(Give the brochures first)

Greetings

Me: No excuse for animal abuse

Mai: speak for the ones without a voice

C: we stan for animal rights

All: animal rights, not wrongs

M: what is an animal right?

Animal rights is the idea in which some, or all, non-human animals are entitled to the possession of
their own existence and that their most basic interests—such as the need to avoid suffering—should
be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings.
Animals don’t totally have legal rights, they most certainly must be granted legal considerations. ...
Ananimal does not have the same legal rights as a human but legal duties and considerations
must nonetheless be emphasized.

C: Why should animals have rights? What rights should animals have?
The reason that people have rights is to prevent unjust suffering. In our beautiful
world, surely animals have the right to live a life free of pain and suffering. Just because us humans are
at the top of the food chain, it doesn’t mean we are the only ones with rights. All living things make up a
balanced ecosystem and within this system all things have their rightful place and earn the necessary
consideration and respect for that place and balance. Animals are sentient beings! They do not have a
voice, us humans need to protect them and give them a voice and this is where the concept of animal
rights is rooted.

D: But the real questions is, do humans aware of it?

Unfortunately , humans ignore this kind of issue.

There is much disagreement as to whether non-human animals have rights, and

what is meant by animal rights.

For example: if animals have a right not to be bred and killed for fun then animals
must not be bred and killed for fun.

Accepting the doctrine of animal rights means:

 No experiments on animals
 No breeding and killing animals for clothes or medicine
M:
 No use of animals for hard labour
 No selective breeding for any reason other than the benefit of the animal
 C:
 No hunting
 No zoos or use of animals in entertainment
M: yes u heard it right! No zoos or use of animals in entairtainment (PRESENT PICTURES WHILE NAG
TALK)

Not all animal rights activists love animals. Some respect them because they
understand animals have a place in the world. Zoos, especially the ones that are
doing everything right, present a special challenge to the animal-loving advocates
because they would like to see and interact with the animals.
The issue here is not on how well they protect the animal but did they give rights
to animals! Here are some of many reasons why animals should not be in zoo.

Arguments Against Zoos

 From an animal rights standpoint, we do not have a right to breed, capture
and confine other animals, even if they are endangered. Being a member of
an endangered species doesn't mean the individual animals have fewer
rights.
 Animals in captivity suffer from stress, boredom, and confinement.
Intergenerational bonds are broken when individuals get sold or traded to
other zoos, and no pen or even drive-through safari can compare to the
freedom of the wild.
 Baby animals bring in visitors and money, but this incentive to breed new
baby animals leads to overpopulation. Surplus animals are sold not only to
other zoos, but also to circuses, canned hunting facilities, and even for
slaughter.
 (Not necessarily sag uhon ni bro. Pwede raka mag adlip base ani na
examples)

PRESENT PICTURES MGA UNHAPPY ANIMALS SA ZOO

C: Aside from that, animals live outside cages are also endangered. (SHOW
THEM THE PICTURES SA KANA NA CHUCHU)

The recent illegal killing of Cecil, one of Africa’s most famous lions, has
increased calls to outlaw trophy hunting. It’s also caused some in the
hunting community to reevaluate their positions on the contentious
issue, even as other hunters dig in and say killing individual animals
can help the wider population.
. At its heart, it is one that encourages the killing of rare animals, ignores science, tramples on
conservation, disregards wildlife laws, and fuels corruption and wildlife trafficking. Isn’t it ethical?
There’s an even bigger point to consider. Iconic wildlife like African lions and elephants belong to
the world and not to the elite few who see them merely as trophies to mount on their walls. We owe
it to Cecil and the thousands of other animals like him who have died at the hands of trophy hunters
to do our very best to protect them. Moreover, we owe it to ourselves. We have the power to
reshape our nation’s policies and conduct when it comes to reckless and ecologically disastrous
trophy hunting, and we should use it.
(Note: not neccesarily sd kani tanan isulti like mao lng jud ni ang thought)
(Ps: wa btaw ko khbaw unsa ako I put dri Clynt, I know naa ka idea na unsa imo isulti ari helhek)
D: And lastly, the argument of klling animals as food, isn’t it contrary to the rights of an animals)
It is an age old question – can one use animal products and eat meat as well as uphold the rights of an
animal? The answer is yes (for some, for vegetarians and vegans is is a No!)We can eat meat and still be
advocates for animal rights. Most meat eaters want animals to be treated as humanely as possible, and
many of them take part in efforts to stop animal abuse just as vegetarians do.

Animals eating animals is a fact of life and always has been—it’s the food chain at work—and
humans eating other animals is no less ethical than a lion or a shark or a venus fly trap doing
so. When Benjamin Franklin opened up a fish and saw a smaller fish inside of it, he reasoned,
“If you eat one another, I don’t see why we mayn’t eat you.”
always wonder, if everyone became vegan wouldn't all the animals of the world over
produce offspring. Chickens multiply very fast and eg.
To conclude this, nit eating meat will not totally affects the life of an animal.

(wala ko khbaw unsay endibg statement ani )

Me: No excuse for animal abuse

Mai: speak for the ones without a voice

C: we stan for animal rights

All: animal rights, not wrongs

Thnkyouuy
P