case PDF
Solution Executive Shirt Case PDF
9-696-071
Rev. March 11, 1996
Executive Shirt Company
Case Analysis-The Executive Shirt Company (Group Project)
Part A
Calculations
Explanation
1. Regular shirt production process without custom shirt fabrication.
a. Cycle time for each station = total station time / # of workers at station
i. Cycle time for system = longest station cycle time
ii. Cuffs station = System CT = 2.0 minutes / 4 workers = 0.5 minutes
b. Manufacturing Lead Time (MLT) = Cycle Time (CT) * Works in Progress (WIP)
i. CT = 0.5 minutes
ii. WIP individual shirts = (196 batches * 60 shirts / batch) = 11,760
iii. MLT in days = (0.5 * 11,760) / 480 minutes per day = 12.25 days
c. Total individual shirts as WIP = Sum of average batches * 60 shirts per batch
i. WIP shirts = 196 batches * 60 shirts per batch = 11,760 shirts as WIP
d. Production capacity of system at continuous 100% utilization (minutes)
i. Production capacity = minutes per day / CT of system
ii. Production capacity = 480 / 0.5 = 960 units per day @ continuous 100%
utilization
e. Production capacity utilization = monthly production / monthly production
capacity
i. Current monthly production is 16,000 (given in case)
ii. Total monthly capacity = 19,200 (920 per day * 20 days per month)
iii. Production utilization = 16,000 / 19,200 = 83%
f. Direct Labor content = sum of time at all stations + time per shirt for cutting
i. Sum of time at all stations = 25.51 minutes per shirt
ii. A single cutting of 8 patterns on 60 layers of cloth produces (60 * 8) = 480
shirts
iii. Total cutting time = (1.5 minutes * 60 layers) + (30 minutes cutting) = 120
minutes
iv. Cutting time per shirt = 120 minutes / 480 shirts = 0.25 minutes per shirt
v. Total labor content (time) per shirt = 25.51 + 0.25 = 25.76 minutes per
shirt
g. Direct Labor Utilization = Total used labor time / Total labor time available
i. Total labor time available = 64 workers * 480 minutes per day = 30,720
minutes
ii. Total time used = time per shirt * daily production (16,000 per month / 20
days)
iii. Total time used = 25.76 minutes * 800 shirts per day = 20,608 minutes
iv. Direct Labor Utilization = 20,608 minutes used / 30,720 minutes available
= 67.08%
h. Total Direct Labor Cost per shirt = (# workers * 8 hours per day * $6 per
hour) / 800
i. Total Direct labor cost = (64 * 8 * 6) / 800 (total daily production = 16,000 /
20 days)
ii. Total Direct Labor Cost = $3.84 / shirt
Part B
Recommendation to Management
Using the calculations in Part A it is possible to evaluate each of the two proposals
in terms of their cost and efficiency. Firstly, to deduce the total cost for the custom
shirts each month, the Direct Labour Cost from each plan can be multiplied by 2000
(the desired quantity produced). By doing this we learn that Ike’s total cost for
custom shirts is $7.68 x 2000 = $15,360, compared to Mike’s $3.47 x 2000 =
$6,940. This results in an $8,420 cost difference in favour of Mike’s plan. Production
of regular shirts on the other hand are cheaper using Ike’s process, that is Ike’s
labour costs are $3.43 x 16,000 (desired quantity of regular shirts) = $54,880
compared with Mike’s labour costs of $3.47 x 16,000 = $55,520. The difference
between the two is only $640, which is fairly insignificant, and leaves the total cost
difference between the two plans at $7,780 in favour of Mike.
The great disparity in cost between the two is mainly due to the efficiency of each
proposal. Whilst Mike increases the efficiency of both capacity and labour utilization
in the factory (absorbing excess capacity and increasing efficiency from 83% to
93.75% as well as improving labour efficiency by 7.31%), Ike over-utilizes capacity
in his regular shirt production line and severely under-utilizes capacity in his custom
shirts production line. The result of this is that he has to pay the workers on the
regular shirt line overtime whilst the workers on the custom shirt line are frequently
starved and sitting idle.
Furthermore, when considering the logistics of each production line layout, Mike’s
proposal is favourable over Ike’s because it allows for more flexibility. Whilst Mike
retains the existing ‘process layout’ in the batch shop process, where similar
operations are performed in common functional areas, Ike instead adopts a ‘product
layout’ structure, where the operations are located according to the progressive
steps involved in making a shirt. Having only one worker completing each
production task, as is the case in Ike’s plan, means that if one worker is slowed
down for any reason or needs to take a break, then there is no one to pick up the
slack. As a result, the whole process is negatively affected. An ideal assembly line
should allow workers to trade elements of work and it should be unproblematic to
add workers to the line to increase efficiency, however the straight-line layout of
Ike’s plan does not satisfy these requirements.
Based upon our analysis, although both processes do essentially satisfy Dwight
Collier’s production lead management time conditions, we would recommend that
he should trial Mike’s plan. If there does indeed prove to be a market for mid price
range custom shirts, then implementing Mike’s proposal is the company’s best shot
at making a lucrative profit from this initiative