You are on page 1of 7

AS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures

 Posted in:Consolidation and Groups, IFRS Summaries, IFRS videos


 Posted by:Silvia M.

39

Let’s focus on associates, joint ventures, significant


influence and equity method today.

You have already learned various aspects of having control over some investment: how to identify
it, how to account for it and we also learned basic consolidation procedures step by step.

It was all covered by IFRS 3 Business Combinations and IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial
Statements.

Another very frequent type of investment is an associate over which an entity has significant
influence. It is all arranged by the standard IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint
Ventures, so let’s take a look.

What is the objective of IAS 28?


The objective of IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures is:

 To prescribe the accounting for investments in associates, and


 To set out the requirements for the application of the equity method when accounting for
investments in associates and joint ventures.
Let me remind you a couple of terms:

An associate is an entity over which an investor has significant influence.

A joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties having joint control of the arrangement
have rights to the net assets of the joint arrangement.

What is significant influence and how to detect it?


Standard IAS 28 defines significant influence as the power to participate in the financial and
operating policy decisions of the investee, but is NOT a control or joint control of those policies.

Sometimes, it can be quite difficult to determine whether we deal with control or significant influence
– and we can’t make a mistake, because the whole accounting treatment and reporting depends on
this classification.

How can significant influence be evidenced?


The main indicator of significant influence is holding (directly or indirectly) more than 20% of the
voting power of the investee.

BUT!

It’s not the rule of thumb and often, the truth is different.
Sometimes, when an investor holds more than 20% of the voting power (but less than 50), it can still
control the investee.

Let me show you an illustration (taken from my IFRS Kit):

Here, CarProd does not own the majority (over 50%), but it’s still more than 20% – that would
indicate significant influence.

But, as other investors own max. 1% each, the probability of outvoting CarProd in major decisions is
very low, so CarProd may in fact exercise control over TyreCorp, rather than significant influence. Of
course, you would need to examine it further.

The other ways of evidencing significant influence are as follows:

 Investor has a representation on the board of directors (or other equivalent governing body)
of the investee.
 Investor participates in policy-making processes (including dividend decisions).
 There are material transactions between the investor and its investee.
 There’s interchange of managerial personnel.
 Provision of essential technical information.
When you assess the presence of significant influence, you should not forget to examine potential
voting rights (in form of some options to buy shares, or convertible debt instruments, etc).

Apply the equity method


Once the investor acquires significant influence, or joint control of a joint venture, then it must apply
equity method.

The basic principles of equity method are:


On initial recognition:
1. The investment in an associate or joint venture is recognized at cost. The journal entry is:
o Debit investments in the statement of financial position,
o Credit cash (bank account, or whatever applies).

2. If there’s a difference between cost and investor’s share on investee’s net fair value of
identifiable assets and liabilities, then it depends, whether this difference is positive or
negative:
o When the difference is positive (cost is higher than the share on net assets), then there’s
a goodwill and you don’t recognize it separately. It is included in the cost of an
investment and NOT amortized.
o When the difference is negative (cost is lower than the share on net assets), then it’s
recognized as an income in profit or loss in the period when the investment is
acquired.
Subsequently, after the initial recognition:
1. The carrying amount of the investment is increased or decreased by the investor’s share on
investee’s net profit or loss after the acquisition date. The journal entry is:
o Debit Investment in the statement of financial position, and

o Credit Income from associate in profit or loss.

Or vice versa when an associate made loss.

When an associate or joint venture make losses and these losses exceed the carrying amount
of the investment, investor cannot bring down the carrying amount of the investment below
zero. Investor simply stops bringing in further losses.

2. When an investee distributes some dividends to the investor, then such a distribution
decreases the carrying amount of the investment. The journal entry is:
o Debit Cash (or whatever applies here) and

o Credit Investment in the statement of financial position.

Learn the equity method procedures


The procedures in equity method are very similar to consolidation procedures under the
standard IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements:

 Both investor and investee shall apply uniform accounting policies for the similar
transactions.
 The same reporting date shall be used, unless it’s impracticable.
 Investor’s share on gain or loss from mutual „upstream“ and „downstream“ transactions is
eliminated.
So here, you don’t eliminate mutual balances (receivables or payables) outstanding at the end
of the reporting period, but you eliminate just investor’s share on trading profit and similar
items.

Exemptions from applying the equity method


Investor does not need to apply the equity method in one of the following circumstances:

1. Investor is a parent that is exempt from preparing consolidated financial statements by the
scope exception of paragraph 4(a) of IFRS 10 (it’s similar as below point); OR
2. All of the following applies:

o The entity is a wholly owned subsidiary; or it’s a partially-owned subsidiary of another


entity and its other owners have been informed about and do not object to not applying
the equity method;

o The entity’s debit or equity Instruments are not traded in a public market;

o The entity did not file, nor is in the process of filing, its financial statements with a
securities commission or other body for the purpose of issuing any class of Instruments
in a public market;

o The ultimate or any intermediate parent of the entity produces consolidated financial
statements available for public use that comply with IFRS.

3. When an investment in an associate or a joint venture is held by in entity that is a venture


capital organization, mutual fund, unit trust or similar entity, then investor might opt to measure
investments at fair value through profit or loss under IFRS 9 (and thus not apply equity
method).
The same applies for the situation when an investor has an investment in an associate
a portion of which is held by these organizations.

Here, I’d like to add that when an investment meets the criteria in IFRS 5 and is classified as held
for sale, then an investor shall apply IFRS 5 to that investment and not equity method (even when it
relates to a portion of investment, then IFRS 5 is applied to that portion).

When to discontinue equity method


An investor stops applying the equity method when its investment ceases to be an associate or a
joint venture.

The way of discontinuing depends on specific circumstances, for example if the investment becomes
a subsidiary, then an investor stops equity method and starts full consolidation in line with IFRS
10/IFRS 3.
You can watch a video with the summary of IAS 28 here:

You might also like