Professional Documents
Culture Documents
690
Dr. Mo Vaziri
By: Mary Sterba
Chapter 2 Summary
The Value Manager
If the two steps above are done well the management will not need to address major
restructuring in the future but rather focus on smaller steps to reach higher levels of
performance.
EG Corporation Case:
EG Corporation is underperforming similar organizations and recent acquisitions
further deteriorated/eroded their value.
Ralph Demsky, felt that great opportunities existed for EG to boost their value.
Ralph set out to evaluate the status of the organization “as is” and causes for low
shareholder value. He investigated the value among six dimensions:
1. Current Market Value – evaluated the organization to similar companies
2. Value as is - assessed the value of each component of the EG portfolio on
the basis of projected future cash flows. Established discounted cash flow
benchmarks to comparison purposes. Results were disturbing so they set
out to see what the results would be if the performance estimates in the
current business plans were hit. Again, the results would be too low.
3. Value with internal improvements – Reviewed what each business might
be worth under more aggressive plans and strategies. Also reviewed what
would happen if each business improved its performance. Results showed
that it was reasonable to assume that some of EG’s businesses could be
made to perform at higher levels. The team determined that the potential
internal value of EG’s businesses was at least $3.6 billion, 50% above its
current market value.
4. Value with internal improvements and disposals – Reviewed the
businesses under four scenarios: sale to a strategic buyer; a floatation or
spin-off; leveraged buyout by managers or a third party; and liquidation.
5. Value with growth, internal improvements and disposals – long-term
growth was known to be imperative. They were willing to wait until after
the restructuring before acting on long-term growth.
6. Total potential value – took a look at ways to take advantage of the tax
advantages of debt financing. It was determined that the company could
take on more debt which would provide a more tax-efficient capital
structure and create about $200 million in present value to EG’s
shareholders.
Ralph determined that shareholder value should be derived from cash flow returns. EG
had been taking the cash flow created by Consumerco and re-investing it in businesses
that were not generating adequate returns to shareholders.
Long term, Ralph needed to develop a plan for sustaining EG’s advantage in the market
for corporate control. In order to do this Ralph needed to understand the company’s
skills and assets and in which businesses they would be most valuable. The value of
these skills needed to be identified in terms of higher margins, growth rates so that
action plans could be built around them.
Management of the business units needed to focus on what was driving the value of
their businesses- i.e.: volume growth, margins, or capital utilization. They needed to
focus on growth in value and economic returns on investments.
The measurement turned to Economic Profit (EP) which is the spread between the
return on capital and its opportunity cost times the quantity invested in capital:
EP = Invested capital x (ROIC – Opportunity cost of capital)
This measure discounts the value of future economic profit (plus the current amount of
invested capital) which would equal the discounted cash flow value (DCF). Therefore,
by maximizing EP, EG could maximize DCF.