You are on page 1of 10

Journal of Asian Business Strategy

journal homepage: http://aessweb.com/journal-detail.php?id=5006

The Impact of Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Programs on


Customer’s Loyalty: An Evidence from Telecommunication Sector

Raja Irfan Sabir


Assistant Professor; Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information
Technology Sahiwal, Pakistan
Muhammad Irfan
MS Scholar; Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information
Technology Sahiwal, Pakistan
Muhammad Arslan Sarwar
Lecturer; Faculty of Management & Administrative Sciences, University of Gujrat, Gujrat,
Pakistan
Binesh Sarwar
Lecturer; Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information
Technology Sahiwal, Pakistan
Naeem Akhtar
MS Scholar; Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information
Technology Sahiwal, Pakistan

1
Abstract
All well reputed organizations know that the key to success lies in their customers. Hence in
today’s world, the companies who do not provide value to their customers bring an opportunity
for the competitors to jump in and steal these customers. Same rule applies in
Telecommunication sector hence this research focuses on finding the impact of service quality,
customer satisfaction and loyalty programs on customer’s loyalty in Telecommunication sector
of Pakistan. All Telecom service provider companies ; U fone, Warid, Telenor, Zong, Mobilink
and PTCL are taken in this research and purpose is to investigate the impact of service quality,
customer satisfaction and loyalty programs on customer loyalty of these telecom service
providers companies. A structured questionnaire was designed and survey was conducted to
collect the data from 150 customers from different occupations in areas of Jhang and Okara
districts of Punjab having different mobile phone connections of companies operating in
Pakistan. A comparative analysis of companies is also made that shows that companies should
focus on improving the quality of their services for better and greater customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty.
Keywords: Customer satisfaction, loyalty programs, customer loyalty

Corresponding author’s details:


Name: Muhammad Irfan
Email address: irfaniba@yahoo.com

306
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(11) 2013: 306-314

Problem statement be converted to loyal customer and thus


will add in customer equity of company.
Telecommunication sector has made Company profitability is not only depicted
tremendous growth in last few years in in its balance sheet but it is also measured
Pakistan ( www.finance.gov.pk) and many on basis of its sound customer base and life
companies are making investment in it but time value that customers deliver to
still customers are not satisfied often from company. Oliver (2000) suggest in his
services or features of their promotion study customer satisfaction is the core
offers. These companies are blue chip but philosophy of marketing strategy of any
customer loyalty is not up to mark. (Said, organization and plays a key role in an
et al., 2013) organization success. In fact customer
satisfaction is the core principle of the
Research objective modern tool of CRM being used by
 To investigate the effect of service marketers to attract and retain customers.
quality and customer satisfaction on
customer loyalty in telecommunication Lim (2010) Customers final pleasure may
sector of Pakistan have significant affect connected with
 To find out the relationship atmosphere. Bodily environment are useful
between loyalty programs and customer to produce graphic within the mind
loyalty in telecommunication sector connected with customer in order to affect
their own behavior. Bodily atmosphere
Literature review with the dining places have the significant
has an effect on for the clients pleasure.
Customer satisfaction Super, providing, routed, tunes and
Qualities of brand characteristics that are different various other atmospheric
offered by company determine the level of components included in this effect in
customer satisfaction. (Khan and Afsheen, customer satisfaction. Complete support
2012). dining places ought to give attention to 3
elements – support good quality
Customer satisfaction can be defined in (responsiveness), cost, along with meals
terms of meeting the expectations of the good quality (reliability) in the event
customers in terms of parameters customer satisfaction will be dealt with like
associated with satisfaction. (Malik & a organizing variable. Oliver (1981)
Ghaffor, 2012). According to Johan E.G. expressed in which pleasure shortly decays
Bateson; the customer mind is a complex directly into one’s total mindset
set of thoughts and ideas and cannot be “Satisfaction can be regarded as a broad
fully predictable by human being. principle; support good quality is a
component of satisfaction” (Zeithaml and
In the context of relationship marketing, Bitner, 2003). Client satisfaction is usually
customer satisfaction is the way that leads defined through Oliver’s (1997) conditions:
to long term customer retention because that it's this consumer’s fulfillment result.
un-satisfied customers have very high It's a ruling that a products or services
switching rate. (Lin & Wu, 2011) feature, or this products or services per se,
According to Zairi (2000) the feeling of comes with a pleasurable level of intake
accomplishment of inner desires is called linked fulfillment. In other words, it does
satisfaction. Customer satisfaction has not take total level of well-being that has a
direct effect on customer loyalty (Oliver, service /product knowledge.
1998; Mittal & Lassar, 1998). If product or
service fulfils the needs and demand of Full satisfaction is usually ordinarily
customer he will become satisfied and will deemed as a general affective result

307
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(11) 2013: 306-314

resulting from the application of some sort within corporeality can be an ought to part
of products or services (Oliver 1981). of it (Kotler & Keller, 2006). Through
acknowledged the necessity associated
Kottler (2000), fulfillment is related to with methods associated with program
encounters or even functions which have excellent quite a few scientists most often
been delivered because of your service or make use of program excellent in order to
product. Firms have to emphasis and also measure customer satisfaction Zeithaml
boost the level of customer satisfaction. (1985).
The greater the client fulfillment, the
greater your storage. The researcher found that greater you give
service as per customer requirement or
There is positive romantic relationship need, greater will be the level of
between fulfillment and also devotion. satisfaction and vice versa. Analysts
Szymanski and Henard (2001), inside their described the direct positive relationship of
meta-analysis, reveal 15 positive and also service quality with customer satisfaction.
major correlations between 2 constructs. (Parasuraman et al., 1988).
Bearden and Teel (1983) in addition have Athanassopoulos, (2000) identified
granted a new romantic relationship development, responsiveness, price, and
between fulfillment and also devotion. program excellence as centre measurement
associated with customers’ satisfaction.
In addition, using the transaction-specific
product, most of us reveal which the Service quality is not an easy task to
merchandise providing for your complete quantify and being evaluated, because it is
program restaurant industry should be not a product to quantify but it is
known as a mix of program and also customer’s evaluation and subjective
merchandise functions. Therefore, clients perception about something. Takeuchi
will take into account these issues with deal (1983) quality is such an important
for example merchandise characteristics (e. characteristic or feature of something that
g. food excellent and also restaurant make some differentiation in your product
ambience), program attributes (e. g. and stands you remarkable in terms of
responsiveness of the representative), and competitive advantage. Service quality is
also price so you can get an overall evaluated when the user of service compare
fulfillment from restaurant. The Theoretical his perception with actual experience.
frame function as well as the worried ideas Gronroos (1984): Satisfaction is wide
are shown yearly part, and also chapters concept and is impacted by many factors
upon research process, your analyses, final and service quality is one of the major
results, and also conversation can also be determinants of customer satisfaction
incorporated. (Zeithaml and Bitner, 2003). Bitner and
Hubbert (1994) give two options of
Service quality explaining the phenomena: satisfaction as
Gronroos (1984): Satisfaction is wide result of some particular experience or
concept and is impacted by many factors event combined effect of satisfaction.
and service quality is one of the major
determinants of customer satisfaction SERVQUAL product supplies a beneficial
(Zeithaml and Bitner, 2003). Ozcelik way to be associated with computing
(1988): Top quality includes 2 main program excellent produced by PZB within
factors: (1) the merchandise fulfils wants or 1988, as outlined by this product
even (2) around that levels it truly is free customers’ awareness and also
from insufficiencies (Juran, 1988). Service anticipations starting upon all 5
is kind of performance that's proposed by 1 measurements: tangibles (Actual
get together to an alternative and also environment or even design), reliability

308
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(11) 2013: 306-314

(Product quality), responsiveness (Service Loyalty programs


quality), assurance and also sympathy. Loyalty programs are also helpful in
Determined by aspects associated with developing the barriers which make
SERVQUAL product exact same final customers committed to the particular
results are already put on restaurant product or service .These barriers are
industry through Stevens (1995) and also further classified as psychological,
he or she created DINESERV from economical, sociological, and relational
SERVQUAL. Inside the restaurant barriers, because of which customers can
industry, only an element of providing can either lose or strengthen their confidence
be a program and it's also intangible and and loyalty with the organization (Morgan
also generation and also utilization of and Hunt, 1994). Loyalty programs are
merchandise have become significantly considered useful because of many factors;
within close up affiliation. Furthermore like these are powerful source of positive
customer wish wide variety and also self publicity or word of mouth and create good
assortment plus they evaluate one’s image of organization in the public. Loyal
providing along with some others when customers are fewer prices conscious so the
they have got clusters associated with marketing cost on these customers is also
eating places inside their thoughts because less (Dowling and Uncles, 1997). Loyalty
of reference point teams (Neal, 1999). programs also boost annual increase in
purchase to a firm for a substantial
Authentic measurements associated with proportion of customers (Lewis, 2004).
SERVQUAL don't need to be incorporated. Perceived values and customer loyalty are
Inside the restaurant industry, customer’s in relation to each other. To gain and
chance just isn't a lot of large because of sustain the customer loyalty, loyalty
the purchase price, the results of the programs are to be launched because they
program, as well as the alternatives play their role in shaping behaviour of
available. Hence assurance just isn't consumer about the product or service
because significant within this industry. In (Ramaseshan et al., 2008). Generally, the
the same manner, sympathy is outlined goal of these programs is to establish a
within the SERVQUAL materials because higher level of customer retention in
particular person consideration and also profitable segments by providing increased
attention that's inclined to each customer. satisfaction and value to certain customers.
This sizing is a lot more applicable in order
to companies where “relationship Customer loyalty
marketing” instead of “transaction Customer Loyalty is the overall behaviour
marketing” is vital on the business. of customer regarding product, service or
However trustworthiness and also any other aspect of the organization in
responsiveness operating industry just like which customer is involved makes the term
restaurant can be a lot more much better. customer loyalty (Oliver, 1999). Customer
Responsiveness, as defined by the loyalty is special kind of customer behavior
SERVQUAL literature, is identified as the towards the organization. It is kind of
willingness of the staff to be helpful and to future prediction about the intentions of the
provide prompt service to the customer. In customer to do business with the firm.
full service restaurants, customers expect (Zeithaml et al., 1996). It is the overall
the servers to understand their needs and behavior of customer regarding product,
address them in a timely manner. SO, the service or any other aspect of the
quality of service includes many factors organization in which customer is involved
and responsiveness is among one of those makes the term customer loyalty (Oliver,
factors which satisfy the customer on 1999). Loyalty is generally explained in
dimension of service quality terms of attitude and behavior (Uncles et
al., 2003). Customer brand loyalty is an old

309
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(11) 2013: 306-314

term playing vital role for many years. (Alfansi et al., 2010). There is no tool to
Loyalty is a marketing strategy used by measure the perceived value therefore its
majority of marketers to enhance the profit role in purchasing decision is not that
but some people think that it is very tough evident. Results say that perceived value
to make it possible. Consumer faith can be should be measured on non-monetary
recognized if marketers try to understand scale. It can be seen that perceived value is
the facts which affect the loyalty. This will among some strong elements of customer
also benefit in building the customer loyalty that can't be measured but can't be
reliability (Mao, 2010). It was observed neglected as well because they are attached
that customer’s services play an important to emotions and the feelings that only a
role in increasing the customer loyalty and consumer can see during purchasing.
customers highly consider the price of Convenience, time and effort are non-
these services (Haroon, 2010). Customers monetary costs. (Li et al., 2010) Moreover,
loyalty based behaviours are dependent on customer loyalty plays a pivotal role in
numerous factors. If firms want to optimize organizational success. Organizations
the loyalty behaviours of customer, they should hold the point that customer’s
must balance and manage different aspects feelings and their needs should be the top
of customer experience (Gopalkrishnan et priority in order to achieve customer
al., 2011). loyalty (Akhter et al., 2011).

It is also observed that service failures Theoretical frame work:


significantly influence the complaint The aim of this study is to find the
behaviour, and complaint behaviours in relationship between service quality,
return influence the switching behaviour customer satisfaction and loyalty programs
and switching behaviours and service with the level of customer loyalty. Below is
failures then influence the brand trust and the proposed model clearly identifying
brand trust influences the customer loyalty variables?

Service quality

Customer
Customer Loyalty
satisfaction

Loyalty
Programs

Research hypothesis
H1: There is a positive relationship H3: There is a positive relationship
between service quality and customer’s between loyalty programs and customer’s
loyalty in telecommunication sector of loyalty in telecommunication sector of
Pakistan. Pakistan.

H2: There is a positive relationship H4: There is a positive and significant


between customer satisfaction and impact of service quality, customer
customer’s loyalty in telecommunication satisfaction and loyalty programs on
sector of Pakistan.

310
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(11) 2013: 306-314

customer’s loyalty in telecommunication Variable Chron bach


N of items
sector of Pakistan. alpha
service
0.750 13
Methodology or research design quality
Customer
0.55 3
The study is descriptive in nature and data Satisfaction
was collected from users of different Loyalty
0.59 5
telecom service provider companies in programs
selected area of Okara and Jhang districts Customer
0.60 3
of Punjab. A structured questionnaire was Loyalty
designed (given in Annexure at the end) for
this purpose covering all facets of the Interpretation
variables of study in form of respondents As the value of chron bach alphas above
response on given questionnaire. The 0.5 for all scale variables so the data
questions on dimension of variables of collected from respondents from selected
study were not fully adopted from single regions in Okara city and Jhang is reliable
source but they were mostly developed by and consistent with the scale.
own by studying different researches on
topic. Moreover idea of few questions was Descriptive statistics
adopted from Siddiqi (2011) and Mohsan N Mean
et al. (2011). The scale used was Five point Service quality 132 3.6521
Lickert scale. The questionnaire was
distributed among 150 users (students, Customer
132 3.8207
bankers, teachers, business persons etc) out Satisfaction
of which 132 forms were collected in Loyalty programs 132 3.7167
complete and correct manner. This data Customer Loyalty 132 3.7222
was then analyzed statistically by using
Valid N (listwise) 132
SPSS-16 version. The reliability of
instrument was checked by finding value of
chron bach alpha for each variable. Interpretation
The values of Mean for three independent
Data Analysis Section variables and one dependent variable are
To check the reliability of instrument we almost near to each other, so all
made reliability analysis and find out the independent variables have significant
value of chron bach alpha for each relationship with the dependent variable.
individual variable in SPSS.
Correlation analysis

Table 1: Reliability analysis


Service Customer Loyalty Customer
quality satisfaction programs loyalty
Pearson
.518 .453 .362** 1
Customer Correlation
loyalty Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .006 .002
N 132 132 132 132
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

311
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(11) 2013: 306-314

Interpretation When we find the relationship between one


The results of table shows there is highly dependent variable and one or more
positive correlation b/w service quality and independent variables we go for regression
Customer loyalty as well as with customer analysis. Correlations only find association
satisfaction but there is medium correlation between variables but regression measures
with loyalty program as ( r= 0.362). All how much there are variation in dependent
variables are significant at 1% level of variable due to change in one or more
significance. independent variables. When there are two
or more independent variables in study we
Multiple regression analysis go for multiple regressions.

Standardized Coefficients
Model t Sig.
Beta
(Constant) 1..630 .050
Service quality .354 5.351 .004
Customer satisfaction .149 2. 898 .021
Loyalty programs .137 4.646 .009

Interpretation Secondly, the study also gives insight into


The values of Beta (Standardized comparative analysis of customer loyalty
coefficient) shows that service quality has among different companies and it is also
much positive impact on customer future implication of the study.
satisfaction with (B: 0.354), customer
satisfaction has 2nd largest importance as References
(B; 0. 149) and Loyalty programs has
medium relationship as (B: 0.137). It means Akhter, W., Abbasi, A. S., Ali, I., & Afzal,
by one unit increase in service quality, H. (2011). Factors affecting customer
customer satisfaction & loyalty programs loyalty in Pakistan. African Journal
cause an increase in customer loyalty. of Business Management, 5(4), 1167-
Moreover value of t for all variables is 1174.
greater than 2 and p value is less than 0.05, Alfansi, L., Nanere, M., Atmaja, F. T., & D
so null hypothesis will be rejected for the Souza, C. (2010). Empirical evidence
said variables. on the antecedences of customer
loyalty. Proceedings of ANZMAC,
Conclusion and recommendation 1-10.
Alfansi, L., Nanere, M., Atmaja, F. T., & D
This study is resulted in two dimensions; Souza, C. (2010). Empirical evidence
one is helpful for companies to discover the on the antecedences of customer
variables of importance for customers of loyalty. ANZMAC, 1-10
telecommunication. Customers give more Athanassopoulos, A. D. (2000). Customer
importance to service quality in telecom Satisfaction Cues To Support Market
service sector. Similarly customer Segmentation and Explain Switching
satisfaction and loyalty programs also have Behavior. Journal of Business
significant impact on customer loyalty, but Research, 47(3), 191–207.
in telecom sector in Punjab particularly, Ayse Ozfer Ozcelik, L. S. A. M. S. S.
customer have little attention toward loyalty (2007). An Evaluation of Fast-Food
programs as all companies are giving Preferences According to Gender.
almost similar programs, the point of Humanity & Social Sciences Journal,
differentiation lies in service quality. 2(1), 43-50.

312
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(11) 2013: 306-314

Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Li, M., & Green, D. R. (2010). A mediating
Selected determinants of consumer influence on customer loyalty: The
satisfaction and complaints reports. role of perceived value. Journal of
Journal of Marketing Research, 20, Management and Marketing
21-28. Research, 1-12.
Bitner, M. J. (1992). Service scapes the Lim, H. (12-1-2010). Understanding
impact of physical surroundings on American customer perceptions on
customers and employees. Journal of Japanese food and services in the U.
Marketing, 56, 57-71. S. UNLV
Bitner, M. J., & Hubbert, A. R. (1994). Theses/Dissertations/Professional
Encounter satisfaction versus overall Papers/Capstones.
satisfaction versus quality. In Rust, Mao, J. (2010). Customer Brand Loyalty.
R. T. and Oliver, R. L. (Eds), Service International Journal of Business and
Quality: New Directions in Theory Managemen, 5(7), 213-217.
and Practice, Sage. Thousand Oaks, Mittal, Banwari., & Walfried M. Lassar
CA, pp. 76-77. (1998). Why do customers Switch?
Chang, S. C., & Chou, C. M. (2011). The Dynamics of Satisfaction versus
Factors affecting user's online Loyalty. Journal of Services
shopping behavior. African Journal Marketing, 12(3), 177-194.
of Business Management, 52, 370- Morgan, R., & S. Hunt (1994). The
382. commitment trust theory of
Dowling, Grahame, R., & Uncles, M. relationship marketing. J. Market,
(1997). Do customer loyalty 58, 20-38.
programs really work? Sloan Morgan, Robert, M., & Shelby, D. H.
Management Review, 38, 71–82. (1994). The commitment-trust theory
Gronroos. (1984). A service quality model of relationship marketing. Journal of
and its marketing implications. Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Mohsan, F., Nawaz, M. M., Khan, S. M.,
Science, 24, 36–44. Shaukat, Z., & Aslam, N. (2011).
Haroon, M. (2010). The impact of customer Impact of customer satisfaction on
service and product value on customer loyalty and intentions to
customer loyalty and purchase switch: Evidence from banking
behavior at Pakistan. Iqra University sector of Pakistan. International
ICBT-2010. Journal of Business and Social
Haroon, M. (2010). The impact of customer Science, 3(2), 1982-1991.
service and product value on Neal, W. D. (1999). Satisfaction is nice, but
customer loyalty and purchase value drives loyalty. Marketing
behavior at Pakistan. Iqra University Research, 11(1), 20-3.
ICBT-2010. Oliver, Richard L. (1999). Whence
Juran, J. M. (1988). Juran’s quality control Consumer Loyalty. Journal of
handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, Marketing, 63, 33-44.
NY. Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management. evaluation of satisfaction process in
10th ed., New Jersey, Prentice-Hall. retail settings. Journal of Retailing,
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). 57, 25-48.
Marketing Management (pp. 402). Oliver, R. L. (1987). An investigation of the
New Delhi, India: Prentice-Hall. interrelationship between consumer
Lewis, M. (2004). The influence of loyalty dissatisfaction and complaining
programs and short-term promotions reports. In Wallendorf, M. and
on customer retention. Journal of Anderson, P. (Eds),
Marketing Research, 41(3), 281-292.

313
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(11) 2013: 306-314

Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction A Restaurant Administration


Behavioral Perspective on the Quarterly, 36(2), 56-60.
Consumer. McGraw-Hill, New York, Siddiqi, K. O. (2011). Interrelations
NY. between Service Quality Attributes,
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. Customer Satisfaction and Customer
(1988). SERVQUAL a multiple-item Loyalty in the. International Journal
scale for measuring consumer of Business and Management, 6(3),
perceptions of service quality. 21-22.
Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-37. Takeuchi, H. A. J. A. Q. (1983 July-
Prof Gopalkrishnan, J., Dr. Mishra, B. B., August). Quality Is More Than
Dr. Gupta, V. K., & Prof. Vetrivel, Making a Good Product. Harvard
A. (2011). The impact of service Business Review, 61, 139-145.
quality and customer satisfaction on Uncles, D. M., Dowling, R. G., Hammond,
customer retention in the Indian K. (2003). Customer loyalty and
banking industry: An empirical customer loyalty programs. Journal
analysis. Research Journal of Social of Consumer Marketing, 20(4), 294-
Science and Management, 1(3), 52- 316.
68. V. A. Zeithaml., L. L. Berry., & A.
Ramaseshan, B., Evanschitzky, H., & Parasuraman (1996). The Behavioral
Johnston, M. (2008). Mediating Consequences of Service Quality.
effect of program loyalty on the Journal of Marketing, 60, 31-46.
relationships between value Zairi, M. (2000). Managing Customer
perception and relationship Dissatisfaction through Effective
investment on customer loyalty. Complaint Management Systems.
ANZMAC. The TQM Magazine, 12(5), 331-335.
Rust, Roland T., & Richard L. Oliver. Zeithaml, V., & Bitner, M. J. (2003).
(2000). Should We Delight the Services Marketing, 3rd ed.,
Customer. Journal of the Academy of McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston, MA.
Marketing Science, 28, 86-94. Zeithaml, P. A. (1985). A conceptual model
Stevens, P. (1995). DINESERV a tool for of service quality and its implication
measuring service quality in for future research. Journal of
restaurants. Cornell Hotel & Marketing Research, 49, 41-50.

314
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.

You might also like