You are on page 1of 4

Criticism- investigation against a nurse accused

of negligence for the death of a patient


Gutierrez Granillo Lizeth Guadalupe

Universidad Autónoma del Estado de


Hidalgo
Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud
Área Académica de Enfermería
Lic. En Enfermería

Enfermería Forense
School Period: July- December 2019
Theme: Criticism of an article
Teacher: Vite Barrera Santiago Emmanuel
Name: Gutierrez Granillo Lizeth Guadalupe
Semester & Group: 6to. “2”
Criticism- investigation against a nurse accused
of negligence for the death of a patient
Gutierrez Granillo Lizeth Guadalupe

Criticism of an article: Filed the investigation


against a nurse accused of negligence for the
death of a patient

Filed the investigation against a nurse accused of negligence for the death of a
patient
The Provincial Court of Castellón has filed an investigation against a nurse who
was present during a surgical intervention in which a gauze was forgotten in the
throat of a patient and eventually died of suffocation. After the investigation, the
cause has been filed since the nurse was in training and had not intervened at
any time. Both she and her partner had been prosecuted for the death of the
patient but considered that the medical-forensic team was mistakenly matching
the level of responsibility of all staff. The event occurred on January 27, 2014
when during a surgical intervention a man died from massive bleeding due to
the lungs. The bleeding occurred due to a bad praxis since a gauze, the size of
a chestnut, had been located in the victim's throat, which had not been removed.
The forensic report referred to the responsibility of all the medical team that was
present during the intervention, including surgeons, anesthetists and auxiliary
personnel, which included the two nurses, attributing the alleged error in
counting the number of gauze.
The nurses resorted to the car distorting the testimony of the anesthesiologist
who blamed them by influencing the erroneous counting of the gauze. That is
why there was a confrontation between the two since, as the nurses alleged “the
anesthetist tries to get rid of the responsibility in the cause, attacking the rest
of the health personnel” and they stressed that they “only assist and assist the
medical staff among others reasons because their academic preparation does
not allow them to invade, they say, areas that are specific to doctors ”. Finally,
the Hearing has filed the case against one of the nurses who was in the learning
Criticism- investigation against a nurse accused
of negligence for the death of a patient
Gutierrez Granillo Lizeth Guadalupe
period and did not participate in the intervention acting only on the failed
resuscitation tasks.
In my opinion regarding the article we all have one more legal responsibility in
the case of lives in the health field It is important to highlight the responsibility
of surgeons during the performance of a surgical procedure discusses some of
the problems with legal implications that may be involved the surgical
specialists, as well as in that case the important work of the circulating and
surgical nurses, since, their job at that time was to make the correct gauze
count, but not only them, also all the medical staff must be I agree with that
count and the responsibility falls partly on everyone, since anesthesiology for
the area that was going to be affected had to pay attention since it is handled
by air, but today and it is something too sad the surgical team is very distracted
at the time of impact and arrive until they use cell phones reaching the end of
long conve rsations that represent a risk for the patient and a disrespect for the
other members of the team Several questions arise regarding the responsibility
in surgery.
If the surgeon performed all possible precautionary measures that include:
Thorough review of the abdominal cavity by the main surgeon: After the revision
of the cavity by the surgeon, the assistants can also become participants, and if
the nurse reports that the account is complete you can proceed to the closure of
the abdominal cavity. It is advisable to make the note in the postoperative report
that the abdominal cavity was reviewed, without the absence of any compress
being reported by the instrumentalist nurse. In the event that one or another
circumstance remains a compress, despite the existence of a shared
responsibility and if the surgeon complied with the aforementioned precepts, it
is clear that in this circumstance an individual responsibility also arises as a
result of the horizontal division of labor in the instrumentalist nurse, since at
present they are professionals with university or higher technical preparation,
with specific tasks assigned and obligations to fulfill.
It is important that the surgeon and his assistants check the abdominal cavity
before closing, regardless of whether the instrumentalist nurse reports that the
account is complete, proceeding to make the corresponding note in the story
Criticism- investigation against a nurse accused
of negligence for the death of a patient
Gutierrez Granillo Lizeth Guadalupe
In case of informing of the absence of a compress before the closure of the
cavity, the surgeon and his assistants should: If the closure of the abdominal or
thoracic cavity has occurred and a thorough review of the cavity has not been
performed, the procedure should be carried out. reopening of the respective
cavity to corroborate the absence of the compress.
If the closure of the cavity has not occurred, the main surgeon and his assistants
should proceed to a thorough review of the cavity. This review should be
supplemented with an x-ray regardless of whether the surgeon is certain of the
absence of the foreign body in the cavity, since the x-ray is an objective test
that complements the examination performed by the surgeon and his assistants.
In the event that the instrumentalist nurse reports the lack of a compress or
other instruments and the main surgeon dismisses that information, not
performing at the end of the operative act an X-ray of the abdomen or thorax
as the case may be, if the presence is subsequently checked of it, the surgeon
must assume his individual responsibility.

You might also like