History and Technology

An International Journal

ISSN: 0734-1512 (Print) 1477-2620 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ghat20

Nation, Knowledge, and Imagined Futures:

Science, Technology, and Nation-Building,
Post-1945

John Krige & Jessica Wang

To cite this article: John Krige & Jessica Wang (2015) Nation, Knowledge, and Imagined Futures:
Science, Technology, and Nation-Building, Post-1945, History and Technology, 31:3, 171-179, DOI:
10.1080/07341512.2015.1126022

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2015.1126022

Published online: 29 Dec 2015.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 2818

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Citing articles: 9 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at

https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ghat20
History and Technology, 2015
VOL. 31, NO. 3, 171–179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2015.1126022

INTRODUCTION

Nation, Knowledge, and Imagined Futures: Science,

Technology, and Nation-Building, Post-1945
John Krigea and Jessica Wangb
a
School of History and Sociology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA; bFaculty of Arts,
Department of History, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

With the collapse of colonial power beginning in 1945 and the emergence of new sovereign
states – by 1965 the membership of the UN had increased from 51 to 117 – the post-World
War II era affirmed the primacy of the nation-state, and bestowed legitimacy on local elites
who secured the power to govern, and on their representatives who defended their sover-
eignty in international affairs. Nation-building became a watchword of the era, not just in
terms of development efforts sponsored by cold war hegemons, but as an emblem of peoples’
own quest for self-determination, national liberation, and prosperity in whatever forms
those always-contested objectives might take. Science and technology, emerging from WWII
as major forces for destruction – and liberation – propelled their practitioners into positions
of influence, and granted them new and heady access to the corridors of power at home and
abroad. Political elites who sought to take advantage of the new opportunities created by the
changing world order to refashion the identities and trajectories of their nations turned to
the transformative potential of science and technology to fill out the contours of imagined
futures. This volume examines how this process unfolded by exploring the diverse meanings
and projects attached to science and technology in contexts tied to nation-building, state
formation, and the long-term struggles of societies to meet human hopes and needs within
the confines of the nation-state structure and a contentious international order.1
A great deal has of course been written about the engagement of science and technology
with state power after World War II. Existing accounts have tended to concentrate on the
quests for advanced weaponry, high technology, and large scientific establishments that came
to define the symbolic and literal meanings of power in the nuclear age. Cold war competi-
tion has loomed large in these histories, given the significance of atomic weapons, nuclear
reactors, rockets, and satellites as quintessential markers of security, modernity, and national
prowess. Powerful states deployed such dual-use systems both to defend the realm and as
forms of technological spectacle intended to secure allegiances in a dangerously divided and
fluid international order. More recent scholarship on development has also drawn attention
to agriculture, public health, scientific and technical aid, industrial policy, and myriad forms
of social scientific investigation as modes of endeavor tied to cold war objectives.2
This work has shed much light on the scientific and technological drivers of the global
reach of the superpowers, particularly from the U.S. side. We know less about how newly
empowered national elites, and their ‘technocratic’ collaborators and lobbyists, called upon

CONTACT  John Krige  john.krige@hsoc.gatech.edu; Jessica Wang jessica.wang@ubc.ca

This article was originally published with errors. This version has been corrected. Please see Erratum (http://dx.doi.org/
10.1080/07341512.2015.1139313).
© 2016 Taylor & Francis
172    J. Krige and J. Wang

science and technology to express their aspirations for social improvement (sometimes
understood as ‘development’). Filled with optimism about the universal potential of science
and technology to enhance the human condition, major fractions of national elites sought
to bend them to local needs in order to secure political stability, improved economic pros-
pects, and a refashioned identity in a world rent with conflicts that were simultaneously
local, national, and global.
The essays in this volume take national contexts of resistance to the imperialisms of both
colonialism and the cold war as their starting points. Nation-building took place amid the
upheaval of cold war superpower rivalry, struggles for national independence, colonial
and neocolonial assertions of power, and the search for a political third way. Throughout
the world, ideas of nationhood served to unite, integrate, and manifest diverse forms of
affiliation, organization, and competition. As Benedict Anderson so effectively articulated
in his classic treatise, for individuals and localized communities, the affective appeal of
the nation created collective bonds and new forms of identity and community across vast
geographical ranges.3 State formation also became bound up with national identity, through
the explicit efforts of state builders to conflate successfully the categories of nation and
nation-state and thereby establish the state as the key institutional entity for the realization
of national development. Moreover, relations with bordering states and broader interna-
tional circumstances shaped national claims in crucial respects, contrary to origin myths
about the organic coalescence of national feeling from the supposedly eternal ties between
peoples and places. In particular, the post-World War I settlement launched a shift in norms
away from empires and towards an international system composed of nation-states, thereby
establishing national independence as the prerequisite for recognition and participation in
international affairs.4
Post-colonial studies has drawn particularly close attention to decolonization and strug-
gles for national independence amid collapsing empires and the reconfiguration of power
structures that produced the U.S.-Soviet conflict of the cold war. But older patterns of power
also shaped the post-World War II world. Latin America, for example, has always fit uneasily
in postcolonial discourses designed for the post-1945 era, given the independence of the
region’s countries dating back to the early nineteenth century. Recent studies, however,
have called for reconceptualizing the period from the American revolution of 1775–1783
to the emergence of independent nations throughout North, Central, and South America
by the 1820s as the first post-colonial era.5 Moreover, anxieties about American imperial
power, from the American conquest and seizure of half of Mexico’s territory in the U.S.-
Mexico War of 1846–1848 to the frequent interventionism that defined U.S. policy in the
Caribbean from the late nineteenth century onwards, combined with potential reassertions
of European power in an era of high colonialism, made struggles over modernity and
nation particularly fraught throughout much of Latin America long after independence.6
In Mexico, the relationship between technoscience, modernity, and the status of the nation
has remained a perpetual conundrum, as we can see from the contributions by Gabriela
Soto Laveaga and co-authors Gisela Mateos and Edna Suárez in this volume.7 Other Latin-
American nation-states have grappled similarly with the possibilities, limitations, hidden
assumptions, and blinders involved in the appeal of technoscience as a means of claiming
modernity, promoting nationhood, and attempting to ward off imperial incursions since
the late nineteenth century, in a history that subsequently aligned the region geopolitically
with the newer postcolonialisms of other parts of the world after World War II.8
 History and Technology   173

Although the recent vogue of transnationalism has sought to diminish or even do away
with the primacy of ‘nation-ness,’ no single concept better captures or refracts the multi-
plicity of competing global processes that have shaped states and societies throughout most
of the twentieth century. As Marilyn Young has pointed out, one can decenter America in
one’s head. But that ‘does not of itself create a world free of its overwhelming military and
economic power […].’9 The same applies to the dying European empires. Indeed, the essays
in this volume underscore how the global distribution of power at the end of WWII and
afterwards was asymmetrical and lived as brutal reality by Vietnamese dying of hunger
induced by Japanese and French policy, by Micronesians suffering the transformation of
their territory into nuclear testing grounds, by Zimbabweans fighting for their freedom
from white minority rule, and by Indians modernizing their country in the shadow of
poverty-stricken millions.
The tormented entanglements of science, technology, and nationhood, as indicated by
several of the contributions here, remind us not to romanticize the liberationist claims of
national projects, even when they offered themselves as much-needed alternatives to the
abuses of imperial power. As one of us has written elsewhere, the imperial and national
projects have had more in common historically than their respective advocates have cared
to admit. Arguably, ‘nation-building and colonial rule in the late nineteenth and early twen-
tieth centuries constituted flip sides of the same coin of modernist developmentalism,’ and
as much as the nation represented an alternative to colonial rule, both forms of governance
shared the modern state’s drive to lay claim over peoples in distant locales and assert direct
authority over their lives by making their societies legible and controllable.10 Recent studies
of right-wing nationalisms in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Bolivia during the 1950s and 1960s
have also drawn attention to the forms of agency that tied authoritarian rule to localized
commitments to nation-building, and not just cold war American imperialism.11
Empires struck back with efforts to preserve colonial rule in some form well into the
1950s, and indigenous elites did not necessarily reject overtures that promised reform and
greater autonomy within imperial structures.12 The cold war further shaped a tortured
dynamic between national priorities and international pressures in both imperial metropoles
and newly independent states. Even with the most generous, high-minded intentions, there
was, of course, no ‘one best way’ to modernize, particularly within a turbulent interna-
tional environment in which diverse states and societies confronted dramatically different
political, economic, and technoscientific circumstances. As the essays in this volume show,
science and technology connoted very different needs and possibilities to the inhabitants
of the tiny Marshall Islands or to anti-colonial insurgents in Zimbabwe-in-the-making,
for example, than they did to national elites in the aspiring behemoths of China or India.
Amid widely varying settings, the terms of the engagement between science, technology,
and nation-building were sometimes set by already available knowledge that established
power structures mobilized and adapted to local conditions. At the other extreme, opposi-
tion to existing or externally imposed norms, values, and structures of power drew on local
knowledge to forge alternative visions of the future. Their realization called for the pursuit
of diverse strategies, from staking claims to sovereignty in a postwar international system
that was committed to upholding national autonomy, to bloody armed struggle when that
same system collapsed under the weight of internal contradictions. Knowledge in myriad
forms was essential to the performance of power in nation building and to the fashioning of
‘legitimate’ and legitimizing new national identities. Spectacular representations of advanced
174    J. Krige and J. Wang

technologies, sophisticated exploitation of new politico-legal sources of legitimation, every-

day but crucial practices of survival under bombardment – all will be found here, defining
a meaning of development, improvement, modernization, liberation, call it what you will,
that was built from the bottom up rather than being derived from teleological visions of
the future imposed from without.
To capture the immense variety of modes of nation-building, and the multiple registers
in which knowledge was deployed to that end, we have favored a multidisciplinary approach
to our theme. We have also sought to range widely in space and time across the postwar
globe, and to contemplate the past in ways that refine, augment, and challenge the domi-
nant historiographical view through the cold war lens. Of course, it would not do to efface
the cold war entirely: it was inscribed in weapons systems, in the transnational movement
of those who developed them, and in the bodies of those who directly experienced their
lethal production, testing and use. Cold war tropes also proliferated in fiction, in art, in
architecture. Indeed, the papers in this volume reveal a world saturated with the material
and ideological stuff of the cold war. But by adopting a pluralist approach that emphasizes
perspectives outside of the immediate exigencies of global superpower conflict, and by giv-
ing primacy of place to the construction of the nation as both a political and cultural project,
the essays presented here shed light on multiple purposes and cross-purposes at work that
generally remain invisible in U.S.-centric histories of science, technology, and international
relations.13 Our authors address novel questions about high politics, the nuclear age, and a
diverse set of ‘nuclear nationalisms’; health, the body, and the maintenance of human life
in moments of crisis, struggle, and hope; and the intersections of science, technology, and
medicine with the realm of mind and national imagination.
Essays by Zuoyue Wang and Jenny Smith set the stage with state-centered analyses that
highlight the intersections between science, technology, and projects of state management.
Wang examines the internal contradictions and political turmoil surrounding nation-build-
ing and state formation in post-revolutionary China by examining the creation in 1956 of
a long-term development plan for science and technology, while Smith’s account of famine
relief efforts in the mid-1940s captures a calculating logic of the modern state that stretched
across the ideological divides of colonial rule, military occupations by fascist or liberal
democratic states, and Soviet governance. The papers by Stuart W. Leslie, Gisela Mateos
and Edna Suárez, and Lauren Hirshberg treat nuclear matters from unusual angles – the
architectural representation of nuclear power as a bearer of modernity in India and Pakistan,
the rejection of nuclear weapons as a leadership strategy in 1960s Mexico, and the legacy of
US nuclear testing in shaping visions for national sovereignty in the Marshall Islands. The
contributions of Gabriela Soto Laveaga and Clapperton Mavhunga focus on the terrain of
human life and health as national and nation-building projects, whether in the form of for-
ward-looking visions of hospitals as symbols of national progress in mid-twentieth century
Mexico, or the innovative and syncretic medical practices that accompanied revolutionary
national struggle in Zimbabwe in the 1970s. Mavhunga’s and Hirshberg’s contributions also
underscore the centrality of local knowledge and suffering in the struggle for liberation from
external rule, be it waged by the guerilla movement in Rhodesia, or by the Marshallese in the
Pacific, and along with Smith’s essay, provide stark reminders of the violence and desolation
inflicted by statist and imperial projects in their drive to sustain legitimacy from the mid-
1940s onward. Finally, Projit Bihari Mukharji’s account of the Masud Rana spy thrillers and
popular geopolitics in East Pakistan in the late 1960s and early 1970s, along with Leslie’s
 History and Technology   175

and Soto Laveaga’s essays, move away from the material practices of power to understand
how science, technology, and medicine have provided cultural resources for tapping into
the promise of modernity and reinventing identity, space, and national belonging.
Other themes cut across the essays in this volume as well: the creative tension between
what different historical protagonists perceived as ‘tradition’ or ‘modern,’ the roles of sci-
ence and technology in nation-building beyond standard developmental accounts of large
scientific and industrial infrastructures, the dynamic between national and international,
and the necessary role of the international – as both a set of concrete political relations and
as a conceptual frame – in constructing the nation. Architects who designed nuclear power
projects in India and Pakistan, local muralists who critically celebrated new public hospitals
built by a ‘welfare state’ in Mexico, and novelists in Bangladesh who excited the fears and
fantasies of the local population all played a role in building new national identities that
mobilized all-too familiar images to fashion modernities that broke with the past even as
they recognized the importance of tradition.
Carl Becker once described the academic’s creed as the challenge to ‘think otherwise.’
We have tried to do so by taking the coupling between knowledge/power as our guiding
thread – be that in the hands of imperial overlords, nationalist leaders, or the oppressed
and disabused fighting for their freedom. Our authors have valorized that dyad by drawing
on multiple representations of it, whether in art, architecture, literature, state practices, the
practices of bush warfare, or resistance to missile testing. To combat the weight of history
requires courage and imagination. To do so in the name of ‘improvement’ is to mobilize a
potent instrument that carries asymmetry within it, that reorganizes power around a new
pole, and that has not led automatically to a more humane existence for all, notwithstanding
the ‘universal’ promise of science and technology. The diverse historical actors described in
this volume, along with the authors of these essays, exemplify these tensions. We commend
this collection to the reader for its geographical scope, for its multi-disciplinarity, and above
all for the new and important questions that it asks about the place of science, technology,
and medicine in the construction of a new world order in the decades after 1945.

Notes
Consider, for example, Abraham, The Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb; Anderson, Nucleus
1. 
and Nation; Barker, “Engineers and Political Dreams”; Gavin, Nuclear Statecraft; Krige et al.,
NASA in the World; McDougall, The Heavens and the Earth; Medhurst, “Atoms for Peace and
Nuclear Hegemony”; Osgood, Total Cold War; Phalkey, Atomic State; and Redfield, Space in
the Tropics.
2. 
On the history of development, particularly in the cold war era, and its blend of social
knowledge and high modernism, see, for example, Latham, Modernization as Ideology;
Engerman et al., Staging Growth; Connelly, Fatal Misconception; Simpson, Economists
with Guns; Cullather, The Hungry World; Ekbladh, The Great American Mission; McVety,
Enlightened Aid; Hecht, Entangled Geographies; and Wang, “Colonial Crossings.”
Anderson, Imagined Communities.
3. 
4. 
For examples of the assertion of national identities and strengthened conceptions of nation-
ness in response to threats from perceived outsiders, see Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism
since 1780, 135–6 and 138 and Winichakul, Siam Mapped, esp. chaps. 4–7. Hobsbawm,
136–8 notes the impact of the Versailles treaty in encouraging the nationalist claims of anti-
colonial movements post-WWI, and the ironies involved in multiple nationalist claims that
reflected imperialist divisions of territory. Consider also Timothy Mitchell’s observation about
international organizations’ demands for economic statistics, particularly after World War I,
176    J. Krige and J. Wang

and their power to turn statistical self-representation into a new national norm. Mitchell, Rule
of Experts, 100–01. Recent studies of social knowledge in China also underscore the extent to
which the nationalism of Chinese elites from the late nineteenth century to the Republican
period drew upon colonial power and foreign claims that associated modernity with medical
and statistical knowledge. Lam, A Passion for Facts and Rogaski, Hygienic Modernity.
5.  On the risks and pitfalls of postcolonialism as a frame for understanding the history of
technoscience in Latin America, as well as the limitations of the concept of “Latin America”
itself, see Medina et al., “Introduction” to Beyond Imported Magic. On recent efforts at
reframing, in which the United States figures as the first post-colonial nation, see, for example,
Yokota, Unbecoming British and Saler, The Settler’s Empire.
6.  For example, from 1900 onward, writer José Enrique Rodó’s famous essay, Ariel, crystallized
anxieties about modernity, civilization, and identity for intellectuals throughout the Spanish-
speaking world in the western hemisphere. Such ruminations reflected long-term efforts to
grapple with the status of Latin America in a world of imperial powers.
7.  Such concerns about science, technology, and the project of the nation have resonated
throughout much of Mexico’s history, whether in the context of steam engines and
technological development during the era of the Porfiriato, the project of Deweyan progressive
education, modernization, and the incorporation of the indigenous into the Mexican nation
in the immediate post-Revolutionary decades, ambitious public health projects and their
associated notions of nation-building and uplift in post-Revolutionary, 1920s Mexico, or the
post-World War II effort to develop a Mexican pharmaceutical industry. Aviles-Galan, “A
Todo Vapor”; Rodriguez, “The Practical Man”; Birn, “Revolution, the Scatological Way” and
Soto Laveaga, Jungle Laboratories.
8.  For example, the ties between technoscience and nationhood have featured prominently
in the history of medicine and public health in Latin America and the place of Rockefeller
philanthropy in the development of public health in the region. See, for example Palmer,
“Central American Encounters”; Brannstrom, “Polluted Soil, Polluted Souls”; Abel, “External
Philanthropy and Domestic Change in Columbian Health Care” and Williams, “Nationalism
and Public Health.” Consider also the case of Cuba, where after the American occupation,
nominal national independence under the Platt Amendment was conditioned, in significant
part, upon the Cuban government’s ability to ensure sanitary standards and satisfy American
demands that the island nation not serve as a source of yellow fever outbreaks that could
threaten the United States. Hence Cuban physician Carlos Finlay’s status as a national hero
(and hero throughout Latin America) for his identification of the mosquito as the key vector
of yellow fever, as well as the particularly prominent place of medicine and public health in
the history of the Cuban state throughout the twentieth century. Espinosa, Epidemic Invasions,
esp. chaps. 5–7. Diana Obregón’s account of leprosy control, state power, and aspirations for
modern nationhood in Colombia in the early twentieth century also speaks to the intimate ties
between public health and nation-building in Latin America. Obregón, “The State, Physicians,
and Leprosy in Modern Colombia.”
9.  Young, “The Age of Global Power,” 291.
10. Wang, “Colonial Crossings,” 189. For example, as Wang’s essay quickly outlines, racial
hierarchy and racism were not confined to colonial and imperial governance. Notions about
the necessity of racial uplift and the challenge of incorporating the indigenous into the nation
strongly shaped public health and other national projects in multiple Latin American contexts.
Eric Andrew Stein, in an essay on medicine, public health, and Indonesian nationalism in the
mid-twentieth century, has observed that “biomedicine is itself a colonizing process” – hence
its colonizing functions within nation-building contexts. Stein, “Hygiene and decolonization,”
65. James C. Scott’s somewhat unwieldly references to ‘domestic colonization’ or ‘internal
colonization’ also capture the extent to which self-proclaimed projects of national belonging
can be essentially colonial in form. See, for example, Scott, Seeing Like a State, chap. 2, in
which practices such as the creation of cadastral maps, the imposition of surnames, and
the reorganization of urban space served the common objectives of state simplification and
 History and Technology   177

legibility whether in colonial or ostensibly national settings. The phrase ‘domestic colonization’
appears on p. 72, and ‘internal colonization’ on p. 82.
11. Chapman, Cauldron of Resistance; Miller, Misalliance; Simpson, Economists with Guns and
Field, From Development to Dictatorship.
12. Frederick Cooper’s recent study of French colonialism in Africa post-1945, by contrast,
points out that the transition from colonial subjugation to national autonomy did not occur
overnight. Leaders in ‘francophone’ Africa, for example, sought a variety of intermediate
solutions with metropolitan France immediately after WWII, including federalism, before
rejecting modes of governance that circumscribed their sovereignty. Cooper, Citizenship
between Empire and Nation.
13. Westad, “Exploring the Histories of the Cold War.”

Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation, the Social Sciences and Humanities
Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), the SSHRC-supported ‘Situating Science’ cluster grant, the Liu
Institute for Global Studies at the University of British Columbia, the UBC Department of History,
and the School of History and Sociology at Georgia Tech for sponsoring the workshop ‘Dark Matters
II: Science and the Cold War in a Decolonizing World,’ which convened in Vancouver in September
2014. We are particularly indebted to Patty Gallivan and the rest of the Liu Institute staff for their
logistical aid, and to Hank Trim, who rendered invaluable service as our conference ‘runner.’ In
addition to the contributors to this volume, we are also grateful to the other workshop participants,
particularly Nick Cullather for his always stimulating interventions, and also John Beatty, Jeffrey
Byrne, John Di Moia, John Harriss, Alexei Kojevnikov, Steven Lee, Hiromi Mizuno, Suzanne Moon
and Carla Nappi, who animated a memorable series of discussions. Finally, we thank Martin Collins
for his enthusiastic support in bringing this volume to publication.

Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Bibliography
Abel, Christopher. “External Philanthropy and Domestic Change in Colombian Health Care: The
Role of the Rockefeller Foundation, ca. 1920-1950.” The Hispanic American Historical Review 75
(1995): 339–376.
Abraham, Itty. The Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb. London: Zed Press, 1998.
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.
Rev ed. London: Verso, 2006.
Anderson, Robert S. Nucleus and Nation. Scientists, International Networks and Power in India.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
Aviles-Galan, Miguel Angel. “A Todo Vapor: Mechanisation in Porfirian Mexico – Steam Power and
Machine Building. 1862 to 1906.” PhD diss., University of British Columbia, 2010.
Barker, Joshua. “Engineers and Political Dreams. Indonesia in the Satellite Age.” Current Anthropology
46, no. 5 (2005): 723–747.
Birn, Anne-Emanuelle. “Revolution, the Scatological Way: The Rockefeller Foundation’s Hookworm
Campaign in 1920s Mexico.” In Disease in the History of Modern Latin America: From Malaria to
AIDS, edited by Diego Armus, 159–182. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.
Brannstrom, Christian. “Polluted Soil, Polluted Souls: The Rockefeller Hookworm Eradication
Campaign in São Paulo, Brazil, 1917-1926.” Historical Geography 25 (1997): 25–45.
Chapman, Jessica. Cauldron of Resistance: Ngo Dinh Diem, The United States, and 1950s Southern
Vietnam. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013.
178    J. Krige and J. Wang

Connelly, Matthew. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge, MA:
The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.
Cooper, Frederick. Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa,
1945–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.
Cullather, Nick. The Hungry World: America’s Cold War Battle Against Poverty in Asia. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
Ekbladh, David. The Great American Mission: Modernization and the Construction of an American
World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
Engerman, David C., Nils Gilman, Mark H. Haefele, and Michael E. Latham eds. Staging Growth:
Modernization, Development, and the Global Cold War. Amherst: University of Massachusetts
Press, 2003.
Espinosa, Mariola. Epidemic Invasions: Yellow Fever and the Limits of Cuban Independence, 1878-1930.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
Field, Thomas C. Jr. From Development to Dictatorship: Bolivia and the Alliance for Progress in the
Kennedy Era. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014.
Gavin, Francis J. Nuclear Statecraft. History and Strategy in America’s Atomic Age. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press, 2012.
Hecht, Gabrielle. Being Nuclear. Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,
2012.
Hecht, Gabrielle, ed. Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Cold War. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press, 2011.
Hobsbawm, E. J. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Krige, John, Angelina Long Callahan, and Ashok Maharaj. NASA in the World. Fifty Years of
International Collaboration in Space. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Lam, Tong. A Passion for Facts: Social Surveys and the Construction of the Chinese Nation-State,
1900–1949. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.
Latham, Michael E. Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and “Nation Building” in the
Kennedy Era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000.
McDougall, Walter. The Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age. Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins, 1997 (Originally published New York: Basic Books, 1985).
McVety, Amanda Kay. Enlightened Aid: U.S. Development as Foreign Policy in Ethiopia. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2012.
Medhurst, Martin J.“Atoms for Peace and Nuclear Hegemony. The Rhetorical Structure of a Cold
War Campaign.” Armed Forces and Society 23 (1997): 571–593.
Medina, Eden, Ivan da Costa Marques, and Christina Holmes. “Introduction: Beyond Imported
Magic.” In Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America,
edited by Eden Medina, Ivan da Costa Marques, and Christina Holmes, 4–8. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press, 2014.
Miller, Edward. Misalliance: Ngo Dinh Diem, the United States, and the Fate of South Vietnam.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.
Mitchell, Timothy. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of
California Press, 2002.
Obregón, Diana, “The State, Physicians, and Leprosy in Modern Colombia.” In Disease in the History
of Modern Latin America: From Malaria to AIDS, edited by Diego Armus, 130–157. Durham, NC:
Duke University Press, 2003.
Osgood, Kenneth. Total Cold War. Eisenhower’s Secret Propaganda Battle at Home and Abroad.
Lawrenceville: University Press of Kansas, 2006.
Palmer, Steven, “Central American Encounters with Rockefeller Public Health, 1914–1921.” In Close
Encounters of Empire: Writing the Cultural History of U.S.-Latin American Relations, edited by
Gilbert M. Joseph, Catherine C. LeGrand, and Ricardo D. Salvatore, 311–332. Durham, NC: Duke
University Press, 1998.
Phalkey, Jahnavi. Atomic State. Big Science in Twentieth Century India. Delhi: Permanent Black, 2013.
 History and Technology   179

Redfield, Peter. Space in the Tropics. From Convicts to Rockets in French Guiana. Berkeley: University
of California Press, 2002.
Rodó, José Enrique. Ariel. Translated by Margaret Sayers Peden. Austin: University of Texas Press,
1988. Originally published 1900.
Rodriguez, Victor J. “The Practical Man: John Dewey, the Idea of America, and the Making of the
Modern Mexican, 1923-1934.” PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles, 2009.
Rogaski, Ruth. Hygienic Modernity: Meanings of Health and Disease in Treaty-Port China. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 2004.
Saler, Bethel. The Settler’s Empire: Colonialism and State Formation in America’s Old Northwest.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.
Scott, James, C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have
Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.
Simpson, Bradley R. Economists with Guns: Authoritarian Development and U.S.-Indonesian Relations,
1960–1968. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008.
Soto Laveaga, Gabriela. Jungle Laboratories: Mexican Peasants, National Projects, and the Making of
the Pill. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009.
Stein, Eric Andrew. “Hygiene and Decolonization: The Rockefeller Foundation and Indonesian
Nationalism, 1933–1958.” In Science, Public Health and the State in Modern Asia, edited by Liping
Bu, Darwin H. Stapleton, and Ka-che Yip, 51–70. London: Routledge, 2012.
Wang, Jessica. “Colonial Crossings: Social Science, Social Knowledge, and American Power, 1890–
1970.” In Cold War Science and the Transatlantic Circulation of Knowledge, edited by Jeroen van
Dongen, 184–213. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
Westad, Odd Arne. “Exploring the Histories of the Cold War. A Pluralist Approach.” In Uncertain
Empire: American History and the Idea of the Cold War, edited by Joel Isaac, and Duncan Bell,
51–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Williams, Steven C. “Nationalism and Public Health: The Convergence of Rockefeller Foundation
Technique and Brazilian Federal Authority during the Time of Yellow Fever, 1925–1930.” In
Missionaries of Science: The Rockefeller Foundation and Latin America, edited by Marcos Cueto,
23–51. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994.
Winichakul, Thongchai. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. Honolulu: University
of Hawai’i Press, 1994.
Yokota, Kariann Akemi. Unbecoming, British: How Revolutionary America Became a Postcolonial
Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Young, Marilyn B. “The Age of Global Power.” In Rethinking American History in a Global Age, edited
by Thomas Bender, 274–294. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.