Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Institute for Materials Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234
(June 1, 1966)
The solubility isoth erm for CaHP0 4 • 2H,O (DCPD) in the three-component system Ca(OH),
- H3 P0 4 - H,O was determined in the pH range 3.5 to 6.8 by leaching a thermostated column of DCPD
with dilute phosphoric acid solutions. In confirmatory experiments, equilibrium was approached both
from s uper- and under-saturation by shakin g DCPD with appropriate solutions. The calcu lated ioni c
activity product (Ca + +) X (HPO ,), appeared to be a parabolic function of pH with a minimum near pH
5.0. The pH dependence of the ionic product could be accounted for by co nsid er in g th e ion pairs
[CaHP0 4 ] O and [CaH,P0 4 ]+ as sem i-empirical parameters, Under the co ndition of saturation with
respect to DCPO , the activity of the pair [CaHPO,]O mu st be a consta nt. The act iv ity of th e species
[CaH,PO,] + was shown to vary direc tl y with hydrogen ion activity. Th e activiti es of the two ion pairs
were adjusted to give a set of pH-independen t ionic activit y produ cts with a mean of 2.19 ± 0.011 X 10 - '.
The stabilit y consta nts for [CaHP04]0 a nd [CaH,PO,] + are 5.88 ± 0.031 X 10' and 7.49 ± 0.039, respec-
tively. Experiments were condu cted to study the hydrolysis of DCPD to more basic calcium phos-
phates and the kin etics of these transformations is discussed. Th e significance of the ion pairs in
hum an se rum is co nsidered.
Key Words : Solubilit y of calcium monohydroge n ph osp hate dihydrate at 37.5 °C, calcium-
ph os phate ion-pairs, solubility of di calcium phosphate dih ydrate , so lubilit y of dibasic
ca lc ium phosphate dihydrate .
3. Calculations
3.1. Apparent Solubility Product Constants, K ;p
FIGURE 1. Leaching apparatus. The ionic strength, j.L , is defined in these calc ulations
546
by' The activity of HPO;, (HPO;), was calculated from
(3)
The solubility product calculated in this way was found
to be dependent on concentration and is referred to
here as the "apparent" solubility product. A more
(4) nearly constant value, K sp , was obtained by allowing
for the presence of the ion pairs , [CaHP0 4]O and
In eqs (2), (3), and (4), (H +) and M re present the [CaH 2 P0 4 ]+ as described below.
hydrogen ion activity and th e molar co nce ntration of
calcium, res pec tively, Kl and K~ are the first and sec- 3.2. Stability Constants
ond dissociation co ns tants for phosphori c acid , and
I' and f" are th e molar ac tivity coefficients for the The several stability and ionization constants co n-
species H 2 PO ; and HPO :, res pec tively. The nu- sidered in this paper are defin ed as th e equilibrium
meri cal values for Kl and K~ use<;l here were 6.53 X 10- 3 co nstants of th e followin g reactions in solution:
[14] and 6.57 X 10 - 8 , res pectively. The value of K~
at 37.5 °C was interpolated by means of the e quation (a) Associative reac tion s (stability co nstants)
derived from a portion (0- 45 °C) of th e ex perim ental (b) Di ssociative reaction s (ionization co nstants)
data of Bates and Acree [15] .
Equation s (1), (2), (3), and (4) are co nsis te nt with the (10)
assumptions that the only ionic phos phate s pecies
prese nt in significant con centration s are H 2 P0 4" and (11)
. HP0 4' and that the contribution of hydroxyl ion to th e
ionic s trength is negligible in co mpari so n with that of For sys te ms saturated with res pect to DCPD, the
the other ioni c species present. Th ese assumptions co nce ntration of the unc harged s pecies [CaHP0 4]O,
are justifiable in the pH range of the pres e nt investiga- Xc, is give n by
tion. .
An approximate ionic s tre ngth was obtained by the
use of eqs (1) to (4) assuming unitary values for I' and
f", improved ionic activity coefficients, J;, were the n
calculated from the extension of the Debye-Hiickel in which (Ca++ ) is the activity of ionic calcium and
limiting law , K sp is the activity product (Ca++ )(HPO;). Therefore,
XO is constant, assuming, as customary, that the ac-
tivity coefficient, j~o , of an uncharged species in a
(5) dilute electrolyte solution is unity. The activity,
(Y+), of the charged species [CaH 2 P0 4 ]+ is given by
547
solution "a" by the equation and the solubility product constant, Ksp, is given by
a..
~
0 5
0
In eqs (15) to (19), T is the total concentration of cal- Q
'0 "-
cium (or phosphorus) in ion pairs, [Ca++ ] is the concen- III
;).
/-t = P [II -~ G
(311) + (€PIA) (1- ~ (311) FIGURE 2.
pH
548
"9 TABLE 3. End·over-end equilibrations
~~3.0
So lu tio n composition
(/):-S 2 .9 Initi a l so lid CO ll cc n lra - Equilibra tio n
1-0 pha ses lio n of tim e- hou rs
Ow 1-1 ,1'0, p I-! Ca. M x If)' P , M X 1f)'
::::J I- 2.8
00
~~ 2.7 M x 10'
0..0::
>- 8 2.6
I- ~ DCPD + OCP 0.0 1 264 5.98., 19.8" 34.9 ,
~::'o. 2.5 DCI'D OCI' .1 288 5.65" 28. 1.; 52.7 ,
aL ~ DCI'D .0 1 5 7.42, 7.20 8.24
::::J:-S 2.4 DCI'D .01 24 5.88, 20.2, 37.9.
6~
(/) w 2.3
DCI'D
DCI'D
.01
.0 1
48
240
5.80,
5.55,
22.7,
30.5,
42.6,
58.4 ,
0:: DCI'D .0 1 960 5.28 , 43.2 , 84.8 ,
if 2.2 DCI'D 0.5 192 5. 13, 5 1.4" 99.9,
0.. DCI'D 5.0 192 3.57, 4 73., 963,l/
<l 2. I ~,..-f.".--;;7-+';--<'7-7';;--T.'---7';
3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6 .0 6 .5 7 .0
pH
two of the systems, the last two e ntries in table 3,
showed congruent dissolution. These contained only
FIGURE 3. So lubility product constants (apparent and DCPD and were equilibrated with 5.00 X 10- 3 M and
co rrected) and percent P in ion pairs plotted against
pH. 5.00 X 1,o- 2M phosphoric acid, respectively. The
Ca lc ul ated e rrors, based on a nalytical unce rtainties, are shown for each co mpositions of these two solutions are the only ones
point .
that are essentially the same as those obtained in th e
corresponding leaching experiments, table 1.
TABLE 2. Ionic st rengths and concentrations and stability cons tants
In the OCP-free syste m s eq uilibrated with 1.00
of ion pairs a X 10- 4 M phosphoric acid, table 3, a more basic phos-
phate precipitated as evide n ced by the c hanges in co m-
Syst e m
No.
p. X 10' TX I04 f3 Y+ X If)' K; X 10- 2
K: position with lime. The rate of this precipitation was
relatively fast at the beginnin g and then decreased.
The two sys te ms co ntai nin g both DCPD and O CP,
I 0.300 1.34 , 0.1 34 0.0475 6.00, 7.64,
2 .408 1.42 • . 104 .133, 5.80" 7.39, table 3, were included with th e hope of obtainin g th e
3
4
.4 10
1.5 10
1.42,
3.W,
. 102
.066
. 136,
2.20,
5.80,
5.79,
7.39,
7. 38,
sin gular point for the two salts (i.e., the solution which
5 2.94, 8.95, .085 7.65, 6.00. 7. 64" would be in equilibrium with both salts). The lack
6 5.57, 24.5, . 120 23.2, 5.89, 7.5 1"
7 5.46, 24.0, .124 22.7, 5.92, 7.55 , of agreeme nt in the final co mpositi on of the two solu-
S 12.6n 92.9" . 192 91.6" 5.83.; 7.43 1 ti o ns indi cates tha t at least one of them did not remain
S. D. " 0.09 0. 11 a t the sin gular point co mpos itio n. Hydrolysis of OCP
Avg. 5.88 ± 0 .03, 7.49 ± 0.03"
C
to a more basic phosphate , presumably hydroxyapatite,
a Va lu es in tabl e ca lc ul a ted for th e fin al sc i X O = 1.293 X 10- 4 a nd Y; = 0.0475 X 10- 4 M
would account for thi s res ult.
h Sta nd ard de via tio n.
Th e initial and final compositi ons in the experim e nt
C Averages given with th e s tandard e rror of th e mean.
~
equilibrium with 1.00 X 10 - 4 M acid failed be~ause a pH above the value 5.984 obtained with the 1.00
considerable hydrolysis of DCPD was evident even at X 10- 4 M acid after 264 .hr.
flow rates 3 to 4 times higher than the rate used with The ionic product for OCP, (Ca++)4(H+)(PO~)3,
more concentrated acids. This behavior is in marked calculated for the solution with pH 5.984 (f3 = 0.08)
contrast to that at 25°C [9] which showed no evidence is 3,8 X 10- 48 . Because of the foregoing reasons , the
of hydrolysis with the same acid. solubility product of OCP at 37.5 °C must be greater
The following facts show that equilibrium was than 3.8 X 10- 48 which puts it in the neighborhood of
closely approac hed in the experiments reported here: the product reported for 25°C, 1.25 X 10- 47 [10].
(a) the plots of experimental points yielded smooth In the absence of OCP, the 1.00 X 10- 4 M acid gave
curves; (b) the end-over-end experiments (systems 8 solutions with pH values below 5.984, the value
and 9, table 3), which represent much longer equilibra- obtained in the presence of OCP; at 24 hr the pH was
tion times, gave solution compositions in agreement 5.883 and it decreased to 5.281 after 960 hr. Pre-
with those obtained in the leaching experiments; cipitation of HA lib erates acid which is not neutralized
(c) the system in which equilibrium was approached by dissolution of OCP when the latter is absent.
from supers'aturation, agreed with that in which e qui- Consequently, the pH in the time series with 1.00
librium was attained from undersaturation with the X 10- 4 M acid in the absence of OCP, decreased fairly
same acid; (d) within experimental error, a constant rapidly to approach that of the DCPD - HA singular
solubility product was obtained when corrections for point. The results suggest that the pH of the DCPD-
the presence of complexes in solution were introduced. HA singular point is below 5.281, and probably above
Dicalcium phosphate dihydrate is metastable with 5.132, the value obtained in system 8, table 3, in which
respect to anhydrous dicalcium phosphate over the no hydrolysis was detected after 192 hr.
entire range studied and with respect to OCP and HA, The hydrolysis steps outlined in the foregoing dis-
in part of the range. The material in the column was cussion are consistent with the known behavior of
examined after each experiment with the petrographic DCPD [9, 10] and of OCP [19]. The formation of
microscope. With one exception, the system in which OCP by hydrolysis of DCPD in aqueous solutions
the most concentrated acid was used, no anhydrous occurs at 25°C, but it was possible [10] to determine
dicalcium phosphate was found. The trace found the singular point for these two salts, because at 25 °C
in the one exception is believed to be too small to hydrolysis of OCP to HA is too slow to displace the
influence the corresponding point on the isotherm composition from that of the singular point.
because it is known that the rate of precipitation of
the anhydrous salt is much less than the rate of dis-
solution of DCPD [18].
5.3. Ion-Pair Formation
5.2. End-Over-End Experiments The values for the concentrations of the ion-pairs
[CaHP0 4 ], and [CaH 2 P0 4 ] +, XC and Y+, in the most
Since all the compositions shown in table 3 fall on dilute solution were selected from an array according
the DCPD isotherm (fig. 2) obtained in the leaching to the following criteria:
experiments, the rate of precipitation of more basic (a) The calculated value for Ksp cannot be highe r
calcium phosphates (such as OCP and HA) in the than the minimum value for K;p in table 1; (b) the sum
end-over-end experiments must have been signifi- of the concentrations of the ion pairs cannot be higher
cantly lower than the rate of dissolution of DCPD. than either the total Ca or P concentrations in any of
With only DCPD and OCP present as solid phases, the systems considered; (c) there must b e a minimum
the solution composition should approach the DCPD- in the fraction (7/ P) of P complexed and it should coin-
OCP singular point. The formation of HA in such a cide with the minimum in the value of K;p in figure 3;
system would cause compositions to shift toward the (d) the variance of Ksp obtained with the final values
more acid region. This would create a condition of of XO and Y,; should be an absolute minimum with
undersaturation with respect to OCP; the OCP would respect to all other possible pairs of values for these
then dissolve, leading to s upersaturation with respect parameters.
to DCPD. The dissolution of OCP and precipitation Designating value,s for XOand Y + for the most dilute
of DCPD would thus tend to maintain the pH at a solution fixes a numerical value of Ky for all the other
higher level, approaching that of the OCP- DCPD solutions because the quantities (Y + )/(H +) and XOin
singular point. Therefore, depending upon the rela- eq (13) are constants in the adopted model. This
tive rates of these three reactions, the solution com- is why the quantity KJI does not appear in table 2 along
position would be either at the DCPD-OCP singular with the calculated values for K; and K~. The value
point or somewhere on the acid side of this point. In derived for Ky is 5.16 X 10 - 6 •
agreement with these considerations, the 1.00 X 10- 3 M The value for the acid ionization constant, K y , of
acid yielded an equilibrium pH of 6.295 in the leaching the species [CaH 2 P0 4]+, 5.16 X 10- 6 , is one hundred
experiments; the same acid after 288 hr in the end-over- times the second ionization constant of phosphoric
end experiments gave a pH of 5.653. The difference acid; this ion-pair is thus a stronger acid than H2POi ,
mus t be attributed to the formation of HA. Likewise, presumably due to the proximity of the charge of th e
it is probable that the DCPD-OCP singular point has calcium ion.
550
If the reasonable assumption is made that the ratio [CaHP0 4]0; these varied from 1.01 to 9.55 X 10- 3 • As
of KylKx is of the same order of magnitude as KJIK2 in previous reports by the same author [23, 24], ionic
or K21 K:J for phosphoric acid, the value of Kx would be concentrations were used instead of activities. For
of the order of 10- 11 • This means that the activity this reason, and becaus e the procedure used in his
of the species [CaP04]- in the system with the highest calculations is not detailed , a direc t comparison of
pH would be of the order of 10- 8 M, which is negli· his res ults with those given here is not possible. His
gible relative to the activities of Ca + + and HPO 4'. average value for the instability constant, 2.77 X 10 - 3.
Therefore, ignoring the concentration of the species gives a K!; (18 °C) = 1/(2.77 X 10- 3 ) = 3.61 X 10 2 • This,
[CaP0 4 ] - in the calculations is justified. too , gives order of magnitud e agreement with the
In a previous study of the solubility of DCPD at value of K1 (37.5 °C) = 5.8S X 102 given here.
25°C [9], the possibility of complexing was not ruled Similar rough agreement is found with the result
out, but the data were treated by an empirical method of Gosselin and Coghlan [25], K'%: (25°C) = 1/1.38 X 10- 2
that gave Ksp by extrapolation to zero ionic strength. = 0.72 X 10 2 , who also used ionic concentrations in-
The 25° data are being re-evaluated in this laboratory, stead of activities in their calculations.
taking into account ion·pair formation. The negative temperature coefficient for the solu -
According to the present treatment, it appears that bility of DCPD relates to properties of both the solu-
as much as 20 percent of the calcium was ion-paired tion and the solid. For example, with an increase in
(e.g., system No.8, table 1). The model adopted for temperature the activity of water increases and it is
the treatment of the ion pairs is not exempt from un- conceivable that less water is associated with the
certainties; for example, it is impossible to ascertain calcium and phosphate ions which, then, for co m-
th e adequacy of eq (5) for calculating activity coeffi- parable concentrations, would display a higher activ-
cients. On the other hand, the variation of the solu- ity; this should result in lower solubility of DCPD as
bility product constant could not be explained simply the temperature increases. However, if the solubility
in terms of activity coefficients because (a) the ex- product, K sp , decreases as the temperature increas es,
tended Debye-Hiickel limiting law should give reason- the magnitude of the standard fre e energy of formation
ably good values for activity coefficients in solutions of DCPD must increase with temperature more rapidly
as dilute as those used here, and (b) it is unlikely that than the sum of the free ene rgies of formation of
the minimum in the value of K;p which occurs at Ca + +, HPO 4', and 2H 2 0. The solubility product of
/.L = 0.025 is related to minima in mean activity coeffi- DCPD at 25°C [9], 2.77 X 10- 1, is higher than the value,
cients whi ch are sometim es observed; such minima 2.19 x 10- 7 , at 37.5 0c. However, since no consider-
occur at concentrations much higher than those ation was given to the formation of ion pairs in solution
described here. at 25°C, a meaningful co mpari son is not possible at
pres ent.
An important application of the stability constants
relates to the formation of ion pairs in biological
5.4. Comparison With Reported Data fluids. Representative figures cited for ionic Ca++
and HPO~ activities in adult human serum, 4.7 X 10 - 4
Davies and Hoyle [20] reporten dissociation constants and 1.9 X 10- 4 M, respectively [26], give the result at
at 25°C for systems containing sodium and potassium pH = 7.4 that about five percent of the calcium or
phosphate buffers and calcium iodate. Allowing inorganic phosphorus is in the form of the ion pair
for experimental differences , the constants obtained [CaHP0 4]0. In infant serum, with Ca + + and HPO;
by Davies and Hoyle , K; (25°)=1/ .002 =5x 10 2 and activities of 4.7 X 10- 4 and 3.7 X 10- 4 , the percentage
K: (25°)= 1/. 084= 11.8, are in reasonable agreement of calcium and phosphorus in paired forms would
amount to 8 and 5, respectively. For both adults
with those given here, K; (37S) = 5.88 X 102 and K:
(37.5°)=7.49. and infants. the concentrations of the ion pairs
Bjerrum [21] ::;tudied the three component system [CaH 2 P0 4 )+ and [CaP0 4] - in serum appear to be
Ca(OHh-Hl P0 4-H 2 0 at 18°C in the pH range 6 to 8 negligible.
in the absence of solid phases. He concluded that a
model involving the ion-pair [CaHP0 4]O or any of the
ion pairs [Ca(HP0 4 h)2 -, [Ca(HP04)(P04 )P - , or
6 . References
[Ca(p04h]4 - , would fit his data. Models involving
[CaHP0 4]0 alone or in combination with any of the [1] S. W. Leumg and A. Tovborg-lensen, Intern. Dental 1. 8,613
above ion pairs with Cal P ratios of 1/2 gave variable (1958).
Ksp values when used with the present data. The [2] G. Chihara, N. Kurosawa, and E. Takasaki, Chern. and Pharm.
only model giving reasonably constant Ksp values was Bull (Tokyo) 7, 622 (1959).
[3] W. F. Neuman and M. W. Neuman, Th e Chemical Dynamics
the one with the ion pairs [CaHP0 4 ]0 and [CaH 2 P0 4 )+. of Bone Mineral, p. 169 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago,
It is believed that the condition of saturation with III. , 1958).
respect to DCPD, which demands a constant activity [4] 1. A. Gray and M. D. Francis, Physical Chemi stry of Enamel
I
for the species [CaHP0 4]0, is more determinative Dissolution. In Mechanisms of Hard Tissue Des tru c tion,
R. F. Sognnaes, ed., p. 213 (AAAS, Washington, D.C., 1963).
than the conditions used by Bjerrum. [5] N. Bjerrum, Selected papers, p. 245 (Copenhagen, De nmark,
More recently, Greenwald [22] used Bjerrum's data 1949).
to calculate values for the instability constant of [6] Tennessee Valley Authority, Chern. Eng. Rept. No.8, (1950).
551
[7] M. J. Shear and B. Kramer, J. BioI. Chern. 79,125 (1928). [17] J. Kielland, J . Am. Chern. Soc. 59, 1675 (1937).
[8] B. S. Strates, W. F. Neuman, and C. J. Levinskas, J. Phys. [18] W. E. Brown and J. R. Lehr, Soil Sci. Am. Proc. 23,7 (1959).
Chern. 61, 279 (1957). [19] W. E. Brown, J. P. Smith, J. R. Lehr, and A. W. Frazier, Nature
[9] E. C. Moreno, W. E. Brown, and C. Osborn, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 196, 1050 (1962).
Proc. 24, 94 (1960). [20] C. W. Davies and B. E. Hoyle, J. Chern. Soc. 4134 (1953).
[10] E. C. Moreno, W. E. Brown, and G. Osborn, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. [21] N. Bjerrum, Mat. Fys . Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk, 31 , 69 (1958).
Proc. 24, 99 (1960). [22] I. Greenwald, J. Phys. Chern. 67,2853 (1963).
[11] R. G. Bates, J. Res. NBS 66A Whys. and Chern.) No.2 , 179 [23] I. Greenwald, J. BioI. Che rn. 161,697 (1945).
(1962). [24] I. Greenwald, J. Redish, and A. C. Kilbrick, J. BioI. Chern. 135,
[12] D. K. Banerjee, C. C. Budke, and F. D. Miller, Anal. Chern. 33, 65 (1940).
418 (1961). [25] R. E. Gosselin and E. R. Coghlan, Arch. Biochem. and Biophys.
[13] J. A. Brabson, R. L. Dunn, E. A. Epps , Jr., W. M, Hoffman, and 45,301 (1953).
K. D. Jacob, J. A.O.A.C. 41, 517 (1958). [26J Ref. 3, pp. 17 and 21.
[14] L. F. Nims, J. Am. Chern. Soc. 56, 1110 (1934).
[15] Ii.. G. Bates and S. F. Acree, J. Res. NBS 30, 129 (1943) RP1524.
[16] G. G. Manov , R. G. Bates, W. J. Hamer, and S. F. Acree, J. Am.
Chern. Soc. 65, 1765 (1943). (Paper 70A6-426)
1j
552